More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost Social Reading
David Miles

GET UPDATES FROM David Miles
 

The Euro Elephant in the German Living Room

Posted: 01/18/2012 2:48 pm

"The current crisis has uncovered the deficiencies in the construction of EMU (European monetary union) mercilessly," was the uncharacteristically frank admission from Angela Merkel and Nicholas Sarkozy in a joint letter to the European Council President on the eve of the December 9th summit. What is typically exasperating about this telling diagnosis of the euro's ills is that the treatment that the heads of government recommended at the close of the summit -- namely tougher budgetary rules with fines -- neither addresses the deficiencies in the construction of EMU which the leaders referred to, nor offers any prescription for ameliorating the severity of the current crisis.

This yawning gap between rhetoric and reality, between identifying the seriousness of the crisis and delivering an adequate solution, has plagued the euro zone for the last two years as it has wrestled unsuccessfully with the Greek debt crisis. Indeed, the failure of the December 9th summit to produce a "breakthrough of sufficient size and scope to fully address the euro zone's financial problems" was one of the reasons cited by Standard & Poors in its recent decision to downgrade over half of the bloc's 17 countries, including France.

In Germany, the country most capable of providing the political leadership and financial muscle to support the euro and reassure sovereign bond holders, it seems that political elites and the media are far more enthralled with the scandal which has engulfed the country's president over his business dealings. Perhaps a sense of debt crisis ennui has set in but it seems that the Germans are doing all that they can to ignore the undisciplined euro crisis elephant sitting in their Wohnzimmer.

Of course, anyone who has travelled on the Berlin subway will be familiar with how masterful Germans are at ignoring awkward or embarrassing situations, such as the often deranged people who get on and off the trains at regular intervals. However noisy the interlopers get, Berlin's commuters just sit quietly reading their books, seemingly oblivious to the gesticulating demented individual standing in front of them.

For Germany, the euro crisis is the loud crazy person on the Berlin subway. The Germans, who have already provided guarantees and direct support to the European Financial Stability Facility worth billions of euros, keep shelling out money to profligate Peloponnesians and sun-soaked southern Europeans, each time hoping that they won't get back on the train. But it's always been too little money, given too late to do any good. Now, however, the euro train is coming to a dangerous junction and it is the Greeks who yet again are showing every indication of derailing the train before they get kicked off for not buying a ticket.

Although overshadowed by news of S&P's downgrade of France, the far bigger story last Friday was the collapse of talks between Greece and its private creditors to agree a voluntary reduction (or haircut) in the amount of money that Athens must repay. An agreed outcome to these discussions is a precondition for Greece receiving enough money to repay 14.5 billion euros of bond redemptions due in late March, otherwise a Greek default looms large.

The exact effects of such a default are difficult to predict. Some German lawmakers have been wistfully contemplating the prospect of getting the debt monkey off their shoulders if the Greeks were to leave the euro. Greece is an isolated case, they argue, and such an event would not trigger bank runs or a calamitous exit from the single currency of other PIIGS countries such as Portugal, Spain, Ireland and Italy.

The markets are less sanguine, and not just about the damaging effects of a Greek default, but about the survival of the euro itself. Italian five-year credit-default swap contracts, which insure against defaults by governments, point to a worryingly high 30 percent probability of an Italian default. Given that Italy's debt market is one of the largest in the world and too big to save, only the most optimistic German policymaker could pretend that the euro could be saved after a default by Rome.

Unfortunately, these optimistic, yet dogmatic German policymakers are in plentiful supply. As the crisis has shifted from the periphery of the euro zone to the core, rather than raising their game and taking incisive action to boost market confidence in the single currency, German policymakers have been found wanting. Such is their state of denial that one of them, the country's foreign minister Guido Westerwelle, even spoke of the damage being done to market confidence by the ratings agencies' decisions.

In fact, it was the German suggestion in 2010 that holders of Greek debt should not expect to be repaid in full that first created uncertainty in the bond market. This was the first time that a chink appeared in the notion of zero risk European sovereign debt, leaving bond investors asking how risky their other holdings of European government debt might be. The damage was done.

