EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Dan Rather

Dan Rather

Posted: March 10, 2010 08:09 AM

Watermelons, Washington, and What We Call News Today

What's Your Reaction:

I must confess that until recently I had no idea what Twitter was. Even now, I'm not completely sure how it's best used. When I want to post something, the younger, more tech-savvy people in my office help me out. But I do know this: if you searched Twitter for "Dan Rather" over the past few days, you probably could guess why I feel the need to write this column.

It started this past Sunday when I appeared on Chris Matthews' syndicated talk show. I've known and respected Chris for many years and I enjoy doing his show. I take the train down from my home in New York to Washington D.C. and as I approach Union Station my thoughts often turn to the years I spent covering the Johnson and Nixon White Houses. It was a turbulent time for the country and a formative period for me as a reporter and a young father.

The Washington of that time was a far different place. In some ways it was better: less politically rancorous, more collegial. In many ways it, and the country it represented, was much worse. African Americans were still very much second-class citizens. Women held few positions of power. We smoked more, polluted our environment more, and accepted social mores that anyone who has seen Mad Men knows are embarrassingly outdated.

The news media was also different, so different in fact that I won't even try to enumerate all the changes. Many who are far smarter and more perceptive than I have written volumes about it. As with the country itself, there were some elements of the press that were better then and some that are better now. There were many more newspapers and they were healthy, full of enterprising reporting. The networks were flush with cash that they spent on their news divisions, supporting large staffs of journalists and bureaus across the country and around the world. Most of the bureaus have closed and the staff has been laid off.

Meanwhile, new forms of journalism have emerged that were unimaginable when I lived in Washington. The online and cable world has allowed a freer exchange of ideas and more access to news. People can scour the New York Times (or the Times of India for that matter) in real time around the globe. If someone reads a fascinating article he or she can share it easily with friends. When news breaks, eyewitnesses have a forum for relaying their observations and insights.

All this is the backdrop for what I said on the Matthews show. I was talking about Obama and health care and I used the analogy of selling watermelons by the side of the road. It's an expression that stretches to my boyhood roots in Southeast Texas, when country highways were lined with stands manned by sellers of all races. Now of course watermelons have become a stereotype for African Americans and so my analogy entered a charged environment. I'm sorry people took offense.

But anyone who knows me personally or knows my professional career would know that race was not on my mind. Reporting on the injustices of race was part of the reason I became a reporter. I grew up in segregated Texas on the same side of the tracks as the African American community. At the time, enlightened people called them Negros. Many people called them much worse. When I covered the Civil Rights movement, I saw sheer hatred in ways that still haunt and shock me. For doing my small part in reporting on the South in the 1960s, I was called a traitor to my roots and other names not fit for print. I was threatened with death by people who would have welcomed me to their church on Sunday on account of my white skin if they didn't know what I was there to do. I do not take this issue lightly.

I can understand why someone who just happened upon my comments could take offense or want clarification. But what has caused this comment to "go viral" is the trumpeting of an online and cable echo chamber that claims the banner of news but trades in gossip, gotcha, and innuendo. Furthermore, even for those who brook no prejudice, when everything is condensed to 140 characters or a small YouTube clip, many people who got this "news" did so without any context, just a headline that popped up on their phone or inbox.

I know that there are many people who are reading this who have preconceived notions about me. I am sure that the comments section will be filled with a gamut of First Amendment expressions. That is our precious right as Americans. Politics has always been part sport, and if my choice of language falls into the bloody heavyweight bout that has become life in Washington today, so be it. Chris' show is a fun, freewheeling political talk show and I enjoy coming to Washington to participate. Our republic has flourished because we as citizens can be provocative in our political discussions and challenge our leaders and our own assumptions. There is a time and place for this, but it can't be allowed to dominate what we call news.

What saddens me is what this experience has made all too clear. Much of what we call news, isn't. Much of what we Tweet, or post, or chat away at under the guise of news, are distractions.

While I appear on Matthews' show from time to time, that is not my day job. Together with a dedicated and talented staff, and under the unbending support of Mark Cuban, I put out a weekly news program on HDNet called Dan Rather Reports. If you want to see what I consider to be news, check it out or download it on iTunes. We just did a report on the travails of Afghan women - not the hottest Twitter topic. We also profiled an army unit in Kandahar - our support for these brave young Americans is bipartisan. The show ended with the news of the death of a young soldier at a remote outpost along the Pakistan border. I met him on my last visit to the country at the end of last year. I wish his memory and brave actions were a trending topic on Twitter.

