Want a case study in disinformation and misinformation?
On March 11th, AJC wrote to the UN General Assembly President, Joseph Deiss, asking him to reconsider hosting the premiere of a new film, Miral, at UN headquarters on March 14th.
Our reasoning was simple: The film was about a highly controversial topic -- the Israeli-Palestinian conflict -- and no such film had ever been debuted at the UN before.
Why now? Why this film? Why with the cachet of Deiss's office?
Moreover, we noted, "The Israeli Mission to the UN was not even given the minimal courtesy of being consulted in advance about the wisdom of showing such a film that deals, after all, with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict." If the event went ahead, it would "only serve to reinforce the already widespread view that Israel simply cannot expect fair treatment at the UN."
Now imagine for a moment that Deiss had opted to premiere a film that portrayed the Indian-Pakistani conflict over Kashmir, which has nearly brought the world to nuclear war, through the eyes of one side only. Or the division of Cyprus through the lens of only the Greek or Turkish perspective. Or the dispute over the Malvinas/Falklands Islands, which has led to an Argentine-British war, from one side, but not the other.
All hell would break loose in the UN -- and that's no exaggeration.
But along came Miral and all the rules were broken. Because it involved Israel, and not nations with far more clout in the UN system, the protest fell on deaf ears. The show went on and, once again, Israel got the short end of the stick on First Avenue.
In the lead-up, the film's defenders rushed to the ramparts. In the end, they knew they'd win. They had Hollywood fame and celebrity on their side, and the UN in their corner. But, hey, a little controversy played right can only help box-office sales once the film hits the theaters, so why not milk the opportunity for all it's worth, even if it means playing fast and loose with the truth?
First, they accused AJC of not having seen the film.
Wrong!
Our colleague, Lisa Palmieri-Billig, viewed it initially in September at the Venice Film Festival. She wrote a review for The Jerusalem Post. Her conclusion: "Israel is portrayed as the unequivocal villain... Not only did [director Julian] Schnabel choose not to tell the whole story, but he also shirked a director's responsibility of providing the historical framework necessary for even his half of the story."
Then the film's distributor, Harvey Weinstein, proclaimed that he had invited AJC to the premiere.
Wrong! No such invitation was ever received.
Then Weinstein went on to invoke his teen-age daughters, Lili and Emma, who reportedly said: "Give Mr. Harris a copy of the Constitution and point out the paragraph about free speech."
How touching!
Perhaps he can explain to his daughters that this is not about the United States and First Amendment rights, but about the UN, where the Constitution doesn't quite apply. If it did, by the way, we'd have a whole lot less to worry about in the world today, beginning with the likes of Iran, Libya, Syria, North Korea, and Cuba.
Don't be concerned, Lili and Emma, no one is trying to deny anyone's free-speech rights, least of all an organization so dedicated to the First Amendment that it defended the rights of American Nazis a few years back to march in this country, however utterly repulsive their views.
This whole story was only -- I repeat, only -- about the appropriate role of the President of the UN General Assembly, not the neighborhood multiplex, though you wouldn't have known it from the plaintive cries of some.
Then along came Jean-Viktor Nkolo, spokesman for President Deiss, who claimed, according to the Los Angeles Times, that "hosting a premiere at the United Nations was not such an unusual occurrence, though he was unable to name another film that had premiered at the headquarters."
Not surprising that he couldn't name the UN debut of another film on a politically controversial topic, because no one else can, either.
Then there's the film's producer, Jon Kilik, who said for the record, "We made this film in order to encourage the very dialogue that AJC seems to want to prevent."
Hmm, that's quite an indictment, if only it were true.
What kind of dialogue does Mr. Kilik have in mind if the Israelis are not part of the conversation? Did Mr. Kilik and his colleagues press President Deiss to discuss the film with the Israeli side in advance, if only out of common decency and the rules of diplomatic etiquette?
As for what happens across the country when the film appears, be assured, Mr. Kilik, that AJC won't be involved in trying to "prevent" dialogue, however one-sided the film might be.
