More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Daniel Dicker

GET UPDATES FROM Daniel Dicker

Strategic Petroleum Reserve Release Under Fire -- For Being Effective

Posted: 06/24/11 03:26 PM ET

Argue all you want about the release of 60 million barrels of crude oil from the International Energy Agency, including 30 million barrels from our own Strategic Petroleum Reserve, but one thing you can't argue is the level of its effectiveness -- it is killing the speculators and dropping prices like a stone, at least for now.

A lot of pushback from market analysts and oil mavens has emerged in the 24 hours since the IEA decision -- that President Obama's decision was politically motivated for one. Other pundits are convinced that the announcement was coordinated with the Bernanke speech that noted the slowdown in growth acceleration since the start of the recovery. Others are calling the SPR release a new "stimulus" plan, being used because so little is left to be done and the Federal Reserve is holding off on fresh monetary loosening, at least for the present.

Argue all the rationales you like, a different QE3, a way for Obama to get ahead of the 2012 elections, I don't know -- but whatever you do, don't argue how incredibly effective it's been and how much it will drop gasoline prices, even if only in the short term.

Crude oil dropped more than 6% on Thursday alone, despite the fact that the SPR release will represent a literal drop in the bucket -- that 60 million barrels is equivalent to 16 hours of global demand, nothing more. The downward move in prices that this release has created, considering how small it is, is nothing less than stunning.

It strikes at the heart of the speculators who have been flooding into the oil trade since the start of the year and particularly since the Egypt unrest. It is signalling, whether rightly or wrongly, that sovereign nations are going to use some pretty unorthodox tools to getting at and getting out some of that spec money with no connection to oil other than the desire to make money from a rising price. Along with margin hikes in the past month, this tool should scare the bejeezus out of the hedge fund players and prop desks -- the White House intimated that this release should not be considered a "one time only" event. As a market player, you've got to be nervous holding long positions with the influence of an SPR release being held over your head.

The timing also couldn't have been better -- It is when markets are under pressure that bearish news has the biggest impact. That's why the argument that oil prices were already coming down and the release was therefore unnecessary was misguided -- for full effectiveness, you'd want to release it as a straw to break a camel's back. With oil streaking higher, a release of reserves would have had far less impact.

Will more releases happen? Will this release "do the job" fully? Will it drop prices for the long-haul? Was it a misuse of the SPR and the reason it was created? Is this a political short-term answer to a mismanaged long-term energy policy?

All good questions, worthy of answers. But for now, there's no need to argue how much it has helped, if you're in favor of lower prices -- it's helped a lot.

 
 
 

Follow Daniel Dicker on Twitter: www.twitter.com/dan_dicker

Argue all you want about the release of 60 million barrels of crude oil from the International Energy Agency, including 30 million barrels from our own Strategic Petroleum Reserve, but one thing you c...
Argue all you want about the release of 60 million barrels of crude oil from the International Energy Agency, including 30 million barrels from our own Strategic Petroleum Reserve, but one thing you c...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:40 PM on 06/27/2011
I fully agree with the author that IEA decision to release strategic petroleam reserve has been very effective. The strongest confirmation of the effectiveness has come from the disapproval by Iran's Ahmadinejad. If he disapproves, it has to be good for US.
photo
thromulese
i have a scream
12:16 PM on 06/27/2011
Anything that cost the speculators and puts them in a difficult position sounds like great start to me.

Now we should do this every couple of months with NO prior announcements. If it keeps hurting the speculators who are running up the price of gas maybe…just maybe, they’ll stop. We all know congress will never put a stop to it.

