iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Deborah Bassett

GET UPDATES FROM Deborah Bassett
 

"Whale Murder" in the Faroe Islands: 100 Pilot Whales Slain for Cultural Tradition

Posted: 09/04/11 11:03 PM ET

It was with deep anguish that I received confirmation early Friday afternoon from Faroese police authorities that over 100 pilot whales have been brutally slaughtered in the town of Vestmanna in the Faroe Islands. These numbers have undoubtedly since risen as locals continued throughout the day to carve up these sentient and intelligent beings who violently lost their lives to bloodlust and greed in a cowardice act of cultural tradition referred to by locals as "grindadrap". In Faroese, "grind" literally translates to pilot whale, while "drap" translates to "murder" thus representing the largest extermination of marine mammals in all of Europe -- literally whale murder. Well, at least we can call a spade a spade here.

Upon recently returning from the Faroe Islands as part of The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society's pilot whale defense campaign, I am deeply saddened by this gruesome turn of events as our presence there over the course of the last 2 months directly and successfully deterred these annual atrocities from taking place. Our ground crew spent over 6 weeks patrolling the hunting bays on a daily basis and engaging with locals in order to gain a firsthand perspective surrounding the grind while working in close collaboration with Sea Shepherd vessels and crews of the Steve Irwin and Brigitte Bardot. Our main objective was to keep pilot whales as far away from the Faroes Islands as possible so that they may continue to roam free as they have for over 30 million years.

2011-09-03-Vestmanna1.jpg
Vestmanna bay on a typical and serene day, Photo: Bassett

Every year during the summer months the Faroese massacre entire pods, or families, of pilot whales as they migrate through adjacent waters. Once a pod is spotted at sea, the local police are notified and give the official clearance to commence a grind which is carried out by local men who are designated to partake in the community ritual. At this point, the whales are forcefully driven into one of 23 hunting bays or fjords by small fishing boats where locals rush the shallow waters to annihilate the corralled whales by slashing through their thick neck tissue in order to sever the spinal chord -- an endeavor that Faroese claim takes only a matter of minutes although eye witness reports indicate that it often takes much longer before the suffering mammals are put out of audible misery. One can't help wonder which is worse -- enduring the agonizing pain itself or the trauma of hearing the cries of family members as they are brutally butchered before one another's eyes.

Ah yes, something is indeed quite rotten in Denmark's little protectorate -- an archipelago of 18 islands located in the North Atlantic, northwest of Scotland and halfway between Norway and Iceland. Whaling in the Faroe Islands has been practiced since the time of the first Norse settlements some 1100 years ago on the islands and locals fiercely defend the brutality, citing that written records of drive hunts in the Faroe Islands date back to 1854. Of course, those of us who are of the scientific, not to mention intuitive, understanding that cetaceans are a socially complex, self-aware and highly sophisticated sentient species, consider the annual bloodbath nothing short of genocide.

2011-09-03-GRIND1.jpg
The grim reality of "cultural tradition", Photo: Peter Hammerstedt/Sea Shepherd

According to Captain Paul Watson in a recent commentary:

Cetaceans possess large, complex four-lobed brains, much larger brains in comparison to our smaller human three-lobed brains, with more convolutions on the neo-cortex area than our own. At a neurological level, cetacean brains display many of the features associated in human beings with sophisticated cognition. These are all socially complex sentient beings, and as recent scientific publications have confirmed, sperm whales and dolphins have demonstrated the ability to identify each other by individual names.

To simply dismiss these scientifically proven facts seems both obtuse and short sided, however detachment from reality, denial, blind patriotism and other such psychological defense mechanisms apparently provide comfortable states of existence for some. In the Faroes, it appears that certain types of socially transmitted behavior allow for the justification and even a certain level of respect for the pilot whale hunt.

