More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
David Yarnold

GET UPDATES FROM David Yarnold

An Open Letter to Secretary Clinton: KO Keystone XL

Posted: 10/11/11 07:50 PM ET

Since last fall, a steady stream of damning evidence about questionable relationships, lobbying practices and political bias have been flowing from the Keystone XL pipeline process. This weekend's outrageous revelation that TransCanada supervised the environmental review has poisoned the process beyond repair.

It's time to KO Keystone XL. It is irreversibly polluted.

Dozens of emails between State Department employees and the chief lobbyist for the company behind the pipeline, TransCanada, reveal a cozy and solicitous relationship.

An earlier 2009 cable obtained by WikiLeaks found another State Department higher-up was caught advising Canadian officials on how to spin their message to win favorable media coverage of Canadian crude.

These murky relationships and end-runs around science were hallmarks of previous administrations that disdained science. Has the Obama administration signed on as well? It may not have been your intent, but the State Department looks like just another agency on a mission to protect Big Oil.

The pipeline itself represents what would be an environmental disaster of epic proportions. The pipeline would send the world's dirtiest oil -- from Canada's tar sands -- over 1,700 miles through farms, over ranches, and across towns. It would run directly through the Ogallala Aquifer -- the source of drinking water for 2 million people -- and across nearly 2,000 rivers, streams and other water bodies.

The risk of major oil spills and chronic contamination of drinking water is real. Look what happened in the Kalamazoo River last summer. Is this an Obama Administration priority?

For climate change, the news is even worse. One of the world's foremost climate experts, NASA's James Hansen, calls it "essentially game over" for the climate if we allow Alberta Tar Sands to be developed.

Last year, we all saw both the hottest year on record and the greatest amount of global warming pollution in history. Extreme weather events are taking place around the world.

This is an Administration that promotes clean energy alternatives and better fuel efficiency. Or does it?

Approving XL is like sanctioning a drug cartel to fuel future oil addiction... and making today's oil just a gateway drug to the nasty bitumen from tar sands. And like a drug cartel, there will be violence, in this case to our reservoirs, rivers, and streams.

To be sure, policies to reduce climate risk and a transition to clean energy are challenging with our current partisan politics. But does the State Department want its first major environmental decision to be locking-in more CO2 emissions and putting more of our precious fresh water at risk?"

The Keystone XL pipeline will pollute -- just as the Trans-Alaska pipeline has. And the first victim is the reputation of the State Department and this Administration. It's time for the State Department to restart the process. It's all just gotten too oily.

 

Follow David Yarnold on Twitter: www.twitter.com/David_Yarnold

Since last fall, a steady stream of damning evidence about questionable relationships, lobbying practices and political bias have been flowing from the Keystone XL pipeline process. This weekend's out...
Since last fall, a steady stream of damning evidence about questionable relationships, lobbying practices and political bias have been flowing from the Keystone XL pipeline process. This weekend's out...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lambdin1
What's this?
03:21 PM on 10/13/2011
Greed has infiltrated everywhere. It will take decades to feret out greed. It is such an insidious thing that it can be hiding in plain sight and not be seen until such as this occurs. I don't think this is the fault of anyone except those directly involved!
01:00 PM on 10/13/2011
If Keystone is defeated in the middle of a recession/jobless recovery, then Obama will be defeated and the next prez will then just approve it, so what's the point?

You'd be better off pushing a robust carbon tax but oh that's right, that can't happen b/c the global left has bungled the carbon tax sale job by relying on algore, Obama (of crony capitalism and cap and trade fame), the IPCC and East Anglia. They have compounded their bungling by conflating global warming which is strictly an atmospheric anomaly with "social justice", global redistribution of wealth and "global governance."

Americans are yawningly uninterested in global warming; fifteen years after the Kyoto treaty, the public couldn’t care less.

Your only chance for a carbon tax is the LMAD plan. Get onboard!

LMAD is more than just a carbon tax: Healthcare-for-All? It’s in there. Balanced budget? It’s in there. CARBON TAX? It’s in there. Rational taxation? Amnesty? Border Security? Limited government? Social Security and Medicare solvency? It’s all in there; it’s all paid for and it’s all scalable and optimized for economic growth.

