More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dan Froomkin

GET UPDATES FROM Dan Froomkin
 

6 Things Obama Could Do To Goose The Economy -- Without Congress

Posted: 11/08/11 10:25 AM ET

How well the economy is doing on November 6, 2012, will likely be the single most important factor in how America votes.

And even though Republicans appear dead-set on blocking any legislative measure President Barack Obama comes up with that could actually stimulate growth, the president isn't entirely impotent when it comes to goosing the economy between now and Election Day -- on his own.

Several progressive thinkers contacted by The Huffington Post described six approaches Obama could still take unilaterally -- if he's willing to get a bit more assertive about things -- that could make an impact before November.

Obama himself has indicated he's thinking along these lines. "Now, there are steps that we can take absent congressional action," he said during a Friday press conference in France.

He cited the measures he approved in late October to reduce the burden of student loans. And, he said at the time: "We're going to keep on rolling out administrative steps that we can take that strengthen the economy."

But Obama wasn't exactly giddy about the prospects of executive action. Congress controls the purse strings, which means, as he put it: "If we're going to do something big to jumpstart the economy ... Congress is going to need to act."

Another caveat: Two days after the 2010 midterm elections, with a near-certain legislative deadlock looming, The Huffington Post spoke to a number of progressive leaders and compiled an entire agenda Obama could have pursued without Congress's help. Obama didn't adopt any part of it.

Demand Banks And Other Mortgage Holders Aggressively Write-Down Principal
1  of  7
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
"By far the biggest thing President Obama can do right now is, rather than cutting a small-ball deal with the banks on the mortgage foreclosure stuff, to really use the leverage that we have -- because of all of their perjury, robosigning and the other illegal acts they committed -- to really put the squeeze on the banks and aggressively force them to write down more mortgages," said Mike Lux, a progressive strategist.

"It's definitely within the power of the executive," Lux said. "I just think they have all kinds of leverage that they're not using."

Many progressives see writing down the principal on underwater mortgages -- rather than just adjusting payments -- as essential to a housing market recovery. "And if we could stabilize and start to revive the housing market, it would make such a difference in the economy. It's like a black hole sucking everything down," Lux said.

While Timothy Geithner's Department of Treasury has historically been seen as indisposed to aggressively pushing for principal writedowns, "I think that's not a fair assessment of where Treasury is anymore," said
Sarah Wartell, who runs the policy program at the Center of American Progress and was deputy director of the National Economic Council in the Clinton administration.

The first settlement coming down the pike, which deals with fraud in mortgage servicing, is currently expected to be in the $20-$25 billion range. But those negotiations are not over. And other settlements -- for instance about misrepresentations to investors -- "have the potential for being larger," Wartell said.

Some of that money could be applied to principal writedowns. And the regulatory apparatus could be brought to bear more aggressively to support writedowns and a number of other related measures.

"You could put the hammer down in a way that would accelerate each one of these initiatives," Wartell said. "If done right, this could move the dial a little bit."

A recent report from The New Bottom Line, a coalition of community organizations, concluded that if the banks were to lower the principal balance on all underwater mortgages to current market value, it would cost about $700 billion -- or about $70 billion a year over 10 years.

That may sound like a lot. But consider that banks have borrowed trillions of dollars from the federal government since the crisis hit -- and, in fact, are now hoarding a record $1.6 trillion in cash -- and it doesn't seem like quite so much.

 

Follow Dan Froomkin on Twitter: www.twitter.com/froomkin

How well the economy is doing on November 6, 2012, will likely be the single most important factor in how America votes. And even though Republicans appear dead-set on blocking any legislative measur...
How well the economy is doing on November 6, 2012, will likely be the single most important factor in how America votes. And even though Republicans appear dead-set on blocking any legislative measur...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,293
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (28 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Humanitari Leandro
07:26 AM on 12/07/2011
Avoid major chains at all cost, try the small people, the mom pop, the young people with stores, the baker, the florist, the Tailor, etc Avoid the usual brand and specially brands like Klein and many other big ones that now do it all in China with cheap labor, fight back, BUY American, buy local, at least American Apparel is made here
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Humanitari Leandro
07:23 AM on 12/07/2011
Buy local! as much a possible, use your local artisans, local farmer/market, local designer, this only helps the economy near youuuuu
photo
rsargerod
On a Journey towards Wisdom!
03:45 AM on 12/07/2011
What the President need to do is to issue an emergency Executive Order, to force Banks to release the hoarding.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Queen
I am a disabled nam vet
09:18 PM on 12/06/2011
So,now he thinks he is a hero to the middle class now.LMFAO.no he isn't,but then none of them are
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sean Connolly
08:12 PM on 12/06/2011
good luck telling China to stop manipulating its currency, while the Fed continues to manipulate the value of the $USD. come on.
02:40 PM on 11/13/2011
Having banks and other mortgage holders lower the principal sound good but it could also trigger more defaults. If you are under water on your mortgage but still making payments you might stop paying hoping the banks will lower your principal. Human nature makes people find ways to outfox the fox.
05:40 PM on 11/12/2011
Dan, I recommend you and other commentators on the economy go to the book, The Devil's Marriage: Break Up the Corpocracy or Leave Democracy in the Lurch and read its Chapter 10. Ending Undemocractic Capitalism and its Appendix C. Creative Economic Thinking From A to Z Minus E for Economists.

Gary Brumback
www.uschamberofdemocracy.com
www.democracypowernow.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JacksonAndy78
Usury Interest FEEDS BANKSTERS
01:16 AM on 11/10/2011
NEW AUDIT SHOWS $16.8+ TRILLION IN BAILOUTS TO BANKSTERS FROM THE FED!

That could have paid off every MORTGAGE and CREDIT CARD IN AMERICA $11 TRILLION and still LEFT $5.8 TRILLION!

