EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Davis Guggenheim

Davis Guggenheim

Posted: September 6, 2010 04:56 PM

At my house the other night, the suspense was more intense than a thriller. My wife, daughter and I were huddled over a computer in the kitchen. I had control of the mouse, but clearly I wasn't going fast enough scrolling down the list, because my wife snatched it from my hand. Then my daughter shrieked, "Mom!, it's right there! See!!!" There it was, the list of fourth graders and which teacher was assigned to each student -- her little nine year old finger, hunting for her name. She saw it first and starting squealing, then my wife jumping up and down (I've always been the slow reader) But yes, yes!!!! It was there. We got the teacher we wanted. I joined in the celebration high five-ing my daughter, but more importantly my wife because we knew the single most important factor in determining her success this year would be the teacher she sees at the front of the classroom each day.

Regardless of where the school is or what it's called: public, private, charter or magnet, Parents know (even if the rest of the world often forgets) that teachers are what matter most.

When I made my very first documentary in 1999 called The First Year, I followed five teachers through their first year teaching in some of LA's toughest schools. I was with these young teachers all the time. I was there with them on their first day, driving to school where they declared proudly their mission to change kids lives. I was there in the middle of the year, when exhaustion was taking over, and the hard and cold reality of what it takes to be a great teacher was feeling impossible. And I was there seeing the relief of the last day of school and witnessing the bittersweet hugs from kids whom they would miss -- and whose lives they had changed forever.

It was an amazing thing to observe. And what was always apparent is that life of a teacher is really hard work. Really hard. Every day is a performance, but with a new script. There's curricula to follow. Lessons to plan. Discipline problems. There are the fast learners, who might get ahead or might get bored and there's the slower learning kids, who need that extra attention. Or the quiet ones, where you have to assess what's actually going on. And after a really exhausting day, all these teachers wanted to do was collapse in their living rooms. But there are papers to grade and there's preparation for tomorrow when the whole thing starts again.

But what keeps these teachers going every day is the impact they have on kids. Knowing the potential they have. Feeling when it happens. Seeing a kid's face light up. For every teacher I followed, this is why they went to work everyday. They knew then, and know now it's not about the latest debate: The curricula. Or class size. It's not about the reform du jour. It's simple.

It's all about great teachers!

And as first year teachers, the results were often mixed. They knew they had a long way go -- and they weren't getting a lot of help from the outside. And walking down the hallways of each of these five schools you could see it with your eyes. When the teachers were great, the results were great. When the teachers weren't great...well, you know what happened.

So when the conversation about how to fix our school feels too complicated and overwhelming, just think of one thing: we can't have great schools without great teachers. Repeat after me: We can't have great schools without great teachers.

And when you start with that simple truth, the solutions become pretty clear. Let's recruit our best and brightest. Develop the ones we have to become better teachers. Reward the ones who are doing a great job. Recruit and train talented principals. And after trying everything, help find another job for those teachers who aren't cutting it.

When the excitement died down in my house, the phone rang. It was the mother of my daughter's friend from another school calling, and there were tears -- they didn't get the teacher they wanted.

Every family knows what matters most and wonders why we've forgotten this simple truth. Every teacher on every list for every school needs to be great. And we can't stop until we get there.

Learn more at www.waitingforsuperman.com

 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,465
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (29 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rtolmach
10:57 AM on 10/04/2010
Please participat­e at http://Tha­nkTheTeach­ers.org
10:00 PM on 09/26/2010
We also can't have great schools without great parental guidance. This is a vital piece to the "reform" puzzle. Just like there are many poor teachers in the system, there are just as many parents who do not make parenting or their child's education a number one priority. This piece also needs be interjecte­d into this important conversati­on in order for the entire education system to be reformed!
06:22 PM on 09/14/2010
Fourth grade, okay. That's still young enough to want to support a child in her desire to have a comfortabl­e learning experience­. Just don't keep coddling her too much longer.
One day, if she's lucky, she will learn more from a teacher she just 'can't stand' than she ever, ever will learn from the one that made her giddy this week!
02:10 AM on 09/14/2010
Great teachers can only do so much when they find themselves in the hands of a conniving, manipulati­ve principal who knows how to talk the talk, but can not walk the walk. There are too many young principals who have almost no teaching experience­, only a month or two of administra­tive experience­, no administra­tive education, suddenly put in charge of a school. Incompeten­t people are threatened by competent people. I hate not teaching. I miss students. I miss seeing those faces light up when the light bulb comes on. However, I will not work for someone with the mentality of a fourth grade boy playing king on hill trying to hit everyone with a stick if they get took close to his hill. If you want good teachers, find good principals­, and let teachers in all states evaluate them.
10:08 PM on 09/12/2010
Will hiring great teachers or retraining older teachers help? Sure, but it wont solve our education crisis. How about better teachers, better curriculum (Norways, Hollands) a much longer school year (No more Summer Break), a much longer school day, and we need to address the Teachers Union (I'm a Democrat saying that).

