iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Daniel Swift

GET UPDATES FROM Daniel Swift
 

Shakespeare and the Book of Common Prayer

Posted: 09/16/2012 8:09 am

One of the last mysteries left in the study of Shakespeare's plays is the biggest of them all: How do they achieve their particular magic? What can explain their hold over us? One answer to this question lies in Shakespeare's use of a book with which most of us now have only a passing acquaintance, but which profoundly shaped his view of both this world and the other-worldly: the Book of Common Prayer.

The Book of Common Prayer is an extraordinary and too-often neglected work. It was first published in 1549, during the Reformation, as the handbook of the new English church which had just succeeded from Rome. The prayer book is foundational, both to the English church and state. Since the king and not the Pope was now head of the church, the Book of Common Prayer instituted and justified royal power, and English monarchs for the next century modified and edited the prayer book as soon as they arrived upon the throne. It is arguably the closest document Britain has to a constitution.

But the prayer book does not concern only earthly power. It sets out the church rites for baptism, marriage, communion and funeral; it dictates the proper cycle of prayer for each day of the Christian year. It is therefore concerned with salvation, with the fate of the soul and the means to avoid damnation, and so its specific phrases matter very seriously. Royal power, holy words, divine law, magic and the supernatural, politics and faith: these are elements of Shakespeare's plays, perhaps most extremely in Macbeth, which is a play modeled upon the prayer book.

As Macbeth, late at night, contemplates the murder of King Duncan, he gives a famous speech, beginning: "Is this a dagger which I see before me?" He speaks of his fear, at what he is about to do, and looks down and pleads:

Thou sure and firm-set earth,
Hear not my steps, which was they walk, for fear
Thy very stones prate of my whereabout.

He is longing for silence, that his footsteps shall not echo, and having done so he exits to kill the king. Critical editions of the play often include an entry next to these lines, as commentators note the oddity of the phrasing: it is perhaps surprising that a character should wish for silence by speaking out loud. This is a curious, rich moment.

The words "walk" and "ways," and their combination in phrases such as "ways they walk" and "walk in his ways" are very common in the Bible, particularly the psalms. The Book of Common Prayer sets out the uses and applications of the psalms: the rite for marriage, for example, includes a cycle of psalms. Psalm 128 -- "Blessed is every one that feareth the Lord and walketh in his ways" -- opens this cycle, and the phrase "walk in his ways" was a common text for wedding sermons.

The prayer book, therefore, links this phrase to marriage: in the play, this holy phrase is borrowed by a murderer who is also married: to Lady Macbeth, who taunts and bullies him into the act of murder. Their marriage is at the centre of the play. These lines from the play echo the prayer book deliberately, and as they resonate they deepen our encounter.

This is not the only echo. After the murder, Macbeth asks: "Will all great Neptune's ocean wash the blood/ Clean from my hand?" But no, he answers immediately; his guilt will instead turn the ocean to its color, "making the green one red." In the baptism rite in the Book of Common Prayer the priest leads the congregation through a prayer about "the Red Sea," a symbol of Christ's promise of "the mystical washing away of sin." This prayer is followed by another which asks: "Open the gate unto us that knock." In Macbeth the scene of bloody handwashing is interrupted by a knocking at the gate.

This continues: in the play, the witches promise that Macbeth may "laugh to scorn/ The power of man, for none of woman born/ Shall harm Macbeth," and he quotes this like a prayer. "What's he/ That was not born of woman?" he repeats, and he believes that he is safe from his enemies. Perhaps he should have been paying closer attention to the Book of Common Prayer, where the phrase "Man that is born of woman, hath but a short time to live, and is full of misery" appears at the very beginning of the rite for the burial of the dead.

Shakespeare's original audience would have been chilled by these words, and Macbeth should have been too. As modern readers, we may miss these echoes, but for the crowds who gathered at the Globe to first hear these plays, these were common phrases, as well known as any other words. The Book of Common Prayer is one of the hidden ingredients of Shakespeare's plays: it is a skeleton beneath the skin of the best-known literary works of our or any time.

