There are canon readers and then there are jump-from-author-to-author readers. I've been both.
For a number of years, liking a novel by a certain author set me off on a binge of consecutively reading other books by the same author. I did that with Margaret Atwood, Balzac, Willa Cather, Colette, Charles Dickens, Alexandre Dumas, Nathaniel Hawthorne, Jack London, Cormac McCarthy, Herman Melville, L.M. Montgomery, Sir Walter Scott, John Steinbeck, Mark Twain, Edith Wharton, Emile Zola and others.
It made sense. If you love one fictional work by an author, there's a good chance (though obviously no guarantee) you'll at least like another. Plus you get into the rhythm of that author's writing style, enjoy seeing the similarities and differences between various books by that author, find out how much the writer evolved or didn't evolve during her or his career, and so on. You might even spot the same characters in different novels -- something Balzac and Zola were fond of doing.
Of course, if you're reading a trilogy (think The Hunger Games or The Lord of the Rings), it's especially natural to stay with one author for a while. Same for a series after a number of installments have been published. For instance, if you finally tried the Harry Potter books in 2007 or later, you might have read all seven of them in a row. But if you discovered J.K. Rowling's series when it made its 1990s debut, chances are you read various other authors while waiting for the next six Harry Potter offerings.
In short, it's clearly easier to do the canon thing when you discover an author late -- or when you're reading a late author!
But I dropped the canon approach and began jumping from author to author in 2011 -- ironically, soon after consecutively reading most of Margaret Atwood's novels and writing an appreciation of that author for this site. It was my first Huffington Post book piece, and soon commenters were suggesting many other great authors I hadn't read before.
So, to keep up with some of those recommendations and expand my knowledge of literature, I began reading a different author almost every time I picked up another novel. This spring and summer alone, those writers included A.S. Byatt, Don DeLillo, Jasper Fforde, Ian McEwan, V.S. Naipaul, Marge Piercy, Arundhati Roy, Anne Tyler, Robert Walser and others.
The jumping-around benefits? Exposure to different ideas, different worldviews and different writing styles. The excitement of possibly finding a new favorite author. And more. Adjusting to an author one has never read before might be tough for the first chapter or two, but it can be very satisfying and educational to leave one's literary comfort zone.
There is the problem of loving a book so much that you have to resist the urge to immediately read more books by the same author. But resist I do! (Usually.)
Though I'm currently polygamous rather than monogamous with fiction reading, I don't think one approach is better than the other. Whatever works best for each literature lover! At some point, I may happily become "canon-ical" again for a period of time.
Do you prefer concentrating on one author for a while, or jumping from author to author? What are the pros and cons of each strategy? And which authors have spurred you to read a number of their books consecutively?
In his part-humorous Comic (and Column) Confessional memoir, Dave Astor recalls 25 years of covering and meeting cartoonists, columnists and others such as Charles Schulz ("Peanuts"), Bill Watterson ("Calvin and Hobbes"), Ann Landers, Hillary Clinton and Coretta Scott King. Contact Dave at dastor@earthlink.net to buy an inscribed copy of the book, which includes a preface by Heloise and back-cover blurbs by Arianna Huffington and Gary Larson ("The Far Side").
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.