iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Danielle Crittenden

Danielle Crittenden

GET UPDATES FROM Danielle Crittenden

Let Them Eat Twinkies

Posted: 11/29/10 11:57 AM ET

It's bad enough that President Obama is nationalizing our health care -- that he's leading the economy to socialist ruin -- and generally seeking vengeance against the white man on behalf of his African ancestors.

But now his bossy wife and her government minions want to tell you what to eat. Just like your mother when she said you couldn't have dessert until you'd finished your peas. Except more sinister. Way more sinister.

This is the latest paranoid fantasy being hatched by my compadres on the right: that, in an effort to fight rising and dangerous levels of obesity amongst Americans, Big Mother is going to come into your homes, snatch that breakfast soda out of your pudgy hands, and force feed you a fresh carrot from the White House garden.

As Rush Limbaugh warned his listeners on Nov. 9:

Anyway, Michelle Obama's on this big obesity kick, right? Gotta eat healthy stuff, gotta eat the garbage that she grows in the garden, nothing but fruits and vegetables...Michelle Obama wants to spend $400 million to combat food deserts. She's all upset that the only food available to poor urban people are convenience stores, the 7-Elevens. What did Biden say, you can't go in one without finding an Indian? Yeah, that's what Joe Bite Me said. So she's complaining about food deserts, and Michelle Obama wants to punish Big Food and Big Retail for not putting quality food stores in poor neighborhoods, right? And that's why there's an obesity epidemic, right?

And Big Mother ain't stopping there. She's going after your children, too. She wants to undermine your parental authority and tell them what to eat: no more greasy pizza slices, deep-fried processed chicken parts, transfat-injected "cake" substances, and high-fructose soft drinks in their school cafeterias.

Sarah Palin recently boasted on her Twitter feed that she would defy a supposed Pennsylvania state cookie ban:

"I'll intro kids 2 beauty of laissez-faire via serving them cookies amidst school cookie ban debate; Nanny state run amok!"

That tweet publicized a Palin speech at Plumstead Christian Academy on Nov. 9:

"I look at Pennsylvania and I think of sweets -- I think of Hershey. Then I think, how dare they ban sweets from school here."

In a surprising departure from her reputation for strictest truth, Palin mischaracterized Pennsylvania's proposed nutrition guidelines. Sweets are not banned from Pennsylvania public schools. The state's department of education will however recommend that schools consolidate in-class birthday parties to one per month -- and that parents sponsoring the parties be asked to ensure that healthier eating options are made available to children.

What's also surprising is that Palin described her cookie giveaway as an introduction to laissez faire. Palin did not charge for her cookies. (To be precise: she did not charge an additional price, above her reputed $75,000 speaking fee.) Handouts are okay, so long as they come from Mama Grizzly.

Interviewed on Laura Ingraham's radio program before Thanksgiving, Palin expanded on her thesis that junk food = freedom:

Take her [Michelle Obama's] anti-obesity thing that she is on. She is on this kick, right. What she is telling us is she cannot trust parents to make decisions for their own children, for their own families in what we should eat. And I know I'm going to be again criticized for bringing this up, but instead of a government thinking that they need to take over and make decisions for us according to some politician or politician's wife priorities, just leave us alone, get off our back, and allow us as individuals to exercise our own God-given rights to make our own decisions and then our country gets back on the right track.

Currently, more than 72 million American adults face serious medical consequences because of their weight. Nearly 17% of children aged 2-19 face the same risks because they are clinically obese. Obesity and being overweight are most likely to afflict the poor and racial minorities.

Palin might not have noticed much adolescent obesity during her visit to Plumstead Academy. Plumstead is located in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, the nation's 76th wealthiest county, and is 90% white. Besides, her visit occurred after school hours, at 7:30 in the evening.

But the spiraling obesity rates Palin mocks are increasingly having an impact on health care costs, which in turn affects the way we must approach and debate reforms to the health care system. Those least able to afford health care disproportionately need it in large part because of the unhealthy food they eat -- and that is served to their children in government-run schools. We've arrived at a point where inner-city children can't identify common fresh vegetables and fruits, such as cauliflower, tomatoes, and potatoes.

Perhaps you regard it as an intolerable violation of personal liberty for government to campaign for nutritional awareness? What then do we call the federal agricultural subsidies that have helped to lower the price of super-abundant junk food? Can you explain why it's okay for government to campaign against smoking and in favor of seatbelts? Or do you also oppose those life-saving public safety campaigns? Or is it perhaps that you have decided that everything the Obamas do is so intrinsically wrong that criticism of the Twinkie now makes you un-American?

That last sentence seems to describe Rush Limbaugh's point of view. Rush recently argued to his listeners that Americans should be eating more Twinkies and exercising less.