On our show we investigated a U.S. company mining in the Congo, trucking schools in Michigan, Iranian influence in western banks, and an epidemic of youth concussions in sports, among many others. These topics don't lend themselves to a five minute segment on a cable talk show or a short blog post. But they shape the lives of real Americans and people around the world. Most of the topics we tackle don't have a Republican angle or a Democratic angle. They can't be put on the political scoreboard.

The optimist in me believes that we are not as polarized as the partisans on the left and right would want us to believe. They make money on division. I have gotten dozens of letters from viewers for my HDNet show saying that they thought I was a left-wing partisan hack until they sat down and watched our reports. This is not meant to be self-aggrandizing. It is just evidence that if we stopped worrying about political point-scoring and sat and listened to the issues that matter, we would be less distracted and more focused on the problems that we all face and must solve together.

 
I must confess that until recently I had no idea what Twitter was. Even now, I'm not completely sure how it's best used. When I want to post something, the younger, more tech-savvy people in my office...
I must confess that until recently I had no idea what Twitter was. Even now, I'm not completely sure how it's best used. When I want to post something, the younger, more tech-savvy people in my office...
 
  • Comments
  • 1,406
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (40 total)
02:43 PM on 03/17/2010
I can't believe that Dan Rather did not realize the using that word and the President name in the same
sentence that people would not get upset. You see Old white people think they can say anything and
everything is alright with the world. Please stop using I grew up in SOUTHEAST TEXAS. I know I will
look at you with different. What ever comes out of your mouth you were thinking it.
10:44 AM on 03/15/2010
Dear Mr. Rather,

Thank you for your article on HuffPost. I agree with what you said.

I know only a little about Twitter and I have read some "tweets" (as they are called). I will not use Twitter.

I know very little about Facebook. I will not use Facebook.

I believe in using the internet for education and fun. However, there is not enough time in a day to do everything­.

I will look at your show. If it is like 60 Minutes, I will watch it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mr d
01:39 AM on 03/15/2010
Would have been nice if everyone was as thorough when Rather went after Bush, and realized that Dan R was actually on point with his report. I agree it could be misconstru­ed....for a millionth of a sec maybe.

I was not offended, and actions speaks louder than word.

Substantiv­ely speakiing, the criticism is legit !
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:27 PM on 03/14/2010
Dan Rather has never forgotten where he came from. That's to his credit as a journalist and American. He should do studies that depict the growing disparity of wealth and opportunit­y. No other reporters deal with economic issues that are destroying our democracy.
photo
Peacedog
I knew there were no WMDs
06:51 PM on 03/14/2010
I love ya, Dan. Keep fighting the good fight.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edgarcaycedoc
05:32 PM on 03/14/2010
While I do not live in Texas, I do know that our own southern, rural community is surrounded by stands selling produce--i­ncluding watermelon­. One of the best kids I knew and with whom I worked helped with the watermelon and gourd crops to supply these stands. It is a kind of under the radar economy that makes a lot of money for kids who don't have to pay room and board. Today this young man is a lawyer in our Capital city. He will come home for the Watermelon Festival on Labor Day. No racism, just a commentary about how some of our farms make extra bux.
04:27 PM on 03/14/2010
Rather's HDnet pieces are in the highest tradition of TV journalism­, stretching back to Murrow.

As for watermelon­, yeah a slip of his tongue. If you want to see white, Eastern establishm­ent journalist­s casually insulting black people using watermelon­s, take a look at the August 9, 1937 issue of Life, the country's leading visual news magazine. Cover story: watermelon­s. Cover photo: a cart piled with watermelon­s, on which sits a black man, back to camera, naked to the waist, wearing work pants held up by suspenders­. Inside, the last photos of the story show white girls in Georgia enjoying melons by a creek, under that a black woman in shapeless dress holding in one hand a baby suckling her mostly-exp­osed breast, in the other a slice of watermelon to her mouth, and finally a photo of pigs rooting around a field, eating melons.

The caption between the last two photos: "Nothing makes a Negro's mouth water like a luscious, freshly-pi­cked melon. Any colored 'mammy' can hold a huge slice in one hand while holding her offspring in the other...Wh­at melons the Negroes do not consume will find favor with the pigs (below)." Published in Henry Luce's powerful magazine.

Next to this, Rather's imagery pales.
08:57 PM on 03/14/2010
But you are missing the POINT! It is BECAUSE of sordid images and words such as those you describe that white people today HAVE to be careful about the language they use when they're talking about African-Am­ericans and other minority races. The ancestors of white people in this country caused so much pain, tragedy and trauma in the name of racism that black people have every right to be outraged whenever any semblance of the same appears in today's dialogue. Black people DIED because of racism, they weren't just verbally assaulted. So such words represent real grief and pain and a past of which we do not wish to be reminded -- ever.

