See Me, Feel Me, Touch Me, Read Me

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

So this time, books may actually be dead.

Reports that Amazon's Kindle book-reader (has anyone else noticed its name's ominous similarity to "kindling"?) is actually a reasonable substitute for a book bring us one step closer to the end of bound paper. (A brief pause while all the trees in the world exhale.)

So, to paraphrase Barbara Walters, how does that make you feel? And by you, of course, I mean me.

I think sad. I'm no Luddite, you whippersnappers. (Wait, using "whippersnappers" may date me. How to fix, how to fix... Ah hah!) I'm no Luddite, you fucking whippersnappers. Hey, I'm a guy -- walk me past an HD plasma and I'm yours for the asking. (Of course, if you're a reasonably attractive woman, I already was -- hey, I'm a guy.) Whisper "T2 connection" in my ear and I may need tissue paper and some private time.

I think about the other things I've ditched. Cassette tapes: transferred to digital, good riddance. Videotapes: are you kidding me? LP's: ouch. But still.

The extra space, the convenience, and of course the goddam coolness -- my general policy is if it's in any way digital or has a hint of black cherry, I want it. (In fact, I have a digital garden: sensors in the ground connect to a web-based GPS system which uses a satellite to determine what gets watered when. Seriously.)

But books? It's a different relationship. Once you've read a book, you've touched, held... (dare I say caressed?... Yes, I dare!)... caressed every page. It's a much more intimate relationship than I've had with any other inanimate object, and a damn sight more than I've had with most animates. (My wife and 12 other women excepted.) (Editor: If you're printing this, please substitute "362" for "12".)

Anyway, I like to look at books, even the spines. I see old favorites -- the blue and white of "Catch-22", the flowers of "100 Years of Solitude" -- at someone's house and think "They have my book too!" And I like browsing a shelf. I search for something and find something else. I maintain that "browsing" is different from "scrolling".

When it's time (I'm a Mildly Early Adopter) I'll no doubt Kindle. But I'll keep my books. (I've kept the LP's. I have all the original Beatles, the first Elvis, the first Stones. Really, c'mon over, I'll show you.) And when books go the way of vinyl, I'm not sure the world will be poorer for it. But I think I will.

 
Comments
3
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- Cathexis I'm a Fan of Cathexis 7 fans permalink

Books won't be replaced. At least not buy online screens. The cramped real-estate inhibits your peripheral vision and makes reading more tiring.

Plus, as noted ... the utility of books extends way beyond capacity of information.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 PM on 06/11/2008

I didn't keep the LPs, but I think I will keep the books (I don't even like to get rid of the dust jackets).

I have slowly converted to getting my news online and doing a good deal of shopping there, but give me a good book store and I am in heaven. Much as I love Amazon, it can't even begin to compare.

I've looked at the Kindle, but don't see one in my near future. Of course, I may just run out of bookshelves and be forced to re-think that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 PM on 06/07/2008
- David Misch - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of David Misch 3 fans permalink

Online news is great but I'll never give up my NY Times -- there's depth (and breadth) you generally can't get from the net. Of course, whether newspapers are doomed is also an open question.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 PM on 06/07/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect