iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dan McKanan

GET UPDATES FROM Dan McKanan
 

The Prophets Among Us

Posted: 11/ 8/2011 5:00 pm

The prophets are among us. The recent upsurge in radical activism -- by immigrants in Arizona, public sector workers in Wisconsin, marriage equality activists and Wall Street occupiers -- revives the spirit of the Hebrew prophets and of the abolitionists, feminists, socialists and pacifists of American history. My new book, "Prophetic Encounters: Religion and the American Radical Tradition," demonstrates that radicalism cannot be fully understood apart from the religious ideas and institutions that have inspired and sustained it.

Radical activism is "prophetic," I believe, because it mirrors the religious phenomena of revelation and conversion. The ancient prophets Amos and Jeremiah continue to inspire activists to "speak truth to power," whether or not they share the theologies of Amos and Jeremiah. When people share their stories of marginalization, struggle and hope for a better world, they gain new purpose and new identity. America's earliest labor activists did it by naming themselves "Working Men" and electing other workers to political office. The first black abolitionists took pride in their "African" identity but also insisted that they had a full place at the table of American power. Empowered by new identities, activists worked to "build a new society within the shell of the old," to use a slogan from the Industrial Workers of the World, or to create the "beloved community," to use a phrase Martin Luther King Jr., borrowed from the philosopher Josiah Royce. Most radical movements have had their own hymns, from "John Brown's Body" to "Solidarity Forever;" they offer pilgrimage in the form of protest marches and sacramental initiation through civil disobedience. Mainstream politics, with its horse-trading and pragmatic compromises, may not look much like a religion. But radicalism burns with divine fire.

The similarities between radical activism and religion help explain why religious institutions and ideas have made vital contributions to every movement for social change in the United States. The Working Men often gathered at Universalist churches or congregations of "Free Thinkers." Abolitionism had deep roots in Black Methodist and Baptist congregations, as well as lodges of Black Freemasons. 19th century women's rights speakers were often Quaker leaders or ordained Protestant ministers or Spiritualist mediums. The activists who marched arm-in-arm at Selma in 1965 were not only black and white, but also Catholic and Protestant, Jewish and Unitarian Universalist. And the Occupy Boston encampment is home to a "spirituality tent," a Jewish sukkah or tabernacle and a cadre of "Protest Chaplains," many of them Divinity students, who help their comrades find the spirituality in their activism.

My conversations with these students have reinforced my sense that radicalism can never transcend its spiritual roots. "At Occupy Boston I feel a sense of purpose I've never experienced before," one student declared. "My friend has never seemed so happy," observed another. Such comments contrast sharply with the mood at commencement time, when extraordinarily talented and well-prepared graduates step timidly out into a world with few jobs and little hope. They suggest that participants in the "Occupy" movement are empowering themselves as well as working to change society. Like countless activists in past generations, they experience "prophetic encounters" when they work together for change.

But the similarities between religion and radicalism also explain the recurring tensions between the "religious" and the "secular" left. In every generation, some activists--abolitionist John Brown, for example, and Catholic Worker Dorothy Day--have seen their work for justice as confirmation of the transcendent visions of Jesus, Moses, Buddha or Muhammad. Their participation in conventional religious communities has deepened their activism, and vice versa. But other activists have felt betrayed by the timidity of conventional religion. For them, the movement is the true church, far superior to "pie in the sky" religion. The white abolitionist movement split in 1840 between those who wanted to work within existing churches, those who wanted to create new, anti-slavery churches and those who wanted to "come out" of all organized religion. Similar divisions threatened women's rights and socialism, and they are present at Occupy Boston as well: one prayer service conducted in the spirituality tent was interrupted by another activist who implied they'd be siding with the police if they didn't immediately join in civil disobedience.

Such conflicts are as inevitable as they are painful. The Hebrew prophet Isaiah compared God's call to having a burning coal placed on his lips and the encounters of activism can be just as fiery. Activist spirituality changes constantly, in unpredictable directions, because activists are also encountering the sacred afresh in one another. It happens when Metropolitan Community Church congregations, Wiccan covens and gatherings of Radical Faeries find the divine through shared celebration of sexuality. It happens when Unitarian Universalists don yellow shirts that read "Standing on the Side of Love" and apprentice themselves to immigrant communities in Arizona. It happens when urban youngsters stick their hands into the rich compost of an organic farm. Wherever humans encounter one another deeply, they find a power that might be named spirit or mana, God or Goddess. For two centuries, this power has placed Americans on the path toward justice -- and it is still available to us today.

