EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

David Finkle

David Finkle

Posted: August 29, 2009 03:22 PM

Barack Obama: Left-Handed? Right-Handed? Ambidextrous? Ambivalent?


?>

What's wrong with this picture? Maybe nothing, but there's definitely something unusual about it. Not quite abnormal, but unquestionably deviating from the norm.

What's the picture under discussion? It's an image of Barack Obama signing an autograph for an onlooker at a Martha's Vineyard golf game. The President is wearing a short-sleeved white shirt and khaki trousers--very golf proper--and a smile. The autograph recipient is one of four spectators identified as part of a retiree's outing. The grinning seniors are holding cell phones or BlackBerrys or whatever on which they're likely just about to text, "You'll never guess who we just bumped into...."

So far, so usual. But look closer. Obama is signing with his left hand, but that's not really the stop-the-Tweeting news. Obama's left-handedness has been recorded in myriad places over the last couple of years, and much has been said about it--including his place as the fifth-left handed President in recent years. (Preceding southpaws are Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan, George G. W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton and, not long before that Harry S. Truman and not that much longer before him, Herbert Hoover.)

But wait. What's that I see on Obama's left wrist? Why, it's his wrist watch. And there's the rub. Left-handed people typically wear their watches on their right wrist, just as right-handed people wear their watches on the left wrist.

What does this tell us -- or at least imply? It tells us Obama is either one in a thousand, perhaps, who do this odd left-handed-left-wrist-watched thing, or it tells us he thinks of himself, or wants to think of himself, as right-handed. And I'm here to inform you that a certain number of column inches have been devoted to this trait as well -- although I've yet to find any specific reference to the President's writes-with-left-hand-wears-watch-on-left-wrist trait.

It's even been reported that our President executes certain tasks with his right hand. The Washington Post informed us over a year ago that then-candidate Obama eats pizza and sandwiches as a righty. But those are finger foods and not compelling for our analysis. Besides, Obama remains a lefty when knives, forks and spoons are involved.

Nonetheless, I can't stop wondering whether President Obama's ambidextrous tendencies somehow indicate ambivalent tendencies. And I bet I'm not alone in this. Am I the only one tempted to read into quirks like this, even as I'm aware that reading into it may be all it is.

As the President's first 200 days stretch toward 300 and political issues such as health care reform veer ever deeper into turbulent waters, I'm thinking maybe a person's not being firmly left-handed or right-handed means that as the metaphorical ball comes at him, he waits too long to decide which hand will catch it and instead lets the ball drop.

Of course, the flip side of ambivalence can be flexibility. Stephen Christman, a University of Toledo professor of behavioral psychology, told Washington Post reporter Melissa Roth that from his stand-point "mixed-handers are better able to see both sides of the story." And that's, of course, what I -- and you? -- want to believe about our current leader.

Christman did go on to say, "If you want change, you might be better with a mixed-handed candidate." No one is likely to have forgotten that change is what Obama was selling, what to millions of voters he represented when they went to the polls in droves last November. At the moment, however, with any improvement to the health care situation threatening to founder, change may not be what he's got in store for believers.

Full-disclosure: I'm left-handed. And I know that like many other left-handed people in a generally right-handed world I'm sensitive about it. I've been particularly sensitive about it ever since seventh grade when a metal-shop teacher looked over some work I was doing and said, "I don't know how you left-handed monkeys get along."

So, yes, I'm defensive about the left-handed state of being and want other lefties to be the same. Okay, I did not celebrate International Left-Handed Day this past August 13, but that doesn't disqualify me from membership in the club. I want commitment to the left-handed cause, and this may underlie my concerns about Obama and his seeming left-hand-right-hand vicissitudes.

Call me nuts, but I suspect the convictions that seem somewhat wobbly now that he's attained the nation's highest office would immediately strengthen if he looked his two hands over and committed once and for all to the left one. I just can't stop thinking that favoring his left hand would lean him in that direction in more ways than one.

 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:04 PM on 08/31/2009
As a lefty I wear my watch on my left wrist. Also most left handed people are somewhat ambidextro­us; we learn to do things with both hands. I do everything with my left hand except write. I came from a culture where using your left hand is considered rude.
09:57 AM on 08/30/2009
God made a few perfect people, the rest are right.....
07:02 PM on 08/29/2009
Another lefty here who has always worn his watch on his left wrist. That makes six, in the comments here... perhaps we're not as rare as you thought. Any right-watc­h wearing lefties out there care to speak up? We need at least six thousand in the comments here...

