iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Danielle Crittenden

Danielle Crittenden

Posted: April 18, 2010 06:55 PM

Sarah Palin's Regional Tour

What's Your Reaction:

It's useful to glimpse celebrities doing the regional circuit: Away from the flattering lights of Broadway or Hollywood, you see what kind of performer they are. Can they handle a stripped down stage and a drunken heckler?

I was thinking this as I watched Sarah Palin "perform" in a "hospitality center," called Carmen's Banquet Hall, on Thursday night in the suburbs of Hamilton, Ontario, a steeltown about 45 minutes west of Toronto.

The event was a charity fundraiser for inner-city Hamilton kids. My father and I attended as guests of the Toronto Sun newspaper, a sponsor of the event. Palin collected a fee somewhere between $100,000 to $200,000 (according to which press report you read) for a speech, book-signing, and VIP photo-session. Some 900 people paid $200 per plate to hear Palin speak and to bid on Palin-phanalia: signed posters; McCain-Palin election flotsam; personalized Sarah Palin vintages of Ontario wine; and the big prize, the actual upholstered seats from which she and an interviewer would take questions after the speech. (The seats ultimately sold for C$3400.)

A thick police presence safeguarded Palin against the one lone protestor. He carried a placard, "Honk for our healthcare." No one honked.

We parked and joined a sea of guests dressed to the nines, as if for a wedding. Palin had issued elaborate advance rules: No jeans. No cameras or recording devices during the speech. (It was permitted to photograph her as she drifted through the lobby.) No questions from the media during the question and answer portion of the evening.

The lights dimmed. Bagpipes heralded the entry of the head table. Todd Palin filed in-but not Sarah. Where was she?

Once the others were seated, there was an anticipatory hush as the crowd looked toward the doors. John Cougar Mellencamp's "Small Town" suddenly blasted over the sound system. Then in burst Palin with her signature wave.

I've attended dozens of these dinners over the years. I've seen Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher speak. I've never witnessed anything like this kind of solo rock start entry.

The charity had clearly negotiated maximum value for its money. Palin entered at seven, but was not scheduled to speak until nine. My dad and I sadly assessed the "Alaskan crab bruschetta" pre-set in front of us. I poured us each a glass of Ontario's finest, and opened up the "Scrabble" app on my iPhone.

Before the program began, the dinner chair had warned the audience that nobody was to approach the dais uninvited. Again, I've never before attended a political dinner at which it was thought necessary to say such a thing out loud. (If anyone ever drunkenly worked up the courage to do so, a Reagan or Thatcher would be unfailingly gracious while a security guard swiftly intervened to escort the guest back to his or her seat.) And as the evening proceeded, a preselected few were escorted up by charity officials to say hello. But no one else dared to do so.

It might seem--may I say elitist?--for Palin to flinch from chatting or signing autographs. And it became apparent that this impulse wasn't, in the end, out of her desire to receive celebrity treatment a la Angelina Jolie or Alex Rodriguez (God forbid a random Joe Six Pack wearing jeans might actually approach her to ask for an autograph!): Clearly, Palin feared any unscripted or unmanaged engagement--and not for what the unscreened person might do or say, more out of her own insecurity about what she might do or say.

Well, she's been burned a lot, you might argue--and burned more than most politicians in her situation. Yes and no. Politics, as the cliché goes, is a rough game--and she has not been put through any more of a personal wringer than, say, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Edwards, Newt Gingrich or any other political figure who steps up to the plate in the Big Leagues. She's just proven less adept at taking it.

So who cares, really--except that her entire image is based on her own projection of a fearless, moose-dressing, rifle-wielding, backwoods kind of gal who can take it; who indeed can take anything and, with fire and a bit of salt, turn it into a tasty stew. (As she told the tea partiers on the Boston Common last week: "Is this what 'change' is all about? I want to tell 'em: Nah, we'll keep clinging to our Constitution and our guns and our religion--and you can keep the change.")

But as I was witnessing at this regional performance--far away from the ruthless Beltway critics, surrounded by friendly, polite Canadians paying to see her for goodness' sakes--she would not risk even a single random encounter. One of my tablemates was a reporter who had been awarded an "exclusive" interview with Palin before the dinner--part of the deal of the Sun's sponsorship of the event. Palin had given her 30 minutes, then just before the interview cut it back to 15, and then five minutes. Five minutes. Just enough time to have her photo taken and answer one question (which turned out to be the familiar, Are you running in 2012?). And even that question had to be submitted in advance.

Finally, Palin surmounted the podium. The crowd gave her a standing ovation and then sat back, waiting to get their $200-per-plate worth.

Dinner speeches by politicians normally adhere to a few simple rules. The politician begins by thanking her hosts and any person in the room who might be insulted if overlooked. She follows with a couple of tested jokes. Then she speaks for approximately 20 minutes (this is key for a dinner-time speech, when the audience is tired), making no more than three key points. It's not rocket-science.