Blog: letsmakeadeal-thebook.com/
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
02:47 PM on 10/12/2011
I am stunned, no one is reflecting upon the multi-thousands of acres of ecosystems that will be killed for the construction of this nightmare. The ecosystems that will be ravaged are boreal, wetland, riverine and grassland and the countless species of plant and animal biological diversity that will be slaughtered.

Ecosystems and biological diversity are in the eco-nomics of life itself or oxygen releasing, fresh water, climate regulation and moderation, the gaseous composition of the atmosphere, the nitrogen cycle and a long list of vital, life giving cycles, functions and systems, including, all ecosystems create the very life zone of Earth or the biosphere. All ecosystems are interconnected, and all have feedbacks and loops to the atmosphere and the climate.

Deforestation of ecosystems inherently heats up and dries out the climate, and to-date, man cannot re-create an ecosystem. He can grow trees, but ecosystems are beyond man's capacity as ecosystems are so complex and so dependent upon their biological diversity, from microorganisms in the soil, all the way up the chains of life.
01:11 AM on 10/12/2011
If you listen careful to what Valerie Jarrett, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have said (and what they have NOT said) about the Keystone pipeline, any sane person paying attention would have to confess that the President WILL sign the Presidential Permit. It's already been decided.

Can you seriously blame them for ignoring the Environmentalists?

Time after time, Environmentalists have threatened to pull support from President Obama - but they never do. You can only threaten doomsday, and have it REPEATEDLY not happen, before people just start tuning you out. Environmentalists have lost their credibility, and until they follow through with their threat to pull support from the President and the DNC, the president will ignore them.
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
04:02 PM on 10/12/2011
It isn't environmentalism; it is the science of ecology, which explains how Earth functions and cycles to create and sustain all life. And, yes, most politicos and those in power are not learned in the ecology of the Earth. Their only focus is the financial economy and the not eco-nomy of our ecosystem-dependent Earth.

Tragically, the financial economy and the Earth's eco-nomy are integrated, one to the other.
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
06:04 AM on 10/13/2011
True that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norma Ward
09:12 PM on 10/11/2011
Here is a summary of a peer-reviewed scientific study that outlines the environmental issues that are created by oil sands mining:

http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2010/09/athabasca-river-how-many-politicians_07.html

The halo of contamination around the mine site is at least 50 kilometres in diameter and is impacting Aboriginal settlements downstream from the operations.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:02 AM on 10/12/2011
A single doctor claimed that the oil sands were impacting aboriginals downstream. A panel of medical experts investigated the claim and found that the doctor's particular claim did not hold up, but that there was a somewhat greater cancer rate than normal. The cause of that excessive rate was not determined, and could have been from a whole host of causes including pulp mills or an abandoned uranium mine in the area, social or genetic causes, or even just chance.

There was no particular reason to blame the oil sands, especially given that contaminated water is not released into the Athabasca river.
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
03:00 PM on 10/12/2011
The problem is not contaminated water; the problem is no water and a dying Earth. The ecosystems that will be butchered for this pipeline are in the eco-nomics of hydrological storage and flux. The forests that will be slaughtered for the construction of the pipeline release cooling water vapor from their leaves, cooling the soil and entire area. These ecosystems that will die are in the business of not only cooling rain and clouds, they are natural sequesters of heat trapping gases while they release oxygen. And, upon deforestation, the trees' stored C02 will be released into the atmosphere!

Removing the plant biological diversity [deforestation], not only heats up and dries out the climate, it kills the homes/habitat, food and shelter of all animal biological diversity, and the bare soil [hotter than a forested plot] is opened to the heat of the sun. The springs and waterways will then dry out, resulting in a drier and hotter climate.

The extinctions of biological diversity also causes dead planet as all plant and animal biological diversity are the creators and job-holders of and in ecosystems. All ecosystems are integrated; they all have feedbacks to the atmosphere and climate, and they all create the life zone of Earth, the biosphere.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:25 PM on 10/11/2011
"Dozens of emails between State Department employees and the chief lobbyist for the company behind the pipeline, TransCanada, reveal a cozy and solicitous relationship."

Yarnold expects us to be shocked that the State Department was in close communication with TransCanada Pipeline.

Of course they were. The State Department was evaluating the pipeline - how could they not be? They probably had hundreds of questions. But I bet the State Department was also in close communication with dozens of other stakeholders in the project, including its critics.

Really, this is silly.