iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
David O. Russell

GET UPDATES FROM David O. Russell
 

FDR Said It All in 1936 -- Who Will Follow in His Steps Today?

Posted: 04/22/11 01:58 PM ET

FDR said it all in 1936 and I wish someone would be this fearlessly blunt today on behalf of everyone in America facing a truly scandalous financial situation, which is only being allowed to repeat itself, shockingly, stupidly, unimaginably. People like my father are shocked that we ever let it happen again after FDR's era.


And here is the text of it:


Senator Wagner, Governor Lehman, ladies and gentlemen:

On the eve of a national election, it is well for us to stop for a moment and analyze calmly and without prejudice the effect on our Nation of a victory by either of the major political parties.

The problem of the electorate is far deeper, far more vital than the continuance in the Presidency of any individual. For the greater issue goes beyond units of humanity--it goes to humanity itself.

In 1932 the issue was the restoration of American democracy; and the American people were in a mood to win. They did win. In 1936 the issue is the preservation of their victory. Again they are in a mood to win. Again they will win.

More than four years ago in accepting the Democratic nomination in Chicago, I said: "Give me your help not to win votes alone, but to win in this crusade to restore America to its own people."

The banners of that crusade still fly in the van of a Nation that is on the march.

It is needless to repeat the details of the program which this Administration has been hammering out on the anvils of experience. No amount of misrepresentation or statistical contortion can conceal or blur or smear that record. Neither the attacks of unscrupulous enemies nor the exaggerations of over-zealous friends will serve to mislead the American people.

What was our hope in 1932? Above all other things the American people wanted peace. They wanted peace of mind instead of gnawing fear.

First, they sought escape from the personal terror which had stalked them for three years. They wanted the peace that comes from security in their homes: safety for their savings, permanence in their jobs, a fair profit from their enterprise.

Next, they wanted peace in the community, the peace that springs from the ability to meet the needs of community life: schools, playgrounds, parks, sanitation, highways--those things which are expected of solvent local government. They sought escape from disintegration and bankruptcy in local and state affairs.

They also sought peace within the Nation: protection of their currency, fairer wages, the ending of long hours of toil, the abolition of child labor, the elimination of wild-cat speculation, the safety of their children from kidnappers.

And, finally, they sought peace with other Nations--peace in a world of unrest. The Nation knows that I hate war, and I know that the Nation hates war.

I submit to you a record of peace; and on that record a well-founded expectation for future peace--peace for the individual, peace for the community, peace for the Nation, and peace with the world.

Tonight I call the roll--the roll of honor of those who stood with us in 1932 and still stand with us today.

Written on it are the names of millions who never had a chance --men at starvation wages, women in sweatshops, children at looms.

Written on it are the names of those who despaired, young men and young women for whom opportunity had become a will-o'-the-wisp.

Written on it are the names of farmers whose acres yielded only bitterness, business men whose books were portents of disaster, home owners who were faced with eviction, frugal citizens whose savings were insecure.

Written there in large letters are the names of countless other Americans of all parties and all faiths, Americans who had eyes to see and hearts to understand, whose consciences were burdened because too many of their fellows were burdened, who looked on these things four years ago and said, "This can be changed. We will change it."

We still lead that army in 1936. They stood with us then because in 1932 they believed. They stand with us today because in 1936 they know. And with them stand millions of new recruits who have come to know.

Their hopes have become our record.

We have not come this far without a struggle and I assure you we cannot go further without a struggle.

For twelve years this Nation was afflicted with hear-nothing, see-nothing, do-nothing Government. The Nation looked to Government but the Government looked away. Nine mocking years with the golden calf and three long years of the scourge! Nine crazy years at the ticker and three long years in the breadlines! Nine mad years of mirage and three long years of despair! Powerful influences strive today to restore that kind of government with its doctrine that that Government is best which is most indifferent.

For nearly four years you have had an Administration which instead of twirling its thumbs has rolled up its sleeves. We will keep our sleeves rolled up.

We had to struggle with the old enemies of peace--business and financial monopoly, speculation, reckless banking, class antagonism, sectionalism, war profiteering.

They had begun to consider the Government of the United States as a mere appendage to their own affairs. We know now that Government by organized money is just as dangerous as Government by organized mob.

Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me--and I welcome their hatred.

I should like to have it said of my first Administration that in it the forces of selfishness and of lust for power met their match. I should like to have it said of my second Administration that in it these forces met their master.

The American people know from a four-year record that today there is only one entrance to the White House--by the front door. Since March 4, 1933, there has been only one pass-key to the White House. I have carried that key in my pocket. It is there tonight. So long as I am President, it will remain in my pocket.

Those who used to have pass-keys are not happy. Some of them are desperate. Only desperate men with their backs to the wall would descend so far below the level of decent citizenship as to foster the current pay-envelope campaign against America's working people. Only reckless men, heedless of consequences, would risk the disruption of the hope for a new peace between worker and employer by returning to the tactics of the labor spy.

Here is an amazing paradox! The very employers and politicians and publishers who talk most loudly of class antagonism and the destruction of the American system now undermine that system by this attempt to coerce the votes of the wage earners of this country. It is the 1936 version of the old threat to close down the factory or the office if a particular candidate does not win. It is an old strategy of tyrants to delude their victims into fighting their battles for them.

Every message in a pay envelope, even if it is the truth, is a command to vote according to the will of the employer. But this propaganda is worse- it is deceit.

They tell the worker his wage will be reduced by a contribution to some vague form of old-age insurance. They carefully conceal from him the fact that for every dollar of premium he pays for that insurance, the employer pays another dollar. That omission is deceit.

They carefully conceal from him the fact that under the federal law, he receives another insurance policy to help him if he loses his job, and that the premium of that policy is paid 100 percent by the employer and not one cent by the worker. They do not tell him that the insurance policy that is bought for him is far more favorable to him than any policy that any private insurance company could afford to issue. That omission is deceit.

They imply to him that he pays all the cost of both forms of insurance. They carefully conceal from him the fact that for every dollar put up by him his employer puts up three dollars three for one. And that omission is deceit.

But they are guilty of more than deceit. When they imply that the reserves thus created against both these policies will be stolen by some future Congress, diverted to some wholly foreign purpose, they attack the integrity and honor of American Government itself. Those who suggest that, are already aliens to the spirit of American democracy. Let them emigrate and try their lot under some foreign flag in which they have more confidence.

The fraudulent nature of this attempt is well shown by the record of votes on the passage of the Social Security Act. In addition to an overwhelming majority of Democrats in both Houses, seventy-seven Republican Representatives voted for it and only eighteen against it and fifteen Republican Senators voted for it and only five against it. Where does this last-minute drive of the Republican leadership leave these Republican Representatives and Senators who helped enact this law?

I am sure the vast majority of law-abiding businessmen who are not parties to this propaganda fully appreciate the extent of the threat to honest business contained in this coercion.

I have expressed indignation at this form of campaigning and I am confident that the overwhelming majority of employers, workers and the general public share that indignation and will show it at the polls on Tuesday next.

Aside from this phase of it, I prefer to remember this campaign not as bitter but only as hard-fought. There should be no bitterness or hate where the sole thought is the welfare of the United States of America. No man can occupy the office of President without realizing that he is President of all the people.

It is because I have sought to think in terms of the whole Nation that I am confident that today, just as four years ago, the people want more than promises.

Our vision for the future contains more than promises.

This is our answer to those who, silent about their own plans, ask us to state our objectives.

Of course we will continue to seek to improve working conditions for the workers of America--to reduce hours over-long, to increase wages that spell starvation, to end the labor of children, to wipe out sweatshops. Of course we will continue every effort to end monopoly in business, to support collective bargaining, to stop unfair competition, to abolish dishonorable trade practices. For all these we have only just begun to fight.

Of course we will continue to work for cheaper electricity in the homes and on the farms of America, for better and cheaper transportation, for low interest rates, for sounder home financing, for better banking, for the regulation of security issues, for reciprocal trade among nations, for the wiping out of slums. For all these we have only just begun to fight.

Of course we will continue our efforts in behalf of the farmers of America. With their continued cooperation we will do all in our power to end the piling up of huge surpluses which spelled ruinous prices for their crops. We will persist in successful action for better land use, for reforestation, for the conservation of water all the way from its source to the sea, for drought and flood control, for better marketing facilities for farm commodities, for a definite reduction of farm tenancy, for encouragement of farmer cooperatives, for crop insurance and a stable food supply. For all these we have only just begun to fight.

Of course we will provide useful work for the needy unemployed; we prefer useful work to the pauperism of a dole.

Here and now I want to make myself clear about those who disparage their fellow citizens on the relief rolls. They say that those on relief are not merely jobless--that they are worthless. Their solution for the relief problem is to end relief--to purge the rolls by starvation. To use the language of the stock broker, our needy unemployed would be cared for when, as, and if some fairy godmother should happen on the scene.

You and I will continue to refuse to accept that estimate of our unemployed fellow Americans. Your Government is still on the same side of the street with the Good Samaritan and not with those who pass by on the other side.

Again -- what of our objectives?

