More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Debbie Hines

Debbie Hines

Posted: February 21, 2011 03:28 PM

The Republican controlled House voted to end all funding to Planned Parenthood for any purpose. The bill to cut Planned Parenthood funds, if passed by the Senate, will also cost lives to men and women. Meanwhile, Rep. Dan Burton (R. IN) introduced a spending bill amendment aimed at promoting contraception use by horses to control and save the population of wild horses. Burton's amendment would prevent the Bureau of Land Management from holding wild horses in pens and offers "immuno-contraception" to the horses as an alternative. These same Republican politicians, who want to strip women of their right for any contraceptive resources through Planned Parenthood, offer an amendment to support funding for contraceptives for wild horses. Does anyone see the irony or better yet, hypocrisy in the two? Rep. Burton says wild horses are treated in an inhumane way and birth control will improve their treatment. I support treating horses and other animals in a humane manner. I just wonder how Burton and his fellow Republicans think lower income women and those without health insurance are being treated by the Republican led House, without access to Planned Parenthood's services. Meanwhile, back in the country, the American people are still screaming show us the money... meaning jobs.

Planned Parenthood federal funding money currently forbids any use for abortions. The federal monies to Planned Parenthood go to help some women without insurance, including lower income women and college students, with birth control, education on HIV, HIV testing, life- saving breast and cervical cancer screenings, education on use of condoms and STD education. Cutting any funding for HIV and cancer testing undoubtedly will cost lives for men and women and deny basic health care access. Completely defunding Planned Parenthood is as reckless as the President of Bahrain ordering troops to fire into the crowd. It will have the same consequences.

Cecile Richards, President of Planned Parenthood Action Fund, says this is the most dangerous legislative assault on women's health in all the years of Planned Parenthood. Richards says the bill to bar Planned Parenthood from federal funding is "part of an unbelievable and unrelenting campaign to shut down Planned Parenthood health centers and deny women access to basic health care." Millions of women, at some time in their lifetime, have gone to a Planned Parenthood Center. Instead of decreasing funding to the war and the contractors who benefit from the war, the GOP has chosen to assault and war against women and at the same time help horse contraception.

It is estimated that 3 million women go yearly to 800 Planned Parenthood centers across America. 97% seek services for annual exams, breast and cervical cancer screenings, contraceptives, well woman health visits and health education. Well, woman health care allows a woman to be assessed for other health issues such as diabetes and hypertension. And then Planned Parenthood ensures that they receive care elsewhere, if needed. Where will they go if the measure is passed in the Senate? And the GOP probably says, don't ask, don't care. House Speaker Boehner would probably just say, if lives are lost as a result of these cuts, then "so be it." Planned Parenthood and women are under attack by Republicans who want to make government smaller by making government "just small enough to fit inside our bedrooms and our medicine cabinets," says NARAL Pro Choice America President Nancy Keenan.

Well, one thing is for sure. Women conceive and so do horses. Unlike horses, women vote.

 

Follow Debbie Hines on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Legalspeaks

 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:27 PM on 02/23/2011
I feel the parallel Ms. Hines asserts between Planned Parenthood and the Bureau of Land Management fails, so her claim of hypocrisy on Mr. Burton's part fails as well. Granted both cases involve contraception, but the BLM isn't planning on setting up voluntary equine reproductive health clinics, and Planned Parenthood doesn't round up random women, involuntarily Norplant them, and then release them back into the wild.
I support Planned Parenthood, and I feel that posts like this detract from Planned Parenthood's case rather than help support it.
photo
intellectualTradition
corruptisima re publica plurimae leges
08:53 PM on 02/22/2011
former president of NARAL paid 349,000 a year now being investigated for theft of money.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:08 AM on 02/22/2011
There is no reasoning with Republicans. They have all lost their minds.
Literally.
iflew
Dyno Remediator
10:36 PM on 02/21/2011
Pro life is a person concerned with the orphan, elderly, unemployed, homeless, disabled, and widows among others.
Anti abortion describes a person who wants to save tax money, and create lots of potential consumers and workers who have to compete for slave wages.
06:06 PM on 02/21/2011
Fantastic. To think we used to worry about being viewed as chattel. Now we're not even worth that much.
04:35 PM on 02/21/2011
Maybe I'm missing something, but didn't our elected body of governance just pass Health care laws that will cover the poor with medical insurance? Are we not trying to save money? Wouldn't Planned Parenthoods medical coverage be obsolete with the new medical insurance laws? Is Planned Parenthood solely funded by the government?
04:53 PM on 02/21/2011
Maybe I'm missing something, but hasn't the GOP been doing their best to defund the new health care law?
05:04 PM on 02/21/2011
I think your questions are valid. But, the well known point you may or may not intentionally be overlooking, is that there is a new "elected body of governance" that is obsessed with repealing those very just passed Health Care laws that you mention. Those are the laws that cover the poor and the marginally poor.
06:14 PM on 02/21/2011
What Congress says they are going to do, and what actually happens are not always the same.