 
 
 
FOLLOW RELIGION
The prophets are among us. The recent upsurge in radical activism -- by immigrants in Arizona, public sector workers in Wisconsin, marriage equality activists and Wall Street occupiers -- revives the ...
The prophets are among us. The recent upsurge in radical activism -- by immigrants in Arizona, public sector workers in Wisconsin, marriage equality activists and Wall Street occupiers -- revives the ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 59
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:24 PM on 11/14/2011
Reading professor McKanan's piece comparing the recent radical activism with Hebrew prophet's work, I was reminded of the recorded words of the great 19th century thinker William James I happened to hear on the radio in my early teens, on the difference between wit and understanding.
He said, "while wit excites the fancy, understanding can [discern] the difference between two very similar things".
So, it might surprise many to know that nowhere does the Bible indorse "individual rights", nor does it condone or support a Democratic form of government, especially of the pluralistic forms as practiced by Babylon which readily accepted other peoples who worshiped gods foreign to Babylonian state religious practice.
We must revisit the history of the Black Civil Rights Movement, and admit the fact that Martin Luther King drank from the spirit of Hinduism, when he practiced the nonviolence of Ghandi's reading of the New Testament through Hindu eyeglasses, to understand that Movement's true spiritual origins, which is Babylon.
So the spirit of "come one, come all whatever your gods are" inspiring this radical activism would have such prophets as Isaiah turning in his grave, for every Hebrew prophet Scripture records stood foursquare against the spirit of Babylon.
11:55 AM on 11/14/2011
Activist 'spirituality' is taking off in a new direction, more radical that anyone could ever have imagined possible and the results could be profound. While many have given up on 'faiths' which accomplish nothing, a change in the faith paradigm could very well make the religious quest the catalyst for change, outside all political process or control, that few ever thought plausible or could ever be realized in their own life times.

For those individuals who can shake off their existing prejudices, imagine outside the cultural box of history, stand against the tides of fashionable thought and spin, who have the moral courage to learn something new, an intellectual and moral revolution is already under way, where the 'impossible' becomes inevitable, by the most potent, political, Non Violent Direct Action any human being can take to advance peace, justice, change and progress. More info at:  http://www.energon.org.uk
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:06 PM on 11/14/2011
If I were you Kaltu, I wouldn't jump to the bait to quickly, because if you "Imagine" that you can get rid of God, and ignore the preponderance of the heavy weight of history which so fully demonstrates that God will have His "Day", you'd be making a serious mistake!

By your own inference, I'm sure you would agree with me, that the spirit which is inspiring and driving this radicalism, in America, is not from God. Yes, we know it isn't. And its not just happening locally in America, but is the identical presiding spirit which is inspiring the general breakdown of leadership and social order in countries around the world.

We can now especially see that this same spirit is sweeping aside the dictators of Muslim regimes, in order to unit the whole Middle East into one monolithic empire of Islamic Jihad whose stated goal it to conquer and subdue the West and by by the sword and war make them submit to Koranic rule under Sharia Law.
What we're seeing happening here in Europe of the increasing takeover by Islam, will happen to you too, if you don't stop it, because believe me, this is a war to the death.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PollyTics
undefined
03:20 AM on 11/15/2011
First off the idea that the "heavy weight of history" displays the absolute proof of God, is just plain unconventional at best. "History" does no such thing, nor does it help to define "faith". Faith is actually antithetical to the cold hard facts of history and is based on a trust or common belief. As strong as someones faith may be, it is a BELIEF not based on fact; whereas history is an actual account of past events.

I think it inappropriate to suggest that the Occupy movement or any other such protests (take the Tea Party for instance) is absent from the spirit of God, as it takes a political stance that mimics far too many people who view life through only a political lens. In addition, who are you (or any of us) to "know" which political protests have God's blessings and which do not.

