More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dave Johnson

Dave Johnson

GET UPDATES FROM Dave Johnson

At the Deficit Table: Wingnuts, Wall Street & Wealthy But Not Women & Working People

Posted: 05/24/11 07:42 PM ET

In DC the elite are gathered around tables discussing budget cuts, but not jobs to cure a deficit largely caused by a lack of jobs and tax cuts. The last time these DC geniuses gathered around tables they extended tax cuts for the wealthy, dramatically worsening the deficits that are causing their fainting spells today. Not at the table: women, working people, the poor or any semblance of democracy.

Just 10 years ago the country had huge budget surpluses. Then they cut taxes for the rich and dramatically increased military spending. They privatized (i.e. handed to cronies) as much of the government as they could get away with. They deregulated almost everything, stopped enforcing the laws and regulations that remained. They closed 50,000 factories, sending millions of jobs out of the country. This all came to a head, as it had to, and millions more jobs were lost, which exploded the already-huge deficits as unemployment, food stamps, etc. increased while tax revenues declined.

Now there is a deficit of jobs, causing the deficit of budget. At the same time there are millions of jobs that obviously need to be done, maintaining and modernizing our infrastructure, educating our people, moving us away from oil and coal and otherwise improving our health and our lives and out spirits. But these are not the issues being discussed at the table.

Wealthy And Wall Street At The Table

These negotiations going on behind the scenes do not represent the public.

Remember the deficit commission that was headed by a right-wingnut and a board member of a huge Wall Street firm? The two of them came up with a "serious" plan that cut taxes for the rich and cut the things government does for the rest of us.

Now there is the Biden Group described (see below) as an "Old Boys Club."

At the table: a bunch of well-paid elites, many possibly even hoping to cash in later with big-money jobs on Wall Street or K Street (lobbying).

Not At The Table

Women are not at the table -- especially not single mothers or older women. Working people are not at the table. The poor are not at the table. The retired are not at the table. The unemployed are not at the table. The open, transparent and accountable processes required by democracy are not at the table.

Restoring taxes on the wealthy and cutting the military fixes these problems, but these are not at the table.

Putting people to work maintaining and modernizing our infrastructure would fix these problems. But this is not at the table.

There is a People's Budget from the Progressive Caucus that fixes all of these problems, but it is not at the table.

And jobs, infrastructure, the People's Budget, cuts in the huge military budget, tax increases on the rich are what the public overwhelmingly wants done. But the public is not at the table.

No one at the table is speaking for the American People, for the American Majority that wants taxes restored on the wealthy.

Women And Working People Not At The Table

Where are the women? Where are the working people? Where are the unemployed? Why are they not at the table?

The Older Women's Economic Security (OWES) Task Force has sent a letter to the President, asking that members of the administration with expertise on women's issues be added to the White House's advisory team discussing strategies to reduce deficit spending. From the letter,

"It is simply not enough to send a few privileged men to the table to 'solve' the nation's budget problem," states the letter from the OWES Task Force. "We welcome the opportunity to bring our voices and expertise to a discussion with you and your advisors, and we request that members of your administration with expertise on women's issues, such as Secretary Hilda Solis and Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, be added to the White House's advisory team working on these negotiations."

... The old boys club meeting has consisted of Republican House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA), U.S. Senators John Kyl (R-AZ), Daniel Inouye (D-HI), Max Baucus (D-MT), Reps. Jim Clyburn (D-SC), and Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), who have convened for the budget negotiations with Vice President Biden, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, Budget Director Jack Lew, and economic adviser Gene Sperling.

Media Gives A Pass

The elite media say that the only "serious" approach to deficits is to cut back on the things We, the People (government) do for each other -- budget cuts. Tax increases on the wealthy, taking rates back to a where they were when we didn't have these problems -- that's not "serious." Investing in modernizing infrastructure, educating our people and efficient energy so our economy is more competitive is not "serious." Taking on mercantilist trading partners who are grabbing jobs and markets is not "serious." The People's Budget especially is not "serious."

The People And Democracy Demand To Be At The Table

A new round of polls is out, and the public is demanding a change in the DC elite approach. Even more than the last round of polls, these polls show that the public demands to be at the table.

Associated Press-GfK poll,

They're not buying it. Most Americans say they don't believe Medicare has to be cut to balance the federal budget, and ditto for Social Security, a new poll shows.

