How to Defund Warrantless Wiretapping

This isn't a debate about national security, because there is absolutely no evidence to suggest that obtaining warrants hurts national security. This is a debate about privacy and the rule of law.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

Over at OpenLeft, I have posted my bi-weekly Strategery article. This week, it's about an alternative strategy to stop the Bush administration's warrantless wiretapping. Such a strategy is necessary because congressional Democrats last week capitulated to the White House and passed legislation allowing this kind of behavior to continue.

Let's be clear -- we all want law enforcement authorities to be able to hunt down terrorists. And we know for a fact that the special FISA courts already have extraordinary tools to process warrant requests (there is even a process to approve them retroactively so as to prevent federal agents from losing precious time in the hunt for terrorists). We know, in other words, that Congress following a strategy like the one I describe would merely force the Bush administration to follow a law that does nothing to hurt our national security, and everything to protect our freedoms. Put another way, this isn't a debate about national security, because there is absolutely no evidence to suggest that obtaining warrants hurts national security. This is a debate about privacy and the rule of law.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot