iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
David Allyn

GET UPDATES FROM David Allyn
 

Can Students Love School? Yes, If Schools Love Students

Posted: 09/12/2012 11:58 am

There has been a lot of talk about the need for greater academic "rigor" in education. Rigor is meant to be a synonym for high standards in the curriculum, but the word reveals much about our culture's attitude toward learning. "Rigor," according to Merriam-Webster, means "harsh inflexibility in opinion, temper or judgmental severity; the quality of being unyielding or inflexible." Think of rigor mortis.

Georgetown Day (GDS), the school I attended from K-12, is considered one of the top private schools in the country. Graduates typically go to the most selective colleges. However, nothing about the school would normally be associated with rigor. From kindergarten through twelfth grade, for instance, we called our teachers by their first names. The Head of School was Gladys; the Upper School Head was Frank. We did most work independently. There were no end-of-year letter grades until high school (in lower and middle school we had effort grades: O for outstanding, E for excellent, G for good, etc.). Starting in ninth grade we were free to leave the building at our leisure; the campus was "open."

Independent schools have an enormous advantage over public schools because they can select their students. Classmates who caused trouble at GDS or failed to work hard were not invited back. Nevertheless, the humanistic culture of the school infused the student body. The school was dedicated to creating a warm, nurturing environment, where each of us was free to express ourselves creatively and intellectually. Sports took a back seat to the arts, which flowed through every aspect of the curriculum. We read novels in history, learned music in English, studied philosophy in math class, produced plays, made music, and had classes in painting every year that I can remember.

I never encountered a traditional "textbook" until eleventh-grade American history. Even that was supplemented with college-level essays by America's greatest historians. (When I got to graduate school and met the renowned Revolutionary historian Bernard Bailyn, I was in awe because I vividly remembered his essay from junior year of high school.)

The school wasn't perfect; there were bullies who acted with impunity beneath the radar of the faculty, who perhaps looked upon us all as little angels incapable of cruelty. And as I have written before, I did have a dud of a fifth-grade teacher. On the whole, however, it was a magical place. We worked hard because it was rewarding to do so. I worked much harder in high school than I would at my Ivy League college.

What was the importance of first names? It created a culture of caring and mutual respect. We knew our teachers were there because they wanted the best for us; we never looked at them as authority figures or people to rebel against. Today, when the school hosts reunions, it's the teachers that everyone wants to see. Laura and Bruce and Janet and Bill. They were our champions and our mentors. People are always surprised that I remember the name of every teacher I had from kindergarten through twelfth grade. How can that be surprising? My teachers were the most important people in my life.

The world would be better with more schools like GDS. And what about the kids who don't behave -- the ones who break all the rules and abuse the trust of the community? Well, perhaps we're collectively responsible for creating such children. Perhaps we reap what we sow. If we assume that children are a "problem" to be solved (to be controlled or crammed full of knowledge or taught how to behave), are we creating a self-fulfilling prophecy?

Excessive rigor is rarely a good idea; it suggests rigidity. Rigid bridges snap. Rigid walls collapse under strain. Personally, I am very glad there was little rigor in my childhood. I was happy with grassy fields and lots of free time, crayons and paper and paint, smart and caring teachers, interesting books, plenty of respect, and good questions to ponder. None of my former classmates went to Wall Street or made millions starting hedge funds, but today none of them seems to pine for more money either. We learned early on that a rich life comes through creativity, exploration, intellectual endeavor and service to the community.

