If Past Is Prologue, Mary Schapiro's Future Should Not Include the SEC

Mary Schapiro's advocacy for FINRA's flawed mandatory arbitration process - and her antipathy for investors' rights -- disqualifies her from confirmation as head of the SEC.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

Mary Schapiro has a well-documented desire to protect the securities industry from investors. She has done a great job as the CEO of FINRA (the industry's toothless "self-regulatory" agency) preventing investors from obtaining redress for the harm caused by brokers.

FINRA runs the industry's mandatory arbitration system. It makes up the rules. It selects the panel of arbitrators who will hear disputes and it resolves all administrative disputes.

Its rules provide that one member of the "impartial" tribunal must be a member of the securities industry!

Game, set and match to brokers.

Here's a concrete example of how this flawed process works:

Mary Jane Schwartz is a 62 year-old, divorced, retired nurse, living in Massachusetts. She had nearly her entire lifesavings -- approximately $1.3 million dollars -- invested with her broker.

Orally and in writing, Ms. Schwartz advised her broker that she was a conservative investor who depended on her investments for her living expenses.

Her broker ignored her instructions and invested most of her portfolio in risky stocks. Mrs. Schwartz lost over 80% of the value of her portfolio.

You would think this overwhelming case would be a slam dunk. Not so.

The panel awarded Ms. Schwartz only $4,994 and then assessed her $5,625.00 in NASD forum fees.

This case is a perfect example of how Mary Schapiro has "protected" investors during her tenure at FINRA.

This is not an isolated example.

Through November, 2008, investors received no recovery in 60% of the arbitration cases that went to a hearing. In a significant percent of those cases where there was a recovery, it was a fraction of what the investor should have received.

Mary Schapiro's advocacy for FINRA's flawed mandatory arbitration process - and her antipathy for investors' rights -- disqualifies her from confirmation as head of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The views set forth in this blog are the opinions of the author alone and may not represent the views of any firm or entity with whom he is affiliated. The data, information, and content on this blog are for information, education, and non-commercial purposes only. Returns from index funds do not represent the performance of any investment advisory firm. The information on this blog does not involve the rendering of personalized investment advice and is limited to the dissemination of opinions on investing. No reader should construe these opinions as an offer of advisory services. Readers who require investment advice should retain the services of a competent investment professional. The information on this blog is not an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities or class of securities mentioned herein.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot