More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
David Harris

GET UPDATES FROM David Harris
 

"Zero Interest in Ever Visiting Israel"

Posted: 01/17/12 12:02 PM ET

I sat down to read the New York Times Travel section, which this week featured a major piece on Jerusalem. By the second paragraph, I was shaking my head in disbelief.

The author, Matt Gross, declared up front that "I will go pretty much anywhere, anytime" as a travel writer. Yet, in the very next paragraph, he revealed that "of the world's roughly 200 nations, there was only one -- besides Afghanistan and Iraq (which my wife has deemed too dangerous) -- that I had absolutely zero interest in ever visiting: Israel."

Two paragraphs later, he took a stab at explaining why: "But to me, a deeply secular Jew, Israel has always felt less like a country than a politically iffy burden. For decades I'd tried to put as much distance between myself and Judaism as possible, and the idea that I was supposed to feel some connection to my ostensible homeland seemed ridiculous. Give me Montenegro, Chiapas, Iran even. But Israel was like Christmas: something I'd never do."

Actually, I was hoping for a happy ending after that kind of set-up -- some realization that, as a first-time visitor, Gross had forged a bond with Israel, that would outlast his stay. Yet, unless the tug of the Austrian Hospice, "my own secret hideout," or the Lutheran Church of the Redeemer, "now my favorite church in the world," or the Barood bar, can lure him back, it didn't seem to happen.

It almost goes without saying that the New York Times would find a travel writer on Jerusalem who brings some heavy-duty baggage to the topic. In this case, he turns out to be a person whose self-declared curiosity extends to every country -- remember that Iraq and Afghanistan are off-limits only because of a jittery wife -- except one, Israel.

And this is my point. It's that a travel writer by profession could proudly proclaim no place -- not, in his own words, Bridgeport, Connecticut, nor Iran, nor Chiapas -- was beyond his scope of interest, save the Jewish state.

And yes, that he considers his Jewish identity relevant to his self-description only makes matters worse.

How can it be that a (Jewish) travel writer could work in the field for so long and only because of a chance meeting with a friend reverse course -- "suddenly feeling life calling my bluff" -- and journey to Jerusalem, otherwise bypassing one of the most intriguing cities in one of the world's most interesting countries?

But then again, for Gross, I repeat, "Israel felt less like a country than a politically iffy burden."
Does Israel somehow make his life uncomfortable as "a deeply secular Jew," while those pesky Israelis endlessly deal with the messy demands of sovereignty and neighbors who aren't always ready, even after 63 years, to recognize the Jewish state's right to exist? Would his self-image and place in the world be enhanced if only Israel closed up shop?

Funny how no other country awakens in him such feelings. He's ready to go anywhere, he says, as if there were no other "politically iffy burdens" in the world, no other countries in conflict, no other territorial disputes, or, unlike Israel, no countries with major issues of domestic political legitimacy.

I understand that Judaism means little to him. He's not alone. But if he's willing to call himself a Jew, as he does, was there nothing about the Jewish state -- its history, archaeology, society, complex tapestry, geopolitics, culture, or psyche -- that aroused the faintest curiosity in all these years?

Does Gross think he was dropped by parachute onto this earth, disconnected from a past that, yes, originates in the Middle East, and not in the shtetls or in the suburbs of Boston where he was born?

Does he not realize that without this part of the world -- without Jerusalem, without the Bible and the prophets who roamed the Land, without a territorial linkage, however abstract it might have become to some in centuries of Diaspora living -- there would be no Jewish people today, not even "deeply secular" Jews?

And since he did visit Yad Vashem, where he described himself as moved by this "hellaciously detailed museum," might he have reflected on the meaning of Israel for those who found refuge there? Or those who might have been saved had a Jewish state existed in the 1930s, at a time when Bridgeport, Connecticut, Iran, and Chiapas weren't falling all over themselves to offer a new home to Europe's beleaguered Jews? Instead, within a sentence, he moved on to his principal quest, as he said, in the western part of Jerusalem: "eating well."

Sadly, of course, Gross is not unique. I know other American Jews for whom Israel has no meaning, no calling. They'll travel to the ends of the earth -- from Tibet to Timbuktu, from Botswana to Bali -- but always skip Israel.

It's a shame.