Now that the laws have changed, and white people are, for the most part, no longer allowed to get away with such behavior, there is ZERO TOLERANCE for such painful reminders.

So, it's not enough to say that "Rather's imagery pales" in comparison to something much worse; his imagery referenced a very painful, distorted racial stereotype­. Don't blame the victims of America's violent past for the fact that white people today have to walk on egg shells when discussing black people -- blame those who maimed and killed and laughed and created stereotype­s in the first place. Your ancestors are to blame for the need that exists today for white people to choose their words carefully when talking about black people.

And it's a very small price for them to have paid for their deeds.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amoment
11:02 PM on 03/14/2010
Your words are so wonderful that I have printed your post and will carry it in my wallet along with other important documents. Thank you for telling the truth so well.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Nelson Montana
Artist, Author, Composer
11:12 PM on 03/14/2010
I'll keep this short. No one is responsibl­e for the actions of their ancestors. And not every white persons ancestors was a slave owner. Many were slaves themselves­.

Stop the hate already.
photo
PRONESE
Somewhat Opinionated Curmudgeon
04:21 PM on 03/14/2010
So Says
*
*
The Teflon Dan.
*
Posish!
*
R/ PRONESE
03:53 PM on 03/14/2010
I grew up in that world, too, Mr. Rather. Next to Walter Cronkite, it's you I think of when I think of classic journalism­. My father always said you were a communist. That was enough of an endorsemen­t for me:)

Thanks for your contributi­on!
10:19 PM on 03/14/2010
Well said! What a shame our mainstream media is so devoid of journalist­s of their training and caliber.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
motoGpifupleez
watching with amusement
03:47 PM on 03/14/2010
Small brained twits were "outraged" by this because FOX "News" told them to be.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThePeoplesKey
Writer/General Disreputable Rogue
03:19 PM on 03/14/2010
"if we stopped worrying about political point-scor­ing and sat and listened to the issues that matter, we would be less distracted and more focused on the problems that we all face and must solve together."

I agree with you wholeheart­edly but don't hold your breath waiting for this to happen . . .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
two 'alves of coconut!
02:28 PM on 03/14/2010
What we call 'news' today is unbridled B.S. The fundamenta­l foundation of 'news' is the accurate, timely, well-writt­en, brief, but informativ­e chroniclin­g of current events, suitable for publicatio­n or for public broadcast. Who, what, when, where, how, why, all that jazz, in under 400 words, with the reporter's name at the top, along with the name of the publicatio­n they're writing for. What we have today is a news INDUSTRY, worth billions of dollars, the organizers and orchestrat­ors of which see themselves as pretty darn important, which, in the sense that they've profited pretty handsomely by publishing all this informatio­n out to the public, they are in fact at least somewhat important. But, they still come second to the latest news, which in modern times now comes from a multitude of sources in multiple countries. Reporting, journalism­, chroniclin­g, television newsmagazi­nes, opinion pieces, editorials­, what you may call it, none of it would mean much without an audience, people to watch the shows, listen to the broadcasts­, or buy the newspapers and magazines. But, how much of it is really important, and how much of it has now just become a venue for people to play politics? How much did these melons cost, where were they being sold, who operated the concession where they were being sold, did they have a business license, facts and informatio­n.

Racism? The only race here is the race to the bottom, and maybe it's time to turn the tv OFF.
12:50 PM on 03/14/2010
Thank you for this thoughtful and insightful article, Mr. Rather. The older I get, the more I too am frustrated by all the "noise" that distracts us from our real problems, severely hampering our ability to understand and solve them.

You are a class act, Sir.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TerryDArc
The heart is the real Fountain of Youth
12:46 PM on 03/14/2010
Thanks for the heads-up on HDNet. Just went out and found that HDNet's website has a station locator, set my Direct TV's recorder for your series and will see my first episode sometime after next Tuesday's show. Screw the watermelon­s!
12:37 PM on 03/14/2010
I've been around long enough to remember as a young girl Rather's coverage of the civil rights movement and later the Nixon White House.
Like everyone else he's slipped over a word a time or two and that's all the watermelon analogy was, a slip, a bad choice, we've all done it.
Rather was one of the best reporters of our time and he became on of the best anchors of our times...an­d it's easy for everyone to sit in judgment, especially since we aren't the ones in front of the camera.
He is right about the cable news shows. They may report 5 minutes of news at the top of the hour, then 10 minutes of opinion, 15 minutes for commercial­s and the rest of the hour is for gossip. It's the gossip part that some listeners take as the gospel and they share it with friends and pretty soon it's an out of control 3 alarm fire.