You also seem to be misguided in your belief that the entire Middle East is being driven into one "monolithic empire of Islamic Jihad". If you truly believe that an entire people can unite behind any one principle, then its clear that you haven't witnessed politics in America today.

Your misguided view that the entirety of the Middle East civilizations are united in imposing Sharia law on the rest of world is not merely radical & incorrect but is reprehensible on so many levels. Here you talk of God and yet it appears that very nature is absent from so much of your
08:47 AM on 11/13/2011
This book that was written many years ago has influence the world.

The Lord Jesus said. Few will hear he's voice and accept it, and others will mock the believers.

Again this book was written a few thousand years ago, but everything written in it is coming to light.

How crazy are you atheists and non believers? How can you boldly disrespect the unknown? When you die don't you know what's waiting for you! And you wont have any control over the unknown. So continue your unbelief lifestyle, for it will only end in fire.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
owlafaye
Love, laugh, be happy and free, God is dead
12:10 PM on 11/14/2011
Ohhhhhhhhhh...I am scared to deaaath...I think I will run out and embrace Jesus.

Maybe tomorrow
Maybe not
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PollyTics
undefined
03:28 AM on 11/15/2011
How can you take to task those who do not share your view in faith when you denigrate those very same people? Faith is just that...a belief in something that is unproven and not based on proof, thus it is "your" personal belief which some may share. The very nature of God is partially based on love and tolerance, yet you seem to display neither.

You speak of disrespect and yet then condemn to fire all of those who don't share your own personal view of faith. Seems a bit hypocritical to me...
08:32 AM on 11/13/2011
Blessed are you when others revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account. Rejoice and be glad,for your reward is great in heaven,for so they persecuted the prophets who were before you.

Stay in the grace of Jesus Christ our Lord. Jesus our God, not just the christians God, but every person who is a live and died. He is their God. He offer life everlasting if you only belief. Such a loving God.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demcratville
Science makes you think.
02:37 PM on 11/11/2011
He’s Dead. It’s Been 2,000 years. He’s Not Coming Back. Get OVER It Already!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sweetlilthing
hurt no one but tell the truth
10:48 AM on 11/11/2011
Everything breaks down in time so that is not justification for the existence of a God(s). It must be the "human way" to be moral and take the high ground. Only then will humanity "go on".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
iLdoRight
Encouraging The Rightest Rightness
07:37 AM on 11/11/2011
One can install and virus blocker on their computer, but for a human life can be like walking down a narrow path where every few feet there is someone lurking with a large syringe with sewage in it ready to inject into one's brain if one does not have their steel brain protector on. People know there are things that are wrong, and most of them are wrong in their own ways, but it can be fun jumping into a movement to try to change another's wrongs without looking into the mirror and seeing one's own wrongs and trying to change them.
TomMartin
Freedom and equality.
01:59 AM on 11/11/2011
These Christian movements sure have not made much contribution to the social movement to achieve equality between monotheists, polytheists, agnostics, and atheists, for example in the Pledge of Allegiance, that millions of schoolchildren are still encouraged to recite. It should not be up to the state to decide what religious idea children should believe in.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
iLdoRight
Encouraging The Rightest Rightness
07:43 AM on 11/11/2011
How about; " I pledge allegiance to my imaginary friend, who is more perfect than anyone else I know and who won't like me as much if I ever do anything intentionally that is not right."
TomMartin
Freedom and equality.
08:55 AM on 11/11/2011
That would favor atheism, calling the friend 'imaginary'. The Pledge should return to what it was before, without 'under God'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PollyTics
undefined
03:34 AM on 11/15/2011
WHAT? Are you actually suggesting that our government to be the only entity to allow what faith we believe in?

