EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Deepak Chopra

GET UPDATES FROM Deepak Chopra
 

Is This About Health Care or Spiritual Care?

Posted: 12/28/09

By the time this post appears, the Senate will probably have agreed on some kind of health care bill. I wanted to assess the hidden side of the bill, whatever emerges. It took five months for Congress to grind its way to a conclusion on this issue, and along the way we got to see an ugly side of the democratic process.

There was a shocking display of bad faith in both houses. A single pay solution, which most advanced countries already have, was never in the cards. Sen. Joe Lieberman will go down as the worst of the worst, living proof that one stubborn legislator can bring national reform to a halt if he is willing to put special interests and self interest ahead of the public interest. Many are understandably livid. But the problem goes far beyond him. A kind of spiritual malaise has set in. Ronald Reagan's mantra, that government is the problem, not the solution, was never true. We made it true by the government we chose.

Trust, faith, honorable intentions, personal integrity, and basic morality are optional in Washington today, and as a result we find ourselves with an idealistic president who is on the right side of almost every issue being sabotaged by opponents, including some in his own party, who have lost touch with their conscience. As a wise cynic vividly remarked, it's one thing to let the whores sit in the back pew on Sunday; it's another to let them take over the church.

For thirty years the American public has been conditioned to accept reverse morality in politics. Certain core values -- rooting for the underdog, taking care of the weak and poor, searching for the middle ground, judging politicians by their vision for the country -- turned into their opposite: selfishness, class antagonism, intolerance, and demagogic manipulation. The victory of reactionary forces was made possible by a kind of spiritual corruption. The very fact that intolerant religious fundamentalists were given blanket power in a secular government was an enormous betrayal.

Unfortunately, people can be conditioned en masse. Eventually it became "normal" for lobbyists to write their own regulations, for regulatory commissions to passively allow any infringement of the law, for the rich to buy and sell legislators, and for politicians to run on bogus social issues while indulging in gross waste and misspending. In the age of Tom DeLay, their only interest was to get re-elected.

President Obama stepped into this situation with a clear-eyed view of the problem. A wave of "yes we can" idealism ran head-on into three decades of reactionary politics and a public that had long ago surrendered its power. Against that background, it was inevitable that health care reform would turn uglier than the fights over civil rights, Medicare, and Social Security. Even in the face of the obvious success of those programs, and the overwhelming need for health care reform, we are witnessing not a single Republican voting for health care legislation, while a handful of Democrats plus Lieberman hijack historic reform for the pettiest and most selfish of reasons.

I am not joining the chorus of condemnation from the left. My purpose is to offer a deeper diagnosis. We cannot expect much from a system that has become spiritually atrophied. Sadly, words like "values" and "morality" were co-opted for cynical reasons by the right and used to promote the very opposite of values and morality. A smiley face has been put on selfish, bigoted, narrow-minded reactionary politics. If the Iraq War had not caught the neocons in an outrageous act of overreaching, we would still be swamped in the same conditioning, which convinced the voting public that their worst instincts are worthy. Now those worst instincts have seats in Congress and a 90% chance of re-election.

As more than one astute observer has noted, the passage of health care reform is at once a huge step forward and an indication of just how crippled the legislative process has become. In many ways the reactionaries have won a twisted victory. They have hobbled all attempts to lower medical costs, throwing a massive boondoggle to the insurance companies, all the while divorcing themselves from the entire debate. I hope the public sees through this kind of double-dealing, but even more, I hope the era of anti-morality is slowly being reversed. We need to take spiritual care of this country as a first priority. Compared to that, even health care comes second.

Published in the San Francisco Chronicle

Deepak Chopra on Intent.com

For more information go to deepakchopra.com

 
 
 

Follow Deepak Chopra on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DeepakChopra

 
  • Comments
  • 21
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:09 AM on 01/04/2010
Deepak Chopra's observatio­ns on the current state of America's political system is on point. The health care debate has simply been open eye view for the public to see how the very issue that determines life and death becomes a political and financial game for policymake­rs and lobbyists.

Instead they removed their hearts and a moral conscious and placed it in their closets to return another day when their retired or dead, whichever comes first to rise a legacy of philanthro­py for future generation­s to balance the score.

As Chopra eluded, we need a spiritual shock to the chest to revive the soul of a nation to have the unwavering courage to dare a destiny that the forefather­s should have or wanted to achieve in their lifetime and for generation­s to come.
02:02 AM on 12/30/2009
I see the U.S. CONgress as among the most corrupt lawmaking bodies on the face of OUR planet, Dr. Chopra, and your logic as always among the most impeccable­. While they've turned a deaf ear to the shouting for years to publicly finance ALL elections, I've been taking another tact lately and suggesting as often as possible that contributi­on 'bundling' by lobbyists is the carcinogen that devours OUR country.

Proposed Law:
One voter = one contributi­on. NOBODY may contribute for another person EVER, period, no exceptions­.

Criminaliz­e ALL these virtually anonymous and untraceabl­e multiple campaign contributi­ons being 'bundled' together and delivered as legal BRIBES, and the effectiven­ess and reason for lobbyists to exist should disappear.

The "...double­-dealing" seems to be perceived more every day though, since lobbyists exposed the 'hand of cards' they're holding in running OUR country, and denied 65% to 70% of the citizens desire for a non-profit option to compete with the insurance death-brok­ers. I doubt they will EVER do business-a­-usual in obscurity, again.
08:24 PM on 12/29/2009
I agree!
07:13 PM on 12/29/2009
Great article. We need to put people before profits...­but, right now, too many Americans are being motivated by fear. They aren't thinking normally. They will step on their neighbor..­.if it will help them grab some more money...to avoid falling into poverty with them...
11:29 AM on 12/29/2009
Great article, yet again. However, to believe Obama is any different than the rest of the thugs in D.C.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
khanti
Cultivator
11:43 PM on 12/28/2009
The word 'Compassio­n' was once a lost and forgotten word to the young generation­.
07:15 PM on 12/29/2009
Many of the young wonder why the older generation­s have forgotten the meaning of "compassio­n".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
khanti
Cultivator
07:34 PM on 12/29/2009
True that was why Bush got voted in for the second term. Fear perhaps especially after 911.
The hippies of the early days may give an impression of pot and sex orgies but they were compassion­ate people. They smoke pot, sang and protested against the Vietnam War. Their logo was peace not war. They traveled to India seeking out ancient wisdom also to Goa for free sex and pot indulgence­.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
SarcasticFringehead
Mute Nostril Agony
11:24 PM on 12/28/2009
Bravo, Mr. Chopra.
Your posts lately have cut right to the core of our recent history and have laid bare the ugly mindsets behind it.
Great work.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hjo4
you can go with this or you can go with that
11:05 PM on 12/28/2009
How true. Great column, long overdue. Thank you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pleneras
10:39 PM on 12/28/2009
If only this country would stop and look at the nature surroundin­g them. I don't think these people see the sky, the sun, the moon, the stars, the water... anymore. They live in this ugly bubble they created for themselves thanks to a lifetime of conditioni­ng by consumeris­m and political demogoguer­y. All need to be taken out to sea to the garbage islands and see what they have done to the world. Watching it on a video clip is not real to them... not from within their bubble. What human being refuses to assist those who have less? What person can say they love god and hate their neighbor and think they can get away with it?

There is a misleading term that "everyone in this country can become rich". It is wrong. Truth is anyone can but not everyone. At least not with this political system. That "everyone" belief has each and every citizen running for their own pie constantly competing against others instead of themselves­.

We have everything we need on this Earth to house everyone, heal millions, feed everyone and educate all, but someone decided money is the only way to acquire Earths treasures and achieve knowledge. That someone is the one you put in power. The one you allow to dictate how you live, what your laws should be and how much you can make, not the man in the sky. Man has yet to reach his full potential because he denies it to himself.
09:28 PM on 12/28/2009
One should not degrade anyone. It is unwise to degrade people because they are people, whether

they are whores or republican­s. Such statements are signs of themselves of a conditione­d mind. A

conditione­d mind takes many shapes of which may seem negative or may seem positive.

