More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
David Kimelberg

GET UPDATES FROM David Kimelberg
 

The Last Acceptable Racism: Native Americans

Posted: 02/10/11 04:50 PM ET

Two disturbing developments recently hit my radar. The first was an announcement from Washington's NFL team that it's planning to change its name and logo. Okay, that seems innocuous enough. Washington Politicos? Nope. The new name is the Washington Jews. The re-worked logo is equally alarming: it consists of a profile of what appears to be a stereotyped Jewish person, complete with the physical features exploited by Sasha Baron Cohen in his film Borat.

The second was the results of a New Yorker cartoon caption contest. Normally a source of great wit and cleverness, this one was just plain distasteful: the cartoon pictured an SS guard taking cover behind a desk against a barrage of "throwing stars" clearly in the shape of the Star of David. While avoiding the onslaught of Jewish-themed steel weapons hitting the desk and everything else around him, he's speaking to someone on the phone. In the New Yorker's caption contests, readers are asked to submit witty captions to accompany the cartoon, with winners announced in a subsequent issue. So, what was the winning caption? Get ready, here's the punchline: "Quick, give them the banks." Not only is the caption just not funny, its racist angle is obvious. Has the liberal and renowned New Yorker gone off the deep end?

Shocked by this news? Of course you are. And, of course, they're not true. If they were, both organizations would be dealing with a deluge of warranted criticism and outrage from all corners. What is truly shocking is that Native Americans are subject to analogous assaults and no one seems to care.

Of course, Washington's NFL team is actually the Washington Redskins. The term "redskins" is highly offensive to Native Americans and is equivalent to the "n-word" for African Americans. Not only is the team's name insulting, its logo is also a slap in the face for Natives. It attempts to depict a profile of an "Indian," complete with braids, feathers and a stoic gaze. It's pure stereotyping and nothing more. It perpetuates a caricature of Native people, and is another societal movement to turn Native Americans into a historical footnote, frozen in time as a cowboy western prop, and not allow recognition of us for who we really are. In the category of "irony of all ironies," the Redskins' owner, Dan Snyder, recently sued a Washington news outlet for including a picture of him with devil horns. His complaint? That, as a Jew, the news outlet depicted him in a blatantly anti-Semitic way, which caused him great harm. Really? Can you not see the clear racist parallels with your own NFL franchise, Mr. Snyder?

The New Yorker obviously doesn't get it either. Instead of my theoretical SS guard, a recent New Yorker cartoon caption contest actually depicted a cowboy seeking refuge behind a desk peppered with arrows. The scene includes him on the phone, behind the desk in an office overlooking a cityscape. The New Yorker, the de facto leader of liberal literary intellectualism, decided that the winning caption should be: "Quick, give them a casino." Instead of highbrow wit, the New Yorker decided that lowbrow overt racism should carry the cartoon caption day. The fact that only a couple commentators took issue with this (all Native Americans) speaks volumes. The message is that racism against Native Americans is acceptable and universally embraced under the guise of alleged humor.

As both a Native American and a Jew, I am equally offended by racist attacks on either group. This type of verbal and pictorial violence has only one goal in mind: to dehumanize the subject group so they're viewed as a subclass not worthy of respect or acknowledgment as a distinct people. Native Americans have suffered the business end of this type of treatment in spades. Our 1492 population was estimated at between 15 and 18 million. As a result of violence and overtly genocidal governmental policies, this number was slashed to 250,000 by 1900. Today's use and furtherance of stereotypical Native American imagery and narrative only serves to keep shameful concepts alive, regardless of whether it's the actual intent. What's more, they remind Native Americans, particularly our youth, that others do not deem us worthy of respect and that our people are merely a historical holdover to be represented by comic book imagery.

A recent New York Times article tells the story of how Native American art collectors have historically identified the source of our artworks by tribe and not individual artists. Only now are museums and collectors beginning to respect and value these works by identifying the individual artists and recognizing their worth as people. Can you imagine if a Monet was just identified as "French"? It's clear that many corners of society view Native Americans as an abstract concept, imbued with normative valuing as a lesser group.

How can racial assaults against Native people be widely accepted, while similar assaults against Jews (or any other ethnic group) be quickly condemned? The answer is twofold. First, we're small in absolute numbers. We represent only about one percent of the U.S. population. Because we don't have a large population, we are potentially easy prey. Second, our mindset and world view are shaped by centuries of conquest and genocidal policies. We were stripped of our lands, our people were killed and we were herded onto reservations to better allow for forced assimilation. We were portrayed as savages not worthy of recognition as human beings. Not that long ago, white administrators of Indian boarding schools told our children that the "Indian in you shall die." This kind of treatment and forced thinking has a lasting generational effect. It can be difficult to break through that type of programming. Many of our people, however, have shaken off these forced ideological shackles to speak the truth and demand long overdue respect. Our voice is getting louder.

