More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Danny Schechter

Danny Schechter

Posted: July 27, 2010 10:30 AM

Unemployment is Worse Than We Know, The Recovery Challenge Harder Than We Think

As we move into the dog days of summer and a coming Congressional recess, the Obama Administration has shifted its focus back on to the economy and wants to convince one and all that an economic recovery is just around the corner.

In recent speeches, the President warns that the Republicans, if they take over, will support policies that will usher in a new recession, as if the current recession is over. "They are the same policies, " he said, "that led us into this recession. They will take us backward at a time when we need to keep America moving forward."

He wants to push "distractions" like the Shirley Sherrod affair and the BP spill out of media view so we can all get back to the economy.

Wake me up when reality intrudes into a "debate" that is flawed on all sides.

The "signs" of recovery, so breathlessly trumpeted by the politicians who want it to be true, is not generating the new jobs we need. The resumption of unemployment benefits will help those who were cut off but not all who need them. Foreclosures are rising, and government programs to stop them are not working.

It is unlikely that the current policies can remedy any of this and it is certain that extending tax cuts for the rich will not create jobs. There is no jobs bill about to be enacted. Many of the industries blue collar workers toiled in are going or gone. Bailed out General Motors just spent $3.5 Billion dollars to buy a new lending company to get those subprime loans restarted to move cars off the lot. Is this moving "backwards" or not?

Unemployment is worse than we know. The Daily Finance site reports that the firm TechnoMetrica which monitors the stats is finding the real figures shocking. "

"The June poll turned up 27.8% of households with at least one member who's unemployed and looking for a job, while the latest poll conducted in the second week of July showed 28.6% in that situation. That translates to an unemployment rate of over 22%, says Mayur, who has started questioning the accuracy of the Labor Department's jobless numbers."

The site adds, "For years, many economists have pointed to evidence that the government data undercounts the unemployed. Economist Helen Ginsburg, co-founder of advocacy group National Jobs For All Coalition, and John Williams of the newsletter "Shadow Government Statistics" have been questioning these numbers for years.

In fact, Austan Goolsbee, who is now part of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, wrote in a 2003 New York Times piece titled "The Unemployment Myth," that the government had "cooked the books" by not correctly counting all the people it should, thereby keeping the unemployment rate artificially low."

Those books are apparently still being cooked. The Administration now admits there will no movement in the rate until 2012.

What may be more serious is the erosion of the middle class that well underway, Business insider cites these statistics:

•83 percent of all U.S. stocks are in the hands of 1 percent of the people. 
• 61 percent of Americans "always or usually" live paycheck to paycheck, which was up from 49 percent in 2008 and 43 percent in 2007.
• 66 percent of the income growth between 2001 and 2007 went to the top 1% of all Americans.
• 36 percent of Americans say that they don't contribute anything to retirement savings.
• A staggering 43 percent of Americans have less than $10,000 saved up for retirement.
• 24 percent of American workers say that they have postponed their planned retirement age in the past year.
• Over 1.4 million Americans filed for personal bankruptcy in 2009, which represented a 32 percent increase over 2008.
• Only the top 5 percent of U.S. households have earned enough additional income to match the rise in housing costs since 1975

While the middle class is shrinking, their wealth is being transferred to the rich. Senator Bernie Sanders has been livid in denouncing this:

"The 400 richest families in America, who saw their wealth increase by some $400 billion during the Bush years, have now accumulated $1.27 trillion in wealth. Four hundred families! During the last 15 years, while these enormously rich people became much richer their effective tax rates were slashed almost in half. While the highest paid 400 Americans had an average income of $345 million in 2007, as a result of Bush tax policy they now pay an effective tax rate of 16.6 percent, the lowest on record.

Last year, the top 25 hedge fund managers made a combined $25 billion but because of tax policy their lobbyists helped write, they pay a lower effective tax rate than many teachers, nurses, and police officers."

The words of Shirley Sherrod on our growing economic inequality are worth repeating in this context.

"Y'all, it's about poor versus those who have, and they could be black; and they could be white; they could be Hispanic. And that made me realize I needed to work to help poor people -- those who don't have access the way others have."

Speaking of "access," last week we learned that the bankers siphoned off $1.2 billion for their own bonuses from bailout funds. They were scolded but no one is demanding the money be paid back. We also learned that the total bailout for the bankers was not just $700 billion but a whopping $3.7 TRILLION once you factor in the Fed, et. al.

And on top of that, companies are making money, hoarding cash, but not creating jobs. The Times reports: "Among the S.& P. 500 companies that have reported second-quarter results, more than one in 10 had higher profits on lower sales, nearly twice the number in a typical quarter... while wages and salaries have barely budged from recession lows, profits have staged a vigorous recovery..." If new jobs are to be created, it looks like small businesses will have to do it.

In light of all this, with jobs known as a "lagging indicator" of economic recovery, how can we expect the Obama Administration to effectively mobilize political support from the millions of Americans who are struggling harder than ever to survive?

