iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Daniel C. Maguire

GET UPDATES FROM Daniel C. Maguire
 

Paul Ryan's Catholic Problem

Posted: 08/21/2012 12:08 pm

Sound the alarm! There has been a Catholic coup d'etat in the United States of America! Six members of the Supreme Court are Catholics (just imagine the furore if six were Muslims or Jews!). Speaker of the House John Boehner and Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell are Catholics. And now, rising to top of this surging Catholic dynasty is the alleged Wunderkind of Republican economics, perky Paul Ryan.

Ryan wears his strange version of Catholicism with a jaunty sophomoric pride. "Catholic social doctrine is indispensable for officeholders." If only Paul Ryan knew what "Catholic social doctrine" is he would take flight from it just as fast as he is scrambling from the Ayn Rand breasts that, as he has proclaimed, suckled him and inspired all his political and economic views. Catholics who know the difference between Jesus Christ and Ayn Rand skewered perky Paul. They know that Jesus' mission, unlike Ayn Rand's, was "good news for the poor" (Luke 4:18). They embarrassed the righteous Ryan when he spoke at the Jesuit Georgetown University carrying a sprawling sign that asked: "Where were you, Paul Ryan, when they crucified the poor?"

Of course they know where he was. He was driving the nails into everything that helps the poor -- and remember most of "the poor" are children. Budgets are intensely moral documents. They show where the heart is. To budget-makers we can say: show me the losers and the winners and I will tel you what you are. The Ryan budget plan, embraced by Mitt Romney as "marvelous," puts greed over need. Among its losers: medicaid, medicare, food stamps, health insurance, preschool programs, environmental and financial regulations, Pell grants, Head Start, mortgage guarantees. "Are there no poor houses?"

The budget is not all sour. There are sweet tidings for the already engorged mega-rich. And as for the military, ah, yes, the military, Ryan feels they do not ask enough though they have never been known for modesty or timidity in their requests. Ryan would further feed that black hole in the economy that already sucks out some $2 million a minute. Kill-power is prized more highly than Head Start and Medicaid.

How Dare You, Paul Ryan!

How dare you invoke "Catholic social teaching" to bolster that warped and brutal vision! Had you presented that budget as an assignment in my theology class at Marquette University I would have had to give you an F and a note would go to your parents saying, "this student is wasting your tuition money." So, listen up, Paul, and I'll show you why the "Nuns on the Bus" and Catholic university faculties are storming against your Catholic pretensions. It is no major undertaking to correct you. That's why your ignorance must be classified as crass.

Just last year, in October 2011, Pope Benedict's Pontifical Council on Justice and Peace gave all the help you need. They summed up centuries of "Catholic social teaching" in a single document and applied it to today's tottering global economy. When asked about the document, you equivocated about whether you had read it. Clearly, from your recent utterances you either did not read it or you read it and trashed it. Small wonder. It would give Ayn Rand a stroke. Jesuit Thomas Reese said the document is "closer to the view of Occupy Wall Street that anyone in the U.S. Congress."

Catholic Social Teaching 101

Here it is in gist: The Vatican document supports fair taxation, greed-controlling regulation and bailouts "with public funds" when necessary. Now, brace yourself, Paul, it excoriates "neoliberals," the greed-is-good creed of your right wing. The document calls for an international solidarity that would end poverty and obsessive reliance on military violence for security. It calls for more active citizenship, not voter suppression. Internationally it calls for "a new model of a more cohesive, polyarchic international society that respects every people's identity within the multifaceted riches of a single humanity." It calls for a "public, supranational authority with universal jurisdiction, a "true world political authority" and a "world bank" to preside over a "global, universal common good." Nations need to "transfer a part of each nation's powers to a world authority and to regional authorities."

It does not call for a tyrannical despotic world authority. The traditional Catholic tradition of "subsidiarity" means that nothing should be done by a higher authority that can be done by active participation at lower levels. Right-winders like you grab that one word "subsidiarity" and claim it supports their maniacal hatred of government. It doesn't. The document, like the Hebrew and Christian Bibles, considers government the prime care-taker of the common good with a particular mission to protect the powerless and the poor from exploitation.

Catholic social teaching abhors despotism, either that of governments or that of corporate power that can enslave the poor of the world as it is now doing. The blood, sweat and tears of the poor are on our clothing, our shoes and on our iPads. Using what is cynically and euphemistically called "labor arbitrage," corporations ship most of their work to slave operations in "the third world."

Now at this point, my student, Paul Ryan, is squirming in his seat. What I had just taught, relying on papal teachings, is not right wing. It is left wing in as much as the left stresses social justice and fair distribution of wealth and opportunity, and the left has a preference for peace-power over kill-power.

So, Paul Ryan, call your knavish, mean-spirited budget plan what you will. But do not call it Catholic. Stop defaming and insulting the stirring compassion and richness of Catholic social teaching by associating it with your form of upper-class warfare.

Have you no shame!