Our words are being said with more frequency and emphasis. But people need to hear us. Societal racism should no longer be an ad hoc affair, which is routinely accepted when directed against a certain group. It should be universally condemned. Perpetuating past wrongs and dehumanizing concepts hurts everyone.


David Kimelberg is an enrolled citizen (Bear clan) of the Seneca Nation of Indians. He is the CEO of Seneca Holdings LLC, the investment arm of the Seneca Nation, and the founder of nativeinvestment.com, an online forum and blog about economic development in Indian Country. His views are his own and not necessarily those of the Seneca Nation of Indians or Seneca Holdings.

 

Follow David Kimelberg on Twitter: www.twitter.com/davekimelberg

Two disturbing developments recently hit my radar. The first was an announcement from Washington's NFL team that it's planning to change its name and logo. Okay, that seems innocuous enough. Washin...
Two disturbing developments recently hit my radar. The first was an announcement from Washington's NFL team that it's planning to change its name and logo. Okay, that seems innocuous enough. Washin...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 135
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
05:52 PM on 03/14/2011
Too often Indigenous Art has been passed from artist to merchant to museum with little attention to the artist's name. I don't know whether it is negligence, the excitement of finding some handmade beadwork or quillwork, or maybe it is an accepted practice to identify Native American, African and sometimes Southeast Asian art by the region, nation, type of skill or "tribe" represented. This does a disservice to the families of the artist because a relative of the artist years later is in danger of seeing and enjoying a work of art in a museum that is made by a relative without knowing it. Imagine if Gaugin's great grandchild could not identify the works of her great granddaddy. This is how disenfranchisment occurs. In this practice commercialization of the art compromises our ability to trace it's true origin, meaning and function, which thwarts our ability to completely grasp who we are. Of course, it does hone our ability to discern objects through our imagination by "vibing it out". That is what is exciting about doing dances from your ancestry.This connects the dots for some who have lost conscious touch with group initimacy (family-feeing) that certain dances bring.
As a member of The Thunderbird American Indian Dancers doing Cherokee stomp dances and Inuit dances like th Caarabou dance reconnects me with an inherent cultural wisdom that lives in the moves of a dance, when you do it with passion over time.
11:51 AM on 02/17/2011
MONEY, HONEY
Our native populations are finally receiving some long-overdue and long-overlooked levels of respect. A contributing factor may well be the casino industry. As Native Americans' wealth increases, their political power also increases. As political power increases, the ability to make your presence felt and your agenda recognized also increases.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greenkid
07:08 AM on 03/01/2011
And that's the way it is BECAUSE... the Natives were conquered and they now exist in the Anglo American world.