It therefore comes as no big surprise that the whalers jumped at the first opportunity they had to hack up a bunch of unassuming whale as sociopathic tendencies and social deviant behavior in general is often times further perpetuated by the group mind mentality, which evidently is the case in the Faroes Islands. Yet, it is somewhat bewildering how the vast majority of people of this legendary land would choose or allow to be portrayed by the actions of a few as modern day barbarians rather than an evolved and empathetic society. Since opposition to the grind is seldom heard, there exists a level of complacency that allows for it to continue to be a part of the society's moral fabric. Apathy is a nasty little culprit. Added Watson:

The Faeroese demand that their culture be respected, but how can civilized people anywhere respect such a barbaric tradition and barbarism as exactly what it is - an affront to decency, an insult to humanity, and a disgrace to civilization. Our task now is to make the rest of the world view the grind for what it is - an obscenity and a disgrace upon the escutcheon of humanity. And hopefully more and more Faeroese will view it as the rest of the world does and compassion will triumph over cruelty. We have the most perfect weapon for the task -- the camera -- and we intend to use it.

While on the surface there appeared very little remorse or shame for the cruel and out dated hunts, locals were keenly opposed to having film crews or cameras around to document their supposed "proud cultural tradition." Ironically I was even physically assaulted by a woman who was concerned about being negatively portrayed in the media -- hmmm.

Locals who support the grind still represent the majority and insist that pilot whale is a necessary food source even though both local and international scientists warn of the very real dangers of eating this toxic meat riddled with PCBs and mercury. Faroese health authorities continue to advise women not to consume pilot whale meat while pregnant and warn that adults should eat no more than one to two meals a month. Given the small amounts of pilot whale meat therefore consumed in the suggested Faroese diet, it is no longer a staple food but rather a specialty item that is certainly not needed for subsistence at this point in time.

Since the pilot whales are not used or exported for commercial purposes, unlike the whaling practices of Norway, Iceland and Japan, the Faroese seems to further possess a sense of moral justification surrounding the hunt. This stance appears nothing more than a feeble attempt to appease an already weakened argument. Two wrongs simply do not make a right. Furthermore, the goal of The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society is to stop the slaughter of innocent life before it comes to the table -- whether locally or abroad.

The whalers continually explained how the pilot whale is killed with the most modern of tools and claim, against documented evidence, that the kill time on average takes less than 2 minutes. After speaking with many local eyewitnesses of past grinds, it is evident that this assertion is simply a falsehood. Last year in the small town of Klaksvick, over 230 pilot whales were literally hacked to death over the course of several excruciating hours pointing to the community's incapability to slaughter, process and distribute the meat efficiently or in a "humane" manner and further pointing to the lack of precision and standardization in the killing methodology. Human error is always a factor that needs to be taken into consideration.

2011-09-03-Grind3.jpg
Did this whale die "humanely" in under 2 minutes? Photo: Peter Hammerstedt/Sea Shepherd

Furthermore, while the Faroese area a culture deeply rooted in Christian faith with almost 90% of citizens belonging to one of the two national church denominations, it appears that the Faroese feel a level of superiority over the whales and are not shy to voice their religious opinions surrounding the hunt. However, perhaps they may have skipped over specific biblical texts that directly condemn the killing of certain marine species:

Leviticus 11-9-10-11-12  11-9: "These you may eat of all that are in the water: Whatever in the water has fins and scales, whether in the seas or in the rivers -- that may you eat."   11-10: "But all in the seas or in the river that do not have fins and scales, all that move in the water or living thing which is in the water, they are an abomination to you."   11-11: "They shall be an abomination to you: you shall not eat their flesh, but you should regard their carcasses as an abomination."   11-12: Whatever in the water does not have fins or scales -- that shall be an abomination to you.

Since the number of whales butchered often exceeds that which the local population can possibly consume, one must also question what really motivates locals to continue what the majority of the European community opposes and considers an outdated tradition.

Both Iceland and Norway have been rejected for inclusion in the European Union due to their on going whaling policies, yet the Faroes continue to reap the rewards of E.U. subsidies without obligation to adhere to E.U. regulations. According to Watson:

Europe has made it plain that the slaughter of whales is not consistent with the ideals of European civilization. These subsidies should be denied or else it translates into discrimination against Norway and Iceland. Denmark must be pressured by the E.U. to withhold subsidies until The Faroes abides by the regulations protecting whales and opposing cruelty that all Europeans must respect.

