Prop. 5: Smarter, Cheaper Crime Policies

Besides the presidential race, California voters face another choice between change and more of the same on November 4. Proposition 5, the Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act, asks voters to decide between squandering billions of dollars each year on the same old criminal justice policies, or voting Yes on 5 to change that system, save money, save lives and reduce crime.

If Prop. 5 passes, it could also send a signal to voters and legislators in every state that there is a better way to deal with addiction and nonviolent crime.

On many issues, California leads the nation. But on crime and prisons, the Golden State lags behind many others, with a costly and overburdened prison system that now consumes more than $10 billion each year.

At a time when our state is saddled by a multi-billion-dollar deficit, Prop. 5 is the only initiative on California's ballot that actually cuts government spending.

The state's nonpartisan Legislative Analyst says Prop. 5 will reduce prison operating costs by $1 billion or more per year, and will save another $2.5 billion by avoiding new prison construction.

Prop. 5 achieves those savings by safely reducing prison overcrowding, and by offering treatment and rehabilitation to nonviolent youth and drug offenders. Sure, treatment costs money, too, but much less than incarceration, which runs at $46,000 per person per year.

There are a lot of people in the prisons running up that huge annual tab -170,000 people are crammed into California prisons built for 100,000. Since the state has been unable to reduce overcrowding, federal judges are now threatening to take over the prison system and impose a solution.

One reason for overcrowding is that we can't seem to keep former inmates from returning. Every month 10,000 people finish their state prison sentences and are released back into California's communities. Almost none of them have received any meaningful treatment or rehabilitation while behind bars. About 70% of them will be sent back to prison within three years, a rate that is twice the national average.

What's happening in California is the most extreme example of a national problem. According to the Pew Center on the States, the United States incarcerates 2.4 million people in its prisons and jails, or one in every 100 Americans -- by far the highest incarceration rate in the world. The United States has only 5% of the world's population but 25% of the world's prisoners. Of those incarcerated, the overwhelming majority have substance abuse or mental health problems, especially nonviolent offenders. And an appallingly disproportionate number are people of color: one in nine black men between the ages of 20 and 34 are behind bars.

Clearly, the system is broken. Now is the time to fix it.

Prop. 5 is a system-wide reform. It starts by creating support services for young people struggling with drugs. Right now, California offers virtually no help for young people with substance abuse problems. Without treatment these youth are at much higher risk of becoming future criminals, fueling a pipeline straight to prison.

Next, Prop. 5 significantly expands access to treatment-instead-of-incarceration options for nonviolent drug offenders. These include drug courts and Proposition 36, a highly successful program passed by 61% of voters in 2000. In just seven years, Prop. 36 has graduated 84,000 people, saved taxpayers nearly $2 billion and, according to independent UCLA researchers, resulted in no increase in crime. These researchers stress that Prop 36 would be even more successful if it received adequate funding.

Prop. 5 greatly expands and properly funds this proven program, while making improvements recommended by national experts and giving judges more power to hold offenders accountable, including jail sanctions as a last resort.

Drug court programs also produce impressive outcomes. Those programs are much smaller that Prop. 36, which is open to ten times the number of nonviolent drug offenders. To help them expand, Prop. 5 nearly triples funding for drug courts in California. In fact, Prop. 5 offers more money for California's drug courts than the federal government distributed to drug courts in all 50 states combined last year.

Prop. 5 also grants judges more power to decide, on a case-by-case basis, whether to divert certain nonviolent offenders to drug treatment. This is something drug courts do now. Under Prop. 5, the judge may find that substance abuse motivated a nonviolent offense and that drug treatment would be in the best interests of public safety.

Finally, Prop. 5 deals with the fact that California has given up on rehabilitation behind bars, with disastrous results. Prop. 5 increases rehabilitation in prisons and for all offenders on parole. They'll have the resources they need, including educational and vocational training, drug and mental health treatment, and family counseling, to turn their lives around. Prop. 5 stops the revolving prison door and creates productive members of society.

By making these smart choices, Prop. 5 will help tens of thousands of people each year break their addictions, break the cycle of crime and incarceration, improve public safety and save taxpayers billions. That's why it is supported by the League of Women Voters of California, California Nurses Association, California Federation of Teachers and the Consumer Federation of California, among many others.

In these tough economic times, Californians can no longer accept the status quo - dumping $10 billion a year into a failed system. We've fallen way behind the rest of the country, even traditionally conservative states, on these necessary reforms, but Prop. 5 gives California voters the chance to once again lead the nation.

It's time to vote Yes on Prop. 5.

Comments

[Thabor]

Read the actual analysis. The annual savings on prisons is expected to be almost completely offset by corresponding spending on th treatment programs.

[Saynit]

Propostion 5 provides for ADOLESCENT DRUG TREATMENT. This is a well kept secret in all the anti-advertisement regarding this propostion.

I am an outpatient services provider and cannot believe that there are relatively few services for adolescents. Especially since this is where the problem starts.. Parents come to my office everyday asking about adolescent services in Riverside County, and we have to tell them that there are few options available. Even the program of which I am the director should be offering more instense services, like mental health treatment, anger management, family groups, vocational counseling etc...but there is no money available to pay for these intense services. With the current state funded Medi-Cal moniesl we can only offer 2 groups per week for 90 minutes, kids go home and nothing else really changes. Adolescents need a treatment program that offers all the components I mentioned and a vote for prop 5 will make that happen.

Tinya Holt
Perris Valley Recovery Program, Inc.

VOTE YES PROPOSITION 5

[themoeman]

This is a wreck--Vote NO!

Why? If someone commits a crime all they would have to do is say they did it to feed their drugs habit and they would get directed into a rehab versus paying the price for their crime. You think criminals will tell the truth? Almost impossible to prove that someone isn't addicted. Geez, If one could do the same for temporary insanity they would all feign mental illness.

My qualifications on this subject are that I have gone thru rehab (paid my own way no crime) and my experience in dealing w/ and cleaning up w/ the criminals who went into the diversion program was ridiculous: they made it hard for people who want to get clean stay in a program.

A friend of mine who was one of my counselors in rehab gave me tons of info on how bad most programs are affected by the current diversion program(but good for the program's bottom line).

If people want to clean up they can do it in jail and get SOME time off for participating. They can work the rest of their program while on parole.

The only crime this may work for is simple possession of a SMALL amount of drugs (if they have ounces of coke, herion...they can only be dealing)--no thieves or other criminals should get this "get out of jail crime". Marijuana should also be separated from the hard drugs...

[LiberalBuzz]

A great post and one worth remembering in the polling booth. We've voted for it.

BUT you are forgetting the single greatest more powerful foe to all of this, The Prison Guards Union.

They don't want ANYTHING to do with making things work. Just more prisoners, with more overtime.No rehab no work, no education, nada.

They want things the way they are.

Arnold came into office vowing to take them on, one year later he was as much under their thumb as anyone has ever been.

THAT is the biggest foe to all of this. The Prison Union.