Unlike Herr Westerwelle, Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne sees the current problems as stemming from a failure on the part of the euro zone to "provide confidence to the market that they will stand behind their own currency." The S&P downgrades have, thus far, had relatively little effect on the markets, since they largely reflect what investors already know about the inadequacy of the German response to the crisis.

Chancellor Merkel and her policymakers have been acting on the basis that Greece is an isolated case. Yet every reactive decision and feeble measure by Berlin increases the likelihood of a Greek tragedy becoming a Europe-wide one. That will be one elephant and one crazy person that the Germans won't be able to ignore so easily.

 

Follow David Miles on Twitter: www.twitter.com/globalpolitic

FOLLOW WORLD
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:20 AM on 01/20/2012
Standing behind ones currency requires one to stand behind states using the currency that overspend and go deep into debt and cannot repay what they owe? No one except some markets and bankers had the illusion that debts taken on by the PIIGS would be paid by other less indebted Euro states.There is nothing in any treaty establishing the euro that says this, in fact the whole notion of transfer and debt consolidation , bailouts of other member states was strictly forbidden.What they are doing now has nothing to do with "saving the currency" in fact the currency is not the problem at all.It's first of all the banks and then the governments that bailed out the banks and now require to be bailed out again or they fail.I've said in 2008 that we can do fine without useless banks that make bad investments and loans.Let them go bust it's good for the world.It cleans the system.People are talked into handing over piles of their cash to corrupt greedy bankers.Thats what all this nonsense is about.It has 0 to do with the currency which is just a store of value and means of exchange.
03:43 PM on 01/19/2012
To support my contention about Japan, the comparative numbers are nicely and concisely portrayed in this article from the BBC:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15748696
12:01 PM on 01/19/2012
It does seem a little strange when you look at the country of Japan with a debt to GDP that far surpasses the average and even the extreme of the Eurozone. And yet there is no measure of extreme imminence concerning Japan. I think this is due to the exposure of American interest in Europe.
06:59 PM on 01/19/2012
That is because Japan is an industrial powerhouse. It is the third largest economy, third in rank in terms of current account surplus and in the top three creditor nations. Hence, investors have confidence in Japan and its ability to repay its debt. Compare that with Club Med or even the UK where these countries' current account deficit is shockingly high because fundamentally they don't produce very much to export to the world but have social welfare systems that they cannot afford. And hence, that is why they are in trouble. It is all about confidence.
11:49 AM on 01/19/2012
The EU is inherently and structurally unsound. And no beautiful, well-meaning rhetoric can compensate for that fact.

I could see a CEU (Central European Union) developing, composed of Germany, Netherlands, Belgium, Austria, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia, and Luxembourg. I think it would be easier to achieve unity here due to the relatively greater affinity -- culturally, linguistically and politically.

I could even see a MEU (Mediterranean European Union) developing, made up of Portugal, Spain, France, Italy, and Greece. But, of course, it would not perform at the exalted level of the CEU. Arguably, France would fit more aptly with the CEU.
01:40 PM on 01/19/2012
Actually, the closest precedent to a CEU was the Holy Roman Empire, which at its height encompassed the above CEU nations, as well as Switzerland, northern Italy, eastern France, and western Poland.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bart DePalma
Bart DePalma
09:22 AM on 01/19/2012
Please. The German voters have been angrily routing the majority party for giving away their money to PIIGS countries who refuse to reduce their welfare states to the size their own people are are willing to pay for.

The equivalent would be Mexico demanding that The United States taxpayers subsidize their debt.
08:52 AM on 01/19/2012
There is no tragedy...unless you are heavily invested in Goldman Sachs. Europeans are discovering the fatal flaw in American style voodoo economics. They need to default and start over. But of course rich investors will suffer..excuse me while I get my hanky.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norma Ward
07:25 AM on 01/19/2012
Here is an article that shows how desperate the situation in Europe, outside of Germany and a handful of other Member States, has become:

http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2012/01/negative-sovereign-bond-yields-sign-of.html

When investors are willing to pay a government to take their money, the world's fiscal situation is dire.
01:48 AM on 01/19/2012
There are too many sovereign countries with different languages, cultures, economies, and willingness to deal with their responsibilities.