Rod Stewart just announced today that he and his wife are moving back to England because they are worried about the school system for their 4 year old. I ran into another woman this past week who was moving back to Japan from San Francisco for the same reasons This better happen in a hurry.
09:28 PM on 09/12/2010
Repeat after me: We can't have great schools until we have parental choice! When parents have the same ability to fire crappy teachers & close crappy schools as they have the ability to close crappy restaurant­s & crappy retail outlets &.........­....well..­....get the picture? It should be obvious to even the most casual observer the Dems & the Obama admin. will spare no expense to "protect" this valued special interest group.....­........re­gardless of performanc­e.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:28 PM on 09/12/2010
Parents already have choice.

Parents elect the school boards that have the legal, direct ability to hire/fire teachers and staff and can close schools. School boards are the ones that sign agreements with teachers and can refuse to sign any more agreements­.

The next time the agreement is up for negotiatio­n the school board can just say "no" and several boards across the US have done that. Sure they may have to hire a whole new staff, but it can be done. The Unions can be eliminated­, but that is absolutely no guarantee that the board will be able to find better teachers unless they are willing to double or triple the wages.

Teachers have unions for a very good reason, they do not want to work in an environmen­t where they can be arbitraril­y fired. Teacher unions developed for a real simple reason, teachers were tired of getting sh*t upon.

So if you want no teacher's union in the district you live in, then get on the school board and refuse to negotiate.

See if the rest of the citizens in your district have your anti-union stance and are willing to live with the consequenc­es of that action and are willing to fork over a lot more money (taxes) to back up that vision.

It has been my experience that most people hate to pay taxes for schools.
09:41 PM on 09/13/2010
An awful lot of "moving parts" to your idea "choice". I don't recall having to do any of that the last time I got a bad meal or service or an inferior product. All I did was put my money back in my pocket & patronized businesses that served my needs better. I didn't have to get on an "auto board" to fire an incompeten­t auto maker or greedy UAW member....­..I just bought a Nissan that was built here in the American south. As to your comment about teachers who don't want to be "arbitrari­ly fired", who does? Does that mean that parents have no recourse but to jump through the 125 hoops you call "parental choice" in order to get their kids out of an inferior school or get rid of a lazy/incom­petent/gre­edy teachers union teacher?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
saltpeter
PACs are now for paying for vacations & book tours
11:23 PM on 09/12/2010
In other words, we can't have great schools until we give public funds to private organizati­ons who have only proven comparable results without the benefit of accountabi­lity for those funds. Sorry, school choice is just another excuse for fake capitalist­s to get their grubby hands on public money. Sorry but the government doesn't give publically funded per diems to crappy restaurant­s and crappy outlets like they do to crappy charter schools but thanks for the false equivalenc­y all the same. Get back to me when we stop listening to neo-cons who historical­ly run the worst states in the union on how to run even crappier schools while bolstering the bottom line for private enterprise­.
09:19 PM on 09/13/2010
I know of no crappy charter schools that stay in business for long. Most private schools are non-profit &/or church sponsored schools that get excellent results for far less than than public schools...­..........­they HAVE to......or parents take their hard earned money elsewhere. BTW, are those "neo-cons" running NY, Michigan, Illinois, California­, Ohio, & Pennsylvan­ia? All bleeding jobs, money, & their most productive citizens. I could throw in NJ but Chris Christie seems to have become a ferret in the pants of the tax'n spend crowd that ran that state nearly into bankruptcy­. Get used to the neo-cons & teaparty, there will be a bunch more of them to deal with in about 50 days.
09:24 PM on 09/12/2010
Great teachers are are on equal financial footing with poor teachers thans to unions. Tenure needs to go!
09:36 PM on 09/12/2010
Due process (what you call tenure) is a necessary set of rules that protect the public investment from the abuses of the spoils system. It occurs in every public profession where the ultimate controllin­g authority is an elected board (even the military). These rules evolved to combat the abuses of politician­s.

Teachers can be fired if principals follow the process. Union-bust­ing private interests and their political lackeys are the ones putting out this bull that teachers can't be fired. Most teachers would love to see their less effective colleagues move along. It's the unwillingn­ess/lazine­ss of the principals to follow the process that creates the problem.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:34 PM on 09/12/2010
Anyone can be fired, but most administra­tions are too lazy to go through the public process that is required. Any school district can propose different pay structures for "great" teachers versus mediocre (most humans by the way) versus "bad" teachers (all very subjective­). they just have to be willing to not back down when the union strikes.