Of course we will continue our efforts for young men and women so that they may obtain an education and an opportunity to put it to use. Of course we will continue our help for the crippled, for the blind, for the mothers, our insurance for the unemployed, our security for the aged. Of course we will continue to protect the consumer against unnecessary price spreads, against the costs that are added by monopoly and speculation. We will continue our successful efforts to increase his purchasing power and to keep it constant.

For these things, too, and for a multitude of others like them, we have only just begun to fight.

All this--all these objectives--spell peace at home. All our actions, all our ideals, spell also peace with other nations.

Today there is war and rumor of war. We want none of it. But while we guard our shores against threats of war, we will continue to remove the causes of unrest and antagonism at home which might make our people easier victims to those for whom foreign war is profitable. You know well that those who stand to profit by war are not on our side in this campaign.

"Peace on earth, good will toward men"--democracy must cling to that message. For it is my deep conviction that democracy cannot live without that true religion which gives a nation a sense of justice and of moral purpose. Above our political forums, above our market places stand the altars of our faith-altars on which burn the fires of devotion that maintain all that is best in us and all that is best in our Nation.

We have need of that devotion today. It is that which makes it possible for government to persuade those who are mentally prepared to fight each other to go on instead, to work for and to sacrifice for each other. That is why we need to say with the Prophet: "What doth the Lord require of thee -- but to do justly, to love mercy and to walk humbly with thy God." That is why the recovery we seek, the recovery we are winning, is more than economic. In it are included justice and love and humility, not for ourselves as individuals alone, but for our Nation.

That is the road to peace.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,365
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (17 total)
03:38 PM on 04/27/2011
Notice that there are no Harvard nuances here. No slogans. No "you are the ones who can do this". No legalistic polysyllabic words that many of us would have to look up. No esoteric essays of reasoning. No roundabout avoidances of naming the true culprits. No there's-always-two-sides-of-the-story-on-every-issue argument. No "Point one ... Point two ... " It's clear simple blunt understandable unquivocable English coming from the man telling the American people what he STOOD FOR and what he was going to DO. That stand-and-deliver caused the citizens back then to take notice, get charged up and come out fighting for their rights and their society, knowing that their President was right with them.
10:01 AM on 04/25/2011
It's sad that we have conservatives who are trying to rewrite history, claiming that FDR made The Great Depression worse. Some even claim he started it so as to enact his "socialist" policies. Since when is protecting the people from the predatory and anti-competitive practices of big business socialist? Is it not the function of government to protect its citizens from threats, both foreign and domestic?
08:31 AM on 04/25/2011
The next FDR -- where are you?!
04:52 AM on 04/25/2011
Wow: that was a great speech, and shockingly current! The Corporatists have been very successful in gutting much of the New Deal, and their "Deceit" continues unabated.
11:50 PM on 04/24/2011
The road to Hell is paved with good intentions.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Stephen Stafford
Be the answer to somebody's prayer!
08:42 AM on 04/25/2011
Mother? Why didn't you tell me opened an HP account.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Stephen Stafford
Be the answer to somebody's prayer!
08:44 AM on 04/25/2011
OK, it is just corny to fan and fave your mother when she is saying what she always says, but fanned and faved. Can you overnight the banana pudding, please?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Didderbops
11:46 PM on 04/24/2011
I thought Obama had a chance to be like FDR. Instead he has turned out to be the new Herbert Hoover.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ugly american
"I drank what?"- Last words of Socrates
12:57 AM on 04/25/2011
Fanned and faved! I am trying to count how many times I have said the same thing. Even on this article I think I have said it at least twice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Didderbops
10:32 AM on 04/25/2011
Yes, and I am tired of his sycophants trying to shout down and attack anyone who dare criticize him. Lately they've been engaging in ad hominem attacks on his high profile critics on the left. Simple minded support of every move of Obama does nothing to advance the Progressive agenda and in fact hinders it by encouraging Obama to take his base of supporters for granted.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eraser
Reality has a well know liberal bias
11:10 PM on 04/24/2011
This is the leadership we need.

Obama had it easy right from the start. To fix the economy and be successful all he had to do was read a non-texan high school history book and do the exact same things FDR did, word for word. It would have worked and he would have been just as successful.

But now we're seeing the alternative version of history, how things could have turned out then but didn't, and will now.
01:28 AM on 04/25/2011
The way to learn from history is not to repeat the same mistakes and then use the same solutions. The way to really learn from history would be to not repeat the mistakes to begin with - to prevent another depression or recession before it happens.