The law abiding Germans are stuck with the tax evading Greeks, while the Greeks are stuck with the Germans who want to make all the rules.

The whole one currency eurozone was a bad idea from the beginning.
(Yea, I said so back then though the euro has lasted longer than I thought....due to good economic times.)

Sovereign countries with their own ways of doing things should each have their own currency.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
becky bradshaw
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth
05:55 PM on 01/18/2012
This is the second blog post by Mr. Miles that I have read. I have visited the Global Politics website. And still, I have no idea what he wants Germany and Europe to do, other than "delivering a solution".

Mr. Miles should rename his magazine the "Miss America Pageant", because the ideas are similar to the "On Stage Question" portion of that contest.
06:36 AM on 01/19/2012
I agree with your criticism. We can guess that by "delivering a solution" he means QE and Eurobonds = pay bondholders in full (especially those who speculated that when they bought stressed bonds at 60 Cents to the Euro they could push governments into paying them 100 Cents plus interest) and socialize risks and losses.

It is a clash of business cultures and I really hope that French and German (and other's) etatism wins over neocon/neo-liberalism/Friedmanite individualism.
photo
philhellene
Far Left and Proud of It!
05:04 PM on 01/18/2012
"In fact, it was the German suggestion in 2010 that holders of Greek debt should not expect to be repaid in full that first created uncertainty in the bond market. "

The EU and the Euro, run by and for the sole benefit of one or two countries. Most of the others can be sacrificed along the way, if necessary.
06:31 AM on 01/19/2012
Wait a second. I am aware that the point the decision was taken that bondholders should face a haircut/ become part of the solution was too late in the sense that considerable parts of Greek bonds had already changed hands from the original buyers to a) the ECB and b) people who were speculating with then "high risk" papers. IMO it should have been done right at the start.

But IMO it's the height of hypocrisies to claim that - against all rules, both legal and common sense - the "bad guy" is the one who refuses to just simply privatize gains and socialize losses.
We cannot lament TBTF on the one hand and then grant an indulgence for all bondholders. These bondholders have been asking an interest rate from Greece for the risk that they would not be paid back. Now the risk manifests and they should get not only their money back but also the interest rates on top; paid by the European taxpayers? We would never act like that when an industrial sector company is affected.

Besides, where would that have led to? So, next they would have gamed the system for as long as it would take that they really got 100% of their investments plus revenues and all the risks were held by the taxpayers.

I really do think that one of the steps necessary to take so that the financial sector stops taking absurd risks is that they need to bear the consequences again.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:16 AM on 01/19/2012
"These bondholder­s have been asking an interest rate from Greece for the risk that they would not be paid back. Now the risk manifests and they should get not only their money back but also the interest rates on top; paid by the European taxpayers? We would never act like that when an industrial sector company is affected."

Well, they get 100% of their investment and pay back the surplus interest. And then let's move on.
06:31 AM on 01/19/2012
I disagree with your "benefit of two countries" for two reasons: Just out of the top of my mind I would say that Austria, Finland, France, Germany, Holland, Luxembourg but also Belgium, Slovakia and Estonia as well as northern Italy do reasonably well. That is the lion share of economies and people in the Eurozone.
And it's not like Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain would have avoided their current calamities had they still their sovereign currency. I think that Hungary right now shows the opposite. Nor is it that nothing is done on their behalf, it is just not announced with fanfare. After all, the ECB is intervening into the bond markets. Money is given to Greece. Guarantees are given (EFSF) and additional money will be put into the ESM and IWF. But there are limits to the burden that Austria, Finland, France, Germany and Holland CAN carry. It's not like we are running surpluses. or have low debt rates ourselves.