iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Dawn Teo

Dawn Teo

Posted March 17, 2009 | 03:45 PM (EST)

Sheriff Joe Arpaio Will Not Be Prosecuted For Racial Profiling Or Discrimination


PHOENIX--Critics of Sheriff Joe "Tent City" Arpaio have been celebrating since the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) opened an investigation last week into alleged civil rights violations by the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office (MCSO). Not so fast though -- the revelry is premature. Neither Arpaio nor his officers will be prosecuted, punished, or sanctioned.

If nonsystemic violations are found, nothing will happen. In fact, if systemic violations are found, the MCSO will be rewarded with more resources. That's right folks. The letter from the DOJ spells all of this out in plain language. Even Arpaio, whose office is the subject of the investigation, described the letter from the DOJ as "a nice, friendly letter" that he believes will have "a positive outcome."

Complaints of civil rights violations -- national origin discrimination and illegal searches and seizures -- from local citizens and officials, members of Congress, and others have been mounting over the last couple of years as "Sheriff Joe" ramped up immigration enforcement under the controversial 287(g) program, which allows certain local and state law enforcement agencies to engage in immigration enforcement.

Last week, the DOJ sent a letter to Sheriff Joe informing him that the Special Litigation Section has opened an investigation into the complaints. I don't think I've ever seen my liberal friends as happy or my conservative friends as angry. I received dozens of emails either celebrating or condemning that "Sheriff Joe is going down!" As much as I hate to cut short the brouhaha, I don't think many people read the DOJ's letter -- those who did didn't read it carefully enough.

Specifically, let's take a look at this part of the letter:

We believe that you and other MCSO officials want to operate the MCSO consistent with the requirements of the Constitution and federal law. During the course of our investigation, we will consider all relevant information, particularly the efforts the MCSO has undertaken to ensure compliance with federal law. We also will offer to provide recommendations on ways to improve practices and procedures, as appropriate.

Provided that the MCSO cooperates fully with our investigation, if we conclude that there are not systemic violations of constitutional or other federal rights, we will notify you that we are closing the investigation. If, on the other hand, we conclude there are such violations, we will inform you of the findings and attempt to work with the MCSO to remedy any such violations. In addition, we will identify any financial, technical, or other assistance the United States may be able to provide to assist the MCSO in correcting the identified deficiencies.

So, what does this mean? The bottom line is: No one is going to be prosecuted.

* The letter clearly states, "if we conclude there are not systemic violations" the DOJ will be "closing the investigation." In other words, if violations exist but are not systemic, nothing will happen.

* And if the DOJ finds systemic violations, they will identify "financial, technical, or other assistance" to "assist MCSO." In other words, if systemic violations exist, the DOJ will help MCSO obtain more resources so that they can fix the problems internally.

If a prosecutor sent you a letter saying that you were being investigated for a legal infraction that you might be committing on a regular basis but said if found guilty they would help you correct it, would you be worried?

This is a program evaluation, not an investigation.

To boot, although there is a common misconception that this is a criminal investigation, the alleged infractions are actually civil, not criminal. The DOJ is also assuming good faith on the part of MCSO. They stated right up front in the letter that they believe Arpaio and his officers "want to operate the MCSO consistent with the requirements of the Constitution and federal law." The official opinion of the DOJ is that Arpaio wants to follow the law.

That said, Arpaio and the DOJ could have a difference of opinion when interpreting the law. Arpaio has proven adept at riding right up to the line of what the law allows (or the current court interpretation of what the law allows). Arpaio has already said that he will take into consideration only the recommendations from the DOJ with which he agrees. He's willing to fight it out in court against any DOJ recommendations with which he disagrees.

The DOJ isn't the enemy of Arpaio -- they are a partner agency. It is the DOJ, after all, that prosecutes most immigration cases. The DOJ wants to continue working cooperatively with MCSO. This is not persecution (as Arpaio supporters believe) or prosecution (as Arpaio opponents believe). This is a friendly program evaluation that will ultimately determine whether the DOJ thinks Arpaio and his officers needs more money for immigration enforcement.