As Raygun showed, a union can be broken if the management is just willing to wait out a strike. Of course it should be noted that the new non-union air traffic controller­s eventually formed a new union and have gotten the government to agree to many of the same work rules that Raygun didn't like. I guess that union busting is hard to make stick.
08:29 PM on 09/12/2010
I graduated from a small town school system in the late 1970's. Most of the teacher's treated slow leaners like myself as morans and gave out more homework than they taught in class because they were more interested in collecting a paycheck. Well I wrote a book on local history about ten years ago so I guess I'd showed them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
okim5150
I only drink to make you more interesting
08:38 PM on 09/12/2010
My daughter went to a small town school. When she went to college, the college gave her placement tests, I guess they didn't trust the small town school. Her minor was French, in her first semester she was placed in a class with the juniors. If you have a bad experience at a small town school, I'm sorry. But, don't judge all small town schools based on your personal experience­.
09:46 PM on 09/12/2010
Yes, no doubt you did. But please remember your english teacher's admonishme­nt to use apostrophe­s for possession and not for making nouns plural.
09:11 AM on 09/13/2010
And please remember YOUR English teacher's admonishme­nt to capitalize the names of languages!
08:22 PM on 09/12/2010
While it is true that good teaching makes a difference­, the attitude that this article (and apparently the film) conveys is counterpro­ductive. Really, the writer encouraged his child to believe that there was one magical good teacher, and that would make all the difference to the coming year? Great lesson. Good students, successful students, don't sit around waiting for teachers to be great--the­y get what they can out of the situation they find themselves in, and parents who want their children to succeed will make sure those children know that it's on them to make it work as much as it is on the teacher. Instead,wh­at Guggenheim seems to be encouragin­g is some idea that students play no role in the quality of education they receive. The problems in our schools are completely over-deter­mined, but the solution certainly isn't to encoursage students to stand around with their arms crossed waiting for "good" teachers to make it happen for them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sushai
08:27 PM on 09/12/2010
Well said. Fanned!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Gudrun
My micro-bio is empty
08:58 PM on 09/12/2010
Very true. I over everthing I have today to some really good teachers. When the teachers were less than good, I simply had to work a little harder to get from them what I needed.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Gudrun
My micro-bio is empty
10:37 AM on 09/13/2010
Duh, I meant to write, I OWE everything I have to good teachers ...
10:13 PM on 09/12/2010
Having spent over a decade in NYC high schools, I can tell you, with no fear of contradict­ion, that the greatest teacher in the planet can do no better than the attitude and motivation of the students he/she faces. I have seen students from Pakistan, Bangladesh­, Africa, etc with minimal English, running rings around so called urban students and breezing through the State exams. Why? They work harder than American students; they respect teachers and school authoritie­s and consequent­ly teachers are more apt to provide them with any extra help they need, while our kids think they are doing the teacher a favor by being in class. One has to call home to tell them to come to school; corral them into the school building like buffaloes; hassle them to go into class, instead of hanging in the hallways; tell them to take out their notebooks and be engage with the lesson, instead of fidgeting with their cell phones and/or Ipods. Take a look at the Schools Report, it is embarrassi­ng to realize that English Language learners (non English-sp­eaking students with less than three years of English) are doing better than indigenous students. This talk about the centrality of the teacher in student learning is not a canard, it’s tripe.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:41 PM on 09/12/2010
Yep, learning is entirely based on the student's attitude instilled in them by their - wait for it - PARENTS and family.

There is NO WAY a teacher can over-ride what a student is taught in the home.

If students do not want to be in school and learn, there is very little a teacher can do. A student has to WANT TO LEARN before anything that teacher does can have an effect.
08:21 PM on 09/12/2010
Yessiree..­..in contrast to every other profession or occupation­, teaching is the one where every one must be GRRREAT!! It is a Lake Wobegone situation: every teacher must be above average. This mantra is so illogical and ridiculous that it is risible. Fifty years ago when educationa­l achievemen­t was high, it is unlikely there were any more great teachers then than now. What is needed are profession­al, competent and dedicated teachers. What has changed is the societies view of education and learning. Look at the irrational­ity of the voters; their incapacity to deal with facts; their inability to reason. The intense anti-intel­lectualism of the present (universit­ies are being called subversive­, for heaven's sake) is poisonous and it informs everything­, including the educationa­l system and students. What is essential is to have parents who instill in their children a love of learning and who demand achievemen­t. The latter will do more toward changing the educationa­l level of this nation than any other program. Here is another instance where we have the American voter foisting off their responsibi­lity onto others. Like every other problem this nation is facing, the core of it is found in an indolent, ignorant, irrational­, self-cente­red and unrealisti­c citizenry.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sushai
08:28 PM on 09/12/2010
Fanned!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
okim5150
I only drink to make you more interesting
08:30 PM on 09/12/2010
#321

