More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dan Solin

Dan Solin

GET UPDATES FROM Dan Solin

Mega-Deficits and Your Investment Portfolio

Posted: 04/ 5/11 07:09 PM ET

As of April 2, 20011, the outstanding public debt of the U.S. was in excess of $14 trillion. Your share of this debt is more than $46,000. The U.S. debt level is approximately 90% of its economic output.

Many investors view the rising debt as having major implications for their U.S. based investments. On the surface, this concern makes perfect sense. Why would you want to invest in a country that can't live within its means? Isn't it obvious the whole deck of cards is about to come crashing down?

Marlena Lea, a Vice-President of Dimensional Fund Advisors examined this issue in a thoughtful research paper. Her research considered the economic and investment ramifications of fiscal deficits.

As expected, she found that deficits are related to higher long term interest rates. This makes perfect sense. As deficits increase, the risk of default also increases. It becomes more expensive to borrow money.

High deficits may also stifle long-run economic growth. No surprise here. Budget deficits decrease national savings, which reduces investment in the domestic economy and increases foreign borrowing. Lower domestic investment leads to lower growth.

You would think high interest rates and slow growth would be the perfect storm for investors. You would be wrong.

Ms. Lea looked at the average annual returns in high and low growth countries in developed markets from 1971-2008. The low-growth countries had an average annual return of 13.52%, compared to 12.90% for the high-growth countries.

The difference was more stark in the returns of countries in emerging markets. For the period from 2001-2008, the average annual return of low-growth countries was 24.62%, compared to 19.77% for high-growth countries.

Ms. Lea concluded that deficits do not predict stock or bond returns and that low future economic growth does not mean low future stock returns, which is precisely the opposite of what most investors believe.

What about currency depreciation? Many investors believe large fiscal deficits are a precursor of currency depreciation. This concern makes sense. The likelihood of inflation and default risk could cause investors to flee the dollar for safer, more stable currencies. The data does not support this view. U.S. deficits increased significantly from 1970-1990. The dollar got stronger, not weaker. The academic data indicates that exchange rates move randomly. Fortunes have been lost in the futile effort to predict currency returns.

Ms. Lea is a highly credentialed academic. She has a Ph.D in finance from the University of Chicago, an MS in agricultural and resource economics and a BS in managerial economics. Most investors would not consider having heart surgery performed by someone without stellar credentials. Yet, they entrust their life savings to their friendly "investment professionals" who base their recommendations on little more than the direction of the wind on a given day. Many of them have no formal training in economics or finance.

There is a vast amount of peer reviewed academic literature which debunks the common investment myths you hear in the financial media and from your "market beating" broker or advisor. Investing your money responsibly requires some effort to familiarize yourself with it, or with books summarizing this research. As for the latter, my books and those by John Bogle, William Bernstein, Burton Malkiel, Mark Hebner, Larry Swedroe, David Swenson and Allan Roth are a good place to start.

The views set forth in this blog are the opinions of the author alone and may not represent the views of any firm or entity with whom he is affiliated. The data, information, and content on this blog are for information, education, and non-commercial purposes only. Returns from index funds do not represent the performance of any investment advisory firm. The information on this blog does not involve the rendering of personalized investment advice and is limited to the dissemination of opinions on investing. No reader should construe these opinions as an offer of advisory services. Readers who require investment advice should retain the services of a competent investment professional. The information on this blog is not an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities or class of securities mentioned herein. Furthermore, the information on this blog should not be construed as an offer of advisory services. Please note that the author does not recommend specific securities nor is he responsible for comments made by persons posting on this blog.


 
 
 

Follow Dan Solin on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DanSolin

As of April 2, 20011, the outstanding public debt of the U.S. was in excess of $14 trillion. Your share of this debt is more than $46,000. The U.S. debt level is approximately 90% of its economic out...
As of April 2, 20011, the outstanding public debt of the U.S. was in excess of $14 trillion. Your share of this debt is more than $46,000. The U.S. debt level is approximately 90% of its economic out...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:32 PM on 04/11/2011
Dan, I always appreciate your skewering of the "Everybody Knows That,........ (fill in the blank)" conventional wisdom.

Skepticism in both the hard news and financial press has sadly, and to our detriment as a society, become a lost art.
oilfield
small manufacturing business owner
04:01 PM on 04/07/2011
i have made over 100% last year...does that mean that all is well in the country? spend away dc...spend away....we will pay later.
unique
Animal lover forever
11:10 AM on 04/07/2011
I see all these advertisements on TV about "Let us go over your investments and advise you."