If the white man lived in the native world, political power would probably seem ireelevant. Everyone would have a full stomach and a healthy spirit.
01:07 PM on 03/03/2011
Your Brain was Conquered, The People you are talking about were subject to fraud, genocide, media misinformation, and list goes on. USA Supreme Courts made the Treaties Valid. Canada the other Righteous Country with First Nation Treaties is following suit. Some Judges are bias and don't care what they write for a decision, and some judges follow their oath and keep their good reputation. Who wants to be know as a judge that Hitler would have loved.
04:32 PM on 02/15/2011
The term Indian is negative to me. In 1902, my grandmother at age 5, left for boarding school somewhere in Oklahoma (honestly she did not know the name of the school) for eight years and during that time she was thoroughly brain washed into believing the "bein Indian was bad". When they (our tribal members) came home these young people did not fit with their parents and relatives. They tried to immerse themselves into white man’s culture because those "Indians" got to eat the government rations. Being placed on unwanted land that produced minimal food back in 1910, the people had to survive. As a young child listening to my grandma entrenched in boarding school/mission catholic referring to "unassimilated' Indian people...they were "savages!” spoken in French. OMG talk about confusing. I did not want to be a savage. Which way would those old people vote on a mascot name? It is not easy. I live in North Dakota…we have the fighting Sioux. I am not Sioux, I am Chippewa. Tribes across the nation sent their kids to boarding schools. What did they learn growing up about being “Indian”? What about my generation? You tell me?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thinkingwomanmillstone
I'm nervous. My life is under a Micro-bioscope.
08:09 AM on 02/15/2011
The only voice that counts in an argument over whether a racially or ethnically based name is offensive is the voice of the people it depicts. It's just that simple. If American Indians don't like having these images and names used, they shouldn't be used.
It's time for the redskins, the braves , the indians, etc. to end their insulting marketing campaign and rename their teams....it's actually long past time.
11:06 AM on 02/15/2011
I agree with a fair amount of what has been said here, but I believe the author and readers are making a pretty classic mistake; we and he are assuming that he speaks for all native peoples. Recently, a town in Montana was holding a school board meeting to change its name from the "Redskins" to something less offensive. The government class I teach in a high school with 95% Native American enrollment was asked if we'd like to write a letter in support of the change. I assumed, like we all have hear that everyone would be for it. Instead I ended up witnessing was a very healthy debate about mascots in general, and the conclusion was that a slight majority actually favored them keeping the name. I should note though, what clinched it was that the school had no "indian head" mascot, the students were much more concerned with a caricature than the name itself. We generally think asking a handful of asking a person or handful of people to represent the views of their entire race as being an ignorant action, why I wonder are we comfortable with that here? It seems that I, as a Caucasian am much more prepared to be offended by the redskins than many of the Natives I am proud to call friends, students, and colleagues.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thinkingwomanmillstone
I'm nervous. My life is under a Micro-bioscope.
01:54 PM on 02/15/2011
Your friends, students and colleagues are certainly entitled to their opinions and probably in a majority when comparing the name to the caricatures that accompany the name. My daughter had a soccer league with a team called the squaws...I can't imagine them being okay with that (we did manage to get it changed even though it wasn't her team). It seems to me though that those Native Americans who do object should have their feelings accounted for just as strongly as those you speak of. There is little doubt that many do find this offensive. Is there a percentage that would be required before it should be changed? On the other side, would your friends, students etc. be offended if the names were changed to avoid any offense whatsoever? I doubt it. It is interesting to note that that new teams that are developed are not using these ethnic names but are coming up with neutral but just as catchy names....I find this a telling development that indicates something is wrong with the old practice.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:26 PM on 02/14/2011
if by native american you mean amerindian, which most latinos are, i would agree, to the stain of 'indian racism' you add the presumption of being an 'alien' race. It is the most visible racism today in America, in fact they seem invisible for the 'others'. www.economicstruth.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
huffponewbie
12:53 PM on 02/14/2011
Where is the outrage against the Notre Dame Fighting Irish?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thinkingwomanmillstone
I'm nervous. My life is under a Micro-bioscope.
08:04 AM on 02/15/2011
if you are offended you should take it up with Notre Dame.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:16 AM on 02/14/2011
Your description of "native" Americans has little validity because it perpetuates the myth that they are native to American soil. No people are native to America, period. "Native" American is a liberal construct and should be phased out forthwith.

