More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
David Protess

GET UPDATES FROM David Protess
 

Wrongfully Imprisoned 29 Years, Stanley Wrice Wins Second Chance

Posted: 02/ 2/2012 12:22 pm

Rhythmically bouncing a faded orange basketball with his right hand, Stanley Wrice drives past a defender half his age, dribbles left and stops on a dime. Freezing a muscular youth in his tracks, Wrice pulls up and lofts the ball towards the rusted cylinder. Floating fifteen feet, the ball's arc is true. Nothing but net.

For a moment, Wrice is triumphant. For a moment, he is free. A small smile crosses his face. Then reality intrudes. Heavily armed prison guards return him to his cell at the Pontiac Correctional Center. He is, once again, caged and alone.

Nearly three decades have passed since he was sentenced, several thousand games in the prison yard like this morning's, yet Wrice is still 32 years away from his projected discharge date. At age 57, he does not expect to shoot hoops in the free world, to watch his beloved Bulls ever play at the Madhouse on Madison, and, closest to his heart, to hold three daughters and six grandchildren in his loving arms. Not without divine intervention.

Still, he believes that God moves in mysterious ways, and today, for the first time since he was tortured by Chicago cops into falsely confessing to a brutal sexual assault, Stanley Wrice has hope. Turning to his Bible, he awaits his lawyer's call.

***
Shortly before 9:00 this morning, Assistant Appellate Defender Heidi Linn Lambros walks briskly from her office to the Illinois Supreme Court, where the long-awaited opinion is about to be issued in the case of People v. Wrice. Lambros has zealously represented Wrice for nine years, believing wholeheartedly in his true innocence. Now the defining moment of his case has finally arrived.


She quickly flips to the back of the 30-page document for the decision. There would be plenty of time to read the entire opinion.

The words jump off the page: "... reversing the trial court's order [against Wrice] and remanding [the case] for second-stage postconviction proceedings."

It was unanimous. Stanley would get a full-blown hearing on his claim of innocence.

Lambros screamed with glee.

The justices had flatly rejected prosecutors' arguments that Wrice's conviction should stand even if he had been tortured by two of Jon Burge's cops. The confession was merely "harmless error," the prosecutors claimed. Without it, the testimony of witnesses was still good enough to prove Wrice's guilt.

But writing for the Court, Justice Mary Jane Theis declared: "The use of a physically coerced confession as substantive evidence of defendant's guilt can never be harmless error." Her opinion noted that Wrice's case involved "beatings perpetrated by two police officers who figured prominently in the systematic abuse and torture of prisoners at Area 2 police headquarters."

"We believe that this type of coercion... constitutes an egregious violation of the underlying principle of our criminal justice system -- 'that ours is an accusatory and not an inquisitive system.'"

The language was a ringing victory for all police torture victims, but what would happen next for Stanley Wrice? Lambros knew his case would soon be returned to Cook County Judge Evelyn B. Clay for the Court-ordered hearing that would determine his fate. But the witnesses now stacked up in his favor.

The three surviving eyewitnesses -- including two of the actual perpetrators -- had given statements to student-journalists at the Chicago Innocence Project swearing that Stanley was innocent. The witnesses also had been tortured, they informed the students. And, the only independent witness in the case had recanted, telling the students his testimony against Stanley had been coerced. (For further details, click here.)

That leaves Stanley's confession. But it almost certainly would be excluded from the hearing because of today's Court opinion -- and because the cops who got the confession are under federal investigation and would take the Fifth rather than testify.

If Judge Clay orders a new trial based on these developments, there would no longer be a basis for prosecutors to re-try Stanley. At long last, he would be free.

Catching her breath, Lambros calls Pontiac to share the good news with her client.

***

Prisoners mark time in different ways. Stanley Wrice measures the years by memorable Chicago sporting events.

He had been already locked up for three years when the Bears won their only Super Bowl in 1985.

During his second decade of incarceration, he saw the Bulls dominate the NBA, winning six titles.

As his third decade behind bars approached after the century turned, the Sox won the World Series for the first time since 1917 and the Blackhawks brought home their first Stanley Cup since 1961.