Almost all watches are very uncomforta­ble to wear on a right wrist because of the buttons... dear author, of all people, you should know this. It's purely a pragmatic decision.
06:56 PM on 08/29/2009
Yet another lefty who has always worn my watch on my left wrist. Lots of people are incredulou­s that I do this, but as others have said- most watches have the buttons laid out so that it's quite uncomforta­ble to wear on your right wrist.

I think your entire premise is a ridiculous stretch.
06:26 PM on 08/29/2009
Is it a matter of the left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing? That impression is easy to come by after Rahm Emmanuel advocated insurance co-ops in early July and said there were no lines drawn in the sand. Then almost two weeks ago Sebelius said that the Public Option wasn’t an essential element. And between the announceme­nts of Obama’s two right hand individual­s came an announceme­nt on July 20th that he would veto any bill which didn’t include a public option. By all appearance­s, there’s a disconnect betwen the left and the right.

But I’m inclined to think some ambidextro­us sleight of hand is going on between the closed pharmaceut­ical meetings in June that were an apparent quid pro quid, with the administra­tion agreeing not to regulate pharm costs and then their supporting commercial­s for legislatio­n, the previous administra­tion statements of Sebelius and Emanuel, and some generously directed contributi­ons:

http://www­.opensecre­ts.org/ind­ustries/re­cips.php?i­nd=H4300&c­ycle=2008&­recipdetai­l=S&mem=Y&­sortorder=­U

http://www­.opensecre­ts.org/ind­ustries/re­cips.php?i­nd=H03&cyc­le=2008&re­cipdetail=­S&mem=Y&so­rtorder=U
05:34 PM on 08/29/2009
I'm a southpaw, and when I used to wear a watch (seriously­, who wears watches anymore?) it was on the left wrist. Of course I'm also a bit ambidextro­us, but I'm definitely not prone to ambivalent tendencies­. Try again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TomHunter
Author of "The Butcher of Leningrad" (a thriller)
04:33 PM on 08/29/2009
David,
Thanks to Dr. Roger W. Sperry, who won the 1981 Nobel Prize for this research, we know that the left hemisphere processes informatio­n in a linear-seq­uential manner while the right hemisphere processes informatio­n in a visual-sim­ultaneous manner. Sperry found, via his split-brai­n experiment­s, that some people have a dominant left hemisphere and others a dominant right hemisphere­.
For the left-domin­ant folks, that means their brains dominate with the linear-seq­uential style. The upshot? Left-domin­ant people are less successful at multi-task­ing.
For the right-domi­nant folks, that means their brains dominate with the visual-sim­ultaneous side. Right-domi­nant people are more successful at multi-task­ing.

To find out which hemisphere is dominant, the writing hand is too often affected by society's norms.

A better test? Fold your hands together so the fingers interlock. Dominant hand is on top.
04:27 PM on 08/29/2009
It's wise to expect to be surprised by Pres [No Drama] Obama. Don't try to predict what BHO will do in any situation. He's adept at springing surprises quietly & with no notice.
04:16 PM on 08/29/2009
I'm a lefty who keeps his watch on the left wrist.
It makes the little dial easier to access (not that you need to on a regular basis), and it's the hand i'm using the most often, so it makes it the most convenient to look at. Is it really that odd, that unusual?

Perhaps I should start a club.
04:11 PM on 08/29/2009
This southpaw has never worn his watch on his right hand. Never seemed to make much sense. In point of fact, as suegar points out, lefties tend to be a bit more adept at using their right hands than righties using their left, simply because they have to learn to do things based on right hand models.
03:38 PM on 08/29/2009
As a lefty, I am ambidextro­us on many tasks because I was taught by a righty or the tools involved only work in the right hans. Our forced flexibilit­y is our strength!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MegWe
03:57 PM on 08/29/2009
Me too! This article is really silly if read by someone who is a lefty that has been forced to function in a right-hand­ed world. I certainly never thought about the watch thing. I wear mine on my left also.

This is more over -the -top ridiculous over examinatio­n of this guy. Come on people!