G-20 Standing Up To China, Now It's Your Turn

As the manufacturing infrastructure of suppliers, technology knowledge, etc., moves to China, dependence follows. China appears to be ready to answer, "So what are you going to do about it?"
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

As the manufacturing infrastructure of suppliers, technology knowledge, etc., moves to China, dependence follows. China appears to be ready to answer, "So what are you going to do about it?"

The world is starting to realize this. Financial Times, yesterday: China reprimanded by G20 leaders.

Five prominent members of the Group of 20 leading economies, including the US and UK, sent a coded rebuke to China on Tuesday against backsliding on economic agreements.

In a letter to the rest of the G20 that shows frustration at slow progress this year, the leaders warned: "Without co-operative action to make the necessary adjustments to achieve [strong and sustainable growth], the risk of future crises and low growth remain."

The letter was signed by U.S. President Barack Obama, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, French President Nicolas Sarkozy, South Korean President Lee Myung-bak and UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

Meanwhile Business Week looks at China, in China: Closing for Business? (turn your sound off before clicking)

Nearly a decade after China's entry into the World Trade Organization, many foreign companies say the warm reception they once received has turned frosty. ... A new government procurement program known as "indigenous innovation" features rules favoring local firms: It could block sales worth billions of dollars a year. ... Beijing has written strict standards for everything from cell phones to cars, often couching them in a way that gives an advantage to domestic producers.

Summary, China used the promise of access to its huge market to grab control of much of the world's manufacturing. "You want to sell to us, you have to build your factories here." Now that they have it they are no longer as interested in sharing. And while they subsidize manufacturing in various ways - including currency manipulation - to lure companies to move factories and jobs to China, they are not letting those companies sell inside China. So the huge trade imbalance continues to grow.

China pursued an effective industrial policy. Meanwhile, we don't even have one.

What are we going to do about that?

The Treasury Department must report twice a year which countries are practicing unfair trade by artificially lowering the value of their currencies, making their imports cheaper and our exports pricier.

The next Treasury report on currency manipulation comes on April 15. The Chinese government is spending an unprecedented $30 billion a month buying dollars and selling yuan to keep its currency low and its exports cheap.

Yet regardless of who is in charge of the White House, the US has yet to follow the law and state the truth.

To share this:
Direct Twitter share link (click on this, don't copy it): http://bit.ly/dAKD4P

Direct Facebook share link (click on this, don't copy it): http://bit.ly/clpBmC

And then, after you have done these, demand that our government formulate and follow a national industrial policy so we can start bringing the jobs back home.

This post originally appeared at Campaign for America's Future (CAF) at their Blog for OurFuture as part of the Making It In America project. I am a Fellow with CAF.
Sign up here for the CAF daily summary.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot