It's puzzling, if not downright bizarre, why more Americans don't root for the underdog. Maybe it was just self-serving, textbook propaganda taught to our school children, but rooting for the "little guy" has always been presented as one of our national traits.
This lack of empathy has never been more apparent than in regard to the public's view of labor unions. Talk about a propaganda victory for business! Management vs. Labor. Wall Street vs. Main Street. Instead of cheering for the "little guy," the public is now cheering for the gargantuan money-creatures that pull the strings. How on earth did things go so haywire?
Instead of being alarmed by the fact that private sector union membership has dwindled to less than 7 percent, and that this statistic correlates directly and undeniably with the decline of the middle class, people don't seem to get it. And this goes way beyond apathy or indifference. Incredibly, they now rejoice when they hear of a union getting its butt kicked.
It's true. When word of a huge, multinational corporation beating down its union workers reaches the man on the street -- a man making a modest wage and enjoying modest benefits -- he nods in approval, pleased that these union guys have gotten their comeuppance. It's a world turned upside down. It's like English peasants rooting for the King.
One of the most absurd complaints you hear is that unions are "too powerful." Really?? With nearly 90 percent of the jobs in America, public and private, being non-union, with profits at an all-time high, with union contracts being cut, with membership dropping, with the Democrats having said, "Adios, muchachos," to organized labor, how in God's name can anyone believe unions are too powerful??
Here's a true story. In 1995, the LA Dodgers brought up Mike Busch to fill in at third base for the injured Tim Wallach. But when Busch arrived, the players, led by their union rep Brett Butler, treated him rudely. They snubbed him. They sneered at him. They muttered things under their breath when he passed.
Mind you, no one pushed him up against the wall and kneed him in the groin, no one beat the living crap out of him, no one vandalized his car or home, all of which would've happened had this been a steel mill in the 1930s instead of a major league clubhouse in the 1990s. They simply snubbed him.
So why the snub? Because Mike Busch was a scab, one who partakes of the benefits provided by a union contract, but turns traitor and coward when asked to fight to preserve those benefits. During the 1994 baseball strike, Busch crossed the union picket line and offered himself as a replacement player. The only thing preventing us from calling this guy a slimy, scum-eating snake is our respect for reptiles.
But here's the topper. The LA Times ran a sympathetic story about Busch's unpleasant reception (presumably, a Dodger executive or Busch himself had gone whining to the media), and received a huge amount of mail in response. In fact, the Times announced that the sports page had received the most letters (actual letters, not email) it had ever received on any single topic.
According to the Times, there were 255 letters, and they broke down this way: 246 letters critical of the union, 4 letters supporting the union, and one letter blaming general manager Fred Claire for not anticipating this reaction. So the public sided with the baseball owners, the fat cats, the majority of whom bought their teams with inherited wealth. They sided with the billionaires against the millionaires.
If the Bible were written today, it might tell a different story. Instead of the Valley of Elah, the fight between the heavily favored Philistine giant, Goliath, and the prohibitive underdog, David, would be held in Vegas. As the two men did battle, the crowd would stomp their feet, pump their fists, and scream, "Kill the little bastard."
David Macaray, an LA playwright and author (It's Never Been Easy: Essays on Modern Labor, 2nd edition), was a former union rep.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.