They're missing out on an essential, and deeply fulfilling, part of their identity. For all of its daily challenges, the rebirth of Israel is nothing less than a modern-day miracle. How many Jews over the centuries, recognizing the intrinsic link between the land and people, would have given anything to witness, savor, feel, and experience the State of Israel!

That connection may not have happened, at least not yet, for Gross, who doubtless will rush off to Iraq and Afghanistan as soon as his wife gives him a green light, unfazed there by "politically iffy burdens." But ask other first-time visitors to Jerusalem how they feel and you're likely to catch the twinkle in their eye.

It's only unfortunate that the Times' editors didn't turn to one of them -- with the writing talent and absent the heavy psychological baggage -- to author this featured travel article.

For more information, visit ajc.org.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 107
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
11:00 PM on 01/27/2012
Because one was born Jewish does not mean they feel Jewish. Look at Bob Dylan , as an example.

Think on this...a Quebecois nationalist federal politician recently converted from Catholicism to Judaism and is now an activist for Judaism and Israel. I think I once read that an Apache Indian converted to ultra orthodox Judaism and emigrated to the Meara Shearim ultra othodox enclave in Jerusalem. Somewhere in the Canadian North there's an Eskimo who feels more Jewish than some Jews.

It's a fact of life. Some Jews have been gutted, or gutted themselves of their Jewish identity. They have made themselves, purposely or by destiny useless as Jews.

In some cases, they've allowed the Jew negative, destructive propaganda of European Christian civilization to influence them, not even understanding its pervasiveness to start with. They've decided that a civilization known for murdering Jews for centuries is more important to listen to on the topic of Jews/Judaism/Israel.

Personally, I was fascinated by my visit to Israel.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allan Richter
07:13 PM on 01/23/2012
"Does he not realize that without this part of the world -- without Jerusalem, without the Bible and the prophets who roamed the Land, without a territorial linkage, however abstract it might have become to some in centuries of Diaspora living -- there would be no Jewish people today, not even "deeply secular" Jews?" (David Harris).

The people of Israel have always had apostates. It takes different forms in different times and places. Unfortunately when some apostatize they do it with a vengeance. They should not refer to themselves as Jews.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:05 PM on 01/23/2012
Jerusalem, is the capital of Palestine, it is not recognized as the capital of Israel by any country in the world - hence why all the Israeli embassies are in Tel Aviv.

Free Jerusalem from Israeli occupation.
01:34 PM on 01/23/2012
Why diminish the importance of someone's honesty? This trip of his was obviously transformative in some way.
10:48 AM on 01/22/2012
Honestly, I want to go to Israel myself, but I'm more afraid to than don't want to. Maybe that's David's case, and he refuses to admit it? You know, with the missiles and hatred form neighboring countries and all.
12:21 PM on 01/20/2012
My family and friends (Jews and frequent visitors to Israel) have been passing around the NY Times article because it's engaging travel writing. David Harris's extended kvetch in Huffpost describes an article I barely recognize as the one in the Times. Matt Gross's personal discomfort with Judaism and with Israel prior to his visit sound a bit bizarre, but his depiction of Israel's charms is pleasant to read.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seawolf56
Truth should never be censored
10:51 AM on 01/19/2012
But what about the 10,000 rockets that get fired at Israel everyday??? On the other hand the more Americans that go the more that will see the things I saw that changed my attitudes towards Israel.. Israel has created it's own boycot and most Americans will never go anyway.
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/03/07/bbc-poll-israel-ranks-with-iran-north-korea-as-one-of-world%E2%80%99s-most-unpopular-countries/
10:03 AM on 01/19/2012
As a frequent traveler to Israel and as someone who works hard to engage Jews with Israel, I think David Harris protests too much. Matt Gross gave us an honest perspective on his relationship with Israel that needs to be heard. And, I think readers of that article would want to visit Israel after reading what he wrote. So, he didn't come away inspired. He came back with more first hand knowledge, with positive experiences -- I bet he will go back.
09:47 AM on 01/19/2012
Visiting Israel is far safer then living in many of the large cities in America. I fact it is so safe I am going back to live there but I need your help because I am bring them Texas Longhorn cattle to help Israel and East Africa where all their cattle died in 2009. If any of you will to help. go to http://longhorn-project.org.
02:21 AM on 01/19/2012
Regarding Gross and "his bizarrely, deliberately impoverished identity" Marc Tracy at Tablet Mag has what to say. I'd like to recommend a book, if I may, to those who are curious about identity. Especially Jewish identity. It's called JOHN LENNON AND THE JEWS: A Philosophical Rampage by Ze'ev Maghen and it's becoming something of an underground favorite. You can read a host of rapturous reviews over at the facebook page http://imagine.maghen.com. You won't be disappointed.
12:54 AM on 01/19/2012
As an individual who does not subscribe to any of the three major monotheistic faiths which hold jeruslaem sacred, I must say that visiting, and later living in jerusalem was one of the most rewarding experiences of my life.