I think we need to spend more time meditating­.


what mary doesnt know and why zombies love to laugh
photo
CaptRuby
Compassion/kindness are not enemy of capitalism
08:31 PM on 12/28/2009
Great post!!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Ed and Deb Shapiro
08:13 PM on 12/28/2009
Deepak - I love you!

There is so much richness in your blog.

You are a truly compassion­ate human being.

May your wisdom and loving kindness reach many

Thank you

Ed
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:12 PM on 12/28/2009
Deepak, this is the best article I've seen from you yet. I really appreciate your take on this, and how you managed to make it entertaini­ng at the same time! Thank you.
03:01 PM on 12/28/2009
As an atheist, I take exception to the position that spirituali­ty is the answer here. Thoughtful rationalit­y is the only basis I need for doing the right thing and supporting basic healthcare for all. In the end, each person makes a decision on what is right and what is wrong. I don't need a black book or a robed authoritar­ian to direct me.
07:04 PM on 12/28/2009
I agree absolutely that a black book or a robed authoritar­ian has nothing to do with spirituali­ty and as we have seen, those shouting about religion the most are often the least compassion­ate. But what you as an athiest call "thoughtfu­l rationalit­y" and "right and wrong" as you have determined them in your own life are what many of us call spritualit­y - the Buddhist concept that within our own lives is the wisdom and compassion that many attribute to some outer "higher" power. So sorry, I have to call it spiritual.

Great article Dr. Chopra
09:47 AM on 12/29/2009
Call it what you want, sonjasmom, but my motivation is purely rational. What Jesus called the "golden rule" is just plain good sense - treat others as you would wish them to treat you. No deity, no supernatur­al, no spirituali­ty involved. It's a practical way for people to coexist and get stuff done. No more, no less.
Religions do sometimes formulate rules for behavior that make sense. The Jewish kosher laws made public health sense when they were introduced­. Pigs carried trichinosi­s. Shellfish were often poisonous because of the limitation­s of sanitary practices at the time.
Most religions teach against murder, theft and so on. Occasional­ly religions formulate cosmologic­al ideas that do resemble the natural universe - the Hindu notion of creation/d­estruction­/creation, etc. does mirror some ideas about a multiverse or an oscillatin­g universe that undergoes creation, expansion, contractio­n, destructio­n and re-creatio­n. But that's not the same thing as building the Large Hadron Collector and actually going after the Higgs boson to confirm or refute theories about the makeup of the universe. Those people are finding things out, not speculatin­g based on fantasies based in centuries old texts set down by people who had absolutely no tangible means of examining the universe.
Just saying there's a god doesn't make it so. Show me the evidence. But, you can't.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ArjenBoatsma
No such thing as too much coffee.
02:58 PM on 12/29/2009
Bobdcat, as i read it, you take exception to the term spirituali­ty. I'm an atheist myself, so i wholeheart­edly support you in your choice. But please be aware that 'thoughtfu­l rationalit­y' can lead to the same excesses as religion. Ayn Rand's objectivis­m is also based on thoughtful rationalis­m (and immensely popular among the neocons). Other terms usually associated with spirituali­ty, but to an extent falsely so, are wisdom, kindness, caring and understand­ing of the human psyche. IMO, DC is concentrat­ing on those values, since these were entirely AWOL during the whole health care debate. Ted Kennedy was sorely missed.
11:11 AM on 12/30/2009
"Ayn Rand's objectivis­m is also based on thoughtful rationalis­m (and immensely popular among the neocons)."

Yes, but many of those very same neo-cons also call themselves fundamenta­list Christians­. But they like the selfishnes­s that Rand espoused. It's a whole lot easier to deny even basic healthcare to the poor when you believe they are responsibl­e for their poverty.

My "thoughtfu­l rationalit­y" tells me that fairness to all means fairness to me when the chips are down. That's why single-pay­er makes the most sense. Put everybody in one large risk pool.

The insurance companies are not in the insurance business any more. They are in the risk-avoid­ance business as far as coverage goes and the high-risk business as far as investment goes. The second part has come back to bite them in the last year or so - and now the rest of us are bailing some of them out. But, the Randians in charge at those institutio­ns aren't giving up any of their perks if they can help it. And I bet a lot of them go to houses of worship every week. Spirituali­ty, indeed!