More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dan Lashof

Dan Lashof

Posted: May 4, 2010 10:38 AM

Beyond Petroleum

What's Your Reaction:

Visit NRDCs Switchboard Blog

Not too long ago, BP was best known for its efforts to rebrand itself as Beyond Petroleum. Today BP is notorious because of its inability to stem the toxic tide of crude oil gushing from its ill-fated Deepwater Horizon drilling platform.

This disaster is a tragic reminder that offshore drilling is dirty and dangerous. It leaves no doubt that we need tighter regulation of where and how oil companies drill. But it would be an historic mistake if our response ends there.

BP must indeed plug the leak and be held responsible for the damage. And we must do everything we can to clean up the crude already killing wildlife and threatening to devastate our shores. But we must also, at long last, commit ourselves to ending our dependence on oil once and for all. Only by actually moving beyond petroleum can we ensure that this kind of environmental disaster never happens again.

The damage being done by the oil gushing out of the hole left by the Deepwater Horizon blowout and coating birds, killing turtles, decimating fisheries and destroying wetlands is visible for all to see. Had it been successfully produced by BP and burned for its energy, the oil would have been converted into carbon dioxide, which is colorless and odorless but still dangerous.

That’s because carbon dioxide traps heat in the atmosphere, driving changes in climate that threatens to cause the greatest mass extinction since the dinosaurs disappeared and increases in sea levels that threaten to inundate and destroy wetlands just as surely, and far more extensively, than the oil slick. In the ocean carbon dioxide becomes an acid that could make it impossible for oysters and crabs to make the shells they need to survive and reproduce.

How can we both protect ourselves from the oil oozing onto our shores and the carbon dioxide accumulating in our atmosphere?

The key is to set and enforce limits on carbon pollution from all major sources. And tighten those limits each year until our energy system has been transformed. In the process we will create millions of clean energy jobs that can’t be outsourced and we will end our dependence on oil from dangerous locations, whether those are deep water rigs or Middle East sheikdoms.  

The House last year adopted a bill that would do just that. Yet Senate action remains stalled by Washington politics. The time to act is now. We can’t afford another oil-fueled disaster before we finally decide to move beyond petroleum.

This post originally appeared on NRDC's Switchboard blog.


 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
OneFish
Various and assorted mutualistic microbial buddies
02:09 AM on 05/06/2010
I think that sort of top-down approach is a bit blind.

I would propose that rather than setting arbitrary caps, we push ourselves to create the alternatives by taxing carbon-based fuels and dedicating the monies so produced, without diversion, to be used for research, development and implementation of alternative energy technology and systems, efficiency improvements and public transportation. We should also put in place more enticements for the use of public transportation(at the expense of continually widening the highways) and installing alternative energy systems at homes and businesses.

Kyoto and Copenhagen were more about political posturing and feeling good than they were about actually doing the difficult work of actually changing the way we use energy. IOW - useless babble.
photo
Chopin
Multiply the truth. Speak truth through power.
11:04 AM on 05/06/2010
Professor Ashof gave a very concise and accurate description of the nature and where the problems are, and how the solutions can be applied. You call it "top down" collective political approach. This lack of understanding of where the problems and solutions are rooted appear out of sync with reality. The nature of the problem is more collective and less individual. You can wish majority of humanity to each change their light bulbs, and drive less, and do all those things that motivated people do. But that still would not get to heart of the problem, and that's collective political will to change all the polluting collective institutions. They are the impersonal large corporations. That can only be done through politics of collective persuasion, setting national and international goals and objectives, rules and regulations and setting up mechanisms to monitor compliance once agreements have been reached.

There's a profound difference of perspectives. The corporate institutions that put profit maximization above everything else will not change until they are forced to change by national laws and international agreements. Lack of understanding of that practical imperative is out of touch with reality. The millions of tons of CO2 pollutants daily put into atmosphere are done by collective impersonal amoral corporations.
photo
Chopin
Multiply the truth. Speak truth through power.
11:46 AM on 05/06/2010
mis-spelled, shoul be Prof. Lashof.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
powder chowder
☮ Peace: the final frontier...
06:10 PM on 05/05/2010
And don't forget about coal. We need to move beyond coal. No nuclear option either. We need energy sources that can't cause catastrophes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
OneFish
Various and assorted mutualistic microbial buddies
02:13 AM on 05/06/2010
it's all about cost. carbon is CHEAP though it will become more expensive over time - think about this: the current mess was created by drilling 8000' into the ocean floor while operating in 5000' of water. That can't be cheap. The days of rising oil prices are probably not too far off in our future. Coal, probably some similar parameters will operate in that economy too.

My greatest concern is that our normal protocol of management by crisis as opposed to dealing with these problems today may result in massive suffering.