iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Daphne Eviatar

Daphne Eviatar

Posted: November 29, 2010 06:12 PM

So far, the 251,287 secret State Department cables leaked by Wikileaks have been more embarrassing to the United States than particularly revealing. But one exchange between U.S. and German officials reveals a sad reality about the tangled web woven by the Bush administration when it decided to engage in torture -- and highlights how President Obama has kept the U.S. ensnared by that legacy.

According to this leaked document, the U.S. State Department in 2007 warned Germany that issuance of arrest warrants for CIA officers involved in the kidnapping of an innocent German citizen, Khalid El-Masri, imprisoned for months in Afghanistan and allegedly tortured there would "have a negative impact" on the two countries' relationship. Indeed, Deputy Chief of Mission John M. Koenig reminded German Deputy National Security Adviser Rolf Nikel that a similar move by Italy, which a year earlier had prosecuted CIA officers for their involvement in the kidnapping from Milan and rendition to Egypt of Hassan Mustafa Osama Nasr, known as Abu Omar, had "repercussions to U.S.-Italian bilateral relations."

According to the cable, which appears to summarize the two officials' conversation, "The DCM pointed out that our intention was not to threaten Germany, but rather to urge that the German Government weigh carefully at every step of the way the implications for relations with the U.S."

In other words, the U.S. was warning Germany not to enforce its own laws against kidnapping and torture, or face serious negative consequences.

Khalid El-Masri was a German citizen mistakenly detained in Macedonia in late 2003 because his name was similar to that of a suspected al Qaeda terrorist, Khalid al-Masri. The CIA, eager to interrogate an al Qaeda operative, quickly stepped in and rendered El-Masri to its secret prison in Afghanistan known as "the salt pit" for interrogation. El-Masri claims he was beaten, stripped naked, deprived of minimally decent food and water and sodomized at the CIA prison. By April 2004, the CIA realized its agents had caught the wrong man. So more than a month later, they dumped El-Masri late one night on the side of a desolate road in Albania. Starved and disheveled, he was picked up by Albanian guards and eventually reunited with his family.

In 2005, El-Masri sued the U.S. government for his ordeal. But the Justice Department, in what's become a regular tactic when confronted with torture allegations, convinced a federal judge to dismiss the case on the grounds that it would reveal sensitive "state secrets."

Given this context, it's not exactly surprising that the State Department, faced a couple of years later with the news that German authorities planned to arrest CIA agents for their role, urged (or threatened) the Germans to refrain. But what the cables highlight is what an awkward, embarrassing, hypocritical and ultimately counterproductive position the whole extraordinary rendition program has boxed the United States into. Not only did the renditions violate international law and in at least some cases lead to the torture of wholly innocent victims, but the Obama administration's refusal to acknowledge the United States' role and provide redress has left it stuck in that cramped corner. Now, in order to avoid having to explain why the U.S. government is not investigating the criminal actions of its own officials, and why the U.S. repeatedly uses the "state secrets" defense to quash individual attempts at accountability, the United States has to quietly strong-arm its allies into not enforcing their own laws.

In Italy, as the secret cable acknowledges, the U.S. tried to prevent Italian prosecutors from going after 23 CIA agents who kidnapped Abu Omar off the streets of Milan and rendered him to Egypt to be interrogated under torture there. That effort failed, and the agents were convicted in absentia. Former Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice was apparently more successful in the case of El-Masri.

Sadly, the Obama administration has kept up the pretense that the United States knows nothing about these incidents and will not investigate further. Never mind that between the lawsuits, the news stories and now the Wikileaks cable, the entire world knows better.

When President Obama traveled to Asia recently, he called on the Indonesian government to exercise a leadership role in the G20 by "embracing transparency and accountability."

Upholding democracy and human rights is "an essential element of everything we do in U.S. foreign policy," Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said in her speech kicking off the Asian tour. She added that "the US administration will work within international bodies like the United Nations and the Association of Southeast Asian nations "to pursue accountability and bring an end to human rights abuses."

Or not. The Bush administration pursued a program of torture that Obama has said reflected "us losing our moral bearings." But until President Obama acknowledges, investigates and accounts for it, he will keep the United States in that contorted position of instructing notorious dictators to respect human rights and hold violators accountable, while informing our democratic allies that it's in their best interest not to do the same.

 

Follow Daphne Eviatar on Twitter: www.twitter.com/deviatar

 
 
  • Comments
  • 41
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
Peter Combs
Amused by the illogical..no, NOT a Republican
03:15 PM on 11/30/2010
None of this is news or new. Numerous Presidents have doen the same and worse..much worse. Not condoning it, but its been going on for decades. FDR, Truman, JFK, Nixon, Regan all violated the rights of others at times of war.