After all, we're the organization that spends more time in the Arab world than any other, devotes more energy worldwide to Muslim-Jewish conversation, and opens our doors to those with whom we don't necessarily agree on every issue but need to hear from.
And finally, Messrs. Schanbel, Weinstein and Kilik, if you're looking for new film ideas, here are two.
How about doing a feature-length documentary on how the UN, founded in the wake of the Second World War and on the ashes of the Holocaust, has become structurally and systemically biased against the State of Israel, irrespective of what government sits in office in Jerusalem or what's happening on the ground?
Evidence abounds wherever you look, beginning with the startling fact that since 1949 Israel has never had the chance to serve as a member of the Security Council, and that more than two-thirds of all resolutions adopted by the UN Human Rights Council deal with Israel alone. It would make for quite a story, one now unknown to many, especially in the hands of skillful filmmakers who profess concern for Israel.
And if you want to get more personal about individual lives in the midst of conflict, as does Miral, here's another plot line yet to be touched by Hollywood -- the personal stories of Jews uprooted from Arab lands, sent packing if they were lucky enough to escape pogroms, and forcibly cut off from their ancestral lands.
Pretty heart-wrenching stuff. I happen to know because I live with it every day through my wife and her family.
But then again, the UN never promoted "dialogue" on this issue. The powerful Arab bloc, joined by their buddies, wouldn't think to allow it.
Would Hollywood consider it?
Given what we were recently told by a top executive, not a chance. In fact, he said, you couldn't have gotten a major studio to produce Exodus today. Too hot to handle, too risky to careers, and potentially too dangerous, for life and limb, to be associated with a film seen as sympathetic to Israel.
Messrs. Schnabel, Weinstein and Kilik, please prove him wrong. You say you want to promote dialogue. There's more than one dialogue that needs promoting.
its charter for so many years and disinformation is so easily swallowed. The children of the world
are going to be disappointed if they rely on the UN to help bring peace and security into their lives.
In the 70 years since the UN's creation, the world has had 1/2 the conflicts/casualties, than in the previous 70 years.
You can go to the UN website and learn what the UN is doing to bring peace and security into the lives of the children of the world.
www.un.org
Before reconciliation comes acknowledgement and dialogue. THe sarcastic tone of this article is not helpful.
enlighten usPlease, and tell us a bit about the "history of the palest inian people".....
Perhaps they need to be told that they are not the center of the world, then perhaps they would give up their intransigent negotiating style. If they felt that all of the suckers were tired of their victimization, then perhaps they would have accepted the state they were offered in 1947, 2000 and in 2009. Or at least accepted Obama's invitation to the peace table.
Where I live there have been almost daily demonstrations in front of the Chinese embassy--for years--sometimes a few people, sometimes a crowd.
What you said about the Palestinians and their negotiating style is really cynical, since they have been offered virtually nothing. And, what happens daily in the West Bank and Gaza is ongoing aggression and oppression.
No, the UN is not concerned with their plight daily--that is an exaggeration.
Oh Lord,
Guard my tongue from evil and my lips from speaking guile,
And to those who slander me, let me give no heed.
May my soul be humble and forgiving unto all.
Bring to naught designs of those who seek to do me ill:
Speedily defeat their aims and thwart their purposes
For Your own sake, for Your own power,
Answer us, Oh Lord, and save with thy redeeming power.
May the words of my mouth and the meditations of my heart be acceptable unto You, O Lord, my Rock. You, who established peace in the heavens, grant peace unto us, unto all Israel and unto all the families of man.
Here is what you need to advocate about the UN:
http://timespost.wordpress.com/2011/01/24/delete-the-un-restart-a-new-and-better-one/
In fact, Israeli fictions have consistently trumped international law under the United Nations for that same period. Israel under US protection has been allowed to ignore over 100 UN resolutions, commit wholesale violations of the 4th Geneva Convention and Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and renege on both conditions of its admission to the UN - honoring the right of return and internationalizing Jerusalem.