Stanley Wrice intently watched it all on his prison TV, but without the camaraderie of other Chicago sports fans at Pontiac. His contact with inmates has been limited since June, 1988, when Wrice found himself in the middle of a brawl over a telephone. A gang-banger slashed Wrice's left ring finger with such force that it was severed from his hand. ("Least it wasn't my shooting hand," he would quip.) Now his human contact is mostly in the heavily supervised yard, at chow, and in "the Pontiac Choir," where he sings on Sundays -- as he had long ago at the Greater Mt. Everest Missionary Baptist Church led by his grandfather, Rev. William Salley.

Alone, Wrice watched Coach Mike Ditka carried on the shoulders of the Bears players. Alone, he saw Michael Jordan light up Magic Johnson in the Bulls first championship, and hit the game-winning shot that brought the Bulls their last championship. Alone, he saw the Cubs collapse five outs short of the World Series in 2003. (The last sporting event he attended was at Wrigley. Fergie Jenkins, Cubs Hall of Famer and Wrice's favorite player, was the starting pitcher.)

So he was predictably alone when he got THE NEWS from "Miss Lambros," as he respectfully calls her. An answered prayer, it was MUCH BIGGER than the Super Bowl and EVEN BETTER than Michael Jordan's heroics.

Dare he think about freedom? He can't help it. The fantasy will no longer elude him. Surrounded by family, he will savor a home-cooked cheeseburger. His baby girl, Gail, will be married on August 12, and he will accept the invitation to walk her down the aisle. And maybe, just maybe, Miss Lambros will work more magic and get him seats to catch the Bulls in their first championship season since Michael retired.

A long road lies ahead, but on this day, after more than 29 years of confinement and despair, anything seems possible. He is ready, once again, to fight for his freedom.

Game on.

 
Rhythmically bouncing a faded orange basketball with his right hand, Stanley Wrice drives past a defender half his age, dribbles left and stops on a dime. Freezing a muscular youth in his tracks, Wric...
Rhythmically bouncing a faded orange basketball with his right hand, Stanley Wrice drives past a defender half his age, dribbles left and stops on a dime. Freezing a muscular youth in his tracks, Wric...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 51
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:53 AM on 02/04/2012
That is so incredibly sad that these situations take place in our justice system and to people like them it is normal behavior to just force someone to confess. I felt so awful for this man to be there for 3 decades with the world and his family changing all around him and he is stuck there, innocent. I am so glad that you posted this story. It's sad but things like this need to be out there. I was talking to my co-worker about this and we both thought, "what would we do if we were being tortured to confess" I said that I would stand my ground and just let them do what they needed to to feel better about themselves but I would not give in. She said that she probably would give in to stop the torture. I thought about that and thought you know what, I really don't know what I would do. I would hope that I could be strong and maintain my innocence. I can't imagine what was going through his mind, but hopefully now it's the thought of getting to hold all of those grandbabies and embracing all of his loved ones. Way to go "Miss Lambros" too. :) What a great lawyer she is. I hope those corrupt cops get what they deserve.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
David Protess
03:03 PM on 02/04/2012
It's hard to say what any of us would do, under the circumstances, but put yourself in Stanley Wrice's shoes for a minute. He was dragged to the basement of Area 2, threatened with hanging (they said it would be a "suicide"), then kicked, punched and beaten with a rubber hose in his groin and upper thighs. The paramedic saw bruises covering most of his body. He was barely able to walk and was urinating blood. I don't know about you, but I'm with your friend. I think I'd confess to anything -- just to get them to stop.
photo
hereisallie
What a long strange trip it's been...
11:18 AM on 02/04/2012
"The language was a ringing victory for all police torture victims"...this is not just a victory for Mr. Wrice, but for all the others still waiting for justice.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
David Protess
03:05 PM on 02/04/2012
Exactly. At least 15 other torture victims will be directly helped by this decision, and there are countless other beating victims who are still waiting for real justice.
11:29 PM on 02/03/2012
These types of crimes committed by cops and prosecutors against citizens will continue until Congress pass laws that will make it a class A felony for cops and prosecutors to commit crimes to "solve crimes".

