More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dan Pashman

Dan Pashman

GET UPDATES FROM Dan Pashman

Sucker Punch: Why You Were Unprepared To See the Film

Posted: 03/28/11 03:07 PM ET

I didn't see Sucker Punch, and chances are, neither did you.

The heavily-hyped special effects film opened Friday, but it lost the weekend box office battle to Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Rodrick Rules, a kids' film that cost a quarter as much to make.

Some people may blame poor reviews for Sucker Punch's disappointing numbers. Critics described it as a poorly-executed, standard issue action fantasy, with Richard Roeper calling it "the most painful test of endurance since Drive Angry 3-D."

But that's not why I didn't go. I didn't go because I was confused by the film's tagline. Every Sucker Punch billboard contained the promise, "You will be unprepared."

What exactly does that mean?

Why the future tense? Does it mean that when I sit down to watch the movie, I will not be prepared for it? If so, doesn't that mean I'm already unprepared now? I mean, if I'm not going to be prepared when I watch it, I must not be prepared now. And if that's the case, shouldn't the tagline be, "You are unprepared?"

Perhaps, though, the PR folks had a different intention. Perhaps when they say, "You will be unprepared," they mean that watching this film will transform me into a state of unpreparedness, as if the viewing experience itself will result in some kind of preparedness regression. Sure, right now, I'm totally prepared, but after I see the movie, I will be UNprepared.

That would be a bold take on a word that's become pretty tired in this post-9/11 world. Since our government established September as National Preparedness Month in 2004, I don't think they've ever prepared us for the possibility that we'd be UNprepared.

This radical usage strikes me as especially bold considering that Sucker Punch seems to borrow every epic fantasy special effects movie trope of the past... well... the past. I don't know how the filmmakers could claim that anyone would be rendered unprepared by a film that actually includes the line, "If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything." Indeed.

Americans have spent our very filmgoing lives preparing for this pablum. And unfortunately for the makers of Sucker Punch, it seems we're mostly content with our current level of preparedness.

 

Follow Dan Pashman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/danpashman

 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:58 PM on 03/31/2011
You know I still want to see this movie, but I ended up going to see Rango believe it or not and Loved it! I found this music video and I can not tell who is singing this song, does anyone know? http://vimeo.com/21420912
03:11 AM on 03/29/2011
I saw this movie as a 43 year old uncle with my teenage nieces and have to confessed I like this movie. The story is something you have to pay attention to and the ending is not a typical ending for an American movie.My nieces on the other hand LOVED this movie and yes they "got it". My teenage nephew went with his girlfriend and she found herself crying at the end (I guess she was unprepared) but she still loved it. My guess here is that the studio marketed to the wrong crowd. The studio went for a young male demographic when they should have gone for young females.
photo
BlackJAC
It's better to be a black king than a white knight
07:14 PM on 03/28/2011
I'm a recovering fanboy and it struck me as nothing but eye candy for its own sake.
07:53 PM on 03/28/2011
Agreed
04:28 PM on 03/28/2011
It looked promising, but the reviews I saw are enough to tell me I'm better off waiting to see it via Netflix.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Beka13
Soylent green is made of...
04:19 PM on 03/28/2011
I saw it and as a 30 something female, I thought it was a very interesting, thought provoking movie where the chicks looked cool. It is being treated the same way my favorite video game Bayonetta was treated...My question to the women who bash these things is: Why cant women look sexy, be clever and kick backside? Why is using our sexuality, which is the only power we truly have over men since there are very few women even in our most desperate time who can physically overpower a man and especially in the time period this movie was made, such a bad thing? If I am going to kick backside then I want to look hot doing it.

SPOILER:
But for those who have seen the movie, I was thinking the "dancing" was a metaphor for the therapy that the Drs were implementing and overseeing...To see how well they positively react to the music therapy. I am not sure that was Zach Snyder's intention, but that is a possible explaination that people missed in their immediate condemnation of this movie. I think there were at least 3 maybe 4 "realities" that were represented in this movie and if you arent prepared for the unpreparable then you would miss the intelligent nuance in the midst of the chaos.