 
FOLLOW RELIGION
One of the last mysteries left in the study of Shakespeare's plays is the biggest of them all: How do they achieve their particular magic? What can explain their hold over us? One answer to this quest...
One of the last mysteries left in the study of Shakespeare's plays is the biggest of them all: How do they achieve their particular magic? What can explain their hold over us? One answer to this quest...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 62
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
06:19 PM on 11/12/2012
I was surprised that your article doesn't mention William Tyndale, and yet among scholars you will hear the phrase "Without Tyndale, no Shakespeare." While I applaud the Book of Common Prayer and its author, and while you may even be right about possible points of influence, it was Tyndale's 1526/1534 New Testament that emancipated the English language that a few generations later would bloom under the gaze of genius (like Shakespeare). Harold Bloom wrote that Tyndale is the "only true rival of Shakespeare, Chaucer, and Walt Whitman as the richest author in the English language." This is a powerful endorsement. This is not a religious issue, its a linguistic one, a matter of influence. To be fair (and complete) we must move Tyndale to the front of the line. Cranmer must concede. Bottom the Weaver says "The eye of man hath not heard, the ear of man hath not seen, man's hand is not able to taste, his tongue to conceive, nor his heart to report, what my dream was." This is Bottom's (Shakespeare's) delicious malapropism of Tyndale's [original spelling] "The eye hath not sene and the eare hath not hearde nether have entred into the herte of man ye thinges which God hath prepared for them that love him." 1 Cor. 2:9. I love your article, and it has tremendous merit. The lens just needed to be widened a bit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Yeshu Abraham
04:11 AM on 10/09/2012
This is not the only experience of this neurosurgeon. Many people involved in accidents and left unconscious have vividly explained their supernatural experiences. Many have seen Jesus and they were carried off to a zone of peace and happiness. Many have seen their dead parents beckoning them to a place of serenity. Many persons on their deathbed have made signs as if they are responding to someone calling them and even speaking to someone not visible to others. These experiences make Hindu beliefs of reincarnation and transmigration null and void. Hinduism says that after death a man becomes a dog or a Brahmin according to his karma or life on earth. Hinduism is mythological and the beliefs are imaginary. No one has seen a dead person coming back as a dog. But the belief that the soul will be alive even after death is powerfully portrayed by Shakespeare when Hamlet's dead father appears to him and explains how he was murdered by his uncle in connivance with his mother.So the live experience of . .Dr. Eben Alexander confirms the Christian belief in the immortality of soul.
06:04 PM on 09/24/2012
I LOVE knowing this - it makes so much sense, especially being a cradle to grave Episcopalian.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cindbird
Using my head for something other than a hat rack.
11:13 PM on 09/20/2012
This is the first article I've ever seen that brought up the Book of Common Prayer. Thank you. Understanding how that book lent weight to the Shakespearean Plays adds greater dimension to the understanding of the plays themselves. Once again, Thank you.
photo
dpkjj
Peace on Earth
05:52 PM on 09/20/2012
Interesting article.
10:32 PM on 09/19/2012
Harold Bloom, noted Shakespeare commentator (Yale & CCNY) maintains: "Shakespeare expresses no opinion about any religious matter." Another scholar says: "Shakespeare does not tell us WHAT to do; rather he shows us what happens to us if we do not do the right thing." Others have written about Shakespeare's role in the poetry of the King James version of the Bible. (see what you think) One of Bloom's salient comments is: "Shakespeare teaches us how to be human." Can you be human without a religious core of forgiveness, care for the other, a concern for justice...? Your article @ the Book of Common Prayer was a thoughtful piece & true I think. Pax
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cindbird
Using my head for something other than a hat rack.
11:17 PM on 09/20/2012
I'm with you on everything you said except one, "Can you be human without a religious core of forgiveness," Yes, you can. Forgiveness isn't contingent on religious belief. Forgiveness is a human action, not religious one, even though most, if not all, religions focus on it. Personally, I think it is one of the greatest human attributes, the others being love and compassion.
03:30 PM on 11/11/2012
Ah yes. Bloom. The most respected figure in academia...
02:05 PM on 09/19/2012
"new English church which had just succeeded from Rome."