Seems like a win win. The speculators lose, and drivers pay less for gas.
mikiao
Empty my micro-bio is.
05:45 PM on 06/27/2011
They wouldn't stop...they'd just become lazier with their excuses as to why the prices keep climbing. Instead of "unrest in the middle east caused oil prices to rise 10%" or "excessive government regulations forced oil prices up 10%" they'd say things like "bob had a cold, so oil is going up 10%" or "Hey, it's Elvis! and oil goes up 10%"
11:39 PM on 06/25/2011
For national security we need reserves to protect against countries who hate us stopping their sales to us. Of course prez. won't stop flying no matter the cost. Let the little people worry about the carbon emissions....not him or his group of elites.. He and his family and cronies are in the air with their massive entourages more than they are in Washington doing what they are paid for.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skeetshooter
Artist, writer, provocateur
09:13 PM on 06/25/2011
This is just more proof that business interests and those of Mahmood Ahmadinejad are in harmony: All want the US economy to stall, and to destroy the American middle class. -Then they'll have us right where they want us....
04:05 PM on 06/25/2011
Sell high, buy low. This could wipe out the deficit. Kill speculators by selling them too much of what they are jacking up the prices on and break their stranglehold -- the when prices fall, buy back at the lower price. Pay the difference to the deficit. Rinse, Repeat.
12:57 PM on 06/25/2011
Dan is always predicting whatever just happened. He was ravingly bullish on oil at 113.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Daniel Dicker
10:12 PM on 06/25/2011
I would like to see a link to that call, please ........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FogBelter
Illegitimis non carborundum
12:28 PM on 06/25/2011
It was a brilliant move by the IEA with long term upside in keeping the speculators from causing chaos in oil prices globally. It doesn't matter the amount of oil the IEA dumps either. The act of dumping the oil in itself was the coup. Investors are risk averse since privatizing the profits and socializing the losses became all the rage after the 2008 crash, and expect only upside to investments. The IEA introduced a potent new element into the oil market for speculators ... doubt that their positions are secure.

That doubt will divest oil speculators of confidence to manipulate the market for fear the IEA, without warning, can undermine oil positions with another release.

Beautiful move on the IEA's part, I wish I had thought of it.
12:59 PM on 06/25/2011
I don't think it's that potent, Fog. It's an easily-called bluff, since the Fed cannot print oil.
photo
thromulese
i have a scream
12:23 PM on 06/27/2011
my thoughts exactly

brilliant move

the proof was in the reaction as it related to the price of a barrel
04:59 AM on 06/25/2011
Just compare this to a partial course of antibiotics where the infection (speculators) will survive and return with a vengeance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph LeCompte
The USA isnt broke.It was robbed.
02:26 AM on 06/25/2011
The U.S. taxpayer owns that oil and Obama is our representative. We will do whatever we want with our oil
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dh Barr
Bringing Clues to the Clueless
12:44 AM on 06/25/2011
A quick downward push by dumping some SPR oil on the market isn't what is needed. An effective long-term energy policy is what is needed.

The CFTC is investigating exactly why the prices started plunging BEFORE the SPR release was publicly announced. It is starting to look like a few politically connected folks must have been trading on inside information folks.
10:31 PM on 06/24/2011
This was never the goal of having the SPR, it wasn't meant to used for price manipulation or political gain. My gut feeling (& I've watched the oil market for decades) is a one shot, sugar rush downward, then prices will return to their natural trend line. If you really want a downward trend, open the Gulf again, Alaska & California coast & ANWAR------then enjoy the rush..
08:04 PM on 06/24/2011
While I agree that the Obama administration is helping reduce oil prices, it is also increasing dependency on oil. Is this not the president and party that believes in renewable energy and reducing CO2? Democrats seem to have no long-term plan to deal with climate change or our long-term energy crisis.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
08:33 PM on 06/25/2011
The United States has no long-term plan for anything, just a bunch of short-term bubbles and the hangovers of the day after.
photo
castlerider
"A man's home is his castle"
03:19 PM on 06/27/2011
Leave it to a GOP'er to come yelling about a fly in his soup.

If Bush would've made the same move in '06 and '07 which HE REFUSED TO DO, We would'nt have lost so much from our economy starting way back then, and of course then you'd be stating what a genius classic move it was. Unfortunately, Ahmadenijad isn't very happy either. You can start a club and invite Iran, you and Cheney. Really patriotic of you, pal.
04:44 PM on 06/24/2011
are they serious?? wow