Adapted from Abraham Lincoln's "Spot" Resolutions, December 22, 1847.
Whereas the President of the United States, in his remarks to a PBS interviewer on Wednesday, August 28, 2013 has declared that "I have no interest in any kind of open-ended conflict in Syria, but we do have to make sure that when countries break international norms on weapons like chemical weapons that could threaten us, that they are held accountable";
And again, in his remarks at the White House on Saturday, August 31, that "Now, after careful deliberation, I have decided that the United States should take military action against Syrian regime targets";
And yet again, in his remarks in Stockholm on September 4, that "My credibility's not on the line. The international community's credibility is on the line";
And whereas this House desires to obtain a full knowledge of the facts that go to establish whether it should vote for war against the government of Syria; therefore
Resolved by the House of Representatives, that the President of the United States be respectfully requested to inform this House--
First: Whether, having originally invited UN inspectors to collect evidence of the chemical warfare agent reported after an attack in Ghouta on August 21, the American government urged the inspectors, in contradiction of the same request, not to collect such evidence; and if so, what the reason was for the reversal.
Second: Whether, when Secretary of State Kerry on August 30 said "the U.N. can't tell us anything that we haven't shared with you," he meant that US inspectors had already conducted an examination of the evidence as thorough as UN inspectors are capable of performing; and when he said "the U.N. cannot galvanize the world to act, as it should," he meant that the US has, in fact, galvanized the world to act as it should; and if so, what countries, specifically, add up to his understanding of the world.
Third: Whether it is the moral right of the US to enforce the "international norms" which the president judges to have been set by the world; and if so, in his opinion, what other countries possess that right, and by what precedent.
Fourth: Whether he can give a source, or not, for the statement on September 4 by the secretary of state that jihadists among the rebel forces, hostile to the United States and committed to terrorism, number only 15% to 25% of the total forces which the congressional authorization would commit the US to subsidize and supply with arms.
Fifth: Whether, in view of the shooting of prisoners by rebel forces, documented in the New York Times on September 5, the US claims to control the actions of rebel forces; and if so, whether the US had control over those forces when this crime was committed.
Sixth: Whether, after the al-Nusra attack on the Christian village of Maaloula, documented by the Associated Press on September 5, the attack on Christians at a checkpoint west of the city of Homs documented by Reuters on August 17, and the reported general flight of Christians from Homs, the US government now assesses that there is, or is not, a pattern of persecution of Christians by rebel forces.
Seventh: Whether the entry into Syria on August 17 and 19 of US-trained guerrilla forces of the Free Syrian Army, numbering more than 300 -- and the passage of those forces through Ghouta about the time of the chemical attack, as documented in the Jerusalem Post on August 23 -- did, or did not, make them targets of the attack; and if not, what information about the activity of the forces leads to this conclusion.
Eighth: Whether there exists, or does not exist, a citable source, or combination of sources, to explain the secretary of state's figure of 1429 deaths in Ghouta, a figure more than double the number cited by any other authority.
Ninth: Whether the violent overthrow of the government of Syria--Iran's most stable ally in the Middle East-- will, or will not, assist the president's avowed intention of making progress toward a peaceful resolution of US differences with Iran.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.