What have I told you about diet and exercise? Exercise is irrelevant. What matters in losing weight is what you eat, pure and simple, and how much, nothing more than that. And everybody tries to tell me I'm wrong, that I don't know what I'm talking about. And every time a story comes out on this I am validated, and nobody has ever said, "Rush, you know, you were right about this." This is CNN, their Web page: "For 10 weeks, Mark Haub, a professor of human nutrition at Kansas State University, ate one of these sugary cakelets [Twinkies] every three hours, instead of meals. To add variety in his steady stream of Hostess and Little Debbie snacks, Haub munched on Doritos chips, sugary cereals and Oreos, too." This is a nutrition professor. "His premise: That in weight loss, pure calorie counting is what matters most -- not the nutritional value of the food."

Never mind that Limbaugh inaccurately describes Haub's study (Haub ate fresh fruit and vegetables along with the sugary cakelets). The headline conclusion Limbaugh draws from Haub's work may well be, and most probably is, correct. A steady reduction in daily calorie intake results in a steady reduction of weight. Cocaine-taking, chain-smoking models also famously keep the pounds off. Perhaps Limbaugh's next monologue could promote a cigarettes-and-cocaine diet?

Here we come to the heart of the destructive craziness of what begs to be called Junk Food Conservatism. Palin, Limbaugh and the others may sincerely believe that "Big Government" is taking advantage of the increase in child and adult diabetes, heart disease and all-manners of obese-related illnesses to trample on our God-given freedom to guzzle soda and eat candy. But in the end, here's the political message they are sending from their own wealthy, option-filled, Subzero-equipped enclaves to this country's poorest and unhealthiest:

Let them eat Twinkies.

This article was cross-posted on FrumForum.

 
 
 

Follow Danielle Crittenden on Twitter: www.twitter.com/dcrittenden1

 
 
  • Comments
  • 181
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
11:57 PM on 12/05/2010
Michelle Obama is absolutely right to encourage healthier eating for children in this country and her campaign is highly appropriate for her role as First Lady. What's troubling is the government's wish to make judgment calls that parents should be making for their kids. I even think it's fine to regulate lunch programs and availability of soft drinks in public (only) schools, but when they start talking about banning bake sales, we've clearly jumped the shark, people...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:45 AM on 12/06/2010
I agree.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Maribeth Curry
12:36 PM on 11/30/2010
How insane, obesity is insuring that the next generation of Americans will be sick but we're complaining because Michelle is using her position to encourage good eating????

How stupid is that?

No one complained when Nancy Reagan preached, "Just say NO to drugs"!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:46 AM on 12/06/2010
Bake sales = drug sales?

Flawed logic.
photo
FirstSpeaker
Emergency nurse. Tu ne cede malis....
10:37 AM on 11/30/2010
This is just one of many areas of daily life that government wants to control. The problem that folks have with these government schemes is that they extend the reach and control of the central government, not the particulars of whatever the government power grab of the day may be. This is not a proper function of government.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheTrue Pooka
08:04 AM on 11/30/2010
So when is Rush going to speak out against Ronald Regan's "National Fitness Award" for youths? In 1985 the Regan administration used that award to do a survey of the fitness of American school children. That's right, Ronald Regan used our children as *gasp* guinea pigs!!!

I don't suppose Rush will ever do a rant about that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carl Caroli
I just don't understand people
07:46 AM on 11/30/2010
Limbaugh will say what ever he can think of to make people people hate Obama. He's disgustingly transparent to anyone with half a brain.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RichieB
Science is true whether you believe it or not
08:20 AM on 11/30/2010
Exactly right. But you have to have at least half a brain and his audience - - well, just saying - -
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
glockman
07:44 AM on 11/30/2010
They probably won't come into our homes to force us to eat carrots, but they will certainly come into our schools where our children are held captive and force them to east carrots.

Don't know if that's a good or bad thing (probably good), but it's still a reality.
09:03 AM on 11/30/2010
As a school board member I have the responsibility to make any food program at our school a nutritious program. No one has to buy a school lunch, but what we provide can't tend to make our children less healthy. Ergo, we either have a nutritious choice or no school lunch program at all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
glockman
09:36 AM on 11/30/2010
That's why I said it's probably a good thing. I'm always at odds at how the school system treats individual choice and necessary overall good. It's a difficult balancing act.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fuzzwald
07:33 AM on 11/30/2010
This is natural selection in action. I only wish that in Rush's case it would work a bit faster.
photo
WaveRhydr
DIEBOLD-WE VOTE SO YOU DONT HAVE TO
05:54 AM on 11/30/2010
What "we" are eating now, and feeding "our" kids, aint what we think. It may look like, taste like, feel like what went by the same name decades ago, but today is no longer made with anything we would select to use in our own cooking.