 
 
 
FOLLOW RELIGION
 
 
  • Comments
  • 36
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Will Storm
03:16 PM on 08/27/2012
Professor Maguire,
You make some great points and clearly are able to find places where Ryan and the Church clash. But you take it much too far. I know it is a huffpost blog article, but if you provided details of Ryan's plan we would be more enticed to believe that his plan is tyrannical. Likewise, if you expressed why College of Cardinals have the ultimate word on economics, then their issues with Ryan's policy might seem more pragmatic.
evekat
Quod erat demonstratum
11:10 AM on 08/24/2012
Prof. MaGuire is right on point. Nowhere in Paul Ryan's record do I see any of the teachings of our Lord being followed, which is what the Roman Catholic Church encourages us all to do. The Ten Commandments are not the ten suggestions...and the first two are the most important. I don't say that we are not sinners..we are. that's why we go to church and try to practice them. He is in direct conflict with most of them,
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Will Storm
03:17 PM on 08/27/2012
I am unsure of where else we are to cut from. With such evil in the world a military presence is always necessary.
And giving money to the poor is not always the best way to help them.
evekat
Quod erat demonstratum
04:24 AM on 08/28/2012
I agree about the military presence as important and necessary. But feeding the multitude with a few loaves and fishes saves lives as well. Christ taught us to care for the poor and sick.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:45 AM on 08/23/2012
The Gospel of Philip sums it up this way on how & why Ryan and other's use religion: But truth brought names into existence in the world for our sakes, because it is not possible to learn it (truth) without these names. Truth is one single thing; it is many things and for our sakes to teach about this one thing in love through many things. The rulers (archons) wanted to deceive man, since they saw that he had a kinship with those that are truly good. They took the name of those that are good and gave it to those that are not good, so that through the names they might deceive him and bind them to those that are not good. And afterward, what a favor they do for them! They make them be removed from those that are not good and place them among those that are good. These things they knew, for they wanted to take the free man and make him a slave to them forever.

http://reluctant-messenger.com/gospel-of-philip.htm
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Giggie
01:47 AM on 08/23/2012
Tea party repubs display proudly a greedy, me first philosophy. They then define this philosophy as Christian, and patriotic, when in fact it is neither. Their distain for the vulnerable and the poor is downright cruel. They don't care if corporate America pollutes, and destroys the beautiful country. The worship the moneymaker, the sermonizer and the gun owner.
01:32 AM on 09/27/2012
Well said!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patriot47
05:16 PM on 08/22/2012
Professor Maguire was one of my favorite profs at Marquette. He is a treasure and this article shows why.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J T K
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
01:42 PM on 08/22/2012
Paul Ryan's views are incredibly out of line with Christian teachings, however I wonder how the people who say that he's a bad Catholic for not being in favor of social programs square that with the thought that these social programs are being paid for not out of charity, something Jesus would undeniably have supported, but under the threat of force and imprisonment, which Jesus would have abhorred, even if it were for the "greater good".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Canary503
An opinionated Iowan
02:24 PM on 08/22/2012
Jesus, being from the first century, had no exposure to democratic government, the essence of which is the people deciding what and how they will do together and then, delegating to their government the responsibility of carrying out their will. There is nothing in the New Testament to suggest that Jesus, or the holy spirit, would have "abhorred" such action.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J T K
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
04:35 PM on 08/22/2012
You are forcibly taking from some to pay for others. It's been quite a long time since I've considered myself a Christian and even longer since I read the Bible but I seem to remember various prohibitions about taking things that don't belong to you by force or threat of force. Of course I wouldn't say that all taxation is that because there is plenty of legitimate taxation but when you are taxing one group not for everyone's benefit but to redistribute the wealth then that is not really legitimately taxing a person to provide them a government service.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bterway
02:48 PM on 08/22/2012
Would be nice if private charity could take care of the social problems, but it can't. that is why the government has to step in to help those who can not be helped by private means.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J T K
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
04:36 PM on 08/22/2012
If that's the case then how can you justify criticizing someone for also not giving for charity? It strikes me as an either or proposition, not absolutely but at least on a moral level.
photo
Indigo1941
Time traveler.
11:38 AM on 08/22/2012
That's all well and good, richness and variety and what not but there's a bottom line here and the bottom line is that that's also all bogus.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theoriginalmatt
My Lords and Ladies; Ladies and Gentlemen...
04:21 AM on 08/22/2012
The irony of "traditional" Catholic laymen telling the magisterium what its teachings ought to mean will never cease to amaze me. In the American context they are so often Republicans who are surprised that Atlas Shrugged was not proclaimed ex cathedra. The whole thing smacks of congregationalism and is certainly not traditional Catholicism.
06:11 PM on 08/22/2012
It's too bad the Catholic hierarchy doesn't listen more to its lay people. They would have more members and not have some of the problems they have today.
photo
john1513
Ora et Labora
02:22 PM on 08/21/2012
This is all very flowery and passionate but you have not addressed how subsidiarity or a lack of subsidiarity is present in Ryan's budget or in any budget. You may think Ryan has a "maniacal hatred of government" but by your lack of argument you may very well be for a higher government with unlimited power of local entities.

If you write another article please consider addressing how local governments or private entities are unable to provide services that federal government tries and frequently fails to provide.

If you think "Nuns on the Bus" speak for the Catholic Church please consider getting to know your local bishop more.
05:29 PM on 08/21/2012
John, thank you so much for posting this. It's a shame that some uninformed Catholics will come across this Huffington article and think it speaks for the Church. There needs to be a balanced analysis made, and there is no such analysis present. Subsidiarity is mentioned, but not applied.
photo
john1513
Ora et Labora
10:21 AM on 08/22/2012
Some people think they can get away with attacking Catholics or Catholic teaching that doesn't align with their favorite political candidate. Sadly media hubs like HuffPo give them a free pass.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:48 PM on 08/21/2012
By your lack of argument you may well be frightened by government per se, or because Ryan or Rand says so. For no good reason that is.
photo
john1513
Ora et Labora
10:17 AM on 08/22/2012
I didn't write an article in HuffPo without describing an argument. It's common sense that matters are better handled and decisions better made at a local level as opposed to a higher level.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:22 PM on 08/21/2012
Now he's never going to read about what catholic social teaching is. Too bad. What a shame.