Furthermore, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) states that the species is "data deficient" and the actual number of long-finned pilot whales that exist in the ocean today is unknown. The IUCN estimate is that there are approximately 200,000 short-finned pilot whales, and that the number of long-finned pilot whales are much less. Yet the Faroes continue to take the fate of the species into their own hands by taking as many as they deem fit on an annual basis. This same mentality of greed wiped out similar cetacean species in the past such as the North Atlantic gray whale which was hunted to extinction and the critically endangered Western North Pacific which to date has fewer than 100 individuals remaining. Without concrete data on the numbers of pilot whales and given the rates of maturity needed for stock maintenance and/or recovery, the Faroese are literally playing a guessing game when it comes to statistical analysis.

Many grind supporters will further argue that the pilot whale meat is wildly "harvested" and not factory farmed, thus making it more ethical than the killing of pigs and chicken in the rest of Europe. Of course, those of us who do not eat any type of meat, consider this to be a moot point. Given modern technology and local farming, there is very little excuse to slaughter innocent marine mammals simply to satisfy the palate of a few.

There is also a considerable amount of waste involved in the hunt as was evidenced by the unveiling of several pilot whale graveyards throughout the Faroe Islands by Sea Shepherd in 2010, which we somberly revisited again this year. We also recently came across the horrific site of piles of pilot whale meat in local dumpsters further pointing to a sincere lack of need, not to mention respect, for the animals.

2011-09-03-whaledumpster1.jpg
Pilot whale meat discarded in local dumpsters, Photo: Bassett

Since many of the Faorese hold very strong views about Sea Shepherd's mission and presence in the Faroe Islands, we offered to have Paul Watson speak directly to the community in an open forum format, but we were met with all sorts of excuses and turned away from the handful of venues that we approached and ultimately refused. It is perplexing that in a culture that proclaims to be an open democratic society, that they would not take the opportunity to have an honest discussion about the subject matter with the very person whom they seem to openly condemn at every given opportunity. However it appeared that they were not afraid of the dialogue that may transpire but rather the media attention that could potentially expose their supposed national pride and joy. It certainly doesn't take a Freudian scholar to recognize the inconsistencies as the rivers of denial and shame (whether conscious or subconscious) apparently run quite deep in the Faroe islands.

While it is of great concern to locals that their picturesque nation which offers some of the most stunning and dramatic scenery to be found on Earth has received such an atrocious reputation in the international arena, this is clearly a fate that they have brought upon themselves. These enchanted isles separated by sounds and fjords, sharp cliffs and crystal streams even earned the Faroes Islands the distinction of being one of "the most appealing destinations in the world" in the past by National Geographic Traveler. It is baffling as to why the Faroese would wish to jeopardize their entire tourism industry of which their economy so desperately depends by indulging in such ferocious activity. After all it is only a matter of time before an international tourism boycott will take a very real toll. Perhaps hitting people in the wallet is the only way to effect change upon those whose hearts and minds sadly already appear devoid and bankrupt.

2011-09-03-FAROES1.jpg
Are the Faroese willing to sacrifice tourism for cultural tradition? Photo: Bassett

It seems obvious that the task of restoring dignity to the Faroes will be be left in the hands the younger generations by putting an end to this grotesque and outlived tradition. By leading the way through example, the Faorese youth have an opportunity and obligation to let the world know that there is no acceptable reason for whaling to take place in the 21st century and must insist that the countries of Iceland and Norway follow suit. While I remain hopeful that this will be the case I am also concerned for the safety and numbers off the pilot whales in the mean time and at the same time comforted in knowing that organizations like the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society exist to provide protection, media exposure and international pressure to put an end to such ecological injustice. Evolution often requires provocation and if the Faroe Island wish to continue to slaughter innocent and threatened pilot whales, it is certain that they will be met with swift and stern opposition. The Faroese have drawn a line in the sand and compromise is simply not a word in Captain Paul Watson's vocabulary.