Americans need to grow up and think about it honestly..
02:12 PM on 11/30/2010
While it’s important to keep pressing Obama to investigate Bush’s torture-by-proxy program, there’s a big reason, often overlooked, why Obama almost certainly won’t do it: He is probably torturing by proxy too. At least, Obama’s CIA chief said the president would continue the rendition program of Bush (and of Clinton, who founded the program). If Obama has indeed rendered some captives, then to investigate Bush’s renditionary crimes would be to open his own crimes (as well as Clinton's) to investigation. Lest there be any confusion about whether sending a captive to a third country to be tortured is a crime: Doing so is specifically outlawed by the UN Convention Against Torture, which Clinton and Congress enacted as U.S. law in 1994. It's a story I discuss in part in my book, A Kidnapping in Milan: The CIA on Trial.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:07 PM on 11/30/2010
It is hard to ignore the prima facie dumbness that got us bogged down in this nasty war in the first place. This is not going to be like Daddy's War, old sport. He actually won, and he still got run out of the White House nine months later.. . The whole thing sucks. It was wrong from the start, and it is getting wronger by the hour.

Three journalists have died in Baghdad... American troops are killing journalists in a profoundly foreign country, under cover of a war being fought for savage, greed-crazed reasons that most of them couldn't explain or even understand.

I take no pleasure in being Right in my dark predictions about the fate of our military intervention in the heart of the Muslim world. It is immensely depressing to me. Nobody likes to be betting against the Home team.

If we get chased out of Iraq with our tail between our legs, that will be the fifth consecutive Third-world country with no hint of a Navy or an Air Force to have whipped us in the past 40 years.

These horrifying digital snapshots of the American dream in action on foreign soil are worse than anything even I could have expected. I have been in this business a long time and I have seen many staggering things, but this one is over the line. Now I am really ashamed to carry an American passport.
- Hunter S. Thompson
01:22 PM on 11/30/2010
We need a LEAK of the 85 Pentagon Video tapes that show what really hit the Pentagon on 911 !

The World needs to see exactly why Bush hid these tapes !
photo
Tribal Knowledge
Be bold and mighty forces will come to your aid!
01:19 PM on 11/30/2010
So, under Bush the interrogation techniques were ratified, verified for legal muster and codified into law by the congress - nearly unanimously, with deep and wide discussions with congressional leaders about the techniques. There was never - not ever - a surprise about this. It was merely political theater - "Bush did it."

Now, "Obama does it" and it seems like I can hear the sounds of crickets.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Robertson
02:29 PM on 11/30/2010
Please reread the article. This is not about Obama "doing it". The kidnapping and toture and the threatening of our allies all happened under Bush. The current administration's only crime is not investigating past abuses and allowing the guilty to continue to hide behind the "state secrets" defense. Nor is this about US law. Congress cannot ratify the snatching of a person from the streets of Milan. This happened in Italy so Italian law applies. The article is about the Bush administration then choosing to threaten our allies when they tried to enforce their own law.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:55 PM on 11/30/2010
"We do all of the extraordinary rendition flights―you know, the torture flights. Let's face it, some of these flights end up that way." That's what an official at Jeppensen Dataplan, Inc., a US defense contractor, admitted during a corporate meeting, according to The New Yorker magazine. Jepessen was sued in 2007 by an Ethiopian national who'd been renditioned to Morocco, relentlessly tortured and interrogated. the Bush DOJ rushed in using the "states secrets" argument to have the case dismissed.

After the 2008 elections, the Obama DOJ handled the appeal parroting the Bush "states secrets" argument; however the Circuit Court ruled against the DOJ.  Judge Hawkins wrote, "states secrets" as argued by the DOJ, “has no logical limit." “As the Founders of this Nation knew well, arbitrary imprisonment and torture under any circumstance is a gross and notorious act of despotism.”

Surprisingly, the Obama DOJ did not accept Hawkins' decision; instead they asked for a full panel review of the decision.  The panel dismissed the case siding with the DOJ.  Obama's allegiance to Bush's abuse of "states secrets," and national security rationales to cover high crimes, shows how deeply Obama has committed his administration to protecting Bush and his trademark, criminal torture policies. 
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dana Walker
12:42 PM on 11/30/2010
So Obama won't prosecute war crimes but he will prosecute those who expose war crimes. Surprise surprise. The only person to go to jail on the Swiss bank scam was the whistleblower. The money launderers just had to pay a fine and their names were not even made public. Why does it take and Australian to hold our government to account?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DasBoot
I accidentally cross-dressed today.
12:04 PM on 11/30/2010
Great post. This is precisely how torture poisons everything once you opened the Pandora's Box.
photo
Indigo1941
Time traveler.
09:59 AM on 11/30/2010
Well, let's see . . . is there any good reason to leak all this to the hungry press? Yes, there is. You see, the US has got itself a reputation for lying to everybody about just about everything. So it's time for a reckoning and truth-telling and maybe even a tumlutous ride on the River of DeNial (been there, it's muddy!) before the open admission of wrong-doing can begin. How's that 5 points thingie go? Denial, Anger, Blame, Negotiation, Acceptance. Something like that. Let's all watch and see which steps get taken. Notice, on step # 1, nobody's yet said the leaks were lies. Isn't that fascinating . . . ?
photo
George Hanshaw
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
12:30 PM on 11/30/2010
"You see, the US has got itself a reputation for lying to everybody about just about everything­."

