More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dave Hollander

Dave Hollander

Posted: March 22, 2010 04:17 PM

There Will Be Blood

What's Your Reaction:
2010-03-22-danieldaylewis.jpg

2010-03-22-MayweatherMarquez_Hoganphotos4.jpg


I don't think there's any way getting around it. It's getting bloodier by the minute.

Last month, reports linked the sinister Dr. Anthony Galea --his creepy-sounding blood-spinning methods and alleged HGH trafficking -- to Alex Rodriguez, Carlos Beltran, and huge names outside of baseball. Jose Reyes, also sullied by the Galea affair, analyzed his blood confirming a mild case of hyperthyroidism. Major League Baseball initiated a whisper campaign that they might adopt some kind of blood testing to catch any more sneaky HGH users. For sure, they say, all will see the needle and the damage done in the minor leagues right away.

Of course, the players unions, the MLBPA, NFLPA -- those bastions of fairness for all members -- will object to blood testing on the grounds that it's intrusive, unreliable, and unfair to members who are scared of needles...

Sigh. What's a non-HGH-taking professional athlete to do?

Enter Floyd Mayweather. Mayweather is insisting that anyone he fights submits, as he will, to Olympic-style random blood and urine testing right up until they walk into the ring. Both he and Shane Mosley, for their May 1st fight in Las Vegas, will be the first boxers ever to agree to such scrutiny. Mayweather hopes all of boxing and all professional sports follows his lead.

For better or for worse there are no unions in boxing. This time it's for the better. You want to fight the champ for big money? Be clean. Manny Pacquiao refused Mayweather's request for blood testing and turned down one of the most lucrative and anticipated bouts in recent boxing history. You've got to wonder why? "Obviously he has something to hide," Mayweather told me. I think it really is that obvious.

What's fascinating to observe here is that we have a sport in boxing where athletes can call out opposing athletes and ensure that both competitors are clean; or else no work and no paycheck. Wouldn't you like to see that in other sports? Why not, in baseball, allow each team to identify five opposing players who must undergo random blood testing before each series? Why not before each NFL Sunday have opposing coaches submit a list of 5 offensive and 5 defensive players whose blood they'd like to see? Individual sports: Phil Mickelson can mercilessly needle Tiger Woods. Wimbledon, finally, would be bloody well PED-free!

You can think what you may about Floyd Mayweather but his stance on blood-testing is intellectually consistent with the purity of his fighting style. Mayweather is a technical boxing genius. He has studied the sweet science since barely old enough to drag his duffle to a Detroit gym. His advantage in the ring comes from knowledge, practice and execution. He takes no shortcuts.

Like Mayweather. Dislike Mayweather. But disagree with his basic stance on blood testing in sports? Obviously you have something to hide.

 

Follow Dave Hollander on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DaveAHollander

 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedWhiteandBlueState
Let's all be purple.
07:04 PM on 05/04/2010
I also respect Manny's spiritual / holistic reasoning. I don't fault Floyd for this stance and I'll also never rule out the whole thing was orchestrated to make even more money for the both of them. After all no serious fight fan gave Clottey or Mosley a chance and now there really is no one else for either to fight.

I think the one chink in your preposition is Manny. I honestly don't think he's juicing. And his offer, from the start, to be blood tested immediately following the fight (and now two weeks before) is good enough for this fight fan.

I love Mayweather and I also love Manny. There was never a doubt, nor is there now that this fight will happen - and if they fight this November, I like Manny. If it rolls late into 2011 - Mayweather.

And yes, there will be blood.
06:23 AM on 03/24/2010
I am a fan of Pacman, but I cant see giving up 50 millions dollars over a needle in your arm for less than a minute. We all know it was used as a way to get under his skin, take the test and get in the ring and pound him everything you think about the needle. I did lose some respect for him, because if you have nothing to hide it would not be a problem.
07:05 PM on 03/23/2010
Using your logic, Cal Ripken, Jr., Tony Gwynn, Don Mattingly, and many, many others must've had something to hide since they never advocated for any kind of testing.

I
08:59 PM on 03/23/2010
It's not a matter of "advocating." And the idea that Ripken (among others) doesn't advocate testing is an assumption, and a pretty dumb one at best.
09:57 PM on 03/23/2010
Oh, please. Ripken never peeped up ONCE when he played that there should be testing to protect the intergrity of the game. Stop the athlete worship. It's sad.
01:53 AM on 03/23/2010
The Mayweather vs Mosley fight is expected to get over 3 million PPV sales and more than the Pacquiao vs Clottey fight. Mayweather the more defensive fighter is the People’s Choice but let’s not take for granted the skills of Mosley.

Mosley has had big fights against dela Hoya, Margarito, Vargas and a lot more heavy punchers.

Mayweather on the other hand who has the reputation of choosing Light Punchers has also great defense. But defense doesn't make you win in boxing.

I predict a Unanimous Decision win for Mosley on May 1, 2010.

http://mayweather-vs-mosley-update.blogspot.com/