The President is right about the Republicans threatening to make things worse, but is he really making them any better? He seems to prefer shadow boxing than ripping into his opponents, being a mediator rather than a fighter. Already, he's getting a lot of flack for being "anti-business."

Bizarro!

Truth to tell, can he do what needs doing at all, given the conservative orientation of our politricks, and the reality that what we are dealing with are structural and systemic problems that political rhetoric of any stripe cannot overcome? As The Economist assessed the "unprecedented rise in the rate of long term-unemployment," it noted bluntly, "sadly, no quick fix is available."

More fundamental changes are needed than those that currently top the Obama agenda.

News Dissector Danny Schechter directed Plunder The Crime Of Our Time (Plunderthecrimeofourtime.com) investigating crime as a cause of the financial crisis. Comments to dissector@mediachannel.org

 

Follow Danny Schechter on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Dissectorevents

 
 
  • Comments
  • 20
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thingumbobesq
08:27 AM on 08/01/2010
Wow! It's hard to believe that reality can even seep in on a George Soros sponsored website like this. Must really be pretty bad then!
03:34 PM on 07/29/2010
Although everything you said is correct and tax inequality really needs to be addressed there is one thing in the climate bill that has real potential. The “Home Star” energy retrofit program with financing through PACE bonds should be signed by Memorial Day and has the estimated potential to be over .5 trillion of additional stimulus through homeowners and businesses not government or deficit spending.
Article: http://www.grist.org/article/2010-05-07-home-star-energy-retrofit-bill-passes-house-broad-coalition-rule
Biden's Middle Class Task Force: http://pacenow.org/documents/Recovery_Through_Retrofit_Final_Report.pdf that precisely spells out both the public and private roles that creates a market through which private sector jobs are created.
Further information on PACE bonds http://www.pacenow.org/.”
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shashi0224
02:46 PM on 07/29/2010
The GOP is against ANYTHING that might help the middle-class, anything the Democrats and President Obama wish to do. Let's be honest, if the economy improves too much who stands to win in November? Democrats. If Democrats win in November, who will lose? Republicans. Do republicans want to lose? No. Do they give two darns about the middle-class? No. (proven by withholding Unemployment and this bill). So, why would any middle-class person vote republican? Two reasons....hate and ignorance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
11:52 AM on 07/28/2010
The US International Trade Deficit must be corrected by any means possible! This is the basic structural economic foundation problem that will destroy the US economy.

The USA is losing the Economic War! The USA must re-industrialize, or become a third world nation of mostly unemployed beggars.

The USA has lost the World Technology Leadership! The USA must change the emphasis of our education systems back to technology and science if the USA wants to compete in the technology competition.

The USA is Bankrupt! Instead of redeeming our freshly printed US dollars and other currency with gold, the US government is allowing these freshly printed US T-Bills, Bonds, or other Securities to be redeemed for title to privately owned businesses, factories, casinos, hotels, farms, land, ports, breweries, refineries, forests, ports, breweries, refineries, and other privately owned wealth and assets located in the USA (that were created by previous US generations prior to de-industrialization) to foreigners in order to pay foreigners to manufacture our imported products that we consume, rather than have US citizens work to produce the things that we consume and also to pay for growing US government expenses that are in excess of our federal tax collections.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcaunter
Profile: schizoid, INTJ, IQ145
01:16 AM on 07/28/2010
In response to your last question, the president's main job is to change the orientation the country's politics. In that respect Obama is an utter, complete failure.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shashi0224
02:49 PM on 07/29/2010
President Obama has offered more olive branches, more concessions, more assistance to the republicans than imaginable. In order to change orientation, the other party has to be willing to at least lift their hand toward you.....republicans are not. They vote against things they themselves proposed previously. There is no changing them or working with them. Personally, I say, ignore them and move on. It's time to realize their culture of destruction, hate and fear is too ugly to continue to bow down to. It's time to just do what the Democrats were elected to do and let the republicans wallow in their ugliness.
06:51 PM on 07/27/2010
Thanks for taking comments Mr. Schechter. Thanks for writing about this issue. Anotehr commentator, Andy Borowitz covered the same topic this week. I am sort of confused about the sweet deal that Mr. Borowitz got on Huff Post thoughl; he seems to be the only commentator who doesn't permit comments. I think he writes funny stuff; I am not sure why he has prohibited comments. I'm just sayin'. So extra thanks for letting us participate a bit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcaunter
Profile: schizoid, INTJ, IQ145
01:17 AM on 07/28/2010
There's one congressman who also doesn't permit comments. After I realized that, I stopped bothering to read their posts.
06:35 PM on 07/27/2010
I think companies and individuals are holding off on making investment or purchase decisions because the government is lurching in every direction. As an individual I wouldn't be surprised to open tomorrow's paper and find that the government will give me a credit to buy a new shower head (car, truck, windows, appliances, house, bed, ceiling fan, porch light...) so if I don't absolutely need something....I'm waiting to see what the .... happens next. Companies are likely sitting on cash since there could be a 2000 page bill reorganizing their industry in six months....or just paying them to hire workers (which if they hired them now ...they wouldn't be eligible for).