The idea that any "one" should be allowed to limit personal beliefs or any religion that is allowed to be practiced, is reminiscent of China or some third world countries. Our country was based on the very notion that we should all enjoy the Freedom of Religion, to believe in what we choose instead of some government dictated theory. Your words truly just made me shudder...
TomMartin
Freedom and equality.
11:01 PM on 11/15/2011
You are claiming I say the opposite of what I do say. I am saying it is not the business of the government to tell kids what to believe. So the government should delete 'under God' from the Pledge. So right now it is like in China, where the government endorses atheism, so similarly here the government endorses monotheism. Both are similarly wrong. You say you shudder, but it is your misunderstanding of what I wrote that makes me shudder. The government is supposed to be neutral.
10:52 PM on 11/10/2011
The political bully pulpit must then be the staple of the Republican false prophet;
http://minnesotaindependent.com/91187/video-anti-abortion-activist-challenging-ellison-launches-anti-islam-ads
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sweetlilthing
hurt no one but tell the truth
01:41 PM on 11/10/2011
"religious institutions and ideas have made vital contributions to every movement for social change"

There is nothing good or scientific about loading up a culture with a set of backwards traditions­­. The Christian religion is riddled with backwards and outdated ideas including but not limited to being against birth control and condoms. How can the Church's teachings be considered good when it's comes with a price, a payback? So if it's associated with a price or to be loyal to the very people giving you the hand out it's NOT GOOD.
09:34 PM on 11/10/2011
Without traditions, there would be no culture.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sweetlilthing
hurt no one but tell the truth
10:24 AM on 11/11/2011
We can have traditions that don't promote a culture that holds us back.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sweetlilthing
hurt no one but tell the truth
11:07 AM on 11/11/2011
My family loves what others call Christmas. We love the idea of gift giving, the excitement of the children, the gathering of family but most of all the wonderful feeling we get from giving. We are not and have not been religious for many generations. So needless to say we do not agree with the "Christ" in Christmas. We love our family, being together, to share our wealth, to care for and love our children, to help when help is needed, to teach morals, and expect that we take to high road in all that we do. These values do not come from an education in any religion. We call our holiday "Giftmas" because it's our tradition to give to others even if our gift is small or made by our own hand. We live sucessfully and honestly without God(s). We understand that life can be hard and sad so we are there for each other. You should know this is our culture and it doesn't include a God.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TC Ragstix
just a songwriter
12:48 PM on 11/12/2011
To be fair Christianity isn't against birth control. (Only some old-school papists, very few left.)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sweetlilthing
hurt no one but tell the truth
07:16 AM on 11/16/2011
Please read the Huffpo article “Catholic Bishops Prepare Religious Liberty Fight” currently appearing. “bishops have been pressing the Health and Human Services Department during its public comment period for a broader religious exception to the provision in Obama's health care overhaul that mandates private insurers pay for contraception”. The Catholic Church is against birth control TODAY despite the fact that Catholics use birth control in great numbers.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:26 AM on 11/10/2011
When a government forfeits the moral high-ground and its authority is questioned, those who rebel against it, are nothing so much as anarchists! Because, a "Mob" (Nee, Anarchists) is defined as: a causeless, disaffected group, in this case, of overwhelmingly middle class Americans, who were all for the status quo, of their government, until it shunted them aside.

That can never be compared to that old warhorse, and Harvard Alum, Martin Luther King, gave up his life for a 10 cent raise for black garbage workers in Memphis, using a strict "application" of the message "let my people go!"-of the Hebrew prophets, who's main focus was always Israel. And its legitimacy was in the fact that Black people still worshiped God. And other groups that borrowed...some black folks say "stole", or even "highjacked"..that religious legitimacy: Feminists, Gay rights et, al., stood foursquare against the teachings of Scripture Black people sought to uphold.