 
FOLLOW EDUCATION
There has been a lot of talk about the need for greater academic "rigor" in education. Rigor is meant to be a synonym for high standards in the curriculum, but the word reveals much about our culture'...
There has been a lot of talk about the need for greater academic "rigor" in education. Rigor is meant to be a synonym for high standards in the curriculum, but the word reveals much about our culture'...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:42 AM on 10/02/2012
As a former GDS student, I appreciate and share your admiration for the school and its teaching philosophy which has undoubtedly shaped me into an informed citizen who is unafraid of questioning the world around me. Your portrayal, however, makes it seem as though its students have no motivations or goals of their own when in reality, GDS is an extremely competitive academic environment. Despite addressing teachers by their first names and the flexible educational model, students are both driven and ambitious; they are certainly not ignorant of financial matters or motivations considering many were from DC’s most powerful and wealthy families. Authority figures and textbooks are not entities to victimize and your interpretation of the word rigor ignores the subtleties that differentiate it from rigidity. What makes GDS a successful school is the balance between the freedom it allows and the high standards expected that achieves a self-motivated rigor stimulated from the students themselves. Being challenged and challenging back is what I loved about GDS and it is this form of rigor that is needed by schools everywhere.
01:37 PM on 10/01/2012
The African-American and Jewish parents who first sent their kids to the school chose to use first names only because of the discrimination against African-Americans: Whites in the city often called Blacks, "boy"/ "girl". African-Americans were degraded and had to call whites Mr. or Mrs. So, GDS adopted the first name thing to push equality. I did not learn this until two years ago when I attended a 65TH anniversary workshop about how parents can talk to their kids about race.
02:12 AM on 09/19/2012
My daughter attended GDS from prek through high school. As an educator, I was thrilled to find this amazing place where a love of learning for its own sake was central to every pursuit, and where students were respected as intelligent curious beings. My daughter thrived. I am forever grateful to GDS for being true partners with us in raising our child to become the interesting, bright, creative, successful young woman she is today. She and her many GDS friends continue to see and support each other as friends do who have shared important and formative experiences. They are thoughtful, generous young adults who give me hope and make me smile at the wonderful people they have become. No surprise...just delight. In my profession I have seen the best and worst of what school can do to an innocent, eager young person. GDS gets child development. Every child deserves a GDS.
02:08 PM on 09/14/2012
Your points are cogent, but are from a limited view of educational/instructional rigor. Rigor is creating an environment in which each student is expected to learn at high levels, each student is supported so he or she can learn at high levels, and each student demonstrates learning at high levels (Blackburn, 2008). In other words, it's about providing experiences so students can learn at higher and higher levels.
02:04 PM on 09/14/2012
Thorough article of interest, but I would point out that instructional rigor is far more than the dictionary definition of rigid. Rigor is creating an environment in which each student is expected to learn at high levels, each student is supported to he or she can learn at high levels, and each student demonstrates learning at high levels (2008). From this perspective, rigor is truly about student learning--at higher and higher levels.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EvanRavitz
07:43 PM on 09/13/2012
Anyone who wants happy, successful kids should check out Sudbury Schools: http://sudval.org/ where kids do what they want within the laws made by them and staff. A weekly school meeting, with kids and adults treated alike, decides everything including the hiring and firing. I took my Congressman Jared Polis there who was very impressed. These schools mostly operate cheaper than public schools, because things aren't regimented, so they need fewer copies of textbooks and computers. Here's how incredible learning can be when the kids are given real freedom and democracy: http://education.change.org/blog/view/simple_math
12:08 PM on 09/13/2012
Beautiful article! I attended GDS from grades 7-12 and it was an incredible place. I felt very lucky to be able to go there, and it influenced the way I went into the world.
11:25 AM on 09/13/2012
When I got to the line about seeing "Laura and Bruce and Janet and Bill" at renunions I couldn't help but smile with fond memories. I love that I could tell exactly who you were talking about even though I'm a younger alumnae and we never overlapped at GDS. It really demonstrates how calling our teachers by their first names created a solid sense of community that was invaluable to my education.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Steve Nelson
01:40 PM on 09/12/2012
Lovely piece, David. Thanks.
11:24 AM on 09/12/2012
Great essay about the school that taught me how to write BEFORE arriving at an Ivy League university where everyone seemed to need help in that department. You left out the award-winning newspaper, The Augur Bit. :) But I did spot one grammatical error: "...but today none of them seem..." should read "seems."
05:57 PM on 09/13/2012
Actually, that "none" must always be treated as a singular pronoun is a common misconception, though I see the author changed it. It can be read as "not one" (singular) or "not any" (plural.) The verb you would use depends on which of these were intended. No worries, though; very few people seem to be aware of this rule! :)