More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
David Wygant

David Wygant

Posted: March 31, 2010 12:51 AM

Why Men Cheat On Celebrities

What's Your Reaction:

I was reading the other day about the new "big news" about Jesse James. No, not Jesse James the old gunslinger. I am talking about the Jesse James who is still technically married to our favorite The Blind Side Oscar winner Sandra Bullock.

The big new development in this saga is that Jesse James apparently didn't just cheat with that woman who is tattooed from head to toe, but has actually cheated with multiple women. They say he may have had as many as ten lovers over the last ten years.

People are outraged to learn this. Poor Sandra! I talked in my blog last week about 'poor Sandra' getting cheated on by Jesse James.

The only story about this whole thing seems to be that another innocent woman has been cheated on by a guy who couldn't keep his penis in his pants. Once again, though, there are so many assumptions being made with this being the only storyline.

We have no idea what their sex life was like. None.

Sandra could have been frigid. Sandra could have been awful in bed. Sandra herself could have been cheating. Sandra could have been so busy all the time, that she had no time for her man.

Nobody ever seems to look at the person being cheated on as anything more than just a victim. This is ridiculous.

Who cares if Jesse James had ten lovers, twenty lovers or fifty lovers? It doesn't make a difference with how many people someone cheats.

There are some guys who will always cheat. There are some guys who can never stay loyal. It doesn't matter if they're happy or sad in their relationship. They will always cheat. They just like the thrill of new women.

There are other guys, however, who cheat for so many other reasons. Nobody wants to write about that though.

Nobody wants to write about Sandra. Everybody just feels so badly because she is an Oscar winner and a privileged celebrity who has been cheated on by a man.

At least one of the questions we should be asking here is how did she treat him? Does anyone ever stop even for a second to wonder how Sandra treated Jesse?

Might there have been any reason why he went and cheated? Could it perhaps have been that the sex at home was nonexistent, or maybe she was too busy for anything but work?

You don't know and, the truth is, that none of us know. Once again, though, we are judging people without knowing all the facts.

Now everyone is even more outraged than ever before because of the discovery that this man cheated on Sandra with multiple women. Once again, the man is portrayed as being totally at fault.

Don't get me wrong. I'm a man, but I am not defending all men who cheat. Just a few paragraphs earlier I said that there are a lot of men who cheat just for the sake of cheating and because they enjoy the chase.

So before you get all crazy thinking that I'm just a man basically protecting other men, I'm not. What I am trying to do, though, is to tell you to look more deeply into things.

There are reasons why people cheat. I've written about this in one of my recent blogs.

People cheat for many different reasons. We need to stop looking at someone who is cheated on as an automatic victim, and realize that many times the person being cheated on is actually a cause of the other person cheating. It takes two in a relationship.

So look at your own relationships, and look in the mirror. Every time something goes wrong in your relationship, are you a blamer? Do you blame the other person for everything that went wrong, or do you look in the mirror and realize that you were also part of the communication breakdown or whatever happened.

So, let's stop judging Jesse James, and let's start thinking that this was a two-way street.

I'd love to sit down and interview Sandra Bullock, our little darling Oscar winner. I guarantee that if I had the opportunity to sit down with her, that I could come up with probably three or four reasons why Jesse James cheated on her.

She's not as innocent as she looks. She might be a serial cheater. Maybe he is a guys who always liked to chase (and to cheat), but I bet there is a pretty good chance that America's new sweetheart had a lot to do with it.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 108
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
05:13 PM on 04/06/2010
Man, you certainly don't have a clue here. It's black and white. He cheated, he's cheated in the past, he will probably cheat in the future because history has a tendency to repeat and sometimes recycle itself. Put the blame where it should be...on Jesse. His mistresses too. I don't buy any of his constant lies and I definitely don't believe that any of these women who have come forward didn't know from the start, that he was married and still with Sandra. He's just a joke and it appears that nothing is SACRED to him.
04:04 PM on 04/05/2010
If she mistreated him and he was so unhappy, why didn't he just leave her? In other centuries or other cultures, divorce isn't an option. In our time in our culture, there is no excuse for cheating. None. If you're unhappy in a relationship to the point that you want to be with someone else, and your partner isn't okay with that (some people are, and that's their business), then break up. It's that simple.
02:45 AM on 04/05/2010
David Wygant, "internationally-renowned dating and relationship coach, and author." Seriously? Mr. Wygant gives advice about relationships and troubled marriages FOR A LIVING and he writes about victim blaming? I am stunned.

I realize that the his article also - and rightly - brings up the fact that no one has the full details. However, it is completely beside the point. Asserting that, if a woman does not cater to her husband's sexual needs it is HER fault that he cheats, is ludicrous. It doesn't matter if they NEVER had sex. I don't suppose Mr. Wygant has noticed the horrible media frenzy around a very private and decent person Jesse James' behavior has created. I suppose Sandra Bullock brought it upon herself. Lest we forget that unprotected sex is extremely dangerous and many STD's have much more serious consequence for women than men.