For more information on the grind, please visit the Sea Shepherd website.

For more information on my personal experience in the Faroes, please see my field reports featured on MYOO.

Sign the PETITION here to let National Geographic know that the global community can not support tourism to the Faroe Islands while these slaughters continue.

 

Follow Deborah Bassett on Twitter: www.twitter.com/debstact

 
 
  • Comments
  • 178
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
09:50 AM on 09/09/2011
“Murder” “genocide”?? If there where any substance in your extremely grim accusations, 50.000 Faroe Islanders would be sitting behind bars right now, wouldn´t they?

If genocide were taken place on European soil, there would be military actions from Nato or some foreign troops wouldn´t it?

How come no such thing is happening on Faroe Island?
Can it be that your accusations are so scandalous far fetched and obviously do not represent common conception of the civilized community?

And by the way, have you told the police? I mean, if you have any decent bone in your body you must have turned Faroe Islands in to the court of Hague? , after all that´s the organ that deals with genocide.

Faroe Islanders have killed whales ever since they settled up to present day, that´ll be 1000 years, so you should have a pretty strong case by now – How come nobody have turned them in????
Well the answer is clear, the world society do NOT share your extreme view.

“Murder” and “Genocide” are just disgraceful offensive words which you know does not hold up in any court, and clearly you do not believe in the case yourself and certainly you know nobody else will.
04:04 AM on 09/09/2011
I wonder if feeding such toxic meat to children who have no say in the matter should be considered child abuse?
07:15 AM on 09/10/2011
Why ask this question? Surely if you truly believe it is child abuse you would report it wouldn't you???? I mean are you just gonna sit around doing NOTHING while there is open child abuse going on and you know about it. That makes you an accomplice!
01:28 AM on 09/11/2011
so you think feeding highly toxic meat to is is fine?
04:25 AM on 09/11/2011
excuse my typo, let me ask that again... so do you think that feeding highly tocic meat to children is ok?
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
10:08 PM on 09/08/2011
It's disgusting to hunt mammals with such high IQ's.

It's stupid to eat whale meat so full of mercury and toxins.
12:01 AM on 09/09/2011
yep
03:44 AM on 09/09/2011
"It's disgusting to hunt mammals with such high IQ's."

Pilot whales were given IQ tests??? When and by whom? What was their score?
11:47 AM on 09/07/2011
So? We as a race slaughter millions of animals for food, clothing, and other products. Just because you feel whales are "cute" or more intelligent than cows or chickens does not give them special privaledges. Different cultures view different animals in different way. Just because we keeps dogs and cats as pet and include them in our familes does not mean every toher culture has to see them the same way.

So some whale meat was "in a dumpster"? Did anyone ask why that particular meat was discarded? Snooping through trash does nothing than fuel rumors.

I have been to the Faroe Islands and whuile you won't tend to find whale meat or direct products in commercial establishments for sale, the family I was visiting had a large freezer that did contain whale meat for their consumption.

People in this country hunt deer, geese, wild hogs, etc and do nothing more than stuff them and hang them on the wall. Its supposedly a "sport".
photo
CTDFalconer
Think twice, post once.
01:13 PM on 09/07/2011
The point is that the whale hunt is not for sustenance and that the whales may be diminishing in number unsustainably and that they are killed inhumanely and that nearly all nations have given up whale hunting and don't miss it. We don't need to do it in Japan or in Norway or in the Faroes or anywhere, with the possible exception of Inuits hunting to for food.

Trophy and sport hunters in this country generally do eat what they kill. I had elk chili a hunting friend made that was delicious.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
messy
artist, writer, adventurer
08:50 AM on 09/08/2011
No, the point is that whales are cute and Squid are not. Therefore the former has a greater right to life.
08:24 PM on 09/08/2011
So it's alright to kill foxes and elks because the make a great chili?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
DeborahBassett
Journalist & Activist
02:42 PM on 09/07/2011
Personally, I don't USE animals for food, clothing or any other products, so please don't lump me into that abusive category.