If this 30 something young person is so smart to advise me, why isnn't he rich?"
08:53 PM on 04/06/2011
Then as any decent Chicago grad in finance will tell you, an academic backround in finance can just as easily hurt your portfolio management results with all the overconfidence as you forecast the markets. Some of the best investment pros had no formal finance training. Ive got more than 1 friend who went to top business schools who never made it. The best investment pro I know managed a bar before he got into finance. What separates the great from all the rest is an x factor which last time I checked was not on the curriculum of any graduate programs.
photo
JBS
Part time misanthrope & full time curmudgeon
03:40 PM on 04/06/2011
If you purchased $1,000 worth of Delta Airlines shares at its peak, your
investment is worth $49.00 today.

If you purchased $1,000 worth of AIG shares at its peak, your investment
is worth $33.00 today.

If you purchased $1,000 worth of Enron shares at its peak, you have
$0.00 today.

But ...

If you purchased $1,000 worth of beer a year ago, drank all of it and
saved the aluminum cans for recycling, your investment is worth $214.00
today.

My new retirement plan is a 401-Keg.
Linda from Deerfield
Paying attention
03:11 PM on 04/06/2011
Somewhat akin to the author's observations, I feel that the effort to adequately vet an adviser is so demanding that it might as well have been directed toward researching on one's own behalf. The benefits are two-fold. 1) You don't have to pay anybody. 2) By not having to pay someone else on top of the returns that you require, your money can be invested at lower risk.

I am suspicious of Ms. Lea's 2001-2008 findings. That is the time frame when an investment in the S&P 500 would have returned 0%, so it is hard to imagine any slow or fast growing markets averaging 20%-25%. Am I off by a year or two? Pardon me, I didn't mean to reveal that markets can stagnate for a decade at a time.
03:46 PM on 04/06/2011
The S&P 500 is only a portion of the market. I do not know of anyone who would recommend a portfolio solely consist of one asset class like the S&P 500. A well built portfolio would consist of index funds in the following, global asset classes: US Large Cap, US Small Cap, US Large Value, US Small Value, US REITS, Internatio­nal Large Cap, Internatio­nal Small Cap, Internatio­nal Large Value, Internatio­nal Small Value and Emerging Markets. Bonds in the portfolio should be short and intermedia­te term. Re-blance annually.

http://genxfinance.com/the-lost-decade-of-investing/
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
10:31 AM on 04/06/2011
The market is a big scam. That is why it doesn't make logical sense.
11:02 AM on 04/06/2011
What's a scam is going down to your local brokers office and having him sell you commissioned products. Rather you should do like Ken, below, and I did. Use Vanguard to build a globally diversified portfolio of low cost index funds and then re-balance it annually. The only qualm I now have of Vanguard is that they are starting to recommend that you also hold some actively managed funds. It's like the dark side of the force is creeping in since John Bogle left. Full disclosure: Though I feel Vanguard is a excellent company and offers the do-it-yourselfer a great set of diversified index funds I moved my money to DFA this past year.
08:36 AM on 04/06/2011
Many so-called money managers and investment advisors do not have a fiduciary responsibility to advise their clients only with their client's best interest at heart. Further, it is an extremely rare investment professional who can even manage to "beat the market" in any given year, let alone on a sustained and continuing basis. In fact, over the long-run, say over a 10-year period, low-cost, broadly diversified index funds beat, on average, about 75% of their managed fund competitors, and, charge a fraction of the cost to do so (low-cost being one important reason they can deliver superior long-term results).

The pentultimate champion of this long-run investment strategy is the Vanguard group of mutual funds, founded by the greatest pro-individual investor of his generation, John Bogle. Mr. Bogle's simple, yet elegant, investing philosophy, then and now, is to invest in a broadly diversified array of stocks using very low-cost index funds, and, to re-balance the stock-bond-other asset mix about once per year. This strategy works, it has worked for me for over 25 years, and, has delivered to me portfolio returns that are the envy of many of my friends and associates.
12:35 PM on 04/06/2011
If you held the index fund from 2000 to 2010...did you make any money?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dan Solin
My Smartest Portfolio book is a game changer.
02:58 PM on 04/06/2011
Please see this blog:

moneywatch.bnet.com/economic-news/article/why-it-wasnt-a-lost-decade-for-investors/375568/
03:39 PM on 04/06/2011
If you held a globally diversified portfolio of index funds (60/40 stocks/bonds) and re-balanced annually then you make money. http://genxfinance.com/the-lost-decade-of-investing/
Equity asset classes should include US Large Cap, US Small Cap, US Large Value, US Small Value, US REITS, International Large Cap, International Small Cap, International Large Value, International Small Value and Emerging Markets. Bonds should be short and intermediate term.
11:23 PM on 04/05/2011
Dan, I hope youire right!