If you own a small business, the recent speech saying the government was going to "help small business" would put everything on hold until you learned exactly how.

If they just said...here's the tax rate (anybody know what next year's tax rates are going to be?), the regulations are set (but will be enforced), there aren't going to be any special deals....then people could make decisions.
Bernique
Solar is clean, cheap and plentiful
07:47 PM on 07/29/2010
Republican talking points, econ1.
03:49 PM on 07/27/2010
Why doesn't anyone talk about the WTO agreements that are at the root of these economic problems here and in other countries? The GATTS and other agreements member nations have committed to do not permit regulation of banking nor breaking up too big to fail.
Our economy, out banking system, offshoring are all controlled by people that we don't see or know about. Our politicians cannot implement any changes the WTO does not permit them to make.
Public Citizen has a lot of information on these agreements and their affect on us.

Until the WTO is changed there will be no changes in accountability or regulation or banking/wall street. It doesn't matter Republican or Democrat - there are laws we have agreed to that aren't going to be violated.
Bernique
Solar is clean, cheap and plentiful
07:55 PM on 07/29/2010
You are right, OrangeSalad. I'd like to hope that the boosters of WTO, GATT, FTAA, and other "free trade" acronyms didn't realize what destruction their ideologies would bring to the planet. I have a suspicion that they knew, but didn't care because the corporations behind these schemes knew that they would make out like bandits. Picture this -- call it "free trade" or "free enterprise" or "capitalism". The winners are the transnational corporations that outsource the union jobs to countries were labor costs are a fraction of what they are here or in Europe, and then ship the goods back to us, the consumers. Some "free trade", right. It's a greedy, illegal loop all covered up by legal gobbledigook in the tomes of the WTO, GATT, CAFTA, FTAA, and other so-called "legal" agreements.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lrobb
Southern Rational
03:46 PM on 07/27/2010
We cannot use "the Depression" statistics as an indicator. In 1935 the norm was a two-parent family with one wage earner. That no longer applies.

Students who graduate and have never held a full time job are not counted in the "unemployment" statistics, since they have never been fully employed to start with.

If you lost a $65,000 year job and are now working part time as a WalMart greeter, you are not counted as "unemployed."

The entire statistical pyramid is a crock. The sooner we acknowledge this and move to a better, and well publicized, statistical model the better.
09:37 AM on 07/28/2010
But that statistical model might be upsetting. And that would be politically regrettable. And that would shock people, that would shock Wall St. as everyone suddenly discovered there is no gold rush of American consumerism to jump-start this hole we're in. Like military information, this sort of information is too delicate to make known.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NABNYC
01:35 PM on 07/27/2010
Wall Street has stolen most of the money from the people in this country. The corporate trade deals (misnamed "free" trade) have allowed businesses to take their jobs and sales overseas, yet sit here to receive taxpayer "bailouts" at the public trough, which money they use to invest in new facilities in other countries. Our jobs are gone. The businesses that remain here have sold the public on the idea that they are legally obligated to pursue greed.

I've got a better idea. Rescind every trade deal. Create new industries to replace the old, owned by workers. Eliminate large percentage ownerships, and make corporations illegal. Create a new business form with legal obligations to its workers, the environment, the community, the country. They will be "our" businesses. Prevent any imports until we can rebuild our industries. Go back to the tax rates of the Eisenhower era and get rid of all the tax cons, including the capital gains rate. Limit deductible compensation to $250,000, and tax everything over that at 90%. That would give us capital to rebuild our country.

Oh yes: prosecute the Wall Street criminals, seize their assets, throw them in prison for life.

That would be a good start.
03:12 PM on 07/27/2010
sounds good comrade
Bernique
Solar is clean, cheap and plentiful
08:02 PM on 07/29/2010
NYC -- Free Speech TV this week is showing a movie called "The Take". It shows how workers can regain control of their livelihoods by "cooperating", creating "cooperatives" from shuttered factories (in Argentina, after the IMF devastated their economy). The cooperative model is growing in Europe, where ...

yes, you can call me comrade, sc.
12:09 PM on 07/27/2010
Jobless recovery. Think about what that means. To me, as I understand it, coming out of the Depression, our leaders expect a 50 million American labor force to become a 15 million American labor force. These leaders make no mention of what the 35 million Americans are supposed to do to survive. And, they care less, as evidenced by the coordinated two party Congress. Even the most strident progressive Democratic members of Congress refuse to address the reality of what is taking place.
09:39 AM on 07/28/2010
Historically this mass of economically deprived people provides the basis for a(nother) war.
Bernique
Solar is clean, cheap and plentiful
08:04 PM on 07/29/2010
It boggles the mind, doesn't it, tompoe.