iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dan Solin

GET UPDATES FROM Dan Solin
 

A Lesson on the Perils of Stock Picking

Posted: 02/05/2013 6:58 pm

A blog by David Randall at Reuters lauded the stock-picking skills of fund managers who dumped shares of Apple before its shares began their plunge. Randall observed that 321 funds had more than 5 percent of their assets in Apple shares at the beginning of 2012. He noted the prescience of the 16 percent of the fund managers who significantly reduced exposure to Apple before the stock decline gained momentum.

The insightful fund managers were all too eager to share the reasons for their decision to dump Apple. One noted his belief that Apple had "saturated the market." Another believed Apple was losing its "pricing premium." A third sold because it "raced through his price targets."

My take is quite different. I find it remarkable that 84 percent of fund managers who were over-weighted in Apple stock suffered massive losses. The funds who didn't see the plunge included some big fund families, like the T. Rowe Price Growth Stock fund and the JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Select fund, both of which added shares of Apple stock as its price was declining.

The debate about whether to buy or sell Apple stock misses the point. Trying to pick a stock that will outperform is little more than a crap shoot. Concentrating your portfolio in any one stock adds unacceptable risk. Wall Street is littered with worthless stock certificates of companies that were once considered "sure things," like Polaroid, Bethlehem Steel, Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers.

Picking a fund manager who believes in stock picking is little better. According to a report issued by Standard & Poors, very few funds that perform well are able to maintain their high level of performance. The report found only 10 percent of 707 domestic stock funds that were in the top quartile as of September 2010 remained there at the end of September 2012.

Instead of being attracted to those funds that dumped Apple, you would be better advised to attribute their decision more to luck than to skill. Your confidence should be shaken by the overwhelming majority of funds that got clobbered when Apple shares dropped in price.

The irrefutable data makes a persuasive case that active management is a loser's game. You play that game at your peril. That's the real lesson of the Apple saga.

2013-01-02-solin_book 7 Steps to Save Your Financial Life Now is available on Amazon, B&N, and iTunes. Dan Solin is the director of investor advocacy for The BAM ALLIANCE and a wealth advisor with Buckingham Asset Management. He is a New York Times best-selling author of the Smartest series of books. The views of the author are his alone and may not represent the views of his affiliated firms. Any data, information, and content on this blog is for information purposes only and should not be construed as an offer of advisory services.

 
 
 

Follow Dan Solin on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DanSolin

FOLLOW BUSINESS
A blog by David Randall at Reuters lauded the stock-picking skills of fund managers who dumped shares of Apple before its shares began their plunge. Randall observed that 321 funds had more than 5 per...
A blog by David Randall at Reuters lauded the stock-picking skills of fund managers who dumped shares of Apple before its shares began their plunge. Randall observed that 321 funds had more than 5 per...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:14 PM on 02/06/2013
OK, I believe in stock picking. I have consistently picked large-cap blue-chips that trade at 10 times earnings and pay a 4-5% dividend. I look for companies that have good management, good cash flow, and sell something that customers will always buy, like cigarettes, gasoline, or electricity. I typically hold these stocks indefinitely, unless the companies go bad.

Do I make money? Yes, I do. Maybe I make more than the averages, maybe less, I am just interested in meeting my own personal goals. My kind of stock tends to go up less in good times, but it goes down less in bad times. Much of the income comes from the dividends, which rise steadily over the years. It is nice to get 15% a year on your original investment.

My main reason for doing this is probably that I like to be in control. I don't hold any companies that are trading at crazy multiples, any companies with problematic accounting, or any companies in businesses that could be gone tomorrow.

Anyone is free to try this approach, all it takes is some money and a few basic financial skills.
12:31 PM on 02/06/2013
Pundits and analysts who have never run a company are busy writing columns on what Apple needs to do. Every adjective for the company has been replaced overnight by their exact opposites. Ignored are the blatant market manipulation by large investment groups who have pushed prices high and dumped at the expense of fools who are often their own customers. In any other place, there will be serious investigations of criminal market manipulation. There is also much by way of defending by analysts an earlier doom and gloom prediction at all costs, perhaps to save one's own job and skin. For Apple, in the least this should be a lesson about the price of not having a large individual investor base by keeping its share price affordable. Moral: If you are an individual investor, stay away from stocks with very high instituional holdings.
11:57 AM on 02/06/2013
Luck or insider trading.
07:20 PM on 02/05/2013
Pundits and analysts who have never run a company or could run one only into to the ground are busy writing columns on what Apple needs to do. Every adjective for the company has been replaced overnight by their exact opposites. Ignored unfortunately are the blatant market manipulation by large investment groups who have pushed prices high and dumped at the expense of fools who are often their own customers. In any other place, there will be serious investigations of criminal market manipulation. There is also much by way of defending by analysts an earlier doom and gloom prediction at all costs, perhaps to save one's own job and skin. For Apple, in the least this should be a lesson about the price of not having a large individual investor base by keeping its share price affordable. The writing on the walll I read is this: If you are an individual investor, stay away from stocks with very high
11:08 AM on 02/06/2013
One lesson many investors forget, is whatever goes up can also go down. A share of stock is a piece of paper, and I always subscriped to the theory once there is a 20% profit in the stock, sell and move on. Holding for the long-run like your grand parents did is a "no-no." Too much can hapened and has. Stock market crash 2001, followed by a return performance in 2007. Analysts want you to believe in "dollar-cost-average, also known as throw more monay after a probablym bad idea. They can't make any money if you don't buy or sell.
photo
time1910
owner-operator germany
11:37 AM on 02/06/2013
stocks with very high ....what?