I have never referred to whales as "cute" in any text, anywhere. They are a highly intelligent and socially complex species--much more so than your "cute" little dog in the photo. I wonder, would you consider the mass slaughter of german shepherds to be anything short of psychopathic behavior? No because you yourself state above that you chose to include a certain species in your family--perhaps it is you who feels an authority here on which animals to bestow "special privileges" upon. Or do you just follow the masses and not even stop to consider the intelligence of life with whom we share the planet? I feel genuinely bad for anyone who can defend the slaughter of such magnificent and gentle creatures such as whales and dolphins--in such a disenchanted and disconnected world they must live.

The sale of whale meat can in fact be found in several local restaurants, making it locally commercial. The stock piling of whale meat to which you refer also points to the excessive amount of whale meat found throughout the Faroes which further proves that this is not a subsistence hunt but merely a cultural pastime at this point. You are right, as pathetic as it may be, hunting is considered a sport to some-- including the Faorese.
10:42 PM on 09/07/2011
Yeesh, get a hint lady! Look at the amount of support you have here and the success rate you've had with convincing foreigners to change their ways. It's time to re-evaluate your line of reasoning.
08:00 AM on 09/07/2011
Wow.

Ms. Bassett, I would love to support you and your work, in principle.

But if the above essay is an example of how you speak with Faroese, and how you speak to the public, I'd want nothing whatsoever to do with you.

Your utter contempt for the Faroese is not going to persuade the Faroese. And it's not going to win other fans elsewhere.

I appreciate your passion and commitment, but the contempt, the derision, the insults, they do nothing to help your cause.

I urge you to try again sometime, and next time do not demonize and heap abuse upon people you are trying to persuade to change their beliefs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gevan
big dubya
03:07 PM on 09/07/2011
When speaking of people who commit contemptable acts, how gently would you prefer to tread?
07:09 PM on 09/07/2011
well said.
07:44 PM on 09/07/2011
"When speaking of people who commit contemptab­le acts, how gently would you prefer to tread? "

People refusing to talk to each other isn't going to bring about any change.
12:09 AM on 09/09/2011
Watson's comment about the Faroese's annual hunt being the inspiration for the Noweigian mass murder certainly didn't help encourage meaningful debate & discussion during the SSCS's recent campaign. Way to put valuable funds from well-meaning donors to good use!
12:43 AM on 09/09/2011
Watson's comment is the sort of thing that makes the Already Outraged & Full of Umbrage feel quite good.

But it's also the sort of thing that encourages most folks to want nothing to do with him or his project.

And that's part of my concern with such comments and such language.

This level of invective and polemic chases away a lot of potential support, causes many people to stop reading, to stop wanting to know more, because they recognize they are being fed something quite toxic.

It's NOT the way to generate support, good will, or donations, and not the way to persuade people who disagree with you.
05:38 PM on 09/11/2011
oh you mean the statement Watson made replying to the accusation that Sea Shepherd was responsible for inspiring Anders Blevik?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thaag Tidestalker
Axial Tilt: the Reason for the Season!
06:46 AM on 09/07/2011
The practice is horrible and barbaric, I agree; and I also agree that this "tradition" should cease. However, the author cites a biblical passage which was rendered obsolete later on in Acts 10:10-16 (NIV quoted)
10 He became hungry and wanted something to eat, and while the meal was being prepared, he fell into a trance. 11 He saw heaven opened and something like a large sheet being let down to earth by its four corners. 12 It contained all kinds of four-footed animals, as well as reptiles and birds. 13 Then a voice told him, “Get up, Peter. Kill and eat.” 14 “Surely not, Lord!” Peter replied. “I have never eaten anything impure or unclean.” 15 The voice spoke to him a second time, “Do not call anything impure that God has made clean.” 16 This happened three times, and immediately the sheet was taken back to heaven.
photo
Boduognat
Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'entrate.
03:04 PM on 09/07/2011
and so the burger was born?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
messy
artist, writer, adventurer
08:54 AM on 09/08/2011
no, bacon cheesburger....
02:01 AM on 09/07/2011
Just because a society is open and democratic does not mean they have to have someone desperate for media coverage preaching on every corner. But that's a fair reason to paint anyone from the islands with a wide stereotypical brush, isn't it? But Paul Watson worship cannot be tempered with such things. And as they make a clear point of saying on the Sea Shepherd website- Donate today!
05:42 AM on 09/07/2011
yes Donate today, help shut down barbaric and unnecessary cruelty perpetuated by brutal people on magnificent cetaceans.
12:40 PM on 09/07/2011
Because if you don't, you'll be reminded ever 6 minutes until you do.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
07:52 PM on 09/06/2011
If it was tradition, they would build their own boats, use sails and oars, and no modern comm tech.

