iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Darell Hammond

GET UPDATES FROM Darell Hammond

If We Don't Let Our Children Play, Who Will Be the Next Steve Jobs?

Posted: 10/20/11 04:16 PM ET

Will the next generation have a Steve Jobs?

The forecast doesn't look good. In an era of parental paranoia, lawsuit mania and testing frenzy, we are failing to inspire our children's curiosity, creativity, and imagination. We are denying them opportunities to tinker, discover, and explore -- in short, to play.

Jobs played not just as a child but throughout his adult life. He played to understand how things worked, then he played to invent new things, and then he kept playing to make those things singularly whimsical and "insanely great."

Despite the fact that Jobs is largely credited for the evolution of today's personal computer, he never advocated that kids spend the better part of their waking hours in front of one. In fact, he almost said the opposite:

"The elements of discovery are all around you. You don't need a computer. Here -- why does that fall? You know why? Nobody in the entire world knows why that falls. We can describe it pretty accurately but no one knows why. I don't need a computer to get a kid interested in that, to spend a week playing with gravity and trying to understand that and come up with reasons why."

And instead of merely watching his TV set as a child, Jobs was busy imagining how to build one of his own, drawing from the skills he acquired through his favorite toys:

"These Heathkits would come with these detailed manuals about how to put this thing together and all the parts would be laid out in a certain way and color coded. You'd actually build this thing yourself... These things were not mysteries anymore. I mean, you looked at a television set, you would think that 'I haven't built one of those but I could... ' It gave a tremendous level of self-confidence, that through exploration and learning one could understand seemingly very complex things in one's environment. My childhood was very fortunate in that way."

Despite his insatiable appetite for learning, Jobs often struggled within the confines of a classroom. He would likely perform very poorly on the multiple-choice tests that have become the golden standard for measuring our children's aptitude:

"School was pretty hard for me at the beginning. My mother taught me how to read before I got to school and so when I got there I really just wanted to do two things. I wanted to read books because I loved reading books and I wanted to go outside and chase butterflies. You know, do the things that five year olds like to do. I encountered authority of a different kind than I had ever encountered before, and I did not like it. And they really almost got me. They came close to really beating any curiosity out of me."

We are raising today's children in sterile, risk-averse and highly structured environments. In so doing, we are failing to cultivate artists, pioneers and entrepreneurs, and instead cultivating a generation of children who can follow the rules in organized sports games, sit for hours in front of screens and mark bubbles on standardized tests.

We say we're "protecting" our children. We say we're setting them up to "succeed." Really, we're doing neither, and we're letting an entire generation down. The most fitting way to honor Jobs' legacy? Let our kids outside to play.

 
 
 

Follow Darell Hammond on Twitter: www.twitter.com/kaboom

Will the next generation have a Steve Jobs? The forecast doesn't look good. In an era of parental paranoia, lawsuit mania and testing frenzy, we are failing to inspire our children's curiosity, crea...
Will the next generation have a Steve Jobs? The forecast doesn't look good. In an era of parental paranoia, lawsuit mania and testing frenzy, we are failing to inspire our children's curiosity, crea...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
03:17 AM on 12/14/2011
It's ironic that the devices Steve Jobs "renovated" are the same ones majorly contributing to the demise of the children which this article says should be more like him.

You put him on a pedestal like he invented sliced bread, or the light bulb. What we need are people with a kinder heart, peace loving, will not make a buck out of every opportunity, and will not go "thermo-nuclear" on every other product that has the potential to overtake him.

More kids like Steve Jobs. Tsss. I say we have too many like him, and not enough kinder hearts.
01:57 PM on 10/27/2011
Steve Jobs was not that great in technological terms. He was, however, a brilliant salesman and marketing strategist. And that is something we will need in the future.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
01:07 AM on 10/26/2011
We may not all get to be Steve Jobs, but at least if the education system is 1/2way consistent, today's deezyoutz might stand a chance of being able to find SOME kind of job...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William Robert Toth
Lifelong progressive and proud of it!
08:07 AM on 10/23/2011
Been saying this for a couple decades now. the "educrats" aren't listening. Neither are the politicians. Why not? Because too many of them want docile, compliant students who will learn to just take orders and do as they are told. These kind of people are easier to control and dominate. I would say that democracy, as we now understand it, might last another 20 years at best. Sad, but, I feel,true.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:17 PM on 10/25/2011
I's not just the politicians. Parents find it easier if their kids are in one activity after another all day long.
wordsalad12
Caring for innocent life after they are born.
07:24 AM on 10/23/2011
While i agree with your essay and like it very much, I have to agree with poster Kritikos in that creative innovators will be born in each generation and those that have the capacity to create and innovate despite odds sometimes come out with masterpieces - history is rife with such examples. I doubt the best thinkers, scientists, composers, writers, astronomers, philosophers etc. had the best of education available to them. What they did have was the freedom/time to create and think and mull over things, even in otherwise adverse personal or social conditions.
11:08 PM on 10/22/2011
II liked your essay however my biggest concern is that ALL children not just a potential Steve Jobs are going to pay the price of our highly structured school curriculum and lack of playtime. I worry that they will ALL grow up to be nervous, neurotic adults who make the pharmaceutical companies richer!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NerdyStudent
Sorry, your micro-bio doesn't meet our standards
04:42 PM on 10/22/2011
Those pesky teachers!
02:47 PM on 10/22/2011
Amen, brother. This whole trend started with the rise of organized education, which eventually became not about learning but credentialism. Once you start running the whole society based on the false foundation of credentialism, more and more of kids time starts being eaten up by these programs and camps and activities and all the nonsense which is, unfortunately correctly, seen as necessary to get into a top college or university, without which people believe, again largely correctly, that there is little hope of 'success'.