Public Policy Polling conducted a poll sponsored by the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, Democracy For America, MoveOn.org, and CREDO Action, which showed the following answer to the idea of cutting Social Security:

In order to reduce the national debt, would you support or oppose cutting spending on Social Security, which is the retirement program for the elderly?
  • Ohio: 16% support, 80% oppose
  • Missouri: 17% support, 76% oppose
  • Montana: 20% support, 76% oppose
  • Minnesota: 26% support, 72% oppose

A Daily Kos/SEIU State of the Nation Poll asked respondents to name their top issue, from a list of nine. Of course JOBS was #1:

Q: I'm going to name nine issues. Which of these is most important to you right now: education, Social Security, Medicare, jobs, national security, gas prices, taxes, immigration, or the federal budget deficit?

Jobs: 26
Federal budget deficit: 18
Education: 15
Social Security: 13
Gas prices: 10
Medicare: 5
National security: 5
Immigration: 3
Taxes: 3
Something else: 2

Take action: Tell President Obama to put the People's Budget on the table.

This post originally appeared at Campaign for America's Future (CAF) at their Blog for OurFuture. I am a Fellow with CAF.

Sign up here for the CAF daily summary.

 

Follow Dave Johnson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/dcjohnson

In DC the elite are gathered around tables discussing budget cuts, but not jobs to cure a deficit largely caused by a lack of jobs and tax cuts. The last time these DC geniuses gathered around tables ...
In DC the elite are gathered around tables discussing budget cuts, but not jobs to cure a deficit largely caused by a lack of jobs and tax cuts. The last time these DC geniuses gathered around tables ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
Lost Rights
2008 Dem Convention Denver, Expect this in 2012
09:36 AM on 05/31/2011
Obama won't help, he is one of the elite, and is owned by them just like 98% of all politicians and judges.
Remember, 'Obama is just not that into you', to quote AH.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert SF
12:40 PM on 05/27/2011
The People's Budget is doomed to fail by its name. People? Never use the word "people" in the context of government. That's what countries like North Korea and Cuba do. That's where you can safely say the People's This or the People's That. But not in the US, where socialism causes a sort of "gay panic," and people go hysterical even at the thought of touching a socialist.

They should have called it the Business Sense Budget or the Dollar Maximizing Budget. That might have garnered it more support.
06:00 PM on 05/25/2011
The author's "Campaign for America's Future" group is great! I recommend signing up to get very informative daily e-mail articles. click below article.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thecreeksedge
10:47 AM on 05/25/2011
What do we expect other than the best government money can buy? Investing in candidates has a payoff. In the Bush years, the tax cuts were the best investment the wealthy could have made. Now, the same mentality is at work on the deficit.
Eppur Si
One of the majority who are not part of the "99%"
10:20 AM on 05/25/2011
How many times must you lefties repeat this tripe. “Corporations are evil oligarchs who run everything and steal from the rest of us, and by the way, how DARE they leave the country and go elsewhere?†Who are you talking to? Anyone who can be taken in by this drivel already believes it, and the rest of us are just laughing.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Johnson
12:20 PM on 05/25/2011
The problem is only those corporations that DO steal from the rest of us.

As for leaving the country to go elsewhere, we fought for this democracy and our way of life. We fought the Civil War and WWII especially, so that we would have the strong protections of our right to decide as a people to have good workers protections.

So you can laugh at us for believing in our democracy, but we are going to find a way to stop these corporate predators from crossing borders to evade the protections that democracy brings us.
Eppur Si
One of the majority who are not part of the "99%"
02:14 PM on 05/25/2011
LOL. You fought in WWII to defend your right to force predator corporations to stay in your country? Which country were you fighting for? The Soviets?

I laugh because what you believe in bears no resemblance to democracy at all.
08:45 AM on 05/25/2011
Don't you people ever get tired of this Democratic nonsense.

Deficits are cause ONLY by spending.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Johnson
10:26 AM on 05/25/2011
Before Reagan cut taxes we didn't have huge deficits.

Clinton raised taxes, we had had huge budget surpluses.

Bush cut taxes -- left office with a $1.4 TRILLION deficit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thecreeksedge
10:49 AM on 05/25/2011
One can believe this only if you ignore history and the facts. The Reagan and Bush tax cuts contributed mightily to budget deficits and the current federal debt. Anyone with an ounce of math sense could figure that out.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
skywalk
Socially Liberal & Constructively Financially Cons
08:35 AM on 05/25/2011
â€At the same time there are millions of jobs that obviously need to be done, maintaining and modernizing our infrastructure, educating our people, moving us away from oil and coal and otherwise improving our health and our lives and out spirits.†Is it not common sense to everyone that these items are our priority, they need to be done! If we eliminated the Bush tax cuts, reduced a military spending, raise the payroll tax cap & means testing for social security and Medicare to invest in these items (jobs and our future) and save crucial safety nets the rich would get much richer faster and we wouldn’t have a revenue problem we could solve our deficit problem. But they don’t want to sacrifice like most Americans have and that played no part in this economic failure (for the most part). Greed kills and it is going to destroy our country!
08:01 AM on 05/25/2011
Eric Cantor's "nothing for Missouri unless I get what I want, first" attitude is ample evidence, in and of itself, that our so-called representatives in Washington do not even pretend, any longer, to represent us.