Tradition is no excuse.
10:50 PM on 09/06/2011
That has to be one of the silliest comments I have ever read on here. Hunting and fishing peoples have always adapted to technology when it made their lives easier. Do you think Indian hunters in the U.S. still use bows and arrows? They adopted the rifle as soon as they could get it. Go to native villages in Alaska and count the outboard motors.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
02:52 PM on 09/07/2011
You are comparing the killing of higher mammals and dear. There is a difference. The rest of the world is forbidden to hunt these whales, and these people got a special exemption largely because they claimed it as tradition.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gevan
big dubya
03:09 PM on 09/07/2011
And fishermen use hand grenades?
12:01 PM on 09/06/2011
“Both Iceland and Norway have been rejected for inclusion in the European Union due to their on going whaling policie..” quote D.Basset

The fact however is, that Iceland and EU are in the middle of the negotiations. This is a longer process which is not finished. It is expected finished during 2012, thus, Iceland could first become an EU member in 2013-14 since it would take around 2 years for all EU member states to ratify the Accession Treaty.

This public hard fact is of no use to your agenda, so it´s better to make some up, so you do on the spot, - however false and as the whole world know, pure fantasy.

Norway have twice on national referendums 1972 and 1994 rejected EU membership. So it is not as you like it to be, EU who rejected Norway inclusion but reverse,- that is Norway have never had a majority of it´s population in favor of EU membership.
So again a lie of yours. That can be verified with just an absolute minimum of historical knowledge.