This won't happen because the ABA is a powerful lobby; powerful enough to get Obama's justice department to come down on the side of the prosecutors in the Terry Harrington case.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
David Protess
10:18 AM on 02/04/2012
I share your sentiments and your assessment of the likelihood of success. But I don't think the ABA is the problem as much as the law enforcement lobby.
09:43 PM on 02/03/2012
Great article. That's my girl Heidi Linn Lambros. Thank you David Protess and all who have been on this journey with Stanley and my daughter Heidi.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
David Protess
12:21 AM on 02/04/2012
You must be so proud of her! Not too many lawyers have won a landmark case before the supreme court AND at the same time laid the groundwork for freeing an innocent man, but that's what Heidi did. And she did it with a level of dedication and passion that I've rarely seen in a lawyer. Congratulations, Heidi's Mom!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
katgal1232
in and out of the garden he goes
10:44 AM on 02/04/2012
Yep, I feel it through your post, truly. xox
10:03 AM on 02/03/2012
People knew this man's confession was coerced, and still are happy to let him sit in prison for 3 decades. And the state still fights it all the way to the Il Supreme Court. This happens far too often, and I agree, they should be prosecuted. Unfortunately, you have to get caught red handed torturing people into confessing, and then basically they (Burge) get a slap on the hand for this egregious abuse of authority. When it is proven the state hid evidence, those state actors at a minimum should be prosecuted for obstruction of justice, like any other citizen. There is no accountability. It makes my blood boil. Thank you to the people and orgs who took it upon themselves to get involved.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
David Protess
11:26 AM on 02/03/2012
Thanks for your post. I wouldn't call Burge's 41/2 year sentence a "slap on the hand," but I get the point. It would have been much longer if then-State's Attorney Daley had listened to his police chief about torture at Area 2 and acted on the evidence in a timely manner. Burge would have been prosecuted for offenses far worse than perjury and obstruction of justice. As for the officers who tortured Stanley Wrice, their day in court is coming. But your larger point about accountability is spot on.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:23 AM on 02/09/2012
Eerily similar to The Hurricane. Justice can only be built upon a foundation of truth and our walls have been crumbling for some time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiMi LLawsonn
08:39 AM on 02/03/2012
And we, the people of AMERICA, calls this kind of treatment fair and just.....there are many, many issues which need to be questioned and addressed in this country with what takes place in our good ole Judicial System....too many innocent people are being railroaded, framed, snowballed, blackballed, intimidated and munipulated into prisons for CRIMES THAT THEY DID NOT COMMIT....it is TIME for LAW MAKERS around the country to TAKE A STAND and put laws in place to PROTECT the INNOCENT from this kind of treatment......http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-736024......this link provides yet another case of what took place in NC in the spring of 2011.....
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
David Protess
11:28 AM on 02/03/2012
Wrongful convictions is a national problem. May justice prevail in your North Carolina case.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lainey
Always remember Troy Davis.
10:31 PM on 02/02/2012
Blessings of freedom to Mr. Wrice. Blessings to the Chicago Innocence Project. Blessings to Ms. Lambros. I have full faith that Mr. Wrice's walk down the aisle with his daughter will be the miracle on which he has so faithfully waited. With that in mind, I still question how some could argue that tortured confession doesn't negate its validity: The system seems so arrogant in that regard. I question the validity of an "innocence" hearing and why it is even in place. But in keeping with the positive energy, I say let the light shine. The more often it does, the better everyone will be...from the innocent, to true justice and to the good cops caught in a cloud of suspicion. Keep shining the light. Kindness.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
David Protess
09:55 AM on 02/03/2012
I will convey your kind message to Mr. Wrice. As for your question, the reason prosecutors argued the tortured confession was "harmless" was that other evidence in the case led them to conclude that Mr. Wrice was still guilty -- even if he had been tortured. The Chicago Innocence Project's students determined that the other evidence had also been obtained through torture, and thus should be thrown out along with the confession. That will be up to a judge, but we are hopeful that Mr. Wrice will be able to walk his daughter down the aisle in August. Thanks, as ever, for your post.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lainey
Always remember Troy Davis.
10:23 AM on 02/03/2012
Thanks for always answering my questions and for sending my message along. I truly believe it will be for Mr. Wrice and his family! I will pray with confidence. As for the answer--and please excuse my ignorance--wouldn't the fact that any information obtained through torture resolve to negate the others by reason that if some was gathered by torture, who knows about the rest? And if not, would it still not be a reason to see that his rights were violated to the point of interference with due process? I am so grateful that the Chicago Innocence Project was able to prove that other evidence was gained that way, but if they had not, how could a judge not conclude that his individual rights were violated. Hasn't that become the real issue at this stage. Sorry for all of the questions, just truly wish to be informed. Kindness.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edgarcaycedoc
07:26 PM on 02/02/2012
What is disgusting about some cops, especially those in very small villages or in the faceless bureaucracies of major metro areas, is that you can tell they have been bullies all of their lives. I have met many cops who were thoroughly professional, but the bad apples make it rough for every cop on every beat.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
David Protess
09:00 PM on 02/02/2012
I'm glad you didn't generalize to all cops. Many of my best sources over the years have been honorable cops, whistleblowers who disdained injustice. But the lives that Jon Burge and his crew ruined is unforgivable, and the sad reality is that police brutality will not end with today's Court decision.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
LazarusRises
Tax The Rich, Feed The Poor!!
06:18 PM on 02/02/2012
5 men involved in 5 different cases were convicted over several years when each of them riding from the jail to the courthouse confessed their crimes to a unknown jail house snitch. Each confessed facts that only the perpetrato­r, the police & the State Attorneys knew. After nearly 30 years, DNA evidence has exonerated 2 of the men & proved the snitch lied. I believe the other 3 men died in jail.