The old, the poor, the unemployed, women and all other categories of Americans aside from the rich and powerful must stand up now and demand that our voices are heard. We all must have a seat at the table. And Social Security cuts, Medicare cuts and so on must be taken off the table.
08:46 AM on 05/25/2011
No, it says that the Washington elite are finally hearing what the constituency is demanding.

Denying funding for something that everyone supports is the oldest game in the book and should surprise nobody.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mike Macguinness
Artist of industrial dementia
07:24 AM on 05/25/2011
The class war heats up. The Corporate Oligarchy, and the "liberal" media nod, and speak wisely with serious voices, and fatherly nonsense. Whats on TV? Hey , Hey did you see Kirstie Alley on that Dancin show. Think the world will end in October? A country gets the leadership it deserves,but we deserve better. If Obama is the only choice, and for me , he is, is it still a democracy?
07:08 AM on 05/25/2011
Its pretty discouraging. The People's Budget is the only one that makes sense and yet very few are talking about it. It needs about 100 times the publicity it is getting.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dave Johnson
10:27 AM on 05/25/2011
You can help by letting your member of Congress know that you know about it and support it.
ALABAMALEFTIST
What is to be done?
06:56 AM on 05/25/2011
Because the media is controlled by the employer class the true viciousness of this class war remains unappreciated. The nation keeps wages low, in some cases at barely subsistance levels, labor demand low by outsourcing to other third world countries and then strips workers of the few benefits they have by busting unions, stealing pensions and failing to enforce labor laws. The toll of human misery is kept hidden while the old boys drink old bourbon and smoke expensive cigars.
03:41 AM on 05/25/2011
Let's be honest here....too many so called lefties have dirty hands too.

I was getting a little excited about the Repugs shooting themselves in the foot with the medicare issue.

Then....sooner or later, I remember once again that most Dems are just like the Repugs....bought and paid for by the oligarchs and corporations.

The politicians represent special interests and not the people, especially NOT the ordinary American people.

It is nice to see the Repugs getting h-ll over medicare....but then we see ONE TRILLION DOLLARS of cuts on the table and no tax increases....and I remember "our side" (Dems) are not really that different.

If they cut ONE TRILLION DOLLARS from the budget....does anybody have to guess who will get hurt the most?
(hint: Not the rich and corporations.)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:39 AM on 05/25/2011
That's precisely why the "People's Budget" is so important. It will leave a $30 billion surplus at the end of ten years, while protecting the poor, elderly, disabled, women, and putting people back to work with upgrading basic infrastructure, as well as investments in education, green energy (to get us off foreign oil), women's health, and the arts, all proven wealth multipliers. In fact, in 30 years, by following the "People's Budget," we could be looking at huge improvements in the quality of life for every American while paying down the debt.
08:51 AM on 05/25/2011
Yo nut...you need to remember that your side just came of huge majorities everywhere in government. As they accomlished so little of your agenda, they are either incompetent or don't REALLY support what they say.

Not good for your side!
03:07 AM on 05/25/2011
Other than social issues, the USA has been a one party entity for some time. There was no one at the healthcare table that didn't represent the industry. It would be remarkeable if an outsider snook in. What happens when government only represents a wealthy minority? If propaganda can't keep the unwashed in their place, force will.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
almostlyniceguy
Not young enough to know everything..
12:59 AM on 05/25/2011
Well written, and a harsh indictment of the process, especially a process under a president who cut his teeth supporting some of the groups you mention. People need to inform themselves and vote. It is the only way out of our predicament.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:18 PM on 05/24/2011
With regard to the poll results, which ranked the deficit as respondents' #2 concern, there wouldn't be any angst about the deficit at all if it weren't for the Tea Partiers who brought the issue to the forefront. Relative to the true problems facing the country (jobs, the economy), the deficit is a "we can put this one aside and deal with it later" type of issue.

And even if the deficit was something that needed to be dealt with RIGHT NOW (again, it's not) of course you are quite correct in pointing out that it could be alleviated if not eliminated by revoking the Bush tax cuts and removing the cap on the payroll tax. But somehow the right-wing spin doctors have convinced the rank & file that this would be a bad thing.

Summary: the current deficit brouhaha is more cynical manipulation by the right.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:40 AM on 05/25/2011
And the "People's Budget" has a $30 billion surplus at the end of ten years, whereas Ryan's "Road to Ruin" brings the deficit to zero in twenty years. Which is more effective at reducing the deficit?