Credentialism and professionalism are traps. Our decline will continue until these false idols fall.
02:47 PM on 10/25/2011
I'm going to strongly disagree top college or university is needed for success. It may help you a bit to land your first job (or more likely internship). Maybe. Even that is debatable. After that, nobody will ever again look which college/university you went to. They'll all look at what you actually did at places you worked before. Your past accomplishments. What have you created/built. "Education" section that simply list names of a school or two is a waste of space on your resume.

Now, university experience is an important one, for many reasons. And I would strongly argue one should go to university for many reasons. However, going to university in order to "land a good job" is the wrong reason for doing it. If that's why you go there, and chances are if that's the reason you'll pick an expensive one as well, you'll just spend ton of money and you are not going to get much out of it.

A good university is not the place that allows you to "only" learn (it's an very important aspect, still). It's a place that will allow you to experiment and do things as part of the learning. If you miss this opportunity to experiment and do things at university, you are missing the best part of learning experience it offers. And guess what, "I did X at university" sounds way better on your fresh-out-of university resume than "I went to big-flashy-name-here university".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sedagive42
11:07 AM on 10/22/2011
My grandchildren go to an elementary school where they are not allowed to run during recess. They may not bring any activity from home, nor do they have anyone to teach them games and activities. They may play organized sports with the teams made up just like when I was in elementary school, the same kids play each day. And there is no adult around to help with the skills and rules of these team sports. Oh and PS due to budget restraints there are not enough equiptment to go around like ropes and balls so the survival of the fittest ...when I offered to bring more I was told no...the School Board Policy is that the school had to have only items from a specific approved list...I offered to use the list and was told it was to keep one school from having more than another one. Even if the village want's to help BIGBROTHER needs to be in control and the kids suffer.
02:50 PM on 10/22/2011
That is the whole spirit and goal of organized, mandatory, state-run 'education'. It is about indoctrination and teaching the students their place in society; beyond basic reading, writing, and math skills (which do not take long to learn), learning in public schools is quite secondary. It is about control. Oh, and the teachers unions' contracts.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:55 PM on 10/22/2011
Your story makes me sad for the future.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kritikos
Intelligence is not a science
09:42 AM on 10/22/2011
All generations have visionaries and innovators, to some degree, not to worry.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
playflute2
flootz
12:21 PM on 10/24/2011
I think what the article is saying is that those visionaries and innovators are being 'driven underground' as it were. I teach young children, private music lessons, and it always amazes me how little they use their imaginations. It is also very sad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsgaetano
Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus
03:58 AM on 10/22/2011
It's all part of the far right's plan. If your kids aren't allowed to be creative and grow to become the pioneers and innovators and intellectuals of tomorrow, that means the children of the wealthy will just own everything, and have the children of today's religious leaders tell people what they're allowed to think.
08:58 PM on 10/21/2011
I am a parent of an almost 5 year old and an almost 2 year old. I totally agree that play is so important.

For my first son we decided to hold back on Pre-K 3 because we felt that there was no rush for him to be institutionalized. We felt a need for more play. Right now he is in Pre-K 4 and the program he is in is just a few hours a day and it has an emphasis on play again.

We will be doing the same thing with our second child.

So many people have such high expectations for their kids to succeed even at the littlest task (who can talk first, walk first, count first, read first, etc). I just feel that what's the rush and why all the pressure? Let the kids play and discover who they are. Of course as a parent we are there to guide them along the way.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
playflute2
flootz
12:22 PM on 10/24/2011
Your children are very lucky.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christian Howell
The STEM. The Whole STEM. Nothing but the STEM.
07:20 PM on 10/21/2011
Short answer, HELL NO. Young kids nowadays don't feel they need to be nerds, but cool. Why I don't know but I can say that this is from a certain person being so far ahead that we (take a guess) want to take away all of his friends and anyone who wants to be like him.

I'm doing fine though so good luck with that.
04:26 PM on 10/21/2011
You know it's a combination~ kids do need to play, they do. But you know what they need more than that? A decent effin education. All the creativity in the world isn't going to mean a thing if they don't know how to spell or do math! I am APPALLED at today's standards. And one more thing~ kids would have more time to play if their parents turned off the freaking TV. Being super safe is only PART of the problem, people need to understand that turning off the tube and telling the kids to go outside is GOOD for them! I know it's certainly done wonders for mine!
08:52 PM on 10/20/2011
My friends and I were athletic high school students who wouldn't make the sports teams because we cared more about having fun than winning games. As schools get larger, teams don't, making even joining a team extremely competitive. Is fun just for children? Professionals are punished for over-celebrating and every year there is a new story of parents brawling in the stands.

We are a perfect example of this article. My friends and I invented a new game called Hantis in high school by PLAYING with a tennis ball. We are now entrepreneurs in our mid-20's, spreading our developed game (now a sport) into middle schools, high school, and colleges. There is nothing wrong with organized sports that keep kids active, they're just too competitive. Rotational Hantis is pretty revolutionary because teammates switch every play and the game focuses more on performing creative tricks than scoring points. As with anything new, adults don't understand, but kids love it. It's only popular where people know about it so far, but we're starting our campaign in Lexington, KY (Men's Health Magazine's #1 Most Sedentary City in America) to change that.