I cringe to think this article was seemingly posted without a thought to the fact that it promotes an argument frequently used by domestic abusers. Jesse James is clearly in the wrong. Until it is proven otherwise there is no need to write a blog about how this whole mess might be Sandra Bullocks fault. Anyone who thinks that Jesse James' actions were justified because his sexual needs were not being met should not give relationship advice for a living.

Some things are a deal breakers and I believe this is one of those things.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
andiannj
07:48 PM on 04/04/2010
Why on would he even want to save his marriage to Sandra then? Why did he cheat on his other two wives? Why did he cheat with the trashiest women he could find?

Some men cannot relate to real life women that actually have to balance life, work, kids, and other non-sex-related stuff., so they go and find tramps that can help them keep their make believe world where women are merely one dimensional sex objects.
02:04 AM on 04/03/2010
Wow, what a self-important, entitled "expert" player who doesn't think men should have to moderate their behavior, be accountable, or Heaven forbid, RESPECT a woman. They should be allowed to have sex with whomever they want because wifey didn't give it up when he wants? Maybe he's the lousy lover, in fact any man into strippers has no idea what sacred love is. Sorry, you're dead wrong on all counts.

Maybe Sandra isn't perfect, but that doesn't justify having unprotected sex with strangers emblazoned with Nazi insignia and exposing your trusting wife to STD's, then don a Nazi cap & take photos, etc. RIDICULOUS. He made his choice, he could have gone to counseling, got into rehab, had a talk with his wife who had no idea about this, or any of the things a healthy, respectful male should do.

NewsFlash- You are not a relationship expert but a guy who thinks random cheating on loving women who trust you is a cool thing to do for no reason. The best thing to come out of this is that men will be held accountable for behavior that has destroyed women because they could get away with it. Shame on you, Sandra's star status has nothing to do with horrible behavior. Take responsibility ,man up, stop excusing the antics of the world's sick, entitled males.

I call on decent men everywhere to hold snakes like Jesse and Wygant accountable and make the world safe for love again.
09:06 AM on 04/03/2010
Perhaps the author should have put it another way. The purely private relationship between Jesse James and Sandra Bullock is not our business. This site was should have maintained a singular focus on promoting liberal political causes, and not become yet another gossip rag.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
andiannj
07:51 PM on 04/04/2010
Great post! Fanned!
12:53 AM on 04/03/2010
So let me get this straight.

What you are saying is that we should not rush to blame poor Jesse because Sandra could have been too busy to have sex with him....so that, in your mind, would justify him having sex with multiple women and not letting her know ?

The last I checked, honesty is an essential part of any normal, mature (supposedly committed) relationship between two people.

I don't care what she did in the marriage. If he wasn't happy, he should have told her and then left to go have his fun.

There's simply no excuse to lie to your partner. That's just plain cowardly and shows a complete lack of respect for her.

Jesse James is coward with no integrity and I hope she dumps his sorry ass. Honestly!!! What kind of mental gymnastics are you engaging in! It makes me wonder what else you'd justify.
12:41 AM on 04/03/2010
This "article" was obviously posted to receive maximum readership and discussion on April Fool's Day. I'm surprised so much energy has been expended on what is obviously a way to agitate female readership- I wonder what response would have been elicited from some headline such as "Would a Total Loss of Earth's Atmosphere Impede Economic Prosperity"
To those of you who got "punked" .... here's the primer (although I wonder if maybe the exasperated responsed might just be punking me into thinging there could be such naivity - hey... the joke''s on me!")
Male celebrities invariably have a partner on the other side who brought about, induced, or even outright triggered their spouse's aactions. Perhaps there could actually be some llack of understanding, in that rarely do news reports elucidate what the wife has done to produce the situation.
The normally admirable trait to "Never state the ovbious" perhaps could be diluted in certain inflammatory issues.... but how much must we "dumb down" journalism to report how women, through their nature and through no flaw in character, are the cause and foundation for the suppsed "mis-behavior" of their husbands.
Hey, as most men I'm all for a good prank... but let's try to be more responsible when the result could be the stimulation of confusing ideas leading to flawed, unsound, and insubordinate beliefs.
.
12:10 AM on 04/03/2010
What a bunch of BS...so, according to your theory, if someone's spouse is busy, tired, sick or even in Iraq, protecting the nation...it is OK to cheat. Oh, but there are always those who will cheat for any reason..blah, blah, blah...You don't even know what YOU believe. A cheat is a cheat, is a cheat, is a cheat. Marriage vows have no conditions..i.e. if you are at home, if you don't work, if you don't ....fill in the spaces. Vows are just that..and any body, man or woman who cheats is just that...a cheat. Period.

What do you have against Sandra anyway...or any victim?
photo
rostov007
Matcha tea will save your life.
07:40 PM on 04/02/2010
Your readiness to abandon the "victim" defense would be a lot more believable if you didn't try to make Jesse James the victim in the same post. Or paragraph. Or sentence.

