I've always distinguished between Christmas (for family) and New Year (for friends), although as I get older and older the thought of seeing in the new year, at the impossibly late hour of midnight, loses many of the charms it once had when I wore a younger man's clothes. But I try, I try, and although New Year is a totally random concept in the real time of days and nights; seasons and changing climate; and family events including life and death; it retains its old spell on the human psyche.
We think that we have got rid of all the things that made, say, 2008, a bad year, and 2009, just like a new born baby, has endless potential for good, for refreshing the human spirit. But new born babies are not blank slates, and they carry all sorts of time bombs in their DNA, and in the background and ability of the parents they have been lucky, or unlucky, enough to be born to. And new years carry all the bad DNA of the old one.
If we had any doubt, there is Israel once again bombing civilians in Palestine, in yet another war to end all wars in the Middle East -- and what war ever did that? And there is CO2 still being pumped into the air at frighteningly accelerating rates. And there are terrorist attacks in Mumbai, and ever-growing hungry populations, and more and more species extinctions, and the killing in Iraq and Afghanistan looks set to go on for not just another year but another decade. Or more.
So plenty of bad DNA, and bad parents (all of us) for 2009 to try to overcome, but don't hold your breath. Hard to stand, wherever you will be standing, at a minute to midnight and look forward to a happy new year. A good year. Chance would be a fine thing. And at the end of 2009 we will find ourselves once again, as we do at the end of the year, answering as we might after being run over by a bus -- "How ya doin?" "Oh, about as well as can be expected".
All we can do, I think, is try, you in your small corner, and I in mine, to do whatever will help, whenever we can, to make some aspect of 2009 better than it would otherwise have been. Only a little bit, I know, but every little bit does help. So there's a new year's resolution for me. How about you?
So to all my friends at Huffington Post I hope 2009 goes about as well as can be expected for you. And if this post has depressed you as much in reading it as it did me in writing it, check out this for a slightly more optimistic view of the count down to 2009.
WASHINGTON — The Bush administration built an...
I'm pleased to announce the launch today of two new HuffPost...
After a three-night stay in Moscow, the Obamas touched down in Rome on Wednesday so Papa President...
Long before $150,000-gate, Sarah Palin seemed to...
Yesterday evening, Greg Sargent reported on The Plum Line that one of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's key reasons...
I was sorry to watch, live on CNN, Edward R. Murrow and Emmy Award-winning broadcaster and...
The following post...
It was with interest that I read Dr. Soram Khalsa's post on The Huffington Post...
ANCHORAGE, Alaska — The former fiance of Gov. Sarah Palin's...
Hermione herself, Emma Watson, charmed David Letterman and...
OH NOES! What happened on Fox and Friends today, people?
As our own Jason Linkins pointed out, Letterman is one of the few comedians...
I'm liveblogging the latest Iran election fallout. Email me with any news or thoughts, or follow me...
MADISON, Wis. (AP) -- Oscar G. Mayer, retired chairman of the Wisconsin-based meat processing company that bears his name,...
It's summer, the time for weddings! A few of my friends are getting married this summer and fall, so lately...
Jim Hansen is director of the NASA Goddard Institute for...
I get many letters like this from readers...
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
par 2
So instead of glum, I take heart and comfort in seeing this possibility. It is made more probable, I think, by the fact that we humans might actually provide the genetic material for nature to select by genetic engineering (see Peter Ward's article in the Jan. edition of Scientific American - in fact the whole issue is about the evolution of evolution!) We might yet be instrumental in the evolution of a newer species, which I should like to dub Homo eusapiens (man the truly wise).
Pipe dream? Perhaps. But it does give me something to work toward that could be positive for us as a genus and the earth in general.
Question Everything
http://questioneverything.typepad.com/
Happy New Year David.
Even though I too have a glum view of what lies ahead, it is only from the perspective of having had an incredibly fortunate life, a very easy life compared with most people for most of time. And having had that life I am rather sorry to see it go as the world of man discovers that there are too many of us, that we cannot go on depleting resources and spewing garbage forever, that some of us cannot be rich while most are poor, and that nature's payback was brought on by our own short-sightedness and greed.
I can feel glum knowing it is all about to crash around us. But instead I have thought about a new possibility, an evolutionary possibility. Humans have been evolving all along as we now know. Though the next step of evolution for man is likely to be through a population bottleneck ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_bottleneck ) it is possible that what comes out the other side will be more sapient (capacity for wisdom) than the current species (in spite of its scientific name).
part 2 to follow
You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in or