It's no accident that the relatively new trend of the splashy January state-of-the-village address was born and burgeoned during the housing boom. Back then--in the 1990s and 2000s, mayors wanted to get up and tout all the new housing starts and retail openings.
In those heady days, the state of the village was good and so the speech amounted to a campaign pitch for the mayor.
But now the damned thing is an institution that the mayors can't duck--even though, this year, they must have wanted to.
In his 9th annual state-of-the-city address in January, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg employed several power-packed rhetorical devices in thundering, "Can we centralize some of our human resource functions? And information technology resources? And payment and billing systems? I think the answer is yes."
Chicago mayor Richard Daley hadn't been any more inspired, when he delivered his state of the city address, back in July (here in Chicago, the year starts when the mayor sez it starts). Daley urged Chicagoans to "remain confident and optimistic and continue to work together."
Seeing that we weren't feeling confident or optimistic or cooperative in the first place, the line fell pretty flat.
The small-town mayors were singing the same lame song. "I look forward to working with my fellow Commissioners," said Jeff Longbine, mayor of Emporia, Ks., "to maintain services, manage the budget and continue to improve Emporia wherever possible."
Woodridge, Ill. mayor William Murphy declared the coming year would be focused on "our core services, maintaining roads and other infrastructure, keeping our community safe, and keeping costs down."
Kind of like the functioning of a human being with mild hypothermia.
Even Murphy's state-of-the-village presentation was simplified, he said. "And yet, scaling back on the bells and whistles does not diminish the essence of the event; because Woodridge works when we work together."
When you find yourself stringing five Ws words together to make your claim, you know you're straining awfully hard.
Mayor Mary Bossart said Rockville Centre, N.Y. couldn't maintain its infrastructure without raising taxes. She drew inspiration from Daniel Webster when she added, "During this coming year, I will be asking the board members to use resiliency--the capacity to remain flexible and recover rapidly from unexpected challenges--as a guiding principle in our decision-making for the village."
I've noticed that mayors talk less about "I" in hard times, and more about "we."
"We know we have another challenging budget shortfall to overcome," said Wilmington, N.C. mayor Bill Saffo. "This council will have difficult choices to face, but together I am confident we can continue to provide core services that our citizens expect and want."
That would be need, Mayor. They are core services, after all.
Mayor John Stromberg was less euphemistic and more pragmatic: "With the world, to a certain extent, crumbling around us, and we being affected as well, I would argue we, as a community, are pursuing the following strategy," he said. "Take full advantage of the old economy as long as it lasts but use this time to develop a new community and new culture that is in harmony with the world in which we live."
He's an old hippie, and he knows just what to do. Keep one foot in the past and another one in the new ...
Perhaps the most valiant attempt at rhetorical sow's ear/silk purse conversion came from Indianapolis mayor Greg Ballard, who acknowledged his "vision" amounted to little more than maintaining "the basics expected by the citizens of their government."
But then he added, "A big city that can get the ordinary things done right can be an extraordinary place to live."
Let's hope better times are coming.
And happier state-of-the-village speeches, right behind.
David Murray is editor of Vital Speeches of the Day, a monthly collection of the best speeches in the world.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.