Just because you see whales on every corner and desperately slash them into every aspect of life and every movement of Norway, Iceland and Faroe Icelands, you can not dream up your own facts.
The purpose of these clumsy lies is obviously to paint a picture of the countries as “persona non grata” in EU. Truth is that these countries are EU closest partners, Norway the 4´th most important trade partner .
11:39 AM on 09/06/2011
Oh where to start?
The whole planet is in trouble! Everything is dying! So let’s just keep killing and killing and killing and let’s keep polluting and polluting and polluting the planet till there is nothing left but rock and acid water!
Just cause we can and because it is "traditional"! So proud to be human!
Most intelligent animal on earth my ass!
05:03 AM on 09/06/2011
so much for no effects or warnings about ill effects from consuming toxic whale-meat.
http://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/impacts/mercury/
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16159-faroe-islanders-told-to-stop-eating-toxic-whales.html
04:41 AM on 09/06/2011
So many wrongs in this article that I don't know where to begin. First of they are not slaughtered for "Cultural Tradition" they are slaughtered for food. We do that most of our meat. Most people have their own sheep and many have chicken, ducks and geese. The difference between our culture and most others is that we slaughter our own animals ourselves. We know that is what it takes to provide food on the table. The whales are no different to us. We live in midst of nature and we follow natures law. And we are not making the pilot whale extinct, the numbers of whales being slaughtered are not up going and their is an estimate of more than 800,000. And we have a newly developed tool to ensure the whales are killed in an instant.
05:05 AM on 09/06/2011
the development of the new 'tool' was as a result of the outside influence of the IWC. Why slaughter something for food when it can't be eaten safely??? Stubborn pride clinging to tradition at the cost of the health of people, including children who have no choice in the mater.
05:57 AM on 09/06/2011
I was a subject in the faroes tests that were taken and my numbers showed nothing out of the ordinary. A friend of mine was likewise a subject and he got the same results. This is why many believe it is OK to eat whale meat. And it is up to each individual to decide if they eat it or not. Most parents have taken precautions and don't serve their children whale meat and women in childbearing ages don't eat it. It has nothing to do with pride or tradition, it is a resource of food like many of the other animals that live in our nature. And I find it strange that everyone mentions the pollution in the whales and are attacking us for killing them as if we are going to be the reason for their extinction. we are at the bottom of ladder when it comes to the extinction of whales. If you truly want to do some good in the world focus all your resources towards stopping the pollution. We could stop killing whales tomorrow and the whales would still be heading towards extinction. One day we will stop because the whales will be too polluted to eat and one day whales will cease to exists and it won't be because of us.
07:34 AM on 09/06/2011
Most recreational fish in North America have levels of mercury, in some regions of Canada moose have high levels of cadmium in their livers, domesticated chickens and beef have high levels of antibiotics, hormones etc. The list goes on and on. Your argument does not hole any water.
11:09 AM on 09/06/2011
What kind of "Newly developed tool" did that kind of damage to that poor pilot whales head? Does not look like that many hacks were pain free and instant!
04:54 PM on 09/06/2011
It is a device that can cut the spinal cord without having to cut the whales throat(so to speak) first. It basically means that the picture you see could be of a whale that if the device was used was already dead when someone, inexperienced by the looks of it, cut the rest with a knife. But let me point out that wounds such as the one on that picture are not the norm and we don't like seeing that either.
07:41 AM on 09/07/2011
SSCS looks for worst photo as it will bring in more funds. This photo is on their web page.
03:47 AM on 09/06/2011
all off thous photos are over a year old and are from when peter was here
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
DeborahBassett
Journalist & Activist
06:57 AM on 09/06/2011
Those photos are clearly credited to Peter and were used as an EXAMPLE and if you read the article I mentioned they were from the Klasvick grind last year. However the whalemeat was in the dumpster from this year as were the others that are credited appropriately.
07:40 AM on 09/06/2011
Please explain the inclusion of the photo of whale meat in the dumpster. People in North America throw food waste out everyday. In fact North Americans are the greatest food wasters in the world. What are you trying to say about the people of the Faroe Islands. Last year the SSCS posted photos of whale waste on the bottom and tried to convince viewers that whales were being killed and then thrown out.
03:10 AM on 09/07/2011
ok
03:32 AM on 09/06/2011
the Faroese don't want their outdated, barbaric 'tradition­' brought to the attention of the world, that's the only reason they don't want camera's there. They also convenient­ly ignore the research done, and the recommenda­tions of their own Chief Medical Officers about continuing to consume toxic whale-meat­.
http://www­.newscient­ist.com/ar­ticle/dn16­159-faroe-­islanders-­told-to-st­op-eating-­toxic-whal­es.html
The 'tradition­' excuse is the last fallback position to defend a practice that is brutal, and unnecessar­y now that the meat cannot be consumed to to the level of toxins in the whale-meat­. What was once a source of food has reached it's 'use-by' date.
07:41 AM on 09/06/2011
"They also convenient­­ly ignore the research done, and the recommenda­­tions of their own Chief Medical Officers about continuing to consume toxic whale-meat­­." Perhaps you should do some research on the recreational fishery in North America regarding health notices etc.
10:10 AM on 09/06/2011
ahh, the old, 'look over there' deflection.... it doesn't change the fact that you Chief medical Officers have said the meat is too toxic for ANYBODY to eat. Funny thing how you choose to ignore it, and some Faroese endanger their children well being by feeding them whale-meat.
10:26 PM on 09/05/2011
My last post has to do with your photo of whale meat in the dumpster. Perhaps you should have had a look in dumpsters in North America before you start beating up on the fishermen on the remote Faroe Islands. I would suspect the fine people of these islands waste very little compared to the average North American.