There's been a seismic shift in investing from actively managed funds to "passive" (index-based) funds.
Consider these facts from a recent blog post by Anne Tergesen and Jason Zweig:
- For the three years ended August 21, 2016, $1.3 trillion was added to passive funds and exchange-traded funds.
During the same period, there was an outflow of more than $250 billion from actively managed funds. Hedge funds reported three consecutive quarters of withdrawals for the first time since 2009. 401(k) plans now have 25 percent of their assets in index funds. Public pension plans have 60 percent of their U.S. stock allocations in index funds. Endowments and foundations now have 63 percent of their assets in index funds.Philip Bullen, a former chief investment officer at Fidelity observed: "The case for passive is being made so well and so clearly. It has become common wisdom."
The disconnect with the financial media
This "common wisdom" has not penetrated the financial media. The vast majority of its programming features fund managers, analysts, investment "pros" and other pundits discussing the direction of the market, their stock picks or why their actively managed fund is a candidate for outperformance.
These blog posts, on CNBC's website, under the column "Latest Pro", are typical:
- Weiss: Your hedge fund investing setup for the week ahead.
Top international fund manager on how to invest globally, his top small-cap growth picks. Bank of America cuts Whole Foods to sell on shrinking margins, slashes forecast to $25 HSBC downgrades Teva on uncertainty surrounding DOJ's reported generic drug investigation.Responsible investors should pay no attention to any "hedge fund set-up." The stock picks of a "top international fund manager" are no more likely to be accurate than a coin toss. Forecasts and downgrades by the Bank of America, HSBC and others are not reliable.
The financial media continues to disseminate discredited advice because its advertisers -- the securities industry -- pay it to do so.
When I started writing books and blog posts about index-based investing in 2002, it was much like pushing a snowball uphill. Index investors were derided by "pros" as not being intelligent enough to do research on stocks and willing to settle for "average" returns. Another common critique was how my colleagues and I could write blog posts every week extolling the virtues of a simple theme: Buy index funds.
How the times have changed! The Internet has played a meaningful role in educating investors about the "emperors with no clothes" who purport to have the ability to pick stocks, time the market and select the next "hot" fund managers. So have excellent financial journalists and authors like John C. Bogle, Burton Malkiel, Jason Zweig, Jonathan Clements, Larry Swedroe, William Bernstein, Ron Lieber, Allan Roth, Carl Richards, Tim Maurer, Manisha Thakor, Rick Ferri, Mark Hebner and many others.
In the aggregate, despite receiving limited media coverage, they generated many fine books and thousands of blogs, accessed by millions of investors. They turned the tide. Investors were the beneficiaries.
It's time for the next phase. A program on network or cable television, or an independent channel, called "Index TV." Instead of the nonsensical musings of Cramer or tips from "technicians", this channel would feature sound, academically based, investing advice. It would showcase stories you won't see in the financial media like why brokerage firms who have admitted engaging in unethical and criminal conduct are still permitted to provide investment advice to gullible investors. It would discuss the data on active management, the lack of evidence supporting technical and fundamental analysis and the importance of low fees and costs.
It would expose the conflicts of interest that are rife in the securities industry. It would discuss the flaws in our retirement plan system that serve to enrich the securities industry at the expense of plan participants.
Best of all, Index TV would be a resource that would actually benefit investors instead of exploiting them.
The beneficiaries of the shift to passive investing would be likely supporters of Index TV. Blackrock has more than $4.6 trillion under management. Vanguard has over $3 trillion. Dimensional Fund Advisors manages over $445 billion. I assume Blackrock and Vanguard have huge advertising budgets. Dimensional has never advertised. Maybe Index TV would cause it to change its policy and increase the name recognition of its excellent passively managed funds (available only through authorized advisors) to investors.
There are many other fund families and advisory firms that put the interest of their clients first and recommend only passively managed funds. These firms are other sources of support for Index TV.
Investors deserve better than the steady drumbeat of misinformation currently on financial media.
The views of the author are his alone. He is not affiliated with any broker, fund manager or advisory firm.
Any data, information and content on this blog is for information purposes only and should not be construed as an offer of advisory services.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.