In stark contrast to Dan McKanan, who, as, I suppose, is a student of Scripture, the New Testament prophet John In Revelations, foretold of a general breakdown of the nations, and many of the groups and social cohorts so named here, with the single exception of the Black Civil Rights Movement, seem clearly part of this breakdown, as they have as their platforms ideologies which attack the Biblical injunctions and moral teachings both the Old Testament prophets and New Testament apostles resolutely stood for.
12:03 PM on 11/12/2011
Yet, there are many Black people who support the equality movements for women and gays. You seem to imply that equality for women and gays indicates a breakdown of our nation and that equality for women and LGBT people is immoral. The Bible is steeped in patriarchy which parades around as morality. Patriarchy elevates men above women and confines women to reproduction. the very idea that a woman can plan to have children or plan to not have children takes the power of reproduction away from men. Gay people generally do not have children which, according to the Bible means they are an abomination which is not a very moral thing to teach, now is it? The Bible has been used by religious people to bash others, including to validate slavery (which again, is not a very moral thing to do, now is it?) and is still used to bash people who do not fit the ideal of the patriarchial world view. So as someone who is committed to equality for all, I will fight the inequality as it is taught in the Bible and believe it is my moral responsibility to do so. It seems to me that you will fight for inequality to remain the status quo and that you believe it is your moral responsibility to do so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TC Ragstix
just a songwriter
12:51 PM on 11/12/2011
Only the Blacks who worshipped god deserved the 10 cent raise?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peter010908
The easiest way to control people is through fear.
09:56 PM on 11/09/2011
As long as there's people who are religious then there will always be people that believe in anything... that's why you have profits.
05:18 PM on 11/09/2011
All recognized religions in America are 501C3 tax exempt . This means their legal fictions of law with a commercial charachter regulated in commerce subject to the Commerce Clause . This in turn makes all churches governed under U.S. govt. sovereignty. The regulated commercial activity is the Federal Reserve notes and U.C.C. title 3 negotiable instruments[ checks.money orders,etc.] routed through the Fed system protected by U.S. govt. thats circulating in the church. Thus all churches are effectively connected to commerce by doing business. The money given, property donated, and whats on the tithing plate is the commercial nexus making all churches subject to govt. scope and purview. There is no wall of seperation because all 501C3 tax exempt religions exist wholly in the body of govt. Not only is there no true seperation of church and state ,all religous free speech by effect is limited and governed and thus not an equal part of the activist equation. Activists can move to occupy the people side of the 10th Ammendment. Business and churches can't cross the 14th Ammendment limitation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wbthacker
Can YOU pass the Turing Test?
05:56 PM on 11/09/2011
Could you please re-phrase that in a way that makes sense?

Thanks.
11:35 PM on 11/09/2011
U.S. Supreme Court in Hooven ,Allison v. Evatt evidences 2 United States operating in law simultaneously. One is Wash.D.C.,insular possessions, and,territories wherein Congress is sovereign. High court also holds in plethora of case law that WASH,D.C. is a FOREIGN NATION in respect to States. U.S. Govt. enters states to regulate its citizens. U.S. citizens are citizens of Congress in whatever state they reside. Money on tithing plate is why I.R.S. influences churches to apply for tax exemption. APPLICATION means one is moving govt. into a contractual relationship. One thus consents and authorizes to make Govt. sovereign over the subject matter by one's signature. Circulating Federal Reserve Notes is a commercial activity and taxable event. Figuratively speaking,all churches are serving Mammon,the Money principality of power. Who is the true owner of Federal Reserve Notes? Federal Reserve is tax exempt because all tax money paid in Fed Notes is Interest return of property they already own. Its a privilege to use their valuable consideration. One which Govt. enforces against any person,artificial or natural, it touches. Bottom line point: Can't compare what's limited to 14th Ammendment with nonreligious activism that can occupy the 10th Ammendment. Apples and Oranges. Does occupying 10th Ammendment really need detailed explanation?
photo
BurtonDesque
Fear a Blank Planet
03:41 PM on 11/09/2011
Blather like this makes it clear that Harvard should long ago have divested itself of its Divinity School.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:58 PM on 11/11/2011
Who else would provide a home for an aging hippie?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wbthacker
Can YOU pass the Turing Test?
03:33 PM on 11/09/2011
"The similarities between radical activism and religion help explain why religious institutions and ideas have made vital contributions to every movement for social change in the United States."

True, it's impossible to overstate religion's essential contributions to social movements.

Without religion there could never have been a Civil Rights movement, nor even the abolition of slavery under Lincoln. For without religion, Americans would never have been able to justify owning slaves in the first place.

And how could we have had the democratic revolutions of the 18th and 19th centuries (including our own) without church-sanctioned kings to overthrow?

The women's suffrage movement would have been stillborn if society hadn't obeyed Biblical rules to treat women as chattel.

And how could we admire the courage and nobility of today's gay rights activists if our forefathers had never enacted homophobic laws based on Leviticus?

To paraphrase a great modern philosopher: "Religion: the cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems." (H. Simpson)