We all know that many foods have preservatives in them. "We" eat them, and feed them to "our" children and think nothing of it. Try thinking of this scenario; Someone offers your child up a bar of frozen preservatives from their freezer. No one, not even the dumbest would let their child touch that chemical glop...yet we feed them that bit by bit in processed foods.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:23 AM on 11/30/2010
"...the garbage that she grows in the garden..."

Mr Limbaugh is so blatantly anti-Obama (not in the way that rational political disagreement exists, but simply displaying a personal hatred of the Obama family) that he can actually characterize home-grown produce as "garbage". I have never seen garbage grown in a garden. I think a more reliable source would be right-wing talk radio.
photo
WaveRhydr
DIEBOLD-WE VOTE SO YOU DONT HAVE TO
05:59 AM on 11/30/2010
I think you are wrong to focus on limbaughs words and draw the conclusion that he is anti Obama. He is anti what hes paid to be anti against.

Another way to convey what Im getting at is that limbaugh is paid by the people wanting to sell their poison to us all to make his listeners (low information voters), want to keep eating it.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
PenGoddess
We are the Universe
01:40 PM on 11/30/2010
Bingo, waverhydr. That is it exactly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:36 AM on 11/30/2010
"In a surprising departure from her reputation for strictest truth, Palin mischaracterized Pennsylvania's proposed nutrition guidelines."

-- A departure from her "reputation for strictest truth". Seriously, this was a surprise to the author?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anastomosis
Firstly do no harm
03:42 AM on 11/30/2010
Irony, the term is Irony.
You really must get around a bit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kevinbr38
Give Me A Pig Foot....
05:44 AM on 11/30/2010
LOL.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:52 PM on 11/30/2010
Um, you do know that the author is a Republican? So where would the so-called "irony" be from one Repub to another? Looks like YOU need to get around a bit, my dear.
photo
TurnToTheLeft
We have nothing to lose but our chains.
01:54 AM on 11/30/2010
Thank you for your article. One of the BEST moves by the Obama Administration is to highlight healthy eating. Over the past 30 years I have seen our nation grow into a herd of diabetic bison people who are hooked on high fructose corn syrup and chemically altered flowers, grease and preservatives. Everyone has heard the real stories about still "edible" 3 year old Twinkies found under the seats of there car - that is not food - that is a science project. While out in public I see a herd of knock-kneed obese bison people. This used to be unusual rather than normal. Not all of these people are funny either - used to come with the territory if you were going to take up 2 seats on the bus. People should question what they eat. If I eat something fattening it has real cream, butter and chocolate in it and NO preservatives.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:37 AM on 11/30/2010
Coming to my home and force-feeding my family fresh fruit and vegetables! There are times over the past 25 years when I would have fallen upon the neck of such a person ... and wept tears of gratitude.

Any sensible parent at the end of their tether with dinner-time whingeing and tantrums - would queue to sign up for such a service.

And that's just for my husband.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MNKen
You're not the boss of me...my cat is!
10:54 AM on 11/30/2010
LOL !!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
PenGoddess
We are the Universe
01:42 PM on 11/30/2010
LOL...sad but true! But you are obviously a woman who cares about her family and its well-being.
01:19 AM on 11/30/2010
My neighbors kid was around 260 lbs at 12 years old. She talked about all the medicine she had to take because of diabetes and cholesterol and pains and aches on her knees. Does this country really think this is a matter of freedom? If it is, then anyone is responsible for their actions at any age. If this is also not correct, then should the parents not be responsible for their childs condition? Oh, freedom is without regard for the right. Sorry, no one will convince me this is ok for these conditions to go unchecked and tolerated.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AndrewC1973
12:57 AM on 11/30/2010
Can you imagine if Bush would have tried something like this? Oh wait, he did:

Steps to a HealthierUS
Obesity, diabetes, and asthma are some of the most prevalent and costly chronic health problems facing the nation. Increased exercise and better nutrition are simple measures that can prevent or delay many chronic diseases. The Steps to a HealthierUS program will fund innovative community-based programs that seek to adopt proven measures to reduce the burden of obesity, diabetes, and asthma-related complications, with a particular focus on youth. The President's 2004 budget requests $125 million for Steps to a HealthierUS.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
PenGoddess
We are the Universe
01:44 PM on 11/30/2010
Oh, so Michelle is being chastised for being better at getting the job done than Bush did. Hmmmm...par for the conservative, libertarian course.
12:44 AM on 11/30/2010
You are trying to talk logic to the wingnuts? The right has moved so far to the right, you and David are now left of the center. Now you see how the rest of us have been going through all these years. Welcome to sanity.