How does one succeed from anything? Or did the South succeed from the Union?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cindbird
Using my head for something other than a hat rack.
11:21 PM on 09/20/2012
King Henry VIII refused to recognize the Pope as head of the Church and broke away. Mostly because the Pope refused to allow him to divorce his wife, Anne Boleyn. The entire Catholic Church of England left the Catholic Church en mass and formed the Church of England. That's how.
10:09 PM on 09/21/2012
But... the Church of England did not succeed from Rome, it seceded.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dnanbart
01:36 PM on 09/22/2012
I believe that Henry VIII wanted to divorce his first wife, Catherine of Aragon, and the Church did not allow for this, which resulted in the schism whereby the Catholic Church in England became reformed as the Church of England.
10:12 AM on 09/26/2012
The article's writer is correct.

suc•ceed
6. to come next after something else in an order or series.
7. to come after and take the place of, as in an office or estate.
8. to come next after in an order or series, or in the course of events; follow.
03:00 PM on 09/27/2012
No, he ain't!  There is no order, series or office involved.  The new English church might be a successor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PlayBall101
09:17 PM on 09/18/2012
The book of Common Prayer is amazing.
05:21 PM on 09/18/2012
We tend to find ourselves in a quagmire of analysis when we should just enjoy the play. It is way to easy, especially when dealing with the Bard, that we intellectualize plays, poems, sports, and writing when we and they are best served by being in the moment and enjoying them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:18 PM on 09/18/2012
con•sti•tu•tion/ˌkänstəˈt(y)o͞oSHən/

Noun:
A body of fundamental principles or established precedents according to which a state or other organization is acknowledged to be governed,
Or, A written record of this

The book of common prayer is not that document and its advices are not those precedents.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cindbird
Using my head for something other than a hat rack.
11:25 PM on 09/20/2012
That is EXACTLY what the Book of Common Prayer is. A document which outlines how royal power is to be exercised and how the common peasants are live and pray during daily life. Read it and you'll understand.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:32 AM on 09/21/2012
Well technically my Irish
Catholicism forbids me to read heretical Anglican material but I’ll give it a
go, despite the fact that my pavlovian training causes me to baulk at the
thought. Flipped through the contents and scanned some passages, on the face of
it I see no constitutional arrangements implicit or identifiable in modern Britain. If this
has constitutional value then I suspect that anything could. The power of monarchy
is probably defined more by Magna Carta and the conditions of the reinstatement
of the monarch in the mid 1600’s rather than derived form a populist commentary
of life and values in 1552. Monarchy has been deriving validity from god since
the instatement of the first holy roman emperor in 800. It is interesting
though that 400 years later the British nobles clipped the wings of those who benefited
from this divine positive ordinance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DavidEm
Top 1% own 40% US wealth; top 20%, 93%. Democracy?
01:21 PM on 09/18/2012
I don't find this article convincing at all.

The examples used were common in religious (well, Christian) language, and even in the ordinary speech of the time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ttsgw
Atheist and secular humanist
11:57 AM on 09/18/2012
Shakespeare was a man of the old faith all his live. Some of his close relatives and friends were executed by the reign of Elisabeth I. He was dangerous close to be a victim himself.
10:55 AM on 09/18/2012
As an Anglican, a Catholic, or a lover of nature, Shakespeare was always concerned with showing us our humanity, and an empathy with our divided human nature is what makes his writings, in addition to the language, so compelling. He promoted humane relations among people, a message sorely needed in his time, by depicting our capacity for good and evil, and the inhumane consequences of evil acts. Whatever else he was, he was a humanist, and probably a Christian humanist. But he could have been a religiously skeptical Christian humanist.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:13 PM on 09/18/2012
well he certainly wasn't afraid of incurring the wrath of mocked scorned witches unlike some.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hawkseye
we have nothing to fear but fear itself
05:14 PM on 09/17/2012
When I taught high school English, I could always tell from their writings who were Episcopalians who had attended church frequently.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Gina Ryder
Community Editor
11:08 AM on 09/18/2012
Hi there. Thanks for commenting. That's so interesting you could tell about your student's faith habits from their writing. Can you explain more? What specifically tipped you off?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hawkseye
we have nothing to fear but fear itself
01:13 PM on 09/18/2012
Elegant phrasing and high level vocabulary.  Sometimes their writing was a bit on the stilted side, but it was easy to get them over that. 
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sean Quaint
04:06 PM on 09/18/2012
Maybe he meant the ones who prefaced each piece by stating, "I will now read from page 309 in the red Book of Common Prayer."
02:31 PM on 09/17/2012
Shakespeare's belief in Nature and the nature of things seems to me stronger than his faith, and I suspect that his vague religiosity, which I'd place somewhere between deism and agnostic theism, was dictated as much by King James's Bible as by common custom. He absorbed everything through Language.