PHOENIX--Critics of Sheriff Joe "Tent City" Arpaio have been celebrating since the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) opened an investigation last week into alleged civil rights violations by the Marico...
PHOENIX--Critics of Sheriff Joe "Tent City" Arpaio have been celebrating since the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) opened an investigation last week into alleged civil rights violations by the Marico...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:37 PM on 03/21/2009
it is so wonderful to have a person actually do what he was elected to do.there are legal ways to enter the country as my relatives did . if they enter illegally we dont know who they are and it endangers our country.
08:06 PM on 03/18/2009
It sure is hard to make the radical leftists happy. My guess is that despite their protests and whining know that nothing is going to happen to Arpaio. They are bitter and it shows.

I just love the way Arpaio stands up to the open border globalists and the corporate slave traders. They can complain all they want but Arpaio is going to keep doing what we voted him into office to do -- arrest and deport illegal aliens.

Maricopa Valley residents are very lucky to have Joe Arpaio to fight crime. Hopefully we will get many more sheriffs like him thoughout the country so that we can get rid of the criminals that are invading our country.

We have a rag called New Times and they are angry at Dawn Teo just because she wrote the truth. I guess they expect Huff post journalists to turn into left wing propaganda machines. The "Feathered Bastard" sure lives up to his name this time!

http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/bastard/2009/03/the_arizona_republics_pro-joe.php

Good thing the New Times is free, because it isn't worth the paper they print it on. LOL!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
10:18 AM on 03/18/2009
IF THOSE DARN IMMIRGRANT WORKERS COMPLAIN ABOUT THE WORKING CONDITIONS WE CAN JUST DEPORT THEM.

GREAT LAW THERE REPUBLICANS !!!!!!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wandering girl
grownup
01:53 AM on 03/18/2009
I don't agree with either his philosophy or his methods, and I hope the intent of the letter was to lull him into a false sense of security so the DoJ can go in and nail his ass to the door.
10:34 PM on 03/17/2009
I have mixed feelings about Sheriff Joe. I basically agree with his POV, but I wrestle with the fact that he goes way too far sometimes. It's hard to reconcile.
07:56 PM on 03/17/2009
I'm glad to hear Sheriff Joe isn't going to be prosecuted, but I think you missed the point of the witch hunt against Sheriff Joe. The DOJ, Janet Napolitano, and a few idiot Congress critters are doing everything they can to harass Joe. The complaint of profiling is just a ruse they are using to try to drag Joe into hearings.

Napolitano opposed 287(g) from day one, and this is just her way of trying to take it away from Joe. If these people have their way Joe will not be able to enforce immigration laws so the corporations and the Latino radicals win. They don't care that 99% of the public who are legal residents and citizens will suffer as long as their corporate buddies continue to get the cheap labor.

Napolitano is a sad excuse for a leader at DHS. The fact that Obama picked her is proof that he doesn't care and/or understand the threat that is brewing just south of our border and he is perfectly willing to ignore the threat of foreign terrorists who are now getting the green light to invade our country. This nation is going to suffer big time if the public allows Napolitano and Obama to run our immigration laws into the ground.
07:24 PM on 03/17/2009
You go Joe.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:42 AM on 03/18/2009
We should be so lucky.
06:54 PM on 03/17/2009
he keeps getting re-elected, the re-election rate in congress is 90+% makes you wonder if democracy is really such a good thing.
07:57 PM on 03/17/2009
He keeps getting re-elected because most people are smart enough to realize that anarchy doesn't work.
01:00 AM on 03/18/2009
He keeps getting re-elected because Maricopa County is proven to have a huge number of ignorant voters and/or voters with strong prejudice against non-whites. Sad, but true. Arpaio's biggest supporters live in a retirement community -- Sun City. They also are the core of his volunteer posse. Most clear thinking, constitutional-minded Americans can't stand the violations of civil rights law and constitutional law that go on under Arpaio's reign of terror. It is quite an outrage. There is a right way to enforce immigration laws and then there is the Arpaio (unconstitutional) way.