NYR More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dave Astor

GET UPDATES FROM Dave Astor
 

The Best Two Half-Decades in Literary History

Posted: 08/08/11 01:30 PM ET

They were unplanned "Five-Year Plans" for the ages: the amazing proliferation of classic novels published from 1846 to 1851 and from 1922 to 1927. And, believe it or not, one author had a book in both those periods!

I thought about those two stellar half-decades in recent weeks because many of the great novelists who wrote during those years had summer birth dates: Alexandre Dumas (July 24, 1802), Nathaniel Hawthorne (July 4, 1804), William Makepeace Thackeray (July 18, 1811), Emily Bronte (July 30, 1818), Herman Melville (Aug. 1, 1819), Marcel Proust (July 10, 1871), Theodore Dreiser (Aug. 27, 1871), and Ernest Hemingway (July 21, 1899).

By seeing those names, you can probably guess many of the books I'm about to list.

Great novels that burst on the literary scene between 1846 and 1851 included Dumas' The Count of Monte Cristo (1846), Bronte's Wuthering Heights (1847), Thackeray's Vanity Fair (1848), Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter (1850), and Melville's Moby-Dick (1851). And then there were these mid-19th century powerhouses by authors born during non-summer seasons: Honore de Balzac's La Cousine Bette (1846), Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre (1847), Anne Bronte's The Tenant of Wildfell Hall (1848), and Charles Dickens' (ital)David Copperfield(ital) (1850).

(In the case of the serialized Dickens and Dumas titles mentioned, the publishing year I gave was for when the books were completed.)

The period from 1922 to 1927 saw the release of these books by summer-born authors: posthumously published installments of Proust's In Search of Lost Time (1923, etc.), Melville's posthumously published Billy Budd (1924), Dreiser's An American Tragedy (1925), and Hemingway's The Sun Also Rises (1926). Classics from that period by authors who entered the world in cooler months included James Joyce's Ulysses (1922), F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby (1925), Virginia Woolf's Mrs. Dalloway (1925), L.M. Montgomery's The Blue Castle (1926), Woolf's To the Lighthouse (1927), Willa Cather's Death Comes for the Archbishop (1927), and Thornton Wilder's The Bridge of San Luis Rey (1927) -- among other wonderful works.

It would take a better literary critic or historian than me to explain why so many all-time books came out during those two five-year spans. Or maybe it was just a couple of incredible 60-month coincidences. Whatever the reasons, I can't think of any other half-decade periods that produced so many classic novels.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:03 PM on 08/10/2011
My spider sense is tingling, telling me that a comparable five-year span might be found sometime in the '60s.

A remarkable lineup of top fiction writers were all hard at work in the decade that began with "To Kill a Mockingbird" and ended with "Slaughterhouse Five." Off the top of my head I can think of Mailer, Cheever, Updike, Roth, Heller, Percy, Vonnegut, Capote, Vidal, Styron, Nabokov, Pynchon, Kesey, O'Connor (I've undoubtedly missed several other big names). And early in the decade, holdovers from the previous generation -- Hemingway, Faulkner, Steinbeck -- were still in there pitching.

I wish I had the time now to pin down which five years of the '60s I'd choose, but my vacation doesn't begin until tomorrow. (The next time I comment here at "Astor Place," I'll be tanned and well-rested. Ta!)
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
02:25 PM on 08/10/2011
Thanks, 3fingerbrown, for your excellent e-mail -- with some great dollops of humor! Yes, when you name all those authors, it's possible there was a five-year period in the 1960s that might rival 1846-1851 and 1922-1927 -- even if Herman Melville (who was represented in those earlier two half-decades) didn't quite pull off a third appearance.
12:29 PM on 08/09/2011
Same cold be said for movies. 1938-1941. Gone with the Wind. Wizard of Oz. Citizen Kane. Countless others.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
12:57 PM on 08/09/2011
Great point, Dave! That was an amazing few years for films (and two of the three you mentioned were based on books). For some reason, there also wasn't a barrage of great movies in the 1800s. Will have to look into that....
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jerry Zezima
07:45 AM on 08/09/2011
Great piece, Dave. You are so literary, you have read books that haven't even been written yet. Now it's time to write one yourself. I know it would be terrific. In the meantime, keep up the good work.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
08:33 AM on 08/09/2011
"You have read books that haven't even been written yet" -- ha ha! The question is, does one read books that haven't been written yet in print form, e-book form, or in the front seat of a certain "Back to the Future" vehicle? Actually, I did write a 2011-finished book that's currently being looked at by a publisher, and am working on a second book. Thanks for the compliment and the comment, Jerry!
05:59 PM on 08/08/2011
Nice piece. I had no idea the sisters' JANE EYRE and WUTHERING HEIGHTS
came out the same year. And another Bronte's book within a year or two
of them. That's what's REALLY amazing to me -- not a five-year, but a
two-year period, and all in the same family! Holy tamale, it's like
Venus and Serena!

I know that with the new translation of Proust, REMEMBRANCE OF THINGS
PAST evolved into IN SEARCH OF LOST TIME. But in keeping with purest French as well as the spirit of his epic, A LA RECHERCHE DU TEMPS PERDU should really be IN SEARCH OF THE LOST TIME. "Du" means "of the," not "of," and the series of books is about his
trying to recapture and preserve and immortalize his past life -- the
lost time. And by freezing and perfecting it in art for posterity in
this way, it would not actually be "lost." Doesn't that make sense?
That's how I would always translate it, no matter what the critics say.
Plus, "In search of lost time" is totally flat, and "In search of the
lost time" is lyrical and evocative, and what is Proust if not lyrical
and evocative (as well as everything else)? One man's opinion, anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Astor
07:30 AM on 08/09/2011
Yes, the Brontes were absolutely amazing, and they were all between 28 and 32 when those three classic books were published. Putting them in the same paragraph as the great Williams sisters was hilarious! Re the Proust title translation. You certainly make an excellent case for including the "the." Thanks for your eloquent comment, Mark!