Discussing McCain Pro-Child Molester Ad On MSNBC's New Rachel Maddow Show

Last night, I appeared on Rachel Maddow's new MSNBC show to discuss John McCain's new ad attacking Barack Obama on education. You can watch the discussion here:

In airing this ad, McCain has done something I never thought I would see: He has sponsored a new television commercial that effectively declares his support for child molestor rights.

I'm dead serious here: The ad explicitly criticizes Obama for supporting state legislation that the Kansas City Star notes was designed to give "schools the ability to warn young children about inappropriate touching and sexual predators."

So by basic logical deduction, then, McCain's ad attacking Obama for supporting that bill means McCain would have opposed it - meaning he would have taken the side of the Pedophilia Lobby that wants young children to not understand when they are being molested. I'm wondering - is there a NAMBLA endorsement in the works for McCain? The Arizona senator sure seems to be courting that interest group with this latest declaration.

Of course, McCain's ad is aimed at pushing the kind of cultural populism Republicans have been using for at least a generation. In this case, McCain is willing to put himself on record as supporting child molesters, as long as it helps him depict Obama as not just a child molester supporter, but a child molester himself - which is what the ad's voiceover basically suggests when it hysterically implies State Senator Obama tried to fondle small schoolchildren while whispering sweet porn nothings into their ear.

Put into pop culture terms, this is McCain's effort to turn the 2008 presidential campaign into the infamous Different Strokes child molester episode - starring Barack Obama as the guy kneeling in this picture.

On Rachel's show last night, we discussed how Obama can - and should - respond to this kind of cultural populism. I reiterated that, in general, he needs to do what I suggested in a newspaper column a few months back: namely, voice strong economic populist themes that keep the campaign debate focused on the issues of most import, and that Democrats win on.

In specifically responding to this ad, I told Rachel that Obama has to learn a lesson from perhaps the most famous example of failed methods of responding to such issues - the one from the 1988 presidential debate, where Michael Dukakis answered Bernard Shaw's question about raping and murdering Kitty Dukakis not with an emotional attack on Shaw's inappropriate inquiry, but with dispassionate platitudes. Watch that moment here:

If Obama reacts forcefully and emotionally to McCain's ad - not through a spokesman but on his own - he could make this ad and the right's whole cultural populist meme backfire on McCain. But that's a big if.

As one addendum: If you haven't checked out Rachel's new show, you should. It's great - fast-paced, funny, informative - and anchored by a real movement progressive. It's also doing really well in its first few days of ratings.

Comments

[JMike]

RE: Dukakis. I have contended for 20 years that Dukakis' response to that inane question SHOULD have been simply, "Bernie, I'd kill him with my bare hands." Millions of men around the country would have said, "Damn straight, Mike. Me too." Dukakis would have been elected.

[GhiaccioPronto]

Wow, Ann Coulter in drag.

[Airmid]

So we'll get a short, pithy, funny add about this - right?

Cue: Kids in schoolground

voice over: Barack Obama's bill would have taught your kids how to stop child molestors

Kids see *Big Bad Wolf* and run

then settle and play again

voice over: the Scouting Federation supported it, local people supported it, we all supported it

BIG shadow over kids

But NOT John McCain

End on now-traditional image of McCain as Pinnochio with his nose growing and his pants on fire.

**why oh, why is this NOT the traditional image? - show it just once and the MSM won't be able to stop showing it**

ENDS

Come ON, people, you have the technology to do this

GET IT OUT THERE

[Zingaro Zorro]

What would Jesus say about the lying liars of the Republcian Party who misconstrue truth for political gain?

[Miamiman]

Warning kids is the responsibility of the Parents not the Schools. Obama said taching Sex Ed to 5 year olds is OK as long as it was "age appropriate"?? At 5 years old age appropriate = NOTHING!

[Teyshar]

And then when they turn around and say that man touched me, they will be 30 years of age after years of psychotherapy and trying to adjust to their fear of men/women and their inability to perform in society. Yay.... Instead of critique do you have a better system or plan?

[lokipuck]

ANY age is a good age to teach kids about inappropriate sexual contact. Or should we leave that to the pedophiles? Good idea Mr. Family Values!

[ChimesOfFreedom]

It's not sex education, you ignoramus, it's molestation education - or don't you know the difference?

[ESerafina42]

Unfortunately, at least some of the time one of the parents IS the molester. What then?

Also, when sex education is left up to "the parents," most of the time the kids will either learn NOTHING, age-appropriate or otherwise, or learn it from their friends - you know, that sage wisdom that "you can't get pregnant the first time" or if you jump up and down afterwards.