But Palin couldn't manage it. Her 45-minute speech rambled all over the place, from her challenges as a mother facing a teenage pregnancy and a Downs-syndrome baby to Todd's Iron Dog racing to the tea partiers to Alaska-Canada ties, wildlife, the Al-Can highway to God helping us take back this nation and stand up for small business, to common sense solutions, to Plato telling us to be nice to others, to getting' our economy workin' again, to the importance of community, to ice hockey and the Olympics--in short, her familiar carpool-mother-with-Tourettes-syndrome.

It was hard to figure out whether she was working up some Christian motivational routine, or just kvetching about her poor treatment by the media, or trying to demonstrate her political cred by hitting the right "facts" about Canada-U.S. relations.

If you tried to parse it, you couldn't. There was not a single memorable line, not a single new political idea, not a single proffered solution beyond the cliché of "needing new solutions." And when the moderator "opened the floor to questions," guess what? Even those questions had to be written down by the tables and submitted in advance, to be selectively chosen by the moderator. Our table mischievously submitted, "Who is your favorite Canadian Prime Minister?" but for some reason it wasn't asked.

But no matter. The audience seemed pleased enough. While a number bolted the moment she finished speaking--not wanting to linger for the Q&A--and another bunch were already gathered in the parking lot, smoking--it seemed that most people had gotten what they'd come for. Again, it was not a political audience. There were no voters or tea partiers here. They wanted to see what they saw on TV-the political equivalent of the tour of Les Miz. She left them feeling peppy and uplifted, humming the last few bars of the hit tune. To that degree, she did not disappoint.

It was political theater--but not political leadership.

 
 
 

Follow Danielle Crittenden on Twitter: www.twitter.com/dcrittenden1

 
 
  • Comments
  • 736
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Texas Aggie
11:04 PM on 04/20/2010
I've made the comment before, but the reason that people need to keep an eye on what this woman is doing and saying is that the nonRon Paul tea partiers seem to think she knows what she is doing and act accordingly. And they have weapons and the stupidity to use them. If we are going to deal with the wing nuts, we need to know what they are being fed.
01:15 PM on 04/20/2010
Sarah Palin would have to pay ME big bucks for me to sit down and listen to her drone on and on. I could be getting a pedicure instead.
11:41 AM on 04/20/2010
Beware, America. This sounds just like Cowboy Ron to me.

Look what we got from him. Thirty years of voodoo economics has just about destroyed the country.

Sarah will finish us off, for sure.
11:39 AM on 04/20/2010
Barack Obama has been through the ringer? Give me a break!! He is the most press-coddled politician ever. His relationships to Ayers and Wright were never fully explored - not even close to even how trivial matters of Sarah Palin were.
photo
PDinCA
Clarity has reared its ugly head again
12:08 PM on 04/20/2010
Black is white. War is peace.
03:51 PM on 04/20/2010
I also agree with that, the press coddled Obama and tried to hide his connections to Ayers. I still believe that Ayers should be behind bars for the things he did. And they did it all because Obama was the one running on the democrat ticket, if Obama had been running on the Republican ticket the press would have connected him to Ayers and anyone else they could have.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Texas Aggie
10:58 PM on 04/20/2010
Considering that when Ayres was active, Obama was something like seven years old, it takes a whole lot of wingnuttery to conclude that they have some sort of hidden close connection.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pahpah25
11:33 AM on 04/20/2010
it is interesting to see that some CANADIANS are as dumb as some AMERICANS..........
10:14 AM on 04/20/2010
" Money for Nothing" by Dire Straits would be more appropriate, but they don't like her either!

Lets see $200 per ticket x 900 people = 1800.00 - 150,000 for 20 minutes of None Speech from a Non Qualified, Know Nothing proven Liar and you get a negative -$148,200.00 to begin your event. Now you have to pay for the hall, the catering, the staff and then the participants are fleeced at a book signing and photo session for money! Seems like a Con that would make Ponzi smile!
Then comes Palins Rider to her contract ....First class plane? First class hotel, food etc...Backstage costs....and don't forget ...." NO BROWN M & M's !!!! .....The problem is Van Halen would draw 80-90,000 tickets for say 80.00 per tix grossing 7.2 Million!!!
AND PALIN DOE NOT EVEN SING OR WRITE SONGS !!

p.s. Stop using John Cougar Mellencamp's music ....He does not authorize it or like Palin !!!
10:47 AM on 04/20/2010
Your math's a bit off- 900 X 200 is 180,000. But that was my first reaction also- that net minus all expenses and what's left? Maybe she cut her fee since it was a charity event- donated her time? That would be the Christian thing to do, and I understand that religion is very important to her.
Not.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Archivist1000
Informed World Citizen
02:47 PM on 04/21/2010
When the gig was first announced, in Dec 2009, it was reported that her fee was $200,000 ... when asked about it, the organizers said that was 'in the ballpark' ...