OR

JUBILEE is needed! JUBILEE IS A GREAT TRADITION AMONG ALL PEOPLES!

JUBILEE is DEBT FORGIVENESS and it can be:
 
1.  VOLUNTARY - BY THE BANKS - UNLIKELY - This Proposal will not happen!
 
2.  DONE WITH A NEW LAW DONE BY THE BRIBED CONGRESS - UNLIKELY
 
3. THE PEOPLE CAN DO IT THEMSELVES BY SIMPLY HAVING TENS OF MILLIONS NOT PAY BACK LOANS!  WE THE PEOPLE SIMPLY STOP FEEDING THE Z0MB1ES EVERY MONTH WITH OUR LOAN PAYMENTS!

NOTE: Mortgage Bankster Association “Walked Away” from HQ - $79 MILLION BUILDING and MORTGAGE - IT IS OK IF BANKSTER WALK AWAY FROM DEBTS!

UNITED WE CAN - 15% DOING THIS COULD TOPPLE THESE OVER-LEVER­AGED Z0MBIES!

Either by law or TAKEN by the PEOPLE THEMSELVES no longer paying as States recommended in 1930's - Pay your property taxes but not your loans.
michaelandolga
Teaching Liberals to Think, One Post at a Time
11:42 PM on 11/09/2011
We need to turn away from the failed liberal ideas that brought us this crisis in the first place - starting with the Federal Reserve. Liberals need to take responsibility for what they have wrought.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dolores de Cabeza
Ante up, 1%. No one plays for free.
09:53 AM on 12/07/2011
Ronald Reagan was the beginning of the end; Bush, the last nail in the coffin.
scipio2009
Alan Wolfe's "The Future of Liberalism"
06:40 PM on 11/09/2011
Outside of the proposal, to try and help small businesses, not a single one of those other ideas is even remotely realistic, politically or based on the actual policy.

Threatening China, without even the consideration of what would be the repercussions of such a move and a means of dealing with the fallout, is stupid. Adamantly refusing to mention the word 'deficit', as if not talking about it would fix things, somehow, is stupid. And, to be blunt, demanding that federal contracts only go to "high-wage" companies completely runs counter to the very argument for the current environment, with costs being low across the board, being the perfect opportunity for doing the "work that America needs done".

Demanding that banks, unilaterally, write-down the principals on all mortgages not only will result in a major jolt to the banks, it'll also shift the entire burden of dealing with the asset value whole onto the financial sector, without an ounce of the burden put on the folks who took advantage of the housing market, refinancing against their homes every couple years, to pay for things that they had no ability to afford in the first place. Then again, we're not supposed to be talking about that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Colin Daniel
06:06 PM on 11/09/2011
This is a great list in theory - the only one that i saw that would with actual authority to do would be regulations on small business lending through he SBA. However right after would come charges of relaxing regulations for people who don't meet the standards,. In other the great debate the Fannie & Freddie was used as the engine for the mortgage melt down.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jgmambo
vive la vida loca, independent voter
12:23 AM on 11/09/2011
Great Presidents always fine a way. Reagan did.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kruggerX
trying to balance life in these times
10:03 AM on 11/09/2011
Reagan- nomics a big failure, unless you were rich. Trickle down economics didn't work then didn't work under Bush. But now we are worse off because the Bush economics plan moved too much manufacturing over seas. Now we don't even have a base to rebuild.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jgmambo
vive la vida loca, independent voter
12:38 PM on 11/09/2011
He had three f.....g years , He make everything worse! , go and spin somewere else.
05:37 PM on 11/11/2011
Not BUSH,CLINTON,BILLsigned free trade act with CHINA.jobs where going to china two years before Bush took office.he inherited a recession from bill clinton.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jgmambo
vive la vida loca, independent voter
12:09 AM on 11/09/2011
After the Republican win the election , they will bring stabillity to the market ,Rich people are going to start investing again,there will be more jobs,the economy will recover. We will be a capitalist nation again ,no more Socialistic tendencies that scare the money flow.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ginny Fischer
Thinking is good . . .
04:53 AM on 11/09/2011
When did rich people stop investing? Are they hiding their millions under their beds?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kruggerX
trying to balance life in these times
10:05 AM on 11/09/2011
Yup.
Star2000dancer
Pay it forward, the movie..
09:24 PM on 11/09/2011
Stop investing? They're buying property, gold, silver and big ticket items at light speed. Owning everything they can, biting at the bit for the currency to collapse.

The middle class and poor hide the money under their matresses. They learned not to trust banks from the Great Depression Days. But the young think they know better. They think "credit" is necessary.. It's how the were conditioned. That does'nt make it smart or right. The ones who will win, will be the one who can think out of the box and see the future.

The more you know about history, the more you'll know about the future. It does'nt take a rocket scientist, just some good old fashioned studying and research., and following good advice.

No, it is not. If you don't have the cash, you should'nt buy it. Then banks would have no control over you, let alone the country.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kruggerX
trying to balance life in these times
10:04 AM on 11/09/2011
What are they going to invest in here, that will bring jobs? They sent the majorty of them over seas.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Queen
I am a disabled nam vet
12:07 AM on 11/09/2011
We have demos fighting,we have repubs fighting,some cases both party's are fighting against the same issues as well.Oboobooo would be wise not to attempt to try to go around the congres.That would be a very drastic mistake for him,although it wouldnt hurt him politicaly because his time has come and gone.I still don't know who "ill vote for as of yet.Their going to have to show me a whole more than they have before i will choose
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jgmambo
vive la vida loca, independent voter
11:45 PM on 11/08/2011
Pray for Obama , Psalm 109:8 , Let's his days be few and brief ; and let others step forward to replace him".