Valentine's Day is all about love -- and one thing I love is a great novel that inspires me to read the author's other books.
Something I hate? You'll have to look near the end of this post for that!
I recently finished my first Margaret Drabble book, The Sea Lady, and was very impressed. So I clicked on that author's bibliography, asked it to "make my day," and it did -- by listing 16 other Drabble novels to eventually enjoy! I'm sure I'll like at least some of them as much as The Sea Lady, a poignant 2006 book about a flamboyant woman and quiet man who meet decades after having a complicated relationship as kids and young adults.
Naturally, I thought about other times a top-notch novel started me on a canon-esque binge to read the author's other works, and what the resulting experience was like.
For instance, I loved Cat's Eye by Margaret Atwood (who shares Drabble's first name and birth year), and followed that novel with many other Atwood titles. It was a very happy few months of 2011 reading, made happier by liking some of her novels -- including The Robber Bride, Alias Grace, and The Blind Assassin -- even more than the excellent Cat's Eye.
(Actually, Cat's Eye was my second Atwood novel. I greatly admired The Handmaid's Tale a quarter-century ago, but inexplicably didn't try another of her books until last year.)
Speaking of acclaimed Canadian authors, I first read L.M. Montgomery in the form of the superb The Blue Castle (what a love story!). Then came Anne of Green Gables (almost as good a book), various Anne sequels (okay), and the semi-autobiographical Emily trilogy (great).
Barbara Kingsolver? I started with her magnificent The Poisonwood Bible, then enjoyed the nearly as amazing Prodigal Summer, then backtracked to three likable earlier novels (The Bean Trees, Animal Dreams, Pigs in Heaven), and then read my third-favorite Kingsolver book: The Lacuna.
I don't want to ramble on too long, so here are thumbnails for five other author canons:
-- The Grapes of Wrath was my first John Steinbeck book, and nothing could top it among his other wonderful novels. But East of Eden was a very respectable second.
-- Germinal got me hooked on Emile Zola when I initially read him. It remains my favorite of his, though titles such as Ladies' Delight and The Beast in Man are strong runners-up.
-- The Count of Monte Cristo is how I first encountered Alexandre Dumas. It outshines his other novels (no Chateau d'Ifs, ands, or buts!), even though many other Dumas books are compelling.
-- I "met" Cormac McCarthy on The Road, which was absorbing but not even in his top five after I subsequently read his previous novels. My favorites are his mid-career Blood Meridian and All the Pretty Horses.
-- The engrossing Ivanhoe came first for me when reading Sir Walter Scott, but I ended up preferring Scott novels such as Quentin Durward and The Heart of Midlothian. (Glad I was able to mention the word "heart" when writing on Valentine's Day!)
Sometimes, an author's other books don't even come close to the first title one tries. For instance, Charlotte Bronte's Shirley and Villette are good but her Jane Eyre -- one of literature's great love stories -- is much better.
The hate (actually, more sadness than hate) mentioned in this post's second paragraph is the emotion one feels after finishing a beloved author's canon. "That's all there is; there isn't any more," sayeth Madeline's narrator.
Yet if novelists you admire are still alive, new titles may arrive in the future. And if the writers are past protagonists on Earth, there's always re-reading!
One more point about author canons: I've often (though not always) found that the best novels are written somewhere in mid-career. That's because an author has gained writing experience and life experience, but is usually not yet repeating themselves in some ways.
Do you agree or disagree with this mid-career-peak thesis? And when you love the first book you read by an author, do other novels by that writer live up to your expectations?
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.