More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
David Sirota

David Sirota

Posted: December 16, 2010 02:08 PM

As the House considers a bill to extend the Bush tax cuts for the top 2%, slash corporate taxes and potentially make the Estate Tax more generous to billionaires than ever before, it's instructive to put the move into a larger cultural/historical context. And thanks to newly released IRS documents, we can do just that.

As the Institute for Policy Studies reports, officials at the National Archives recently released a 67-year-old U.S. Treasury Department report detailing what the richest Americans once paid in taxes in the middle of the 20th century. IPS notes that "We have simply never had clearer evidence of just how much America used to expect out of individual wealthy Americans -- and just how little, by comparison, we expect out of our wealthy today." Here are some of the details:

We learn, for instance, that 1941's top executive at IBM, Thomas Watson, collected $517,221 in compensation that year, about $7.7 million in current dollars. Watson paid 69 percent of his total 1941 income in federal income tax.


Last year, today's chief exec at IBM, Sam Palmisano, took home $24.3 million for his executive labors. We don't know how much income above that sum Palmisano reported in 2009, or exactly how much of that total he paid in taxes.

But we do know that the 13,374 Americans who reported incomes over $10 million in 2008, the latest year with IRS stats available, paid an average 24.1 percent of their taxable incomes in federal income tax.

In other words, IBM CEO Palmisano last year took home, after adjusting for inflation, over three times more than his predecessor Thomas Watson took home in 1941. Yet Watson in 1941 paid almost three times more of his income in federal income taxes than Palmisano likely paid in 2009.

So assuming that Palmisano pays roughly what his fellow millionaires pay in taxes, we've seen IBM CEO tax rates go from 69 percent down to 24 percent. That's a massive tax cut, and it's no coincidence that it came over the very same period we saw an explosion in federal deficits. And remember, these numbers compare the data that exists before this week's expected passage of even more new deficit-expanding tax cuts for the super-rich.

Save for being referenced in Bernie Sanders' 9-hour-long quasi-filibuster, these new numbers weren't a part of the debate about the new tax cuts - and they certainly didn't play a decisive role for White House and congressional policymakers. That's because the numbers represent a deeper cultural/attitudinal shift toward wealth deification in this, a radical new greed-is-good epoch (by "new" I mean the last 30 years in our country's 200+ year history). Embedded in our tax and budget debates is the bipartisan assumption that the super-rich shouldn't pay the tax rates they paid during the mid-20th century - AKA the tax rates that existed when our economy boomed.

Somehow, this assumption goes unquestioned at a time when we simultaneously wonder why we have huge deficits and why our economy is now faltering. We are so enthralled with preserving the riches of the so-called Masters of the Universe, and those Masters of the Universe have their wealth to buy off so many politicians, that we are now immersed in a culture of willful ignorance. We can no longer learn history's lessons about taxes -- even the lessons that are as crystal clear as this newly released IRS data.

 
 
 

Follow David Sirota on Twitter: www.twitter.com/davidsirota

 
 
  • Comments
  • 195
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
11:25 AM on 01/24/2011
WWW.TAXPROBLEM.ORG
09:49 AM on 12/26/2010
As a progressive I know that many of the rich people and Businesses in this country do not pay enough taxes ( GE paid 5.3% last year ). However, I think that almost 25% of one's income is enough for any one of us to pay in taxes. In fact I think in fairness that almost everyone except for the poor should pay the same rate.I feel that it is too easy to to focus on beating up people who make $24.3 million dollars a year. I think that there are many other avenues we should take before raising the top tax rate back to 90%.

1 We should root out corruption in Government especially in the DOD. End all the sweet hart deals where universities are doing Gov't sponsored research and then handing it over to industry etc.
2 We could cancel all tax breaks for businesses who make wooden arrows and people who buy race horses and the such thereby raising more revenue.
3 Corporate governance laws could be reinforced so that stock holders (many of them average people or retirement plans) would not be bilked out of returns by these CEOs all of whom are taking these obscene salaries in violation of their legal responsibility to maximize profit for the share holder.

