iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Dave Burdick

Dave Burdick

Posted: April 29, 2009 08:00 AM

Obama's First 100 Green Days


Barack Obama: The first ______ president.

Can we put the word "green" in that blank? Hard to say, so early. But we may be off to a pretty good start. When Obama was elected president, some environmentalists believed it signaled the dawning of a new, green era. Others pointed to his history with the coal lobby as a red flag. In fact, Obama's coal talk still worries some enviros.

Grist's David Roberts blogged here at HuffPost Green what the Obama presidency could mean for the environment. Have the projections stood up?

Here are some environmental highlights from Obama's first 100 days as president:


IT'S THE STUPID ECONOMY, STUPID

Was it over before it began? HuffPost's Sam Stein reported way back in November on an issue that environmentalists just hate: the false notion that going green means going broke. Enviros worried soon after Obama was elected that he'd get so caught up in repairing the economy left in shambles by the previous administration that he'd forget about the environment and energy infrastructure left in shambles by the previous administration.

So what happened? Obama stepped up to the plate and faced the chin music.

In his first press conference, he devoted time to defending energy spending. And he's continued to defend the easy stuff that critics have made fun of: spending money on weatherization and retrofitting. Remember Obama's tire gauges? He's defended that, too. It turns out that science (with facts) has shown that weatherization and proper inflation of tires can save the nation a pretty penny, so he's taking it seriously.

While sometimes it seems that Obama's environmental goals suffer at the hands of the economy, the president insists that bringing the United States up to speed on energy technology and infrastructure is not negotiable and that, among other things, a "green stimulus" would include spending for a vitally important smart grid. Obama also created a Middle Class Task Force, headed up by Vice President Joe Biden. Its first objective was to investigate creating more green-collar jobs for the middle class.

HAVE TEAM, WILL CHANGE

In striving to create what you'd call "change," the Obama administration found the environment to have a pretty low bar. How low? It was headline news when new EPA administrator Lisa Jackson said that science would be a major consideration when determining environmental policy. Really. The U.N. was stunned.

Suddenly, the U.S. was interested in taking action against things that poison people and the planet, like mercury, and even labeling carbon emissions as harmful to public welfare -- a move whose implications will be widespread. (Like, "Hey Ya" widespread.)

A Nobel laureate physicist and three EPA staffers from the Clinton administration rounded out Obama's green team picks, plus a guy from rural Colorado in a bolo tie and cowboy hat. You know, that guy might just have a thing for mountains.

The cherry on top for some grassroots environmentalists was Van Jones being appointed to a spot advising on green jobs.

Obama is said to prefer his staff choices to form a team of rivals. With his green team, he hit that dead on. The New York Times reported that members of Obama's cabinet had been dueling over environmental issues since 1997.

CHANGE ENABLER

On one toxic issue, the president has stepped aside -- to allow someone else to enact faster change. Environmentalists have long called for stricter standards on cars, and while Obama may not have been able to do anything at the federal level with Congress trying to figure out if and how to save the U.S. auto industry, he knew who could: California.

So Obama decided to let states determine their own stricter emissions standards. The upshot was that if California, a very large, environmentally-aware (and yet car-obsessive) state were to set high fuel economy standards, major automakers would have no choice but to cater to the needs of that state's residents. (Or maybe it could limply fight back.)

Of course, when you do things like that, you risk getting the middle of the country a bit steamed.

And when the executive branch isn't enough, Obama's action -- and perhaps the winds of change -- have freed up legislators to do things like drafting a bold climate bill tougher even than what Obama outlined in various campaign promises.

NOT SWEATING THE SMALL STUFF

He drinks bottled water and he keeps the thermostat up. What can you do? He's not quite shaping up to be the green living role model that his wife is. Though they did both go out and plant trees with former President Bill Clinton recently.

Follow Dave Burdick on Twitter: www.twitter.com/daveburdick

Barack Obama: The first ______ president. Can we put the word "green" in that blank? Hard to say, so early. But we may be off to a pretty good start. When Obama was elected president, some environmen...
Barack Obama: The first ______ president. Can we put the word "green" in that blank? Hard to say, so early. But we may be off to a pretty good start. When Obama was elected president, some environmen...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:17 PM on 05/01/2009
On the environment, the key thing is the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) issue. Unfortunately, not only the Obama Administration and the Democrats in Congress (the mainstream liberals and not just Sen Byrd & co), and the liberal activist coalitions like the 1SkyCoalition and PowerShift/Powervote all have signed on to the notion that a GOAL of 80% or 83% or so CO2 emissions cut by the US by 2050 is sufficient. Jim Hansen, who to Huffpo's credit and the discredit of most of the MSM including the NY Times, has had a chance to run columns here, about how not just EMISSIONS, but overall atmospheric LEVELS of GHGs must be cut, to under 350 ppm CO2 equivalent GLOBALLY, and soon, or we are in what daddy Bush (who was despicable but looks great compared to his son) called "deep doo doo".

I would hope that at least SOME in the movement and the leading writers on the subject would constantly at least consider this urgent analysis by the leading climatologist on the Greenhouse Effect, even though the MSM in the US ignores him (he got page one coverage in the Guardian)

BTW I drink bottled water -- and FIJI! -- as I need to maximize the amount of what I drink is water. I know I'm lazy but unless the right policy goals are set, all this will be merely shifting deck chairs on the proverbial Titanic
05:31 PM on 04/29/2009
And how many thousands of gallons of jet fuel has he used up in the first 100 days going all over the world to tell other countries how much the U.S. sucks and how green he is?
08:01 PM on 04/29/2009
I agree!
04:47 PM on 04/29/2009
Al Gore said Tuesday the world must act quickly to slow the melting of the world's polar ice packs and glaciers before it reaches a critical rate for global warming.

But it turns out the world acted very quickly indeed, as Germany's Radio Bremen reports (translation here):

The research aircraft "Polar 5" today concluded its Arctic expedition in Canada. During the flight, researchers measured the current ice thickness at the North Pole and in areas that have never before been surveyed. The result: The sea-ice in the surveyed areas is apparently thicker than scientists had suspected.

Normally, newly formed ice measures some two meters in thickness after two years. "Here, we measured ice thickness up to four meters," said a spokesperson for Bremerhaven's Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research.

Is it possible that global warming is neither a catastrophe waiting to happen nor a fraud but merely the result of confusion induced by the metric system?
--J. Taranto
04:02 PM on 04/29/2009
Where were the greens during the flyover debacle. Us little people need to air up our tires and turn down our thermostats, but it is OK for Obama to fly around a 747 and scramble fighters for a photo op. The true greens need to calculate how many average Americans could heat/cool their homes with the wasted fossil fuel.
03:59 PM on 04/29/2009
"Your life is your garden, your thoughts are the seeds. If your life isn't awesome, you've been watering the weeds." -Terry Prince
01:24 PM on 04/29/2009
so because he drinks bottled water, he may not be "green" enough?! Obama is not a tree-hugger, he wants to change things for the better, but he won't do it at any cost or by somehow harming his chances for reelection. If we are lucky to see his second term and the Dems still have a majority in Congress, maybe then we can see bigger changes. These things can't happen very fast.
11:06 AM on 04/29/2009
The machine will protect us from ourselves. Welcome to the machine. Those that oppose the machine will be re-educated.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mountainweb
Conservative Commonsense
09:51 AM on 04/29/2009
Way to early to try to tag him with that label. Have to keep in mind that the economy is far more important at this point than being "green" and we have yet to see any real "green" jobs created because, it takes time to turn things around. And sadly the "green" technology is not in place to truly replace coal.

We have to hope that what is now in place, is the will to push the "green" technology forward to the place where coal can be replaced.....