The various team names, Seminoles, Redskins, etc. describe fierce tribes from the PAST who were known for their great bravery and fighting skill. Also, Vikings, etc. These names are meant as a compliment, a great compliment, but if the majority of American Indians poll that they are against the terms, then I suppose the teams should get another name.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:44 AM on 02/14/2011
using your rationale, no people are "native" to europe, either. if people won't want to be so "honoured" why continue to do it?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:06 PM on 02/15/2011
I agree, take away the honor, they don't deserve it anyway.
photo
Fez
Ignorance is no excuse for the law.
06:42 PM on 02/14/2011
Following your logic, the only "natives" were the humanoids who migrated out of Africa about a million years ago. Everyone else is a recent arrival, wherever they are. North America has been populated for at least 15,000 years by "natives." Their ancestors came across the Bering Land Bridge from central Asia. And those central Asians? Their ancestors came from Africa... and they were black. And according to Beat poet Byron Gysin, the white race evolved from mutant survivors of a long-ago nuclear war in the Gobi Desert.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:01 PM on 02/15/2011
My point is you cannot bestow native on one and not another based on the divide of time. Some indians came over 10kya and some came 1kya. Flints have been found in Virginia which point to European immigrants thousands of years ago. Norsemen 1kya. Germans and others came over 3hya. Technically, if you are born somewhere, you are native to that land. If you are born in Maryland, you are a native there. Unfortunately, in an attempt to divide people and diminish the newcomers, the liberals have concocted this scenario where Americans who have been here hundreds of years, are still considered interlopers.
07:16 PM on 02/13/2011
Thank you for your article. I do not accept racism against any ethnic group. I do think Native Americans should be featured in the news more often, so people can learn that they are still here and have a voice! It is particularly alarming that the First People of this country are among the poorest in the nation. How is the U.S. government planning to help them? Will the Obama administration and Congress support honoring broken treaties and returning land and resources back to the Native tribes? It would be great if you could arrange an interview with Obama and discuss this. I hate to say this, but when I go online, I realize more people are racist than I thought. These people do not share their thoughts out loud in person, because they know it is wrong. Please, please, please believe that not all white people are racist! I am "white"/Causcasian/ European American if you will, and I totally care about ALL people and know that everyone deserves to be free and treated with the same respect. I know an apology is not much, but I am truly sorry for all of the cruelty inflicted upon the Native Americans and all other ethnicities by the caucasians. For all that the Native Americans have taught us and shared with us, we should be more grateful, thankful and helpful to them. The white settlers would never have survived without the assistance of the Native Americans.
04:18 PM on 02/15/2011
What have these leftists done to you? You are truly the a sterling example of the guilty white American. You have done nothing to anybody that warrants an apology. The next time you start really feeling guilty about being a horrible caucasian person, look up the various race on race crime statistics over the last 3-4 decades, the supposedly downtrodden are making up for past atrocities....and then some....or maybe we can just get past racial politics and just be Americans.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThinkinPerson
09:57 AM on 02/16/2011
Why does an apology so scare you?
photo
tippisheadrun
Get 2 birds stoned at once
05:17 PM on 02/13/2011
I was surprised & horrified at some of the comments that accompanied stories & blogs from the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver. The opening ceremonies with its emphasis on native culture was derided & described as boring by a lot of American commentators. I was so proud of my country & their acknowledgement of the role of aboriginal people in Canada's history & the fact that the games were being held on ancestral lands. But Americans found it boring. I was reminded of this after the Tuscon memorial service, when it seemed that nobody had a decent word to say about the Native American man who led the blessings.
North Americans need to understand that this is not just aboriginal history & culture but it belongs to you as well & its time that you recognized it, embraced it & gave it some of the attention that you lavish so extravagantly on your "founders" & constitution.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Soulcatcher
Soulcatcher
02:51 PM on 02/13/2011
What about the New York Yankees? Aren't you also offended by them and their stereotypical mascot? Could we get a column about them next time? At least it would be an original idea!
I heard somewhere that all the nation's Bears are lawyered up and planning to break that horrible group of animal-bigots from Chicago--what are your feelings on that?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:46 AM on 02/14/2011
what "tereotypical mascot" of the yankees?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Soulcatcher
Soulcatcher
08:59 PM on 02/18/2011
Yankees, of course.
08:20 PM on 02/12/2011
If "Redskins" is no big deal then renaming the Patriots as the Palefaces shouldn't either... Oh wait, that would be offensive...
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
JessCostello
08:27 PM on 02/12/2011
Is there a lot of support in New England for changing the name of the Patriots to the Palefaces?
08:34 PM on 02/12/2011
No, the metaphor was original. Got any other questions?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Soulcatcher
Soulcatcher
02:53 PM on 02/13/2011
I doubt many people would complain if they did. We aren't that insecure.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Wade
07:19 AM on 02/14/2011
Please,if they changed the name of some sports team to the Palefaces,there would be outrage. Somebody like Sean Hannity would run something on it every night talking about how it's a double standard. The dude already has white folks thinking that they're some oppressed minority in this country.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Melinda Gopher
A Progressive for an American Spring
05:32 PM on 02/12/2011
another acceptable racist term I hear too much of in major news dialog and in some movies, "off the reservation." I really despise this term.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:09 PM on 02/12/2011
concur-it's acceptable, nothing to see here folks....keep it moving
go skins...
actuallyreadit
Now treating birtherism with shock treatments....
03:02 PM on 03/02/2011
oh brother...
02:45 PM on 02/12/2011
now you have to take a look at how things are balancing out and how the mexicans are occupying the old stomping grounds of their relations. the red bounced back .but .. albeit not the same tribal affiliation still bounced back .... regardless ... redskins are not going anywhere
02:41 PM on 02/12/2011
you have to remember there were no genocidal plots in canada, the city i am from boasts a population of 30% who are full blooded indians. canadian native or redskins have even been extended a territory which is innuit (eskimo as americans probably know them). when you talk about being accultured the door swings both ways and US government (constitution and government structure) and Canadian (government programming and services offered to all canadians) government have fashioned their governments after native social and governmental order, which in turn have fashioned the stage for the united nations in terms of structure. the order i am talking about is ensuring that human rights are extended to elders, children, men and women and this is now universal in terms of application of laws on planet earth. not to mention true environmental stewardship and care for the balance of the ecology on the earth, not so much the harmony, but leave it to the masons to ensure that world domination plots include a harmonious plan with nature in which a population under 500 million (at all times) is to be maintained.

the redskin is not all gone not by a long shot sorry to burst your bubble but we extend from north america to south america for we are deemed algonquin (much like black, white or yellow (asian) races) and yeah including mexicans we have some of the biggest and most complex pyramids on the earth and this is just the tip of the iceberg.