If you thought that electing Obama was going to lead to action on global warming you might take a look at this week's events in Australia. A year ago the equivalent of the Democratic Party was elected in Australia, replacing the Republican equivalent party of John Howard (George Bush's best buddy). Howard had worked with Bush to prevent any international action on climate change and refusing to sign up to Kyoto. Kevin Rudd was elected on a platform a significant element of which was an immediate signing of Kyoto (which he did) and a promise to set GHG reduction targets of 20% by 2020 (and 60% by 2050, for what that is worth). He has postponed the latter, first by setting up an enquiry with an effectively predetermined outcome (recommending only a 2020 target in the range 5-15%) and then this week announcing that he would accept only the very lowest target in that range -- a derisory 5%. In that year there has been massive pressure from big business, energy companies, mining companies, farmer's organisations, and the Murdoch press. In addition Rudd's cabinet seems to have a number of denialists present. And in the background, beavering away, racking up the pressure when it seemed there was some chance of a real target being set, are the right wing think tanks and denialist organisations. Germany may well have seen similar activity with its announcements last week in Poznan which simply reflected the wishes of big business.
I would like to see Barack Obama put pressure on both Rudd and Merkel, in the nicest possible way, to rejoin the international community. But I think he is going to have his work cut out not being swamped by the same wave that has overtaken Mr Rudd. Most of us thought that with growing public awareness of the rapidity of climate change and its dangers, and with the completion of the Bush term of office, the world could at last, very belatedly, start to move. But the closer that has come to reality, the more active becomes the resistance. These people are determined to exploit every last inch of the Earth while there is still an Earth to exploit. I don't think they have thought beyond that point. We have to, and we have to make sure that the pressure coming from the climate realist side is greater than that coming from the climate denialists. So far they are 2 to zip, coming into the ninth.
If you have a blog -- use it, if you have the ear of a politician -- speak into it, if you are able to protest -- make a banner, if you hear a lie -- correct it. Be as noisy as the geese who saved Rome. If Copenhagen fails all our gooses are cooked.
Follow David Horton on Twitter: www.twitter.com/watermelon_man
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
The unfortunate reality of reducing greenhouse gas emissions is that it is painful. It easy to make promises, but when it boils down to a politician's task of enacting legislation or taxes to reduce emissions, someone has to suffer and resistance will be met.
It easy to make promises and commitments from afar. I truly hope that Obama has the political strength to carry through.
However his promise to Iowa farmers to continue their biofuel subsidies was not a good sign. It was a blatant buying of votes, when all the scientific opinion is now pointing away from biofuels , considering their carbon input and effect on food markets.
Why don't American leaders, Al Gore included, come out and say that consumption has to fall? You folks need less stuff. And so do we in the other OECD nations. Roll on the recession.
I'm afraid I have to agree somewhat with SeenItBefore. I am on record as pointing out that an Obama administration will show either that there really is hope or that politics as usual will condemn us all to suffer the consequences of climate change and peak oil. During the primaries and political season I said I suspected that it almost didn't matter who was elected president. The system is designed to exploit the planet without regard. And the vast majority of people want to exploit the earth to its limits. They want to be rich (what they think is being rich).
The solution is evolution. Whatever happens it will surely destroy the majority of unwise humans. One hopes that wiser minds will survive and form the basis of a future human species where wisdom is a stronger feature.
I keep looking for ways to salvage civilization, but not to save BAU.
We're sorry to inform you, David, that Obama will soon be told how and why the cow ate the cabbage.
Shortly thereafter, every campaign promise will be shelved or gutted. The re-election coffers will then immediately swell and it will be politics as usual.
The American taxpayer has been getting royally ripped off for almost 100 years. Since virtually NO one protests, outside of lip service, the blatant thievery continues.
Eventually, all citizen taxpayers will be busted and the politicians and their contributers will have settled in Dubai. Or some other equally outlandish retirement community.
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with