All everyone has to do is remember high school level American history (non-texan yes of course) and if Obama could count on Americans that knowledgeable, it would be easier to take these much needed bigger bolder steps because the public would be more likely to understand and support him I think.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eraser
Reality has a well know liberal bias
02:17 PM on 04/25/2011
Indeed that would be best. But it's too late for that.
08:32 AM on 04/25/2011
Well stated!!
photo
Si1ver1ock
the bread of wickedness, the wine of violence
10:47 PM on 04/24/2011
Say, where can I get a nice big poster of FDR, suitable for framming and hanging on the wall?
11:29 PM on 04/24/2011
LibrulsЯUs ?

:p
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ugly american
"I drank what?"- Last words of Socrates
01:00 AM on 04/25/2011
Amazon.com is where I got mine. 36x48 was as big as i could afford a frame from Hobby Lobby for.
photo
CapitalismIsCancer
Celebrating the End of Conservatism
10:33 PM on 04/24/2011
Relentless spying on citizens.
Paranoid, over-powered police-state
Torture and secret imprisonment of dissidents
Military Industrial Complex
Prison Industrial Complex
"Free Market" for bankers, harassment and excessive taxation for small business

The U.S., under unchecked capitalism, has all the horror of the old Soviet Union but without the free healthcare, education, housing.

The ONLY time Capitalism EVER worked was when it was balanced with Socialism. The fall of the Soviet Union, ironically, is the worst thing to happen to most Americans.
nothingchanges
too soon old, too late smart
10:28 PM on 04/24/2011
"Who will follow in his steps today"?

Looks to me like that might be the wrong question.

It took about 75 years to complete the cycle from what FDR was fighting against.............. to having the exact same thing happening now. A new "Gilded Age" where wealth is concentrated in the hands of the very few....... very fortunate .

Yet even today, the rich are getting richer, and the poor are being abandoned by their own government in so called deficit reduction "cost cutting" endeavors. They tell us balancing the budget is their primary concern and a matter of National security.......... but only after politicians extended lower tax rates to those not in need of them, in a convoluted system where the wealthiest already pay a much lower RATE of taxes then the working class.

The real question might be, "how long will it take for America to repeal the 13th amendment"?, so that the US will once again be the "competitive leader" in world commerce?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ugly american
"I drank what?"- Last words of Socrates
11:22 PM on 04/24/2011
I was with you right up until "how long will it take for America to repeal the 13th amendment"­?
Who exactly do you think should be shackled by slavery?
Perhaps I am just misunderstanding what you are trying to say?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
daveny
11:59 PM on 04/24/2011
I think they were trying to say that the ultimate achievement of the conservative "get gub'mint off our backs and we'll make more money!" argument would be the re-institution of slavery, since that was a profit-making enterprise. For rich people, anyways.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
06:27 PM on 04/25/2011
Of course as soon as we DO repeal the 13th we'll be worse off than the worst 3rd world country in the world...
photo
TremoluxMan
Politics: BS on Steroids.
09:44 PM on 04/24/2011
Wow. After reading through some of the comments, it looks like nothing brings out the T'bagger Trolls like mentioning FDR.

Sad to say, Obama isn't even a pale imitation of FDR at a time when such is needed most. He will be even less so in the next election and possible second term.
09:47 PM on 04/24/2011
Dudes like Beck and Rush have been trying to tear down FDR, and some people here are obviously listeners, repeating the stuff that Beck, Rush, etc., have said.
10:09 PM on 04/24/2011
In GOP bizzaro world FDR is a bad president and Hoover, Nixon, and Bush Jr. are great presidents.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
The Smartest Monkees
Planet of the Apes? We're on it, baby!
10:11 PM on 04/24/2011
It's just amazing that poor and working class folks, are allowing two multi-millionaires to talk them into giving away their social safeguards to further enrich the rich. Masochists, the lot of them.
photo
Si1ver1ock
the bread of wickedness, the wine of violence
10:08 PM on 04/24/2011
It's weird. I feel like these people are from another reality. Some of these things seem like fairly settled history, the depression has been studied several times by several economists, endless books and movies have been made about WW II, but no matter, they just make up assertions about FDR and spew them out.

They have left the reality based community far, far behind.
04:57 AM on 04/25/2011
"They have left the reality based community..." You've got that right!
photo
CapitalismIsCancer
Celebrating the End of Conservatism
09:34 PM on 04/24/2011
Reagan replaced the New Deal with a Bad Deal. Capitalist-rule is far more oppressive and violent than even the (usually embellished) anecdotes about the Soviet Union (..though the Commies gave FREE healthcare, education, housing). Capitalist-rule is the worst of ALL worlds.