ALSO: Charity of Hope was not the original beneficiary of this event........ that Charity was chosen AFTER outrage was expressed about Palin being booked to raise funds for 2 Canadian hospitals.

Details here: http://archivist.leapserve.com/sarah-in-hamilton-ontario-background-and-speech/ it's classic sarah palin delusional!
10:55 AM on 04/20/2010
Better check your math; you missplaced the decimal point by two places.
10:10 AM on 04/20/2010
Excuse me, when has favorite Prime Ministers of Canada been a category for anyone, including Canadians? Worst maybe.
photo
PDinCA
Clarity has reared its ugly head again
10:23 AM on 04/20/2010
The question was clearly just a polite way of asking if she could name a single Prime Minister. Remember when she couldn't name a single Supreme Court decision she disagreed with, just two months after having issued a press release about how much she disagreed with the ruling in Exxon v. Baker?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Texas Aggie
11:00 PM on 04/20/2010
Also remember that she didn't know who the Prime Minister of Canada was when the Quebecois comedians called her with their fake Sarkozy phone call.
09:40 AM on 04/20/2010
Sarah is sad and non descript. Always...
photo
PDinCA
Clarity has reared its ugly head again
10:00 AM on 04/20/2010
Nondescript is not a word I'd use for her, largely because there are so many other ways to describe her.
:)
I'd chose, perhaps, vacuous.
11:43 AM on 04/20/2010
D-a-n-g-e-r-o-u-s
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Romanwolf
Truth, Reality, Being
09:37 AM on 04/20/2010
It seems this column was written because, last check a significant number of people believe this person qualified to be President of the U.S.. She is momentarily the Tea Party, if not the Republican front runner for the 2012 nomination. It was well written and insightful as to the limiting of exposure to the possibility of Palin be forced into an spontaneous thought which could have been fatal given the state of the Canadian healthcare system. I could relate the carpool mom comment. It is possible to verify the paring down the interview from 30 to 5 minutes, unlike Palin death panel propaganda. I took the time to read the article, so did you. You remind of the people who write negative comments about religion in the religious section. Shut up, go away, go to a Palin rally.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mickthebiologist
Field ecologist
11:48 AM on 04/20/2010
Seriously?

i thought there was no rally. no frontrunner or backburner? no mind, no thought, no attachment to anything. a new kind of buddha in four-inch teeter totters.

you get what you pay for. barbie on steroids. if what this woman says is holy, then it should stand up by itself, to any scrutiny. isn't that what 'frontrunners' are supposed to be all about?

go to a palin 'rally?' what would that experience be like? watching homer simpson?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mercedes1947
GOP: "We don't got to show you no stinking facts."
06:07 PM on 04/21/2010
The only thing more troubling than Palin is the millions of souls who are under her spell.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Damaven
09:30 AM on 04/20/2010
So when are these 900 having her back? What a crying shame. Saw a pic of her this morning without I guess her "makeup artist" and girl is wearing out, probably from carrying all that ill-gotten money; I mean if folks pay to hear you speak, then give them a worthy speech and some Q&A time. She'll probably fade out like Miss Vicky, you know, Tiny Tim's wife.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
vippy
Carpe Diem!
09:22 AM on 04/20/2010
Someone is pushing this lady to be in the press daily! Why? Obvious. Why not start with us and ignore all articles written about her. We can do it!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lstl4
09:19 AM on 04/20/2010
Sarah Palin gets on the stage and criticizes Pres Obama and makes fun of him. That is all she is good for. She is so unimportant in the scheme of things. She might be good for one thing and one thing only. The Obama supporters will be more determined than ever to keep him in office.
08:53 AM on 04/20/2010
Instead of the Huffington Post, this place should be called the Palin Post, because you have something about her everyday! Can you say obsessed........
07:33 AM on 04/20/2010
If you get a chance Danielle read Hunter Thompson's FEAR AND LOATHING IN LAS VEGAS.
I'm not sure I'll ever get my head around the continued fascination with Mrs. Palin. Pretty sure I don't want to...looked at too hard its juvenile and kind of creepy.
03:58 PM on 04/20/2010
I agree, what is the continued fascination with this woman. By constantly talking about her and putting her down you actually build her up and give her notoriety.
03:59 AM on 04/20/2010
Half way through this article I thought "why does she sound so sad"?

It is like deep resignations that the world is what it is and the rules are the rules.

You try a little mischief and amuse yourself with a game to get through it al. But there is that all suffocating sadness. That in the end nothign matters.

I know, your article wasn't designed to lift people up. In view of the way Palin does it, it would have been an insult, I guess.

The world is not that bad. It is not what it is. It is not even what we make it.

It is what we LET THEM make it.

Maybe in there lies the answer to why happiness eludes modern women - and men. We let the ones deciding for us what we should be tought, fed, and presented for viewing and reading do it. Even those of us who educate ourselves fall into the traps.

If You read this I hope You didn't look for a solution ;o).