And by revealing this documentation we can now see that EVERYONE has been lying to EVERYBODY about just about everything. It sort of levels the playing field here. All countries lie, all diplomats lie, so grading on the curve, we really aren't any worse than anyone else.

It's just an uglier curve than most of us would have believed.
05:52 AM on 11/30/2010
Far better for Congress to pursue this investigation. No president can prosecute anyone at all, but the AG can act on Congress' findings. While there were many within Congress who would have done this, too many pressures for "bi partisan" investigation, partly from some human rights groups themselves, slowed or halted action. Without a willing Congress, there is not much left within the US to do - international courts and law MUST act against Bush, Cheney, et al. whenever and however they can.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mountainweb
Conservative Commonsense
09:07 AM on 11/30/2010
"and highlights how President Obama has kept the U.S. ensnared by that legacy", be careful, you cannot attack Bush on this without dragging Obama down as well. The international courts have their own side of this to hide as well. Senseless attacks on Bush are not going to accomplish anything...
photo
Tribal Knowledge
Be bold and mighty forces will come to your aid!
01:21 PM on 11/30/2010
No. Wrong. Silly.

The congress codified these techniques into law, nearly with unanimous approval. They are the law of the land. Obama has taken steps to ensure their strength legally. You are on the wrong side of the facts.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
waldopepper
I'd tell you all about me if you were my friend.
05:31 AM on 11/30/2010
The slid to pariah nation seems unstoppable. And yet it is not, If only the government had the courage to run the nation in accordance with what it likes to think of as its core principles. Respect for rule of law, decency, honesty, fairplay. Things like that. Sad.

Also sad is that the Italians (it would seem) had more guts than the Germans. Enough at least to uphold their own ideals and laws, rather than to cave to pressure. Personally, I don't see that it has harmed relations with Italy either. Rather Italy can at least hold its head up a little after this affair. Amazing considering the government that Italy is currently saddled with!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
waldopepper
I'd tell you all about me if you were my friend.
06:21 AM on 11/30/2010
Slide... ooops.
12:28 AM on 11/30/2010
Funny...The Germans and Italians are now lecturing us behind the scenes torture?
I am too old for this.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Robertson
02:01 AM on 11/30/2010
In Germany it's a crime to deny the holocaust. They've taken ownership of their guilt for past actions. It would be nice to see the US do the same. The sins of past generations of Germans do not mean that we can today pluck their citizens off the streets and torture them and expect no consequences.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cccoyote
America couldn't be bought by corps.
03:40 AM on 11/30/2010
Faved/fanned
photo
Impulse725
Expects to see humans extinct, enjoying show
04:39 AM on 11/30/2010
Well said
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Articulator
11:09 PM on 11/29/2010
I remember George W, on a number of occaisions, standing in front of the TV cameras, looking the world straight in the eye and saying "we dont torture".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:48 AM on 11/30/2010
I also remember Bush saying he was going to continue to disallow reimportation of pharms to keep America safe. The lie was so obvious that Bush could not even hold a straight face. I thought he might break out in hysterical laughter at the ridiculousness of his lie.
photo
Tribal Knowledge
Be bold and mighty forces will come to your aid!
01:23 PM on 11/30/2010
He was right.

Unless you are saying that the entire congress acted to sanction torture.

Though you may be.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kara Kramer
08:56 PM on 11/29/2010
I find it starnge that this article goes to such lengths to lay blame for incident which happened entirely during the Bush administration at the door of the Obama administration, and the verbal contortions required to make this work are exhausting to read.
This whole thing was over by 2007, 2 years before Obama became President. If you want to see Bush dragged off to the Hague, by all means have at it, but this persistent culture of holding President Obama responsible for the actions of people he had nothing to with is just nonsensical.
Are you suggesting he start arresting random CIA operatives so he can look morally superior?
09:26 PM on 11/29/2010
This writer understands this complex issue quite well. There are no "contortions." You would do well to try learning from those who know what you do not.
10:37 PM on 11/29/2010
The blame is not for initiating the policy of torture and rendition, but for continuing and expanding the policy after condemning so eloquently in his confirmation speech.

Obama should end this program, or he gets tarred with the same brush.
06:01 AM on 11/30/2010
I have been waiting for two years for evidence that we are carrying out torture. There is none. As I was a member of a national human rights group pursuing justice on torture, I was privvy to and aware of significant issues - there were NO revelvations that we have, in any way, carried out acts of torture since this administration took office. What is now happening is that the desire for punishing the previous administration has become a divisive issue. That IS where the convolutions come in - Constitutionally, the White House CANNOT prosecute anyone, and those seeking justice against Bush have failed too often to understand that it is the responsibility of CONGRESS to investigate then turn over information to the Attorney General. Human rights groups have become unclear among themselves about proceedure, and now, at least for the next two years, nothing at all will be done. Blaming the President for obeying his constitutional duties is pretty counterproductive, and we've lost the time we could have used mobilizing Congress.