While the religious fanatics on all sides (living in east jerusalem, I found my personal life constrained by christians, muslims, as well as jews) did their part in attempting to change my mind, I am still drawn breathless by the beauty of the city and the place it has in my heart.
photo
basenji
Dog lover
10:42 PM on 01/18/2012
Visited once in 2000. Never again. The arrogance of the airport security personnel was enough to last a lifetime. Not to mention watching the IDF officers turn over palestinian carriages filled with oranges just for the laugh is too painful for any decent human being.

From a purely tourism POV, outside of the churches in the old city in Jerusalem, the country has nothing to offer.
photo
cosmiczulu
let the good times roll
02:43 AM on 01/19/2012
propaganda, I call BS
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GZLives
04:21 PM on 01/19/2012
Absolutely
photo
SaneUSA
American, Jew, Zionist.
12:03 AM on 01/20/2012
Yup.
06:52 PM on 01/19/2012
So you wouldn't even visit the mosques?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Domingo Cardoza
USARMY Ret. _Unabowed America-Firster
10:25 PM on 01/18/2012
I would love to visit Jerusalem, just for the history alone is worth it. I disagree with the NYT author's general regard of political burden; although it sounds more like a personal decision he should have kept to himself. Notwithstanding Mr Harris eloquent disappointment with the author's view based on his religion, Jerusalem is also important to Christians and Muslims and am sure many of them would also love to visit
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cynthia Rays
peace in the valley seeker
09:19 PM on 01/18/2012
The author of the NY times piece mistakenly states that the separation wall separates the West Bank from Israel which is not correct. The wall separates many villages within the West Bank from each other. He further doesn't mention that from Yad VEshem museum one can look out and see where the Deir Yassin massacre took place with no marker.
01:25 AM on 01/19/2012
Are other sites of massacre (of whomever) marked in Israel? I've never been, so I'm curious to know whether Deir Yassin is unusual in this way. It seems to me that if every massacre site in Israel were marked, the place would be thick with such markers.
05:13 PM on 01/24/2012
Deir Yassin is not that unusual, especially given the fact that it wasn't actually a massacre, & there are several ARAB sources that will say so - you just have to want to find them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GZLives
04:29 PM on 01/19/2012
I wonder if they have a marker where just days after Deir Yassin almost 100 Jewish doctors and nurses were massacred by Arabs on a bus on the way to the hospital.

And as for Deir Yassin ...
The now revealed exaggerations need to be thoroughly examined - as was the case in Jenin, this too was an overblown exaggerated early example of Pallywood. And here's how it came to be

"Everyone exaggerated. Most of them had never seen so many dead before, and the high figure was convenient for all involved. The dissidents [Revisionists] wanted to brag and scare the Arabs. The Hagana and Jewish Agency wanted to smear the dissidents and scare the Arabs. The Arabs wanted to smear the Jews. The British wanted to smear Jewish terrorists. They all latched on to a number invented by Ra’anan. We loaded 30 bodies onto the truck. That was the main group. There were about another 30; all told - about 60 bodies. I reported that to my SHAI operator, who reported to his chiefs."

http://www.hirhome.com/israel/milstein-deir-yassin.htm
05:17 PM on 01/24/2012
I never thought anything could be more misrepresented than Deir Yassin, & then along came Jenin. The "Palestinians" went from screaming that "3,000 had been murdered, mostly civilians! (while Israel said "No, about 55, mostly combatants")" to "Er, 300 - yes, 300, mostly civilians! (while Israel said "No, about 55, mostly combatants")" to the UN actually being forced to admit that it was "about 55, mostly combatants", whereupon the "Palestinians" then cried "They tried to kill us all & they failed! It's a VICTORY!" & yet the world not only lapped it up, they call for more.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:41 PM on 01/18/2012
Good article, Mr. Harris. I saw that NY Times piece as well and had the same reaction you did.