Last week, a man impersonating billionaire Republican donor David Koch asked Gov. Scott Walker (R-Wisc.), "Now what else could we do for you down there?" After taking tens of thousands of dollars in Koch-related donations for his election, and creating a budget filled with corporate special interest carve outs, it would seem to make more sense if Walker asked David Koch, "what else can Wisconsin do for you?"
And that got me thinking. If he’ll spend 20 minutes shooting the breeze with a billionaire but he won't spend two minutes negotiating with Senate Democrats or unions, who else would Gov. Walker take a call from?
Certainly not nurses, or teachers, or cops, or firefighters standing in solidarity together against the political attack against the rights of workers.
But maybe some of these folks:
- He'd probably take a call from Diane Hendricks. She's the head of Wisconsin-based ABC Supply Company, and personally worth $2.1 billion, according to Forbes magazine. That ranks her as the third wealthiest person in the state. Perhaps he'd take her call because she donated $10,500 to Walker's 2010 run for governor, and another $10,000 to the Wisconsin Republican Party, according to data from the National Institute on Money in State Politics.
- Wisconsin's richest billionaire, Menard's Inc. CEO John Menard Jr., would also probably get through. The flinty CEO gave Walker $2,000 last year, and is also virulently anti-union. The 71 year-old Menard, who has a net worth of $5.2 billion, reportedly threatens store managers at his home improvement chain with 60 percent pay cuts if a store's employees organized a union. According to Good Jobs First, Menard's isn't opposed to government-funded programs, though, having received taxpayer-funded loans and credits worth $300,000 across the Midwest.
- Herbert Kohler Jr. also gave $2,000 to Walker's campaign. He probably knows how to get his calls returned. The plumbing fixture CEO has let the political money flow all over the country, and has given hundreds of thousands to GOP candidates and state and national political committees. And as Walker prepares pink slips for state workers, Kohler can probably offer advice: the company lost 487 jobs in Wisconsin in 2006, chalked up to imbalanced trade policies with China, according to a trade adjustment assistance database maintained by Public Citizen.
- Walker would probably also answer a call from Donald Schneider, who is the now-retired CEO of Schneider National, a trucking company. Though Schneider, worth $2.5 billion, didn't himself give political money to the governor, four family members and Schneider National employees gave more than $1,000 each. The trucking company is almost exclusively non-union, and its employees appear to give exclusively to Republicans. Schneider National isn't opposed to government spending per se, though. According to Good Jobs First, the company has received nearly $1 million in tax credits and rebates from the State of Illinois.
- Any one of the Johnson clan from Racine, Wisconsin - four family members each with a net worth of $2 billion, according to Forbes - would probably be able to get through to the Governor. The family, which runs chemical manufacturer S.C. Johnson is comprised of reliable Republican donors to candidates and political committees around the country. Fisk Johnson, current Chairman and CEO of the family business, gave Walker $1,000 in 2010.
Walker may or may not have received calls from these billionaires, but that's not the point. Instead of discussing placing troublemakers at rallies, running ads in swing areas, or crushing the unions with David Koch, Walker should be proactively calling these billionaires and other Wisconsin corporate leaders to ask them to share in the sacrifice to repair the state budget. To balance the budget on the backs of workers alone is wrong.
Just these eight Wisconsin billionaires - whose net worth is collectively $19.8 billion - could fill the $137 million budget gap this year with less than seven tenths of one percent of their net worth.
Think about that for a minute. Would any of these billionaires even miss seven tenths of one percent of their net worth?
Well, the real question here is not whether eight billionaires could do it. The question is whether Walker would ask them to give anything--besides contributions to his own campaign, that is. If Walker won't ask them, perhaps the citizens of Wisconsin should.
*The campaign finance data in this article was provided by the National Institute on Money in State Politics and the Center for Responsive Politics.*
Follow David Donnelly on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/daviddonnelly
Regardless, Federal Campaign laws exempt corporate media. The term "expenditure" does not include any news story, commentary, or editorial distributed through the facilities of any broadcasting station, newspaper, magazine, or other periodical publication.
Is it any wonder corporate media are the biggest supporters of new and stricter campaign laws that insure they have a monopoly?
But if a politician, individual citizen or grass roots organization must pay media outlets to carry their ads, how can positive or negative editorials by those same media outlets not have value?
Media corporations are themselves special interests and dependent on the advertising dollars of other special interests.
In the words of E.W. Scripps: “A newspaper must at all times antagonize the selfish interests of that very class which furnishes the larger part of a newspaper's income... The press in this country is dominated by the wealthy few...that it cannot be depended upon to give the great mass of the people that correct information concerning political, economical and social subjects which it is necessary that the mass of people Shall have in order that they vote...in the best way to protect themselves from the brutal force and chicanery of the ruling and employing classes.”
Do you think newspaper and broadcast corporations should have greater freedom than flesh and blood people? Do you think other types of corporations should have equal rights?
For the record, over and over and over again, whenever a study uses proper methodology including not only factoring in the cost of salary, benefits and pension, but also correcting for experience and expertise as opposed to simply comparing anybody who has a similar job title, it is clear that private industry workers make substantially more money than government sector workers. Yes, plenty of studies show otherwise, and all.... not most of them or some of them, but ALL OF THEM... use flawed methodologies. Call me old-fashioned, but, when I hang my belief system on something, I like to know it is correct and not based on junk science. That's just me, of course.
Fox news?
I bet he'd take a call form Nathan Lane.
Next it will be private worker rights - whereby people will be begging for any job they can get without vacation, sick days, weekends, or any benefits like pension etc.