And Harris, with altogether sublime chutzpah, whines about UN "bias" against Israel.
There are 56 Muslim majority countries, many more countries who rely on their oil, and many 3rd world countries that hate Democracy. Against, this is the 1 Jewish majority country, Israel.
Who among us would ever be foolish enough to feel that Israel would ever get a fair shake in the UN?
I am wondering where all the talk is about Turkey occupying Northern Cypress, or Russia and Poland (rightly) occupying German land that they too won in a defensive war. Israel was attacked by 5 Arab armies at its birth. It was attacked many times thereafter. It won these defensive wars, just as the Russians and Poles did in Germany. I guess it is OK for Russia and Poland to keep the German land, but not Israel who confronted the same situation and won.
There has always been a double standard against Israel. Does anyone remember any UN resolutions condemning Hamas' firing of 6,000 rockets into Israel?. Or how about the one last week where 5 Israelis from the same family had their throats slit, including the 3 month old baby and the 4 year old? It will never happen.
many ships carrying escaping Jews were turned back by the British as they went to Palestine. In fact, FDR turned down ships from Europe that resulted in many Jews dying. .
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Checkmate.
"Hind al-Husseini (Arabic: هند الحسيني) (April 25, 1916–September 13, 1994) was a Palestinian woman notable for rescuing 55 orphaned survivors of the Deir Yassin massacre, after they were dropped off in Jerusalem and left to fend for themselves. She later converted her grandfather's mansion into an orphanage to house them, which became a school providing education to orphans and other children from Palestinian towns and villages.
Hind was also dedicated to women's issues, establishing a college for women, and serving in the Arab Women's Union."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hind_al-Husseini
Good!
aside from being tiresome and childish, i find it rather amusing that the pro-p side thinks that their
comments are just comments based on *humanity* reasons, while any opposing view, must be
*paid posters*. to have to constantly turn to that sort of ridiculousness speaks volumes.
in trying to delegitimize all pro-I commenters, yuOnly delegitimzeUre own.
Washington, D.C.
Legislative Assistant, Washington, D.C.
Sr. Analyst and Deputy Director for PGA (Planning)
Policy and Government Affairs, Washington, DC
Arizona
Arizona Leadership Management Director , Phoenix, AZ
California
Region Synagogue Initiative Director, Pacific Northwest
Synagogue Initiative, San Francisco, CA
Valley Leadership Management Director, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Regional Political Director, Pacific Northwest
Pacific Northwest Region, San Francisco, CA
Leadership Management Director, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Illinois
Area Director - KS, MO, WI, Chicago, IL
Associate Area Director for Chicago
Midwest Region, Chicago, IL
Michigan Area Director
Midwest Region, Chicago, IL
Maryland
Leadership Management Director - Baltimore and Greater Washington, Baltimore
Nevada
Assistant Area Director, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV
Though I would suggest his job is becoming much more difficult as the year goes on, Israels unilateral and grotesque behavior is creating issues that are taking up more and more of his time and I'm glad about that.
In case you were wondering folks, that right there, is the definition of antisemitism. In the absolute sewer of countries that populate the Australia Middle East, this tiny democratic nation , the size of N.J., with a total population of 7.4 million people in total, receives more than 2/3 of all the attention. Tell it to the Syrians, the Jordanians, the Lebanese, the Egyptians, the Libyans, the Saudis, the Yemenite, the Bahrainian, the Iraqis, the Turk, and the Persian, then come back and tell us all how well differing opinion and religious freedom is practiced in those little garden spots, it is hypocritical of the highest caliber and chutzpah of the nth degree to accuse the only place in the Middle East with Jews as the one place to shower 2/3 of the worlds contempt upon.
"theunivesalcollective, you are talking bollocks - - - again".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uL8ANySuSuk
filmmaker Ari Folman on the Israeli gov'ts response to "Waltz with Bashir"
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=98723606