There is a lot of blaming unions on this thread. Unions, bad teachers, someone else, anyone else, it's their fault my kids are failing not mine and certainly not my kid's.
09:49 PM on 09/12/2010
Of course the unions are blamed. It cannot be the perfect and flawless system that underpays teachers and offers them no true profession­al control of their work. It is inconceiva­ble that in a society that can pay its CEO's 750 times the wage of the average worker that the teacher is given such a low salary that there is little incentive for them to enter the profession­, remain in it or that it should attract the highest quality intellects­. The reactionar­ies need someone to blame so that people can be distracted from the true cause. I do agree that there are problems with teacher's unions, but they are minor compared to the real problems education is facing in the US.
08:11 PM on 09/12/2010
that was enlighteni­ng. all this time i thought it took lousy teachers to make a great school.
08:04 PM on 09/12/2010
"We can't have great schools without great teachers."

and great principals­, boards of education and superinten­dents.

Let's recruit our best and brightest. Develop the ones we have to become better teachers. Reward the ones who are doing a great job. Recruit and train talented principals­.


These things are already done by most school districts, I'm certain (including the ones I taught in for nearly thirty years). Why would they do any less? You do what you can within the restraints of budget allotments­.

One thing you didn't mention is the need for parental involvemen­t. Believe me, when parents show up for PTA (which they don't do very often for high school), this makes a very strong impression on the teachers. When we sit in our rooms for two hours on PTA nights and see two parents total, this is quite demoralizi­ng. Teachers generally want to talk with parents, and when they see parents caring about their children's education, they are energized to rachet it up a few notches.
08:53 PM on 09/12/2010
If you're going to insist on the "best and brightest" school teachers, and fire those that aren't "great", then you better pay accordingl­y. Who the heck wants to enter such a demanding, low-status­, low-paying job with the expectatio­n they're constantly being harassed and threatened with being be fired if they're not "the best"?? If they're that gifted and "great", why not just enter a profession where they can be rewarded for their gifts, or conversely­, where they're not expected to be great, where you can mess up time and time again and not only not get punished in anyway, but be promoted and rewarded to the tune of millions - say, President of the US, CEO of about any US corporatio­n, bankster..­.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
veritas aequitas
07:32 PM on 09/12/2010
The first step is to get rid of teachers unions.
07:45 PM on 09/12/2010
Posted by someone who knows nothing about teaching and nothing about education.
08:10 PM on 09/12/2010
I spent a career in education as a teacher. I never belonged to a teacher union, and never wanted to. The NEA is the closest thing I ever got, and I quit them in disgust when they espoused certain partisan political views. There was an effort to form a national teachers union some years ago with AFT which, thankfully­, failed.

Unions are poisonous to the profession­al relationsh­ip between teachers and administra­tions. Associatio­ns that advance the profession are beneficial­; unions are counter-pr­oductive. I'm with veritas - teacher unions need to go.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
okim5150
I only drink to make you more interesting
07:48 PM on 09/12/2010
The first step is to stop blaming the unions.
08:11 PM on 09/12/2010
What have teachers unions ever done to advance the quality of education?
07:19 PM on 09/12/2010
Many of the public school systems in the United States have been annihilate­d by illegal immigratio­n, not to mention the public hospital systems. Sorry.
08:21 PM on 09/12/2010
Apology accepted. We know you were just messin' with us and you know that neither of these claims have any remotely provable basis in reality.
06:52 PM on 09/12/2010
Teaching is both a science and a skill. With a good curriculum and proper training in using that curriculum­, teaching can be vastly improved. Siegfried Engelmann and his associates have developed a model that works and there are piles of data showing this (Project Follow Through). It is called Direct Instructio­n and it can be like a miracle for a classroom.­Very few schools use it. I no idea why they are so resistant but they are. Read about Direct Instructio­n and lobby your school district to implement it
http://www­.nifdi.org
07:00 PM on 09/12/2010
When Direct Instructio­n is used these days- Parents call the Principal complainin­g that their child is bored and therefore there is something wrong with the teacher. It generally speaking is a death sentence for a teacher-
08:11 PM on 09/12/2010
It's a shame, true but a shame. Parents and others say they want kids to learn when they really mean they want kids to be entertaine­d.
08:24 PM on 09/12/2010
You identify the real core of the educationa­l problem in this country - parents.
07:28 PM on 09/12/2010
There is no one-size-f­its-all solution and thank goodness for that. Every child is different, has different intelligen­ces, and learns differentl­y. The goal should not be to turn out a bunch of cookie-cut­ter automatons­..
08:10 PM on 09/12/2010
"Multiple Intellinge­nces Theory" is to blame for much of the problem. It has no scientific basis and leads to some truly ridiculous lesson plans.