There is a problem. The convicts could not have provided facts that they could not have known about. It is extremely unlikely that the snitch ever met the investigat­ing officers. Unfortunat­ely, that leaves only the 2 Assistant State Attorneys who knew the facts & met with the snitch. One of them is now a judge.

This sort of conduct will only get worse now that The Bill of Rights has been gelded.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
David Protess
06:45 PM on 02/02/2012
What a horrifying tale. I'd be interested in writing about this matter. Feel free to follow up with comments in this space or shoot me a message at the Chicago Innocence Project. Thanks. As for the Bill of Rights, what's that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Lee Smyth
a nomadic view
04:37 PM on 02/02/2012
Wonderful article...
Dave...I know you have some idea of my attitudes towards police procedure and the way the system is regularly abused by those in power. This is a prime example of what was once very common. The taping of interrogations has helped to allay some of this but, the general use of fear and intimidation are used instead of the downright beat downs of the past. The line where "deadly" use of force is allowed and for what situations gets thinner every day.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
David Protess
04:46 PM on 02/02/2012
Thanks, Michael. Good point about videotaped interrogations. If they had been in place in 1982, Stanley Wrice and so many other innocents would never have been incarcerated. But more needs to be done. There is legislation pending that would extend videotaping to the entire questioning process and to more violent crimes than it presently does.
04:19 PM on 02/02/2012
One year again, I began investing Stanley's wrongful with the Chicago Innocence Project. I cannot put into words how much the ruling on this case means to me. (I actually began crying at work... tears of joy, of course.) It's an incredibly rewarding feeling knowing that my efforts as a student with the Innocence Project, may help in granting Stanley's (incredibly overdue) freedom. Let's hope he doesn't need to wait much longer. It's about time.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
David Protess
04:36 PM on 02/02/2012
And what amazing work you and your teammates did, working for no school credit or pay, to find the truth. That quest took you to Minnesota, Arkansas and the South Side of Chicago. It sure paid off. Congratulations!
09:37 PM on 02/02/2012
In total agreement. Makes all of those long car trips and days spent knocking on doors of empty apartments completely worth it. Who knew, as we sat reading case files in the basement of a campus building last year, how "real" it would all become. Looking forward to Stanley's future
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
David Protess
10:59 PM on 02/02/2012
So is Stanley, thanks to you guys!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
LazarusRises
Tax The Rich, Feed The Poor!!
04:07 PM on 02/02/2012
5 men involved in 5 different cases were convicted over several years when each of them riding from the jail to the courthouse confessed their crimes to a unknown jail house snitch. Each confessed facts that only the perpetrator, the police & the State Attorneys knew. After nearly 30 years, DNA evidence has exonerated 2 of the men & proved the snitch lied. I believe the other 3 men died in jail.