...America has become a far, far, far worse place to live since converting to gascism/unchecked capitalism (even quick-buck foreigners no longer want to come here)
Dayne
People are people
09:52 PM on 04/24/2011
Have you lived under Communism? Are you a revisionist historian? For you to make a comparison between the oppression of capitalism vs. communism is a joke. Perhaps you and your commie friends can attempt to form another socialist/communist utopia. Just for the record, they have all failed. So, enjoy your unsubstantiated anti-Americanism, I hope it bites you in the proverbial posterior.

Dayne
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
daveny
10:06 PM on 04/24/2011
Did you live under Communism? Do you even know the difference between socialism and communism? Do you have any rationale for why anti-capitalism is anti-Americanism? Funny, I thought America was about a political ideal, not an economic one...
10:07 PM on 04/24/2011
Every time communism was tried we immediately cut them off, embargoes, assets frozen, etc... Plus there were nuts in charge. China? Hmm...
wsdave
Abusive or Insulting? I won't be responding.
10:15 PM on 04/24/2011
"Reagan replaced the New Deal with a Bad Deal."

Was Reagan elected in 1945, or did FDR last until 1980?
photo
CapitalismIsCancer
Celebrating the End of Conservatism
10:21 PM on 04/24/2011
Easy research, - give it a whirl!
05:00 AM on 04/25/2011
Read a book.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jwmellott
09:27 PM on 04/24/2011
1936? That was year 4 of 7 of the Roosevelt Depression.
How come today, Presidents (GOP only) are blamed when
a recession occurs and drags on, but FDR is praised?
09:31 PM on 04/24/2011
Because the economy grew at *double digits* for every year that FDR had the New Deal (except the one year when he pulled back the New Deal a little to please the Republicans). The Depression, caused by Republican policies, was so deep that double digit growth every year was not enough to end it completely until World War II really boosted government spending beyond what was spent during the New Deal.
photo
Si1ver1ock
the bread of wickedness, the wine of violence
10:31 PM on 04/24/2011
You should reread the above speech several times, the nine years and three years part especially. The Depression had been going three years before FDR took office. It was not self correcting, it could not self correct after the banking system imploded. There was no FDIC in those days. When the banks went under, savers lost their money.

FDR actually did something, lots of things( read the speech ). People were ( and are ) tired of "indifferent government."
11:23 PM on 04/24/2011
Henry Morgenthau, (yes, THAT Morgenthau) FDR's Treasury Secretary, May 1939:

"We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work. And I have just one interest, and if I am wrong ... somebody else can have my job. I want to see this country prosperous. I want to see people get a job. I want to see people get enough to eat. We have never made good on our promises ... I say after eight years of this Administration we have just as much unemployment as when we started ... And an enormous debt to boot!"

. . . and Congress and the President will soon kick this down the road to $16 Trillion in debt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patches12
08:55 PM on 04/24/2011
Hey Einstein... FDR was also adamently AGAINST public sector unions... should the Dems follow that vision as well?????
photo
meglon978
Beware of gifts bearing Greeks.
05:56 AM on 04/25/2011
And Reagan raised taxes, quite a few times.. should republicans be wetting their diapers trying to follow suit?
photo
BluePhantom2
The Blacksmith & the Artist reflected in their art
08:28 PM on 04/24/2011
While I respect FDR for his vision I personally do not support it as did congress which set term limits after his death. Johnson and his great society I find scary on several levels. This country was founded on personell resonsibility and work and is being turned into a welfare state entirely too fast based on things these two regularly quoted leaders knew to be wrong! America is based on the premise of work hard and you have a chance of excelling not a promise of mediocrity equals life. The constitution says "Life liberty and the pursuit of happiness" it is not a promise of happiness, or support.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zambiland
08:58 PM on 04/24/2011
That's a nice vision, but what it does is protect those who have the resources not to work hard but to squash those who would compete and set those who should be able to make a living wage against each other. It leaves us all wallowing in the mire of pollution. Prior to FDR's New Deal, life was nasty brutish and short for most of us. I like the mythology of your ideals, but the reality of it is the basis of a oligarchy under which most people never have the opportunity to get anywhere near the American Dream. Only with equality that comes with giving people the value of their labor and the ability to determine the terms of their labor do we get a society that is fair for all rather than a vehicle for the wellbeing of the wealthy few.
photo
Si1ver1ock
the bread of wickedness, the wine of violence
10:38 PM on 04/24/2011
he country moves toward a welfare state when the markets fail, which they do regularly. Big government isn't the only threat people face.

"business and financial monopoly, speculation, reckless banking, class antagonism, sectionalism, war profiteering."

Read the speech.