And on, and on, the list goes but I think we should take a holistic approach rather than pile driving one aspect of the problem.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tacevad
American SS Card Carrying Socialist
11:32 AM on 12/19/2010
any correlation between tax rates for the very wealthy and the Nations deficit are purely coinky dinks right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peedropaula
I macraméd my micro-bio.
10:02 PM on 12/18/2010
Remember Jonathan Swift's "A Modest Proposal"? We're fast approaching the time when the only sensible thing to do is eat the wealthy. Of course, we'll exclude people like Bill Gates, Warren Bufftet, etc. who've pledged to give away half their wealth, but the greediest bastards should prove to be pretty tender since they've fattened themselves on the hopes and dreams of the little people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eileenla
Author, "Sacred Economics"
01:00 AM on 12/18/2010
When are we going to stop taxing wages and start taxing hoarded wealth? Taxing wages - a policy designed by the wealthy to require the sort-of-haves to take care of the have-nots - was a diabolical stroke of genius. It got the wealthy off the hook for paying taxes since so few of them generate wage income, AND it pitted the middle class against the lower class in a raging war for survival that ensures they don't rise up in concert to massacre the rich.
schatsie
banks are more dangerous than standing armies
03:45 PM on 12/18/2010
See FairShareTaxes.Org....If the Swiss, Germans and French can tax wealth, the only question is why can't we? After 30 years of waiting for trickle down, for giving up unions and pensions and Family jobs for the middle class. we need to wake up and start clawing back the wealth that was GIVEN to the rich in the tax cuts.....
10:04 AM on 12/26/2010
I have spent some time looking at the site it seems to make sense for the most part. I do support clawing back unpaid taxes and then imposing a fair tax rate for all Americans. We need to combine these efforts with a strong balanced budget amendment to the Constitution and a citizen monitored corruption watch to make sure all tax dollars are spent ethically. Those measures along with publicly sponsored elections should go a long way towards getting things back in order.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:30 PM on 12/20/2010
if the IRS actually enforces accumulated profits rules on the corporations (fat chance) the 1.2 trillion dollars they are sitting on would be taxed at capital gains of 15%; a tidy little sum to the Treasury, I doubt Mr President discussed this in his lttle CEO meeting the other day
03:03 PM on 12/17/2010
Federal Income Tax collected from individuals has gone from 2.3% of GDP in 1942 to 7.4% in 2003

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=1324

Do you honestly want to increase that even more? Your superficial analysis is blatantly subjective.
03:19 PM on 12/17/2010
Maybe if the corporate world bore a fair share of the tax burden rather than sheltering enormous amounts of money in an off-shore holding company shell game, we wouldn't have to be dealing with these kinds of questions about taxes on individuals.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Trepasky
Sanity is neither free nor easy
02:58 PM on 12/17/2010
To fund the rise of the wealthy, someone had to pay.
It used to be those of us who wanted their superior products and services. It was a fair trade of money for products.
Now the buyers are our Government (with our money), and the middle class and poor. And what we get now are promises (tax cuts), threats (bail outs), and reasons why we should be happy to have a job and are not like the 'lazy' unemployed.
Something happened to quality and useful. Greed has transformed them into junk and threats.
Greed has worked well for Congress, they can now command a higher price for laws and benefits for their backers and patrons. Lobbyists have to pay more but then they get it back in benefits.
Those of us who still have to buy food and other luxuries like toilet paper, can reminisce about the old days when a dollar bought a dollar's worth of goods. Now that same dollar buy about $.10 of goods and our pay since the 1970s is largely unchanged.
Pandora was blamed for letting loose the on this world. She got everything back into the box except for greed which the wealthy keep hidden away in their castles.Only to take greed for a walk now and then though Congress for a show and tell. Or is that a bribe and threat?
03:47 PM on 12/17/2010
When this country goes down, and it will, probably sooner than later, it will have been GREED that killed the patient, put the body in the box and nailed shut the lid .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:32 PM on 12/20/2010
'they' are actually waiting for us to cry "deliver us from our inefficient government", and they will be glad to step in with the one world order; hmmm...I wonder if the Chinese are suffering from 'inefficiencies' in government as well.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mark331blue
Left leaning independent
01:37 PM on 12/17/2010
Mr. Sirota, the comparison you make is far too simple. Not that it's wrong. The preponderance of power, both congressional and presidential, has remained in the hands of the right for a generation. It is during this time that facts, as we once knew them, became irrelevant to political debate. In other words, the question is no longer, "Are you right or wrong with regard to the truth?" The question is, "Are you loyal or are you disloyal to right wing orthodoxy?" Facts are easily misrepresented, a tool to be manipulated by hucksters and sloganeers for the purpose of advancing ideology.

The Republicans will be happy with nothing short of a return to 1929...and they will pay any price to get there. That should be clear to not only you, but the entire voting public, by now. If not, perhaps placing the likes of Sarah Palin in the White House backed by a hardcore Republican Congress will do the trick. That way the voters can wonder what happened as they stand amid the smoldering ruins, wondering why no one has a job, a savings account, a retirement account or health care while the top two percent continue down the road to fascism.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CMB1969
raging moderate
12:11 PM on 12/17/2010
Of course the tax codes of the mid-20th century were much more riddled with deductions and tax shelters than they are today (both because of the closing of loopholes and inflation making the application of the alternative minimum tax more widespread) and the tax codes of that era provided for a much smaller marginal rate on capital gains, which is how most of the "super rich" (as opposed to the ordinary run-of-the-mill rich) derive their income. That is not to say that the tax codes of fifty years ago are better or worse than they are today--they were just different.
11:47 AM on 12/17/2010
Every dollar the plutocrat sees in the hand of a middle class person is a dollar that the plutocrat thinks belongs to him by divine right. And there is nothing too low for the plutocrat to stoop to in order to relieve the middle class of every last penny they own.
11:38 AM on 12/17/2010
As disturbing as the decline in the rate of taxation is the explosion in total compensation in constant dollars. I suspect Watson actually worked far harder for his money than Palmisano would ever be willing to.

Excellent article, David, and pretty much a summary of everything wrong with this country's economic policy for the last 30 years.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:36 PM on 12/20/2010
I believe the values and character differences between the two would be interesting as well
11:31 AM on 12/17/2010
Get wise, incorporate. Corporations are the "real" "persons"
and ordinary human people are only their intestinal parasites.
If you don't believe me, check the tax code. Not to mention,
when's the last time a corporation got the death penalty for
mass murder? Or any of its culpable minions? Right. And
any fine they get is deducted straight off the top, just like
all their "living expenses".

There's a new class of citizen and we ain't it.
RedneckLiberal
Redneck is not synonymous with Conservative
10:44 AM on 12/17/2010
Now David, you know that using actual facts isn't going to get you anywhere. You need colorful graphics, a dose of terror and a clueless nitwit of a talking head explaining why those that don't embrace these facts are unAmerican. Then you might see people actually listen. They will still get all the details wrong and not be able to explain it to anybody else, but they will believe, deep in their hearts, that Jesus wants us to tax the rich at a higher level.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cheryl tobin
Alpha Dog with my pack!
10:38 AM on 12/17/2010
Wonder how bad the average American will suffer financially until everybody wakes up from this "greed is good" joy ride!
photo
Inkosi
The gods themselves rage aginst stupidity
11:42 AM on 12/17/2010
By then we will be a colony of China.
photo
Blodo
Time to build a better world
09:14 PM on 12/17/2010
I hope it's before the average American realizes that made-in-China toaster costs a month's wages in US dollars.
10:18 AM on 12/17/2010
Perhaps it is time to admit we are no longer a government of the people; we are a plutocracy (a government controlled only by the wealthy). The obscenely rich want this to remain a secret because they are afraid of class warfare. If we ever figure this out, for their own safety the rich might have to move to gated communities or move overseas and move their money offshore.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MeinNH
Ooooo Silly Me
11:27 AM on 12/17/2010
I think that cat is out of the bag now....just sayin'
photo
Inkosi
The gods themselves rage aginst stupidity
11:42 AM on 12/17/2010
They are already doing that in case you had not noticed.