Jesse James cheated because women were available to cheat with. That was his decision, regardless of circumstances.
09:52 PM on 04/02/2010
HP doesn't let me to post in the main thread!!! So, here to David. I have never read this much BS in one article! First of all this is not 1800 where people (allegedly) got married before they had sx. Secondly even if they had problems in that area, I have news for you pal. Marriage is more than only effing! Obviously that's what you understand under it. You're sad figure and very stoopid. Cheating is WRONG no matter how much you try to justify it.
12:34 PM on 04/02/2010
I keep seeing the word 'ridiculous' used in comments about your post. I can't agree more. There is really no excuse for Jesse James' behavior. Nice try slick. But you're a dope.
07:06 AM on 04/02/2010
Whilst I agree that none of us have any insight into the day-to-day relationship between Jesse and Sandra, and it takes two to make a marriage, I think it is deplorable to attempt to shift the blame for his infidelity onto Sandra. We are not talking about one or two one night stands here, we are talking about sustained adulterous relationships with multiple women over many years. He cheated on his two previous wives, so he has form for this sort of behaviour which should have been a major red flag to Sandra, I don't understand why warning bells did not go off for her, but perhaps he snowed her really well during their courtship. He should not be trying to save his marriage - there is nothing to save, as it was clearly a sham from day one. He should accept that he is a chronic womaniser who is not suited to a monogamous relationship.
01:42 PM on 04/01/2010
You make no sense. You're trying to say that it is possible that Sandra cheats too so we should not blame Jess for everything. If I extend your argument, I can say that it is possible for Jesse to be a wife beater in addition to being a cheater so we should put even more blame on him. After all, anything is possible if we're just going to use our imagination instead of relying on evidence.
01:08 PM on 04/01/2010
"Renknowned" relationship coach promotes the justification of dishonest behavior. Nice field.

Anyone who chooses to defend their right to be true to themselves might consider extending knowledge of such "truth" to their partners, and probably shouldn't consider marriage. The Jesses of the world tend not to take kindly to the idea of sharing when the shoe would be on the other foot, and bringing an outsider into your home is a big no-no in anyone's book.
10:35 AM on 04/01/2010
I would give credence to at least some of your argument -- we don't know what their home life was like, and that she was this clueless speaks of either a serious disconnect, or a desire NOT to see. I'd even say she may not be the sweetheart she portrays (although all reports are she is a genuine, warm human being).

But....as I pointed out in another post, I first saw Jesse on last year's Celebrity Apprentice, and he behaved like an absolute lout towards Joan Rivers. Hate her, love her -- she's got quite an honest, tart mouth on her, I adore the way she cuts thru the c.r.a.p. -- she's a much older woman, who showed unflagging verve, humor and heart on the show (she won), and he was disrespectful in a boorish way that spoke clearly about his attitudes towards women, and his selfish, uncompromising, graceless personality.

The man is trash. Pick someone better to defend.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Eris23
Justice is in indefinite detention.
11:14 AM on 04/01/2010
Not everyone is distrusting. Some may view that as naive but, particularly for those who have things to do along with a healthy sense of self-esteem about them and their partner, they simply may never see it. It happened to me. I had absolutely no idea I had a cheating partner. I did not care who they chose to hang out with and felt no need to be there to ever keep watch, and it seemed that the same applied towards me. I had many friends of the opposite sex, would often be with them, when my partner wasn't around, and nothing ever happened. I didn't think it was any different with my partner. Turns out, I was very very wrong. Why is it that so many people feel a need to believe that the person who had been cheated on must have known? I've yet to know a single person who has known, since everyone I know who has been through that experience has walked as soon as they found out.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Eris23
Justice is in indefinite detention.
12:03 PM on 04/01/2010
Hey, Slim. Not sure why they wiped your post, but I see what you're saying. I'm not going to pretend I was 100% clued into the details of what they knew about each other. But, this is why I won't get into a relationship with anyone who I know has cheated before.
12:15 PM on 04/01/2010
Why did that post vanish?????? HP is infuriating.

And yeah, my point is that while many men cheat discreetly, and blindside their wives, both Tiger & Jesse cheated for years, had mulitple long-term affairs, and were far from discreet, with texts, photos, voicemails and more. To convince me that the women were obvlivious would take work. This is epic cheating, not one sleazy affair.

And really, for all the speculation and taking sides, we haven't got clue one into the private lives of these people, but I believe that it's true what they say: the rich and famous are different from you and me.

And Eris, my sympathy for your betrayal....
10:30 AM on 04/01/2010
It's called Divorce. If you don't like the person you are married to, then do something about it. What an absolutely ridiculous article.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Souldrifter
Newton's 3rd Law of Motion: Not just for physics.
11:24 AM on 04/01/2010
Thank you. Took the words right out of my mouth... and on the first page, even. This article is irritating in its disregard for "doing the right thing."
03:15 PM on 04/01/2010
It is a ridiculous article. No amount of (alleged) behavior by one party justifies lies and deceptions by the other. If I don't like the way I am being treated in a relationship, I need to be a man and take steps to either change the behavior or leave the relationship.

Seriously, what dating and relationship "expert" would endorse such behavior?