There is a problem. The convicts could not have provided facts that they could not have known about. It is extremely unlikely that the snitch ever met the investigating officers. Unfortunately, that leaves only the 2 Assistant State Attorneys who knew the facts & met with the snitch. One of them is now a judge.

This sort of conduct will only get worse now that The Bill of Rights has been gelded.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
David Protess
12:22 AM on 02/04/2012
The Bill of Rights? What's that?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
LazarusRises
Tax The Rich, Feed The Poor!!
03:57 PM on 02/02/2012
Our legal system is so horiffically flawed & corrupt. If the above facts are true & complete, the state should release him today.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
David Protess
04:40 PM on 02/02/2012
Oh, how I wish that would happen, but prosecutors will never admit their mistake so quickly after investing 29 years of resources into putting and keeping him behind bars. It will, however, happen in time -- hopefully in time to walk his daughter down the aisle in August.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kilakhan
speaking my mind however wrong!
03:04 PM on 02/02/2012
when a justice system is peopled by lazy cops who feel obligated to "solve" cases and "solve" them quickly the results will be frequent miscarriages of justice...to make it worse lawyers like the prosecutor who argued that a confession that was tortured out of a victim is "harmless error" are just rubber stamping the dirty work of the cops and do the legal profession a serious disservice!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
David Protess
03:26 PM on 02/02/2012
Amen! Most police and prosecutors do their jobs honorably, but there are exceptions, and a tragic one is the mishandling of the Wrice case over three decades.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
LazarusRises
Tax The Rich, Feed The Poor!!
03:59 PM on 02/02/2012
Prosecutors are supposed to attempt to find justice. Unfortunately, they far too often, focus on winning as the only important factor. Is it any wonder why the public holds attorneys in such ill repute?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Weissman
Hooah!
02:22 PM on 02/02/2012
He should sue the state of IL for about 100 million dollars and the cops involved should have to fork over whatever they own to him. There is no excuse for this none whatso ever..
photo
intotheabyss
Imperialism is a form of insanity.
04:01 PM on 02/02/2012
X2!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Accountant
The time for truth is now - always
06:41 PM on 02/02/2012
Rather than their property and belongings it seems more fitting they should have their freedom taken. More than anything that's what was stolen from Stanley Wrice. His ability to be with his loved ones and to develop his talents and potential in a normal way.

I can't figure why the "justice" system is so slow and how prosecutors get away with this collusion for that is what it takes to do this to an innocent man. It is not just the corrupt cops. So long as there is immunity for all these folks they will continue to destroy innocent people's lives.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
David Protess
11:03 PM on 02/02/2012
Many exonerees have said that wrongful prosecutions would be far less likely to take place if cops and prosecutors would spend time in prison, sort of like trading places.
As for your second point, I think you did figure it out -- the problem is they have immunity in most instances.
Thanks for your post.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:00 AM on 02/06/2012
@ TheAcccountant -- I completely agree. As long as immunity exists for overly zealous & corrupt cops and prosecutors, then absolutely nothing will change and we'll continue to see more cases like Mr. Wrices' come to light in the coming years. As disheartening as this realization may be, I'm grateful that people of conscience like Ms. Lambros, and the lawyers and students at The Innocence Project are out there fighting the good fight. Kudos to them, and my sincerest best wishes to Mr. Wrice -- may justice finally prevail in his case.

"Justice consists not in being neutral between right and wrong, but in finding out the right and